心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 357-367.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.03.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    

中小学教师情绪劳动与职业倦怠的纵向联系:情绪弹性和师生关系的链式中介作用

胡莹莹1, 杨一鸣1, 王文静1,2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    2. 教育部师德师风建设基地(北京师范大学), 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 王文静 E-mail:wangwenjing@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(21YJA880064)。

Longitudinal Associations between Emotional Labor and Job Burnout in Primary and Secondary School Teachers: The Chain Mediating Role of Emotional Resilience and Teacher-student Relationship

HU Yingying1, YANG Yiming1, WANG Wenjing1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Center for Teacher Ethics Development under the Ministry of Education at Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2025-05-20

摘要: 为深入探讨中小学教师情绪劳动(表层行为、深层行为和自然行为)、情绪弹性、师生关系与职业倦怠之间的纵向联系及内在作用机制,采用整群抽样在我国六省市十一所学校选取829名中小学教师,使用问卷调查的研究方法对其进行为期六个月的追踪研究。结果表明:(1)在表层行为与职业倦怠间,情绪弹性起纵向中介作用,并通过师生关系起链式中介作用;在深层行为与职业倦怠间,仅师生关系起纵向中介作用;在自然行为与职业倦怠间,情绪弹性、师生关系分别起纵向独立中介作用及链式中介作用,且独立中介效应量无显著差异;(2)不同发展阶段教师在纵向中介模型中“T1深层行为→T2职业倦怠”和“T1自然行为→T2职业倦怠”路径上存在显著差异。研究结果为有效缓解教师职业倦怠提供有力证据与重要实践启示。

关键词: 情绪劳动, 职业倦怠, 情绪弹性, 师生关系, 中小学教师

Abstract: In order to further explore the longitudinal associations and the internal mechanism between the primary and secondary school teachers’ emotional labor (surface acting, deep acting, and expression of naturally felt emotions), emotional resilience, teacher-student relationship, and job burnout, a total of 829 primary and secondary school teachers were selected in eleven schools in six provinces and cities of China using whole cluster sampling and followed up for six months using a questionnaire research method. Results showed that: (1) Between surface acting and job burnout, emotional resilience played a longitudinal mediating role and a chain mediating role through teacher-student relationship. Between deep acting and job burnout, only teacher-student relationship played a longitudinal mediating role. Between expression of naturally felt emotions and job burnout, emotional resilience and teacher-student relationship played a longitudinal independent mediating role and a chain mediating role, respectively, and there were no significant differences in the independent mediator effect sizes; (2) Teachers at different developmental stages differed significantly in the “T1 deep acting → T2 job burnout” and “T1 expression of naturally felt emotions → T2 job burnout” paths of the longitudinal mediation model. These findings provide strong evidence and important practical insights for effectively alleviating teachers’ job burnout.

Key words: emotional labor, job burnout, emotional resilience, teacher-student relationship, primary and secondary school teachers

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Luedtke, O., Goellner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126-136.
Buri, I., Kim, L. E., & Hodis, F. (2021). Emotional labor profiles among teachers: Associations with positive affective, motivational, and well-being factors.Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1227-1243.
Chang, M.-L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 193-218.
Corbin, C. M., Alamos, P., Lowenstein, A. E., Downer, J. T., & Brown, J. L. (2019). The role of teacher-student relationships in predicting teachers’ personal accomplishment and emotional exhaustion.Journal of School Psychology, 77, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.001
Côté, S. (2005). A social interaction model of the effects of emotion regulation on work strain.The Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 509-530.
Cui, L. (2022). The role of teacher-student relationships in predicting teachers’ occupational wellbeing, emotional exhaustion, and Enthusiasm.Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 896813.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896813
Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339-359.
Gabriel, A. S., Daniels, M. A., Diefendorff, J. M., & Greguras, G. J. (2015). Emotional labor actors: A latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 863-879.
Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95-110.
Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224-237.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811-826.
Hobfoll, S. (1989). Conservation of Resources—A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress.American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983).The Managed Heart—Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkely, CA:University of California Press.
Kalliath, T. J., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2000). A test of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in three samples of healthcare professionals.Work and Stress, 14(1), 35-50.
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health.Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 467-480.
Lavy, S., & Eshet, R. (2018). Spiral effects of teachers’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies: Evidence from a daily diary study.Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 151-161.
Lee, Y. H. (2019). Emotional labor, teacher burnout, and turnover intention in high-school physical education teaching. European Physical Education Review, 25(1), 236-253.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236-247.
Li, Z., Zha, J., Zhang, P., Shangguan, C., Wang, X., Lu, J., & Zhang, M. (2020). Negative life events and mood states: Emotional resilience as mediator and moderator.Social Behavior and Personality, 48(5), e8843. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8843
Liu, Y., Prati, L. M., Perrewe, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2008). The relationship between emotional resources and emotional labor: An exploratory study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2410-2439.
Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes.International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714
Martínez-Iñigo, D., Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2007). Emotional labour and emotional exhaustion: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms. Work & Stress, 21(1), 30-47.
Mastracci, S. H., & Adams, I. T. (2019).Understanding Emotional Labor at the Cultural Level. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Perspectives on Emotional Labor in Public Service (pp.119-148). Palgrave Macmillan.
Mijakoski, D., Cheptea, D., Marca, S. C., Shoman, Y., Caglayan, C., Bugge, M. D.,… Canu, I. G. (2022). Determinants of Burnout among Teachers: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095776
Milstein, M., & Farkas, J. (1988). The overstated case of educator stress. Journal of Educational Administration, 26, 232-249.
Noor, N. M., & Zainuddin, M. (2011). Emotional labor and burnout among female teachers: Work-family conflict as mediator.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(4), 283-293.
Park, H. I., O’Rourke, E., & O’Brien, K. E. (2014). Extending conservation of resources theory: The interaction between emotional labor and interpersonal influence. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(4), 384-405.
Pedditzi, M. L., Nonnis, M., & Nicotra, E. F. (2021). Teacher Satisfaction in Relationships With Students and Parents and Burnout.Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 703130.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703130
Philipp, A., Schüpbach, H., & Schüpbach, H. (2010). Longitudinal effects of emotional labour on emotional exhaustion and dedication of teachers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(4), 494-504.
Pisaniello, S. L., Winefield, H. R., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). The influence of emotional labour and emotional work on the occupational health and wellbeing of South Australian hospital nurses.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 579-591.
Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2015). Facets of teachers’ emotional lives: A quantitative investigation of teachers’ genuine, faked, and hidden emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 78-88.
Tian, J., Zhang, W., Mao, Y., & Gurr, D. (2022). The impact of transformational leadership on teachers’ job burnout: The mediating role of social-emotional competence and student-teacher relationship.Journal of Educational Administration, 60(4), 369-385.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers.Teachers and Teaching, 15(4), 421-439.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320-333.
Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Taxer, J. L. (2019). Antecedents and Consequences of Teachers’ Emotional Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analytic Investigation.Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 663-698.
Wang, K. L.,& Groth, M. (2014). Buffering the negative effects of employee surface acting: The moderating role of employee-customer relationship strength and personalized services. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 341-350.
Yin, H. (2012). Adaptation and validation of the Teacher Emotional Labour Strategy Scale in China.Educational Psychology, 32(4), 451-465.
Yin, H., Huang, S., & Chen, G. (2019). The relationships between teachers’ emotional labor and their burnout and satisfaction: A meta-analytic review.Educational Research Review, 28, 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100283
Zhang, Y., Tsang, K. K., Wang, L., & Liu, D. (2022). Emotional Labor Mediates the Relationship between Clan Culture and Teacher Burnout: An Examination on Gender Difference.Sustainability, 14(4), 2260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042260
陈依萍, 王芳. (2014). 护士的情绪劳动策略与工作倦怠的关系:个体内和人际间路径. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(05), 873-876.
邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. (2023). 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 39(1), 121-131.
葛玲霞. (2007). 教师情绪调节及应付方式的差异性研究——基于新手—专家型教师的比较. 集美大学学报(教育科学版), 3, 33-37.
李蓓蕾, 徐萍萍, 张莉莉, 高婷, 邓林园. (2022). 疫情前初中生亲子关系与疫情期间家庭学习适应的关系——情绪弹性的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用. 教育学报, 18(04), 126-138.
李鹏, 张志超, 杨洋, 杨佳奇, 李洪玉. (2022). 工作压力对中小学教师职业倦怠的影响:情绪劳动和工作满意度的链式中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 20(03), 412-418.
连榕. (2004). 新手—熟手—专家型教师心理特征的比较. 心理学报, 01, 44-52.
连榕. (2008). 教师教学专长发展的心理历程. 教育研究, 02, 15-20.
连榕. (2015). 专长发展与职业发展视域下的教师心理. 心理发展与教育, 31(01), 92-99.
廖化化, 颜爱民. (2014). 情绪劳动的效应、影响因素及作用机制. 心理科学进展, 22(09), 1504-1512.
毛晋平, 莫拓宇. (2014). 中小学教师心理资本、情绪劳动策略、工作倦怠的关系研究. 教师教育研究, 26(05), 22-28+35.
田国秀, 余宏亮. (2021). 教师情绪劳动策略的分段、分层与分类. 全球教育展望, 50(08), 93-102.
田瑾, 毛亚庆, 田振华, 杜媛. (2021). 变革型领导对教师幸福感的影响——社会情感能力与师生关系的中介作用. 教育学报, 17(03), 154-165.
田瑾, 毛亚庆, 熊华夏. (2021). 变革型领导对教师职业倦怠的影响:社会情感能力和幸福感的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(05), 743-751.
涂蔷惠子. (2019). 中学教师情绪劳动策略对师生关系的影响(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
王耘, 王晓华, 张红川. (2001). 3—6年级小学生师生关系:结构、类型及其发展. 心理发展与教育, 03, 16-21.
王振宏, 郭德俊. (2005). 情感风格及其神经基础. 心理科学, 03, 751-753+746.
伍新春, 曾玲娟, 秦宪刚, 郑秋. (2003). 中小学教师职业倦怠的现状及相关因素研究. 心理与行为研究, 04, 262-267.
伍新春, 齐亚静, 余蓉蓉, 臧伟伟. (2016). 中小学教师职业倦怠问卷的进一步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(05), 856-860.
伍新春, 齐亚静, 臧伟伟. (2019). 中国中小学教师职业倦怠的总体特点与差异表现. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 01, 37-42+189-190.
谢敏, 李峰, 罗玉晗, 柯李, 王侠, 王耘. (2022). 小学教师职业倦怠维度发展顺序探究——来自结构方程模型和交叉滞后网络分析模型的证据. 心理学报, 54(4), 371-384.
尹弘飚. (2017). 教育实证研究的一般路径:以教师情绪劳动研究为例. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 35(03), 47-56+168-169.
余凤燕, 郑富兴. (2021). 因果机制与管理路径——国外教师情绪劳动研究综述. 比较教育学报, 06, 101-115.
张敏, 卢家楣. (2010). 青少年情绪弹性问卷的研究报告. 心理科学, 33(01), 24-27.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 06, 942-950.
朱仲敏. (2020). 青少年情绪韧性的特点及其对积极情绪、心理健康的影响(博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
[1] 邓宇泽, 杨佳奇, 朱芷滢, 王烨晖. 小学生社会情感能力、师生关系和同伴关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 322-331.
[2] 程亚华, 闫琳, 张锋. 批评方式对初、高中学生行为改善意向的影响: 师生关系亲密度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 42-50.
[3] 余宾, 郭成, 缪华灵, 彭于珏. 师生关系与小学生攻击行为的关系:自尊和亲子亲合的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 99-108.
[4] 黄强, 侯金芹, 陈祉妍. 家校共育视角下同伴侵害的影响因素探究:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 845-852.
[5] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[6] 李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度:师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[7] 辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[8] 余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[9] 邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[10] 周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[11] 田瑾, 毛亚庆, 熊华夏. 变革型领导对教师职业倦怠的影响:社会情感能力和幸福感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 743-751.
[12] 楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[13] 罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[14] 吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[15] 郑建君, 付晓洁. 利他动机对中小学教师知识共享的影响——组织认同和组织支持感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 421-429.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!