不同任务类型条件下4~6年级儿童比例推理策略的表现

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.04.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随机选取小学4~6年级被试86名，从辅助策略、比例推理策略的策略选择和策略效用三方面，通过五种类型的天平任务考察儿童比例推理策略的表现。结果表明：（1）儿童最常使用手指动作辅助加工基本数量信息。辅助策略的使用率随年龄增长而减少，五年级开始使用出声思维，反映出元认知能力的发展。（2）在正式学习比例知识之前，各年级儿童都能使用两种以上策略，也能根据任务难度自发产生新策略，具备策略选择的多样性和适应性。其中，三个年级均能使用定性比例推理策略（双维策略，IIIA策略，补偿策略），表明儿童初步认识了距离和重量两个维度的共变关系。此外，六年级儿童能使用“运货车策略”将冲突问题灵活地化解为简单问题。（3）儿童的错误策略表现为：在冲突任务中盲目使用补偿策略、简单策略或加法策略。（4）分层回归分析表明，在控制年龄后，儿童的一般推理能力越高，其对重量策略的依赖性越低，且可能更容易发掘距离维度的意义，其使用运货车策略的频次更多。此外，一般推理能力对解决冲突类天平任务的正确次数有正向预测作用。

关键词: 儿童, 比例推理, 策略发展, 天平任务

Abstract: This study investigated the developmental characteristics of children's proportional reasoning in general domain by balance scale task. Eighty-six 4^th to 6^th graders in a primary school from Beijing were chosen. The results indicated: (1) Children used support strategies to help them represent problems. They use finger strategy to process basic information of numbers, and this strategy decreased with age. Children in grade 5 began to use think aloud protocol, which showed the development of children's metacognition; (2) Before the formal education of proportional reasoning, the children can use more than two kinds of strategies, and they can develop new strategies automatically. Children can use qualitative proportional reasoning strategies (two-dimensional strategy, compensatory strategy, IIIA strategy). It means that children recognized the co-variation of distance and weight. In addition, children in grade 6 used buggy strategy in conflict problems. With the buggy strategy they transferred complicated tasks into simple tasks. (3) The characteristic of children's wrong strategies were as follows: using compensatory strategy blindly in conflict circumstances, or using simple strategies and additive strategies to solve conflict tasks. (4) Hierarchical regression analysis shows that, after controlling age, the children with higher general reasoning ability depend less on weight strategy, and they use more distance strategy and the buggy strategy. In addition, the general reasoning ability positively predicts the correct times of the conflict problems.

Key words: children, proportional reasoning, strategy development, the balance scale task

中图分类号:

B844

赖颖慧, 尹称心, 陈英和. 不同任务类型条件下4~6年级儿童比例推理策略的表现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 385-393.

LAI Yinghui, YIN Chenxin, CHEN Yinghe. The Performance of Proportional Reasoning Strategies of Children in grade 4 to 6 under Different Types of Tasks[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(4): 385-393.

参考文献

Adjiage, R., & Pluvinage, F. (2007). An experiment in teaching ratio and proportion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(2), 149-175.

Akatugba, A. H., & Wallace, J. (2009). An integrative perspective on students' proportional reasoning in high school physics in a West African context. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1473-1493.

Artut, P. D., & Pelen, M. S. (2015). Sixth grade students' solution strategies on proportional reasoning problems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.066

Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 39-58.

Boom, J., & Hoijtink, H. (2001). Rules in the balance. Cognitive Development, 16, 717-735.

Boyer, T. W., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Development of proportional reasoning: Where young children go wrong. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1478-1490.

Coyle, T. R., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1996). The development of strategic memory: A modified microgenetic assessment of utilization deficiencies. Cognitive Development, 11(2), 295-314.

Cramer, K., & Post, T. (1993). Proportional reasoning. The mathematics teacher, 86(5), 404-407.

Dandurand, F., & Shultz, T. R. (2014). A comprehensive model of development on the balance-scale task. Cognitive Systems Research, 31-32, 1-25.

Gignac, G. E. (2015). Raven's is not a pure measure of general intelligence: Implications for g factor theory and the brief measurement of g. Intelligence, 52, 71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.07.006

Heller, P. M., Post, T. R., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1990). Qualitative and numerical reasoning about fractions and rates by seventh-and eighth-grade students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 388-402.

Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2013). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess middle-years students' proportional reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 523-545.

Itaguchi, Y., Yamada, C., & Fukuzawa, K. (2015). Writing in the air: Contributions of finger movement to cognitive processing. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1-17.

Jansen, B. R. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2002). The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(4), 383-416.

Jeong, Y., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2007). The development of proportional reasoning: Effect of continuous versus discrete quantities. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(2), 237-256.

Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Dupuis, D. N., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Effectiveness of schema-based instruction for improving seventh-grade students' proportional reasoning: A randomized experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(2), 114-136.

Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Rodriguez, M., Lindell, M., & Someki, F. (2011). Improving students' proportional thinking using schema-based instruction. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 731-745.

Johnson, K. H. (2013). Understanding proportional reasoning in pre-service teachers (Order No. 3576466). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A & I: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. (1477235539). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1477235539?accountid=8554

Karplus, E. F., Karplus, R., & Wollman, W. (1974). Intellectual development beyond elementary school IV: Ratio, the influence of cognitive style. School Science and Mathematics, 74(6), 476-482.

McKeown, R. G., & Gentilucci, J. L. (2007). Think-aloud strategy: Metacognitive development and monitoring comprehension in the middle school second-language classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 136-147.

Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I-Differentiation of stages. Educational studies in mathematics, 11(2), 217-253.

Normandeau, S., Larivée, S., Roulin, J., & Longeot, F. (1989). The balance-scale dilemma: Either the subject or the experimenter muddles through. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150(3), 237-250.

Quinlan, P. T., Van, D. M. H. L., Jansen, B. R. J., Booij, O., & Rendell, M. (2007). Re-thinking stages of cognitive development: An appraisal of connectionist models of the balance scale task. Cognition, 103(3), 413-459.

Schirlin, O., & Houdé, O. (2007). Negative priming effect after inhibition of weight/number interference in a Piaget-like task. Cognitive Development, 22(1), 124-129.

Schwarz, B. B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 510-531.

Siegler, R. S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology(4), 481-520.

Siegler, R. S. (1999). Strategic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 430-435.

Siegler, R. S., Adolph, K. E., & Lemaire, P. (1996). Strategy choices across the life span. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 79-121.

Siegler, R., & Jenkins, E. A. (2014). How children discover new strategies (2th Edition). New York, NY: Psychology Press. pp 6, 27.

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., Bay-Williams, J. M., Wray, J. A., & Rigelman, N. R. M. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. MA: America: Pearson Publication. pp. 115-133.

Van der Maas, H. L., & Jansen, B. R. (2003). What response times tell of children's behavior on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(2), 141-177.

Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Just answering … or thinking? Contrasting pupils' solutions and classifications of missing-value word problems. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 12(1), 20-35.

Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2002). The balance beam in the balance: Reflections on rules, relational complexity, and developmental processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(4), 458-465.

刘电芝, 杨会会. (2008). 几种策略选择模型的发展轨迹与比较. 心理科学, 31(1), 156-159.

张厚粲,王晓平. (1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报(02), 113-121.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed