家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.02.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察在中国背景下，家长参与在家庭社会经济地位与高中生学习品质之间的中介作用，以及师生关系对上述中介效应的调节。以东部某省13442名高中二年级学生为被试，采用家长的受教育程度、家长的职业以及家庭拥有物三个指标测量家庭社会经济地位。采用家长参与子女学习和家长参与子女日常生活两个指标测试家长参与度。采用学习兴趣、学习自信心、学习策略、自主学习能力、学习习惯五个分指标测量学生的学习品质。采用师生关系量表测量师生关系。结果表明：（1）家庭社会经济地位可以正向显著预测高中生的学习品质；（2）家长参与在家庭社会经济地位与高中生学习品质之间起完全中介作用；（3）家庭社会经济地位经由家长参与影响高中生学习品质的中介作用受到师生关系的调节；（4）因家庭社会经济地位不同造成的学生学习品质的差异，在一定程度上会受到师生关系的弥补作用。

关键词: 高中生, 家庭社会经济地位, 学习品质, 家长参与, 师生关系

Abstract: In order to investigate the mediating effect of parental involvement in the relationship between family socio-economic status and senior high school students' approaches toward learning in the Chinese context, as well as the moderation of teacher-student relationship on the above mediating effect, 13,442 senior high school students in an eastern province were selected. The family socio-economic status was measured by three indicators: the educational level of parents, the occupation of parents and the family property. Parents' participation in children's study and parents' participation in daily life were used to test parents' participation. The students' approaches toward learning was measured by the five metrics of learning interest, learning confidence, learning strategy, autonomous learning ability and learning habits. The results showed that: (1) Family socio-economic status can positively predict the approaches toward learning of senior high school students;(2) Parental involvement plays a completely mediating role in the relationship between family socio-economic status and senior high school students' approaches toward learning;(3) The mediating effect of parental involvement in the link between family social and economic status and senior high school students' approaches toward learning is moderated by teacher-student relationship;(4) The differences in students' approaches toward learning caused by different family socio-economic status, to some extent, will be mitigated by teacher-student relationship.

Key words: senior high school student, family socio-economic status, approaches toward learning, parental involvement, teacher-student relationship

中图分类号:

G442

罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.

LUO Haifeng, LIU Jian, ZHOU Da. The Mediating Role of Parental Involvement in the Relationship between Family Socioeconomic Status and Senior High School Students' Approaches toward Learning:The Moderating Role of Teacher-student Relationship[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.

参考文献

Balli, S. J. (1996). Family diversity and the nature of parental involvement.The Educational Forum, 60(2), 149-155.
Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure.Free Press, 20-60.
Bourdieu, P., Brown, R. (1973). Knowledge, education, and cultural change:Papers in the Sociology of Education. Contemporary Sociology, 21(3), 580-582.
Bracey, G. W., (1996). SES and involvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(2), 169-170.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development.Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & Flor, D. (1995). Linkingfamily processes and academic competence among rural african american youths. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(3), 567-579.
Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education:Conceptual issues and methodological challenges.Methodological Advances in Cross-national Surveys of Educational Achievement, 6, 150-197.
Christenson, S., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001).Schools and families:Creating essential connections for learning. Guilford Press, 1(1), 7-10.
Coleman, J. S. (1968). Equality of educational opportunity.Integrated Education, 6(5), 19-28.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development.Annual Review Psychology, 58, 175-199.
Culp, R. E., Schadle, S., Robinson, L., & Culp, A. M. (2000). Relationships among paternal involvement and young children's perceived self-competence and behavioral problems.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9(1), 27-38.
Dotterer, A. M., & Wehrspann, E. (2015). Parent involvement and academic outcomes among urban adolescents:Examining the role of school engagement. Educational Psychology, 36(4), 812-830.
Duncan, O. D. (1961). A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations. In A. J. Reiss(Eds). Occupations and Social Status (pp. 109-138). Free Press of Glencoe New York.
Englehart, J. M. (2009). Teacher-Student Interaction. In International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching (pp. 711-722). Springer US.
Englund, M. M., Luckner, A. E., Whaley, G. J., & Egeland, B. (2004).Children's achievement in early elementary school:Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations, and quality of assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 723-730.
Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In Advanced personality (pp. 211-238). Springer, Boston, MA.
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001).Parental involvement and students' academic achievement:A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.
Flay, B. R. (2002). Positive youth development requires comprehensive health promotion programs.American Journal of Health Behavior, 26(6), 407-424.
Flouri, E., & Buchanan, A. (2003a).The role of father involvement in children's later mental health. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 63-78.
Flouri, E., & Buchanan, A. (2003b). The role of mother involvement and father involvement in adolescent bullying behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 18, 634-644.
Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children's schooling.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 538-548.
Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1973). Status Attainment Processes.Sociology of Education, 46(1), 51.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach.Guilford Publications, 3(7), 219-265.
Jennings, J. F. (1995). National Issues in Education:Goals 2000 and School-to-Work. Phi Delta Kappa, Eighth Street & Union Avenue, Box 789, Bloomington, 65-89.
Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement:A meta-analysis.Urban Education, 42(1), 82-110.
Kagan, S. L., Britto, P. R., Kauerz, K., & Tarrant, K. (2005). Washington state early learning and development benchmarks.Olympia, WA:The State of Washington. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wa.us./EarlyLearning/Benchmarks.aspx
Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Reconsidering children's early development and learning:Toward common views and vocabulary. Report of the National Education Panel, Goal1 Technical Planning Group.
Karbach, J., Gottschling, J., Spengler, M., Hegewald, K., & Spinath, F. M. (2013). Parental involvement and general cognitive ability as predictors of domain-specific academic achievement in early adolescence.Learning and Instruction, 23, 43-51.
Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships:The importance of cultural capital.Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73-85.
Lerner, J. V., Phelps, E., Forman, Y. E., & Bowers, E. P. (2009). Positive youth development.Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 1.
Matthews, K. A., & Gallo, L. C. (2011). Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health.Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 501-530.
McDonnall, M. C., Cavenaugh, B. S., & Giesen, J. M. (2012). The relationship between parental involvement and mathematics achievement for students with visual impairments.The Journal of Special Education, 45(4), 204-215.
Nurmi, J. E. (2012). Students' characteristics and teacher-child relationships in instruction:A meta-analysis.Educational Research Review, 7(3), 177-197.
Okpala, C. O., Okpala, A. O., & Smith, F. E. (2001). Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement.The Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 110-115.
National Education Goals Panel, Washington, DC. (1992). Thenational education goals report 1992:Building a nation of learners. ERIC Clearinghouse,(1), 11-33.
Rivers, J. C., & Sanders, W. L. (2002). Teacher quality and equity in educational opportunity:Findings and policy implications.Teacher Quality, 13-23.
Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226-249.
Shaffer, D. D. R., & Kipp, K. (2010). Developmentalpsychology:Childhood and Adolescence. Cengage Learning, (6), 199-246.
Shumow, L., & Lomax, R. (2002). Parental efficacy:Predictor of parenting behavior and adolescent outcomes.Parenting:Science and Practice, 2(2), 127-150.
Taylor, A. R., & Machida, S. (1994). The contribution of parent and peer support to Head Start children's early school adjustment.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9(3), 387-405.
Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harden, K. P. (2012). Intellectual interest mediates gene×socioeconomic status interaction on adolescent academic achievement. Child Development, 83(2), 743-757.
Wang, M. T., & Sheikh-Khalil, S. (2014). Does parental involvement matter for student achievement and mental health in high school?. Child Development, 85(2), 610-625.
White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461.
Yeung, R., & Leadbeater, B. (2010). Adults make a difference:the protective effects of parent and teacher emotional support on emotional and behavioral problems of peer-victimized adolescents.Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1), 80-98.
Zhang, D., Hsu, H. Y., Kwok, O. M., Benz, M., & Bowman-Perrott, L. (2011). The impact of basic-level parent engagements on student achievement:Patterns associated with race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES).Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22(1), 28-39.
安桂清, 杨洋. (2018).不同社会经济地位家庭的家长参与对子女学业成就影响的差异研究. 教育发展研究, 38(20), 17-24.
葛明贵, 杨永平. (1997). 小学生学习品质训练的实验研究.安徽师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 3(03), 98-102.
黄爽, 霍力岩,房阳洋. (2019). 国外学习品质的本质与结构研究进展.比较教育研究, 41(04), 108-114.
黄亮. (2016). 家长参与学校教育对初中学生认知能力表现影响的实证研究:基于中国教育追踪调查基线数据的分析. 教育科学研究, (12), 53-59.
李春玲. (2003). 社会政治变迁与教育机会不平等:家庭背景及制度因素对教育获得的影响(1940-2001). 中国社会科学, (3), 86-98.
李佳丽. (2017). 家长参与和代际闭合对初中生认知能力的影响——基于科尔曼社会资本理论的分析. 教育发展研究, 37(Z2), 6-14.
李文道, 邹泓, 赵霞. (2003). 初中生的社会支持与学校适应的关系. 心理发展与教育, (3), 73-81.
李湘萍. (2008). 义务教育阶段择校行为与教育机会分布公平性研究:基于中国18个城市居民家庭教育选择支出的实证分析. 教育研究, (3), 67-72.
梁霞. (2005). 家校合作:青少年社会化的有效途径(硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学.
林崇德. (2008). 发展心理学(第二版). 浙江教育出版社, (7), 383-418.
刘保中, 张月云, 李建新. (2015). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年教育期望:父母参与的中介作用. 北京大学教育评论, 13(3), 158-176.
庞维国, 徐晓波, 林立甲, 任友群. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位与中学生学业成绩的关系研究. 全球教育展望, 42(02), 12-21.
彭贤智. (2004).对学习品质的结构与培养策略的研究. 唐山师范学院学报, (1), 75-79.
乔娜, 张景焕, 刘桂荣, 林崇德. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位、父母参与对初中生学业成绩的影响:教师支持的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(05), 507-514.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(05), 714-726.
文军, 李珊珊. (2018). 文化资本代际传递的阶层差异及其影响:基于上海市中产阶层和工人阶层家庭的比较研究. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 50(04), 101-113.
吴重涵. (2013). 从国际视野重新审视家校合作:《学校、家庭和社区合作伙伴:行动手册》中文版序. 教育学术月刊, (1), 108-111.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, (6), 942-950.
周皓. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位、教育期望、亲子交流与儿童发展. 青年研究, (3), 11-26.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[3]	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[4]	李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度：师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[5]	辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[6]	杨宝琰, 柳玉姣. 元刻板印象威胁对县城农村高中生学校归属感的影响:身份认同整合和自我肯定的作用机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 645-653.
[7]	余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[8]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[9]	张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[10]	张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[11]	徐鑫锫, 莫玲菲, 刘明, 邓赐平. 高一学生成就目标特征模式及学业适应:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 81-89.
[12]	楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[13]	吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[14]	罗世兰, 张大均, 刘云艳. 家庭社会经济地位对幼儿良好行为习惯的影响:父母教养方式与幼儿心理素质的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 26-33.
[15]	刘广增, 张大均, 朱政光, 李佳佳, 陈旭. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响:父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 240-248.