汉语高功能自闭症儿童代词加工:利用提及顺序和重读线索的表现

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.04.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用句子理解任务分别探究了5~7岁的汉语高功能自闭症儿童在单独提及顺序线索，提及顺序线索和重读线索共现两种条件下代词加工的表现。研究结果表明，汉语高功能自闭症儿童不像智商和工作记忆广度匹配的同龄典型发展儿童一样能够单独利用提及顺序线索加工代词，即倾向于选择首先提及的实体作为代词的指称对象，而表现为随机选择代词所指。当提及顺序线索和重读线索共现时，典型发展儿童在两条线索一致和冲突时都倾向于依靠重读线索加工代词，而汉语高功能自闭症儿童对两条线索都不敏感，表现为随机选择代词所指。这表明5~7岁的汉语高功能儿童不能够利用这两条线索加工代词，在利用语篇突显性线索加工代词方面存在困难。

关键词: 汉语高功能自闭症儿童, 代词加工, 提及顺序, 重读

Abstract: The current study applied sentence comprehension task to investigate whether 5~7 years old Mandarin-speaking children with high-functioning autism can use the sole mention order cue and co-occur mention order and accent cues to process pronouns. The result of the first experiment indicates that Mandarin-speaking children with high-functioning autism randomly chose the references of the pronouns, which means they cannot use mention order alone to process pronouns. However, 5~7 years old typically developing children whose IQ and working memory span are matched with the children with high-functioning autism can use this cue to choose the reference of the pronoun. When the mention order cue appears simultaneously with accent cue, no matter the accent order cue is congruency or incongruency with the mention order cue, typically developing children show the tendency to rely on the accent cue to process the pronouns. However, the children with high-functioning autism were insensitive to these cues, still randomly chose the references of the pronouns. The results of the two experiments indicate that 5~7 years old mandarin-speaking children with high-functioning autism cannot use mention order cue and accent cue to process pronouns, in other words, it is difficult for they to process pronouns by the discourse prominence cues.

Key words: mandarin-speaking children with high-functioning autism, pronoun processing, mention order, accent

中图分类号:

B844

王菡, 俞稼钰, 梁丹丹. 汉语高功能自闭症儿童代词加工:利用提及顺序和重读线索的表现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 481-488.

WANG Han, YU Jiayu, LIANG Dandan. Pronouns Processing in Mandarin-speaking Children with High-functioning Autism: Use of Mention Order Cue and Accent Cue[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 481-488.

参考文献

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA:American Psychiatric Publishing.
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents(pp.56-64). London:Routledge. Cascadilla Press.
Arnold, J. E. (1998). Reference form and discourse patterns (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
Arnold, J. E. (2001). The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 137-162.
Arnold, J. E., Bennetto, L., & Diehl, E. (2009). Reference production in young speakers with and without autism:Effects of discourse status and processing constraints. Cognition, 110(2), 131-46.
Balogh, J. E. (2003). Pronouns, Prosody, and the Discourse Anaphora Weighting Approach (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California.
Brehme, D. (2014). Perspectives on Personal Pronoun Reversal in Children with ASD:A Critical Review. Journal of European Psychology Students, 5(1), 31-37.
Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Van der Lely, H. (2008). Narrative Discourse in Adults with High-Functioning Autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 28-40.
Edelson, L. R. (2011). Cues to Pronominal Reference Resolution in Children with and Without Autism Spectrum Disorders (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants:The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 699-717.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In R. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics:Speech Acts(pp.41-58). New York:Academic Press.
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274-307.
Hartshorne, J. K., Nappa, R., & Snedeker, J. (2015). Development of the first-mention bias. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 423-446.
Itzhak, I. & Baum, S. R. (2015). Misleading Bias-Driven Expectations in Referential Processing and the Facilitative Role of Contrastive Accent. Journal of Psycholinguist Research. 44(5), 623-650.
Järvinen-Pasley, A., Peppé, S., King-Smith, G., & Heaton, P. (2008). The Relationship between Form and Function Level Receptive Prosodic Abilities in Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1328-1340.
Kertoy, M. K. (1991). Listening Comprehension for Sentences:the Accessibility of Referents for Pronouns as a Function of Age, Topic Continuity, and Pronoun Emphasis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52(3), 344-353.
Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Unravelling the paradox of the autistic self. Cognitive Science, 1(3), 393-403.
Maratsos, M. P. (1973). The effects of stress on the understanding of pronominal coreference in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(1), 1-8.
Nieuwland, M. S., & van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution:Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1118(1), 155-167.
Novogrodsky, R. (2013). Subject pronoun used by children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(2), 85-93.
Peppé, S., McCann, J., Gibbon, F., O'Hare, A., & Rutherford, M. (2007). Receptive and Expressive Prosodic Ability in Children with High-Functioning Autism. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1015.
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, John C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions:The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238-299.
Solan, L. (1980). Contrastive Stress and Children's Interpretation of Pronouns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25(3), 688-698.
Song, H. (2004). The Influence of Discourse Representation of Young Children's Pronoun Interpretation (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University.
Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2005). Who's ‘she’? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers' comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 29-57.
Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. Lingua, 777(11), 1959-1987.
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(4), 473-592.
Swaab, T. Y., Camblin, C. C, & Gordon, P. C. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 715-726.
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., & Francis, K. (2016). The interface of syntax with pragmatics and prosody in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 46(8), 2692-2706.
Van Rij, J., Hollebrandse, B., & Hendriks, P. (2016). Children's eye gaze reveals their use of discourse context in object pronoun resolution(pp.267-293). Berlin/Boston:De Gruyter.
陈伟英, 皮姆·马克, 泰德·桑德斯.(2013).句法角色与话题性对实体突显性的影响.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 43(1), 122-134.
李伟亚. (2009). 自闭症谱系障碍学生汉语句子理解过程的实验研究(博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
缪小春. (1996). 影响代词加工的语义和语法因素研究. 心理学报, 28(4), 352-358.
邵敬敏. (主编)(2007). 现代汉语通论(pp.180-184). 第二版. 上海:上海教育出版社.
郑波, 王蓓, 杨玉芳. (2002). 韵律对指代歧义的解歧作用及其机制. 心理学报, 34(6), 567-572.

相关文章 15

[1]	关文军, 胡梦娟, 刘晨. 自闭症儿童父母歧视知觉对群际关系的影响:一个有调节的中介作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 854-863.
[2]	李维佳, 胡清芬. 空间再定向任务中心理表征的多样性——来自虚拟现实实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 385-394.
[3]	向玲, 范淑娴, 陈家利, 王宝玺. 学习困难青少年认知控制特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 410-416.
[4]	侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 417-425.
[5]	阚佳琦, 刘斯漫, 时嘉惠, 闫琦, 郭俊斌, 王争艳. 祖辈共同看护背景下母亲和祖辈将心比心、母子依恋与婴幼儿认知的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 395-402.
[6]	田云龙, 喻承甫, 林霜, 叶诗敏, 张晓琳, 刘毅, 路红, 张卫. 父母体罚、学校参与与青少年网络游戏成瘾:亲子关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 461-471.
[7]	李若璇, 朱文龙, 刘红瑞, 姚梅林. 家长教育期望对学业倦怠的影响:家长投入的中介及家庭功能的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 489-496.
[8]	彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 504-512.
[9]	江永强, 邵云天, 蔺秀云, 何先友. 初中生班级团体依恋、自悯与学习倦怠的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 472-480.
[10]	范航, 朱转, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突对青少年抑郁情绪的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 481-488.
[11]	叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 刘明矾, 王凯凯, 杨强. 压力知觉对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 497-503.
[12]	陈庆秋, 徐华, 吴南. 助人情境中幼儿知恩图报意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 403-409.
[13]	徐璐璐, 吴佩佩, 贺雯. 贫困大学生元刻板印象威胁对群际关系的影响:群际焦虑的中介和自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 426-433.
[14]	丁子恩, 王笑涵, 刘勤学. 大学生自尊与网络过激行为的关系:社交焦虑和双自我意识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 171-180.
[15]	刘雪萍, 陈子卓, 黄文, 彭华茂. 成功老化内涵及影响因素分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 249-256.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed