心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 173-183.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.02.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

7~9岁儿童对群体内成员间互相帮助的道德责任探究

何晓燕1,4, 花蕊1, 段继鹏3, 罗润锋2, 尹军1   

  1. 1. 宁波大学心理学系暨研究所, 宁波大学群体行为与社会心理服务研究中心, 宁波 315211;
    2. 绍兴文理学院教师教育学院, 绍兴 312000;
    3. 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062;
    4. 北京师范大学心理学部, 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2023-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 尹军 E-mail:yinjun1@nbu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“社会群体线索对行为预测的影响及其认知机制”(31871091)。

The Moral Obligation of Helping Each Other within Social Groups at Children Aged 7~9

HE Xiaoyan1,4, HUA Rui1, DUAN Jipeng3, LUO Runfeng2, YIN Jun1   

  1. 1. Center of Group Behavior and Social Psychological Service, Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211;
    2. School of Teacher Education, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000;
    3. School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062;
    4. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2023-03-11

摘要: 以往研究对儿童持有的群体内成员间的道德责任进行了探讨,但仅局限于伤害这一消极交互行为上。然而,社会交互还包括积极的交互行为,如帮助,故本研究对7~9岁儿童是否持有群体内成员间应互相帮助的道德责任进行探讨。通过比较外在规则存在与否,被试对群体成员间互相伤害或互不帮助行为的合适度评价是否发生变化,来推测群体内道德责任的存在性。若相较群体间条件,外在规则不存在时被试认为对群体内成员的伤害或不帮助行为更不合适,则说明被试认为群体内成员间应持有相应的道德责任。结果发现:(1)相较于群体间条件,7~9岁儿童认为外在规则存在与否对群体内互不帮助行为合适性的评价影响更小,即外在规则不存在时,儿童依然认为群体内成员间应互相帮助;(2)针对群体内的不帮助行为,13~15岁青少年也表现出与7~9岁儿童相同的结果模式。结果表明,7~9岁儿童认为群体内成员间存在互相帮助的道德责任,且该现象具有跨年龄(至少是13~15岁的青少年)一致性。

关键词: 社会分类, 社会群体, 互相帮助, 道德责任

Abstract: The social groups play a vital role in organizing our social experiences. It has been suggestedthe foundational role of social groups is to mark people as intrinsically obligated to one another (i.e., moral obligation). About this moral obligation, previous studies mainly focused on the interactive behavior with negative effects (i.e., harming), while the social interaction could be also positive (i.e., helping). Hence, the current study was aimed to explore whether children aged 7~9 years old would view people as morally obligated to help persons belonging to their own group. To examine the belief of moral obligation toward group members, we examined judgments about whether the wrongness of violations of obligations depends on the presence of explicit rules. Using this method, when children maintain that an action (e.g., do not help someone or harm someone) is unacceptable, even if there are no explicit rules in the agent’s environment prohibiting the action (e.g., no rules against unhelping), it suggests that they view the action as an intrinsically moral obligation. As to the current settings, comparing with between-group unhelping condition, if children still believe that the harming or unhelping behavior within within-group members is more unacceptable when explicit rules do not exist, it would indicate that children hold the corresponding moral obligation for ingroup members. The results found that: (1) The difference of rated scores of acceptability between whether the explicit rule information was present or not in the between-group unhelping condition was significantly higher than that in the within-group unhelping condition; (2) Teenagers aged 13~15 years old also showed the same evaluation differences about unhelping behaviors between within-group and between-group conditions, as 7~9 years old children reported. The above results indicate that the explicit rule has a greater impact on the acceptability about mutually unhelping behaviors when two interactive persons are from the same social group than when two interactive persons are from the different social groups. Hence, children aged 7~9 years old view social groups as marking patterns of intrinsic moral obligations that the ingroup members should help each other, and this belief maintains across ages (at least 13~15-years old).

Key words: social classification, social group, mutual help, moral obligation

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Aboud,&Frances, E.(2003). The formation of in-group favoritism and out-group prejudice in young children:Are they distinct attitudes?Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 48-60.
Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L.,&Marques, J.(2003). The development of subjective group dynamics:When in-group bias gets specific.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(2), 155-176.
Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Ferrell, J. M.,&Pelletier, J.(2008). Children's judgments of disloyal and immoral peer behavior:Subjective group dynamics in minimal intergroup contexts.Child Development, 79(2), 444-461.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M.,&Sommers, S. R.(2015). Social Psychology. New Jersey, NY:Pearson Education.
Axelrod, R.,&Hamilton, W. D.(1981). The evolution of cooperation.Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396.
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M.,&Bian, L.(2016).Psychological reasoning in infancy. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 159-186.
Barreiro, A., Arsenio, W. F.,&Wainryb, C.(2019). Adolescents' conceptions of wealth and societal fairness amid extreme inequality:An Argentine sample.Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 498-508.
Baron, A. S.,&Dunham, Y.(2015). Representing'us' and'them':Building blocks of intergroup cognition.Journal of Cognition&Development, 16(5), 780-801.
Bian, L.,&Baillargeon, R.(2019). Toddlers and infants hold an abstractexpectation of ingroup loyalty. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Kang, S. K.,&Peery, D.(2012).Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. T. Fiske,&C. N. Macrae (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Cognition(pp. 311-329). London, UK:Sage Publications.
Boyd, R.,&Richerson, P. J.(2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3281-3288.
Brewer, M., Hong, Y.,&Li, Q.(2004). Dynamic entitivity:Perceivinggroups as actors. In C. Judd, V. Yzerbyt,&O. Corneille (Eds.),The psychology of group perception:Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism(pp. 25-38). Philadelphia:Psychology Press
Campbell, D. T.(1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates ofpersons as social entities. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14-25.
Chalik, L.,&Dunham, Y.(2018). Beliefs about moral obligation structure children's social category-based expectations. Child Development, 91(1), 108-119.
Chalik, L.,&Rhodes, M.(2018). Learning about social category-based obligations. Cognitive Development, 48, 117-124.
Chalik,L., Rivera, C.,&Rhodes, M.(2014). Children's use of categories and mental states to predict social behavior. Developmental Psychology, 50(10), 2360-2367.
Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M.,&Wittenbrink, B.(2002). The police officer's dilemma:Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314-1329.
Dawkins, M. B., Ting, F., Stavans, M.,&Baillargeon, R.(2019). Early moral cognition:A principle-based approach. In D. Poeppel, G. R. Mangun,&M. S. Gaz zaniga (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences IV. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S.,&Carey, S.(2011). Consequences of "minimal" group affiliations in children. Child Development, 82(3), 793-811.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A.,&Lang, A. G.(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Gelman, S. A.,&Coley, J. D.(1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird:Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 796-804.
Gopnik, A.,&Wellman, H. M.(2012). Reconstructing constructivism:Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory.Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1085-1108.
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K.,&Bloom, P.(2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559.
Hofstede, G.(2001).Culture's Consequences:Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Ip, W. M., Chiu, C. Y.,&Wan, C.(2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together:Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait-versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality&Social Psychology, 90(3), 368-381.
Jin, K. S.,&Baillargeon, R.(2017). Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8199-8204.
Jin, K., Houston, J. L., Baillargeon, R., Groh, A. M,&Roisman, G. I.(2018). Young infants expect an unfamiliar adult to comfort a crying baby:Evidence from a standard violationof-expectation task and a novel infant-triggered-video task.Cognitive Psychology, 102, 1-20.
Johnson,D. W.,&Johnson, R. T.(1989). Cooperation and Competition:Theory and Research. Edina, MN, US:Interaction Book Company.
Kashima, Y., Kashima, E., Chiu, C., Farsides, T., Gelfand, M., Hong, Y., … Yzerbyt, V.(2005). Culture, essentialism, and agency:Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups?European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 147-169.
Kalish, C. W.,&Shiverick, S. M.(2004). Children's reasoning about norms and traits as motives for behavior.Cognitive Development, 19(3), 401-416.
Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L.,&Kinzler, K. D.(2017). The origins of social categorization.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 556-568.
Markus, H. R.,&Kitayama, S.(2010). Cultures and selves:A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspective on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420-430.
Misch, A., Over, H.,&Carpenter, M.(2014). Stick with your group:young children's attitudes about group loyalty. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 19-36.
Mulvey, K. L.(2016). Evaluations of moral and conventional intergroup transgressions.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 489-501.
Mulvey, K. L.,&Killen, M.(2017). Children's and adolescents' expectations about challenging unfair group norms.Journal of Youth&Adolescence. 46(10), 2241-2253.
Ng, S. H., Han, S., Mao, L.,&Lai, J. C.(2010). Dynamic bicultural brains:fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 83-91.
Olson, K. R.,&Spelke, E. S.(2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children.Cognition, 108(1), 222-231.
Paek, H. J., Lee, H.,&Hove, T.(2014). The role of collectivism orientation in differential normative mechanisms:A cross-national study of anti-smoking public service announcement effectiveness.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 166-176.
Powell, L. J.,&Spelke, E. S.(2013). Preverbal infants expect members of social groups to act alike.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41), E3965-E3972.
Rand, D. G.,&Nowak, M. A.(2013). Human cooperation.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413-425.
Rhodes, M.(2013). How two intuitive theories shape the development of social categorization. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 12-16.
Rhodes, M.,&Chalik, L.(2013). Social categories as markers of intrinsic interpersonal obligations. Psychological Science, 24(6), 999-1006.
Rhodes, M.,&Chalik, L.(2014). The interplay between intuitive psychology and intuitive sociology.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 248-251.
Roberts, S. O., Gelman, S. A.,&Ho, A. K.(2017). So it is, so it shall be:Group regularities license children's prescriptive judgments. Cognitive Science, 41(53), 576-600.
Rothbart, M.,&Taylor, M.(1992). Category labels and social reality:Do we view social categories as natural kinds?In G. R. Semin,&K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition(pp. 11-36). London:Sage.
Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F.,&Piliavin, J. A.(1995). The psychology of helping and altruism:Problems and puzzles. McGraw-Hill.
Scott, R. M.,&Baillargeon, R (2013). Do infants really expect others to act efficiently?Acritical test of the rationality principle.Psychological Science, 24(4), 466-474.
Shutts, K., Roben, C. K. P.,&Spelke, E. S.(2013). Children's use of social categories in thinking about people and social relationships. Journal of Cognition&Development, 14(1), 35-62.
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M.,&Ball, C.(2014). The social domain approach to children's moral and social judgments. In M. Killen,&J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development(pp. 23-45). New York, NY:Psychology Press.
Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R.,&Harris, P. L.(2013). I should but I won't:Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them.PLoS One, 8(3), e59510.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059510
Spokes, A. C.,&Spelke, E. S.(2017). The cradle of social knowledge:Infants' reasoning about caregiving and affiliation. Cognition, 159, 102-116.
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S.&Triandis, H. C.(1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures:Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482-493.
Taylor, M. G., Rhodes, M.,&Gelman, S. A.(2010). Boys will be boys; cows will be cows:Children's essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species. Child Development, 80(2).461-481.
Ting, F., Dawkins, M. B., Stavans, M.,&Baillargeon, R.(2019). Principles and concepts in early moral cognition. In J. Decety (Ed.), The social brain:A developmental perspective. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Ting, F., He, Z.,&Baillargeon, R.(2019). Toddlers and infants expect individuals to refrain from helping an ingroup victim's aggressor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(13), 6025-6034.
Tomasello, M.,&Vaish, A.(2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality.Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 231-255.
Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A.,&Gonzalez, C. M.(2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories.Social Science Electronic Publishing, 59(1), 329-360.
Wellman, H. M.,&Gelman, S. A.(1992). Cognitive development:Foundational theories of core domains.Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337-375.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M.,&Lee, H. K.(2007). The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping.Social Cognition, 25(2), 306-338.
何晓燕,邵美璇,段继鹏,尹军.(2020).群组成员行动目标的一致性对群体实体性的影响:动作形式一致性的调节作用. 应用心理学, 26(1), 56-65.
刘璐,肖雪,刘丽莎,徐良苑,张旭然,李燕芳.(2019).儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用. 心理学报, 51(5), 62-75.
徐浩,段继鹏,陈满,尹军.(2019).基于群体信息的行为预测机制. 应用心理学, 25(3), 239-252.
叶浩生.(2004).文化模式及其对心理与行为的影响.心理科学, 27(5), 1032-1036.
郑旭涛,郭文姣,陈满,金佳,尹军.(2020).社会行为的效价信息对注意捕获的影响:基于帮助和阻碍行为的探讨. 心理学报, 52(5), 584-596.
[1] 王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2] 于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3] 邬钟灵, 陈亮. 父亲、母亲教养行为对幼儿社会适应的影响:同胞关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 478-489.
[4] 毕爽, 朱华琳, 周晖. 每日父母教养焦虑与儿童亲社会行为的动态关系:正念教养的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 490-501.
[5] 李书琴, 向燕辉. 初中生宽恕的发展趋势与异质轨迹:大五人格的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 502-511.
[6] 唐凤华, 翟予童, 李家瑶, 王芳. 是在“卷”我吗?大学生学业零和信念影响对他人努力的解读及其后果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 512-524.
[7] 杨明, 辛素飞, 辛自强. 社会支持弱化与倾向避免失败:中国大学生成就动机的代际演变[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 525-535.
[8] 陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[9] 刘媛, 曹文锦, 王美芳, 权思翔. 父母体罚和青少年攻击行为的双向动态关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 577-585.
[10] 吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[11] 舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[12] 金星, 刘景弘, 马跃, 于战宇. 聋童和正常儿童身体表情注意瞬脱的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 305-312.
[13] 钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 语言范畴影响面部表情知觉的电生理学证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
[14] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[15] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!