长期经历父母体罚儿童的自发推理特点

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.05.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究从内隐社会认知的角度,采用探测词再认范式考察了长期经历父母体罚儿童的自发推理特点。实验1发现,当呈现既隐含特质又隐含情境的行为句子时,无论体罚组还是对照组儿童均自发地使用特质对他人行为进行推理。实验2借助隐含积极或消极特质的行为句子,考察体罚经历和情绪线索对儿童自发特质推理的效价效应的交互影响。结果表明,体罚组儿童在愤怒线索下表现出自发特质推理的积极偏向,而在中性线索下没有进行自发特质推理;对照组儿童无论在愤怒还是中性线索下均未进行自发特质推理。上述结果表明长期父母体罚经历会对儿童自发推理产生重要影响。

关键词: 父母体罚, 自发特质推理, 自发情境推理, 效价效应, 儿童

Abstract: Based on the perspective of implicit social cognition, the present study examined the spontaneous inferences of children with long-term exposure to parental corporal punishment by using a probe recognition paradigm. In experiment 1, when children were presented with behavior sentences that imply both trait and situation, children with long-term exposure to corporal punishment (CP-exposed group), as well as children with low exposure to corporal punishment (control group) were inclined to spontaneously infer traits rather than situation. Experiment 2 was designed to further examine the interactive effects of parental corporal punishment and emotional cue on the valence effect of spontaneous trait inferences by using behavior sentences that imply positive or negative trait. The results of experiment 2 revealed that CP-exposed group exhibited positive bias in spontaneous trait inferences in anger cue condition, but they did not make spontaneous trait inferences in neutral cue condition. In both anger and neutral cue conditions, control group did not make spontaneous trait inferences. The findings of the present study indicate that long-term experience of parental corporal punishment has significant influences on children’s spontaneous inferences.

Key words: parental corporal punishment, spontaneous trait inferences, spontaneous situational inferences, valence effect, children

中图分类号:

B844

刘仕凡, 张蓉, 王美芳, 方永超, 赵建设. 长期经历父母体罚儿童的自发推理特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 616-624.

LIU Shifan, ZHANG Rong, WANG Meifang, FANG Yongchao, ZHAO Jianshe. Spontaneous Inferences of Children with Long-term Exposure to Parental Corporal Punishment[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(5): 616-624.

参考文献

Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 593-605.
Bons, D., van den Broek, E., Scheepers, F., Herpers, P., Rommelse, N., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2013). Motor, emotional, and cognitive empathy in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and conduct disorder.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 425-443.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678.
Fani, N., Bradley-Davino, B., Ressler, K. J., & McClure-Tone, E. B. (2011). Attention bias in adult survivors of childhood maltreatment with and without posttraumatic stress disorder.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35(1), 57-67.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83.
Healy, S. J., Murray, L., Cooper, P. J., Hughes, C., & Halligan, S. L. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of maternal influences on the development of child hostile attributions and aggression.Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(1), 80-92.
Heleniak, C., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2020). Social-cognitive mechanisms in the cycle of violence: Cognitive and affective theory of mind, and externalizing psychopathology in children and adolescents.Development and Psychopathology, 32(2), 735-750.
Horsley, T. A., de Castro, B. O., & Van der Schoot, M. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Eye-tracking assessment of social information processing in aggressive behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(5), 587-599.
Kalish, C. W., & Shiverick, S. M. (2004). Children’s reasoning about norms and traits as motives for behavior.Cognitive Development, 19(3), 401-416.
Krull, D. S., & Erickson, D. J. (1995). Inferential hopscotch: How people draw social inferences from behavior.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(2), 35-38.
Lee, E., Kang, J. I., Park, I. H., Kim, J. J., & An, S. K. (2008). Is a neutral face really evaluated as being emotionally neutral?Psychiatry Research, 157(1), 77-85.
Lo, C., Ho, F., Wong, R., Tung, K., Tso, W., Ho, M., … Ip, P. (2019). Prevalence of child maltreatment and its association with parenting style: A population study in Hong Kong.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071130
Nava, E., & Turati, C. (2020). Subliminal affective priming changes the ‘feeling’ towards neutral objects in infancy.Social Neuroscience, 15(4), 447-457.
Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380-391.
Saxbe, D. E., Negriff, S., Susman, E. J., & Trickett, P. K. (2015). Attenuated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning predicts accelerated pubertal development in girls 1 year later.Development and Psychopathology, 27, 819-828.
Sedikides, C. (1994). Incongruent effects of sad mood on self-conception valence: It's a matter of time.European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 161-172.
Shi, W., Yang, F., Xia, J., & Wang, M. (2019). Differentiating the effects of anger and sadness: A perspective of spontaneous trait inference.International Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 487-494.
Shimizu, Y. (2012). Spontaneous trait inferences among Japanese children and adults: A developmental approach.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(2), 112-121.
Sims, T., Hogan, C. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (2015). Selectivity as an emotion regulation strategy: Lessons from older adults.Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 80-84.
Smeijers, D., Benbouriche, M., & Garofalo, C. (2020). The association between emotion, social information processing, and aggressive behavior: A systematic review.European Psychologist, 25(2), 81-91.
Smith, K. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2020). Early life stress and development: Potential mechanisms for adverse outcomes.Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 12(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-020-09337-y
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D. W., & Runyan, D. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents.Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(4), 249-270.
Thompson, R. A. (2008). Attachment-related mental representations: Introduction to the special issue.Attachment & Human Development, 10, 347-358.
Todd, A. R., Molden, D. C., Ham, J., & Vonk, R. (2011). The automatic and co-occurring activation of multiple social inferences.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 37-49.
Wang, M., & Liu, L. (2014). Parental harsh discipline in mainland China: Prevalence, frequency, and coexistence.Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(6), 1128-1137.
Wang, M., & Yang, F. (2017). The malleability of stereotype effects on spontaneous trait inferences: The moderating role of perceivers’ power.Social Psychology, 48(1), 3-18.
Wang, P., Tao, A., Gao, F., & Xie, Y. (2019). The effect of stereotype activation on spontaneous inferences.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(8), 1-9.
Wang, Y., Chen, J., & Ku, Y. (2021). Subliminal affective priming effect: Dissociated processes for intense versus normal facialexpressions. Brain and Cognition, 148, 105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105674
Yan, X., Wang, M., & Zhang, Q. (2012). Effects of gender stereotypes on spontaneous trait inferences and the moderating role of gender schematicity: Evidence from Chinese undergraduates.Social Cognition, 30(2), 220-231.
Zhang, Q., & Wang, M. (2013). The development of spontaneous trait inferences: Evidence from Chinese children.Psychological Reports, 112(3), 887-899.
Zhang, Q., & Wang, M. (2018). Theprimacy-of-warmth effect on spontaneous trait inferences and the moderating role of trait valence: Evidence from Chinese undergraduates. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02148
方永超, 王美芳, 杨峰, 史文凤. (2020). 知觉者与行为者贫富对自发特质推理的影响. 心理科学, 43(5), 1162-1168.
罗峥, 郭德俊, 方平. (2002). 小学生对情绪社会调节作用的理解. 心理发展与教育, 17(3), 34-39.
王妍, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13(4), 396-398.
闫秀梅, 王美芳. (2011). 内、外归因个体自发特质推理与自发情境推理的比较. 心理科学, 34(1), 155-159.
张庆,闫秀梅, 王美芳. (2010). 大学生自发特质推理中的性别刻板效应. 心理科学, 33(6), 1488-1491.
张庆, 朱江松. (2019). 儿童青少年自发特质推理及其效价效应. 青少年学刊, (1), 21-25.

相关文章 15

[1]	王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2]	于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3]	陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4]	刘媛, 曹文锦, 王美芳, 权思翔. 父母体罚和青少年攻击行为的双向动态关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 577-585.
[5]	吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[6]	舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[7]	韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[8]	范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[9]	张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[10]	袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[11]	谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[12]	范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[13]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[14]	王宇轩, 刘梦连, 杨滢晖, 毕鸿燕. 学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 457-464.
[15]	王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed