4~7岁儿童汉字正字法意识的发展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用两项实验考察学龄前儿童正字法意识的发展情况。实验1选取146名4~7岁儿童被试，要求其在计算机上完成词汇判断任务，刺激材料分为部件错误非字，部件位置错误非字，假字和真字。结果显示：大班在两项非字条件上的正确率均显著高于假字，而小班各条件差异均不显著；中班在部件位置错误非字上的正确率显著高于假字。表明学龄前儿童的正字法意识已经开始逐渐发展，且部件位置意识比部件意识容易获得。实验2采用Tobii T120型眼动仪，记录24名大班儿童在词汇判断（同实验1）过程中对刺激项目关注的眼动行为，从实时加工的过程探讨学龄前儿童正字法意识的发展。结果显示：儿童对部件错误非字/部件位置错误非字的目标部件的晚期关注程度显著高于假字，有力地证明：学龄前大班儿童已经具有部件和部件位置的意识。

关键词: 正字法意识, 部件, 学前儿童, 眼动

Abstract: It is widely reported that the acquirement of orthographic awareness is an important aspect of emergent literacy which linked to the processing of reading. Have the preschool children being in the period of emergent literacy begun to develop the orthographic awareness and how far? Two studies were designed to investigate the development of Chinese orthographic awareness in preschool children. In study 1, 152 pre-school children aged from 3 to 7 were instructed to complete the character decision task containing 4 different kinds of stimulus: non-characters with the radical in illegal form(IC), non-characters with the radical in illegal position (ICP), pseudo-characters and real characters. The results showed that children in bottle class acquired nothing about orthographic knowledge; in comparison, the level of radical position awareness increased significantly for the children in middle class; and both the level of radical position awareness and radical awareness improved significantly for children in top class than that for children in bottle and middle class. Additionally, the level of children's radical position awareness was higher than that of radical awareness in top class. In study 2, the eye movements of 24 children in top class were recorded as they did the character decision task as same as in study 1.The result showed that children paid more attention on the target radicals of IC/ICP than that of pseudo-characters. To conclude, the results of current two studies using different methods consistently indicated that pre-school children had acquired the awareness of radical position as well as the awareness of radical before they received formal reading instruction. However, the level was still low.

Key words: orthographic awareness, radical, pre-school children, eye movements

中图分类号:

B844.1

刘妮娜, 仝文, 闫国利. 4~7岁儿童汉字正字法意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 457-465.

LIU Ni-na, TONG Wen, YAN Guo-li. The Development of Chinese Orthographic Awareness in Pre-school Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(5): 457-465.

参考文献

Chan, L. (1990).Pre-School children's understanding of Chinese writing. Unpublished master's thesis. Institute of Education, University of London.
Chan, L. (1996). Children Learn to Read and Write Chinese Analytically. London: University of London.
Chen, Y., Allport, D., & Marshall, J. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49(4), 1024-1043.
Chan, L., & Nunes, T. (1998). Children's understanding of the formal and functional characteristics of written Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 115-132.
Chan, L., Cheng, Z. J., & Chan, L. F. (2008). Chinese preschool children's literacy development: from emergent to conventional writing. Early Years, 28(2), 135-148.
Cheng, C.-M., & Huang, H.-M.(1995).The acquisition of general lexical knowledge of Chinese characters in school children. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on the Cognitive Processing of Chinese and other Asian Languages, Hong Kong.
Clay, M. M.(1993).An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Ortonvile, MI: Cornucopia book.
Ding, G. S., Peng, D. L., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530-539.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1997).The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 776-781.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T.(1999a). Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis(pp. 19-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T.(1999b). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559-576.
Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W. O., Lee, S. H., Tsang, S. M., & Luan, V. H. (2004).Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91(1), 43-75.
Ho, C. S. H., Ng, T. T., & Ng, W. K. (2003). A "radical" approach to reading development in Chinese: The role of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(3), 849-878.
Kuby, P., Goodstadt-kiloran, I., Aldridge, J., & Kirkland, L.(1999).A review of research on environmental print. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(3), 173-182.
Lavine, L. O.(1977).Differention of letter like forms in prereading children. Development Psychology, 13, 89-94.
Levin, I., & Bus, A.G.(2003).How is emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children's products and their sorting by children and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 39, 891-905.
Levy, B. A., Gong, Z., Hessels, S., Evans, M. A., & Jared, D.(2006).Understanding print: Early reading development and the contributions of home literacy experiences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 63-93.
Li, H. (1997). Recognition of Chinese characters: A radical-based approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Li, H. (1999). Development and validation of the preschool and primary Chinese literacy scale. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L.(2000).Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 596.
Luo, Y. C., Chen, X, Deacon, S. H., & Li., H. (2011). Development of Chinese orthographic processing: A cross-cultural perspective. Writing System Research, 3(1), 69-86.
McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C.S.H. (2005). Predictors of beginning reading in Chinese and English: A 2-year longitude study of Chinese kindergarteners. Scientific Study of Reading, 9(2), 117-144.
Monique Sénéchal, Jo-Anne LeFevre, Brenda L. Smith-Chant, & Karen V. Colton.(2001).On refining theoretical models of emergent literacy The role of empirical evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 2001, 39(5), 439-460.
Peng, D. L., Li, Y.-P., & Yang, H.(1997).Orthographic processing in the identification of Chinese characters. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 85-108). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005).The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movement in Reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychology Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang C.(2008).Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Development Secience, 11(1), 171.
Shu, H., & Anderson, R.C.(1999). Learning to reading Chinese: The development of metalinguistic awareness. In J. Wang, A. Inhoff & H.C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive Analysis (pp.1-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761-775.
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J.(1998).Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848-872.
陈烜之. (1997).中文阅读的认知历程, 载彭耽龄(Eds.), 汉语认知研究(pp.65-82), 山东教育出版社.
钱怡, 赵婧, 毕鸿燕. (2013).汉语学龄前儿童正字法意识的发展.心理学报, 45(1), 60-69.
李辉, 刘丽薇. (2007).家长对幼儿中文识字能力发展的影响—北京、香港和新加坡三地比较研究.幼儿教育(教育科学版), 3, 33-37.
李虹, 彭虹, 舒华.(2006).汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展.心理发展与教育, 01, 35-38.
李娟, 傅小兰, 林仲贤.(2000).学龄儿童汉语正字法意识发展的研究.心理学报, 02, 121-126.
李燕芳, 董奇. (2004).儿童早期读写能力发展的环境影响因素研究.心理科学, 27(3), 531-535.
梁志粲, 李辉, 吴云霞. (2007).幼儿园识字教育的几个基本问题.学前教育, 1, 2-4.
刘鸣. (1996).汉字认知与形象思维.华南师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 4, 46-51.
刘妮娜. (2009).学前儿童文字意识发展的研究.硕士学位论文, 天津师范大学.
刘翔平, 刘文理, 张立娜, 徐先金, 张微, 张秀秀, 张婧乔. (2006).儿童识字能力与汉字规则意识关系研究. 中国特殊教育, 61(7), 56-61.
彭聃龄, 刘颖, 陈鹰. (1996).汉字识别的计算机模拟.应用心理学, 2(1), 9-16.
彭聃龄. (2004).汉语信息加工及其认知神经机制的研究—20年研究工作的回顾北京师范大学.当代语言学, 6(4), 302-320.
汉字信息字典. (1988). 北京: 科学出版社.
周兢, 刘宝根.(2010).汉语儿童从图像到文字的早期阅读与读写发展过程: 来自早期阅读眼动及相关研究的初步证据.中国特殊教育, 12, 64-71.
周新林, 曾捷英. (2003).汉字早期字形加工中的部件数效应.心理学报, 35(4), 514-519.

相关文章 15

[1]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[2]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[3]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[4]	白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[5]	张光珍, 梁淼, 梁宗保. 父母教养方式影响学前儿童社会适应的追踪研究:自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 800-807.
[6]	占淑玮, 杨宁, 赵必华. 留守学前儿童接受性语言能力与社会退缩的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[7]	于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[8]	张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[9]	施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[10]	马安然, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周治金. 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 391-399.
[11]	王英杰, 李燕, 吴凡. 家庭功能与学前儿童行为问题的关系:依恋回避和社交焦虑的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 76-83.
[12]	张凡, 赵德懋, 刘霞, 白荣, 张明亮, 邢淑芬. 父母教养与MAOA基因rs6323多态性对学前儿童外化问题的共同作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 659-667.
[13]	李倩倩, 姚力宁, 梁金军, 邢淑芬. 电视暴力对不同外倾性气质学前儿童社会行为的差异化影响——“一般攻击模型”与“催化剂模型”的理论之争[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 545-554.
[14]	于晓, 王红梅, 陈英和, 刘瑞曙, 韩瑽瑽, 韩敏, 张涵, 刘静. 分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 385-393.
[15]	辛聪, 张曼曼, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 前瞻记忆意向后效应的加工机制:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 138-145.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed