心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 585-593.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

家庭环境与高中生发展:自主的中介作用及其性别差异

王帆, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 唐芹   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2014-11-15 发布日期:2014-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 方晓义,E-mail:fangxy@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:fangxy@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“普通高中学生发展指导制度研究”(11JZD037).

Family Environment and High School Students' Development:Mediating Effect of Autonomy and its Gender Difference

WANG Fan, FANG Xiao-yi, HU Wei, CHEN Hai-de, WU Meng-xi, TANG Qin   

  1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2014-11-15 Published:2014-11-15

摘要: 从浙江省三所全日制高中选取348名高一到高三的学生为被试, 采用集体上机填答的方式实施问卷调查, 考察家庭环境对高中生发展的影响及作用机制, 探讨自主的中介作用及其性别差异。使用描述检验、相关分析和结构方程模型等方法, 结果发现:(1)男生的情感自主显著高于女生, 感知到的家庭亲密度水平显著低于女生;(2)家庭环境和自主与积极发展呈显著正相关, 与消极发展呈显著负相关, 积极发展与消极发展呈显著负相关;(3)家庭环境对积极发展有显著的正向预测作用, 对消极发展有显著的负向预测作用, 且对积极发展的预测作用显著高于消极发展;(4)总体上, 自主在家庭环境和高中生积极、消极发展的关系中起显著的中介作用;自主在家庭环境和积极发展间的中介作用在男生和女生样本中均达到显著水平, 而在家庭环境和消极发展间的中介作用在男生样本中为完全中介, 在女生样本中不显著。研究结果为从家庭角度促进高中生的积极发展、降低消极发展的可能性提供了依据。

关键词: 高中生发展, 家庭环境, 自主, 性别差异

Abstract: 348 high school students from three high schools in Zhejiang province were selected to fulfill the questionnaire online in group. Results were used to explore the effects and mechanism of family environment on high school students' development as well as the mediating effect of autonomy and its gender difference. Based on describing test,correlation analysis and structure equation models,results revealed as follow:(1) emotional autonomy of male students was significantly higher than that of female students,while perceived family intimacy was the opposite; (2) both family environment and autonomy were positively related to high school students' positive development,negatively related to negative development; high school students' positive development were negatively related to negative development; (3) family environment positively predicted high school students' positive development,negatively predicted negative development,and the former predictive effect was significantly higher than the latter one;(4) autonomy partially mediated the relationship between family environment and high school students' development; the mediating effect of autonomy between family environment and positive development were significant in both male and female group; as to negative development,the mediating effect is significant in male group while not sighificant in female group. The results provided initial statistics for promoting positive development of high school students as well as reducing the possibilities of negative development from family perspective.

Key words: High school students' development, Family environment, Autonomy, Gender difference

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
Andresen E. M.,Malmgren J. A., & Carter W. B. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults:Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). American Journal of Preventive Medicine,10(2),77-84.
Beavers,R.,& Hampson,R. B. (2000). The Beavers systems model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy,22(2),128-143.
Bowen,M. (1978). Family treatment in clinical practice. New York:Jason Aronson.
Bronfenbrenner,U. (2005). Making human beings human. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Bynum,M. S.,& Kotchick,B. A. (2006). Mother-adolescent relationship quality and autonomy as predictors of psychosocial adjustment among African American adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies,15(5),528-541.
Catalano,R. F.,Berglund,M. L.,Ryan,J. A.,Lonczak,H. S.,& Hawkins,J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States:Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,591(1),98-124.
Chen,Z.Y.,& Dornbusch,S. M. (1998). Relating aspects of adolescent emotional autonomy to academic achievement and deviant behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research,13(3),293-319.
Chirkov,V.,Ryan,R. M.,Kim,Y.,& Kaplan,U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence:A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(1),97-110.
Côté,J. E. (2009). Identity formation and self-development in adolescence. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg(Eds.),Handbook of adolescent psychology(3rded.,Vol. 1, pp. 266-304). Hoboken,NJ:John Wiley.
Dai,B. B.,Zhang,B. S.,& Li,J. (2012). Protective factors for subjective well-being in Chinese older adults:The roles of resources and activity. Journal of Happiness Studies,13,1225-1239.
Deci,E. L.,& Ryan,R. M. (2000). The‘what’and ‘why’of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,11,227-268.
Eklund,K.,Dowdy,E.,Jones,C.,& Furlong,M. J. (2011). Applicability of the dual-factor model of mental health for college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy,25,79-92.
Erikson,K. (1986). On work and alienation. American Sociological Review, 1-8.
Ge,X. J.,Brody,G. H.,Conger,R. D.,& Simons,R. L. (2006). Pubertal maturation and African American children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,35(4),531-540.
Gysbers,N. C.,& Henderson,P. (2012). Developing & managing your school guidance & counseling program(5th ed.). Alexandria,VA:American Counseling Association.
Harter,S. (2006). The self. In W. Damon,R. M. Lener & N. Eisenberg (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology:social,emotional,and personality development (6thed.,Vol. 3,pp. 505-570). New York:Wiley.
Havighurst,R. J. (1948). Developmental tasks and education. Chicago,IL,US:University of Chicago Press.
Hyde,J. S.,Mezulis,A. H.,& Abramson,L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression:Integrating affective,biological,and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychology Review,115(2),291-313.
Johnson,M. K.,Crosnoe,R.,& Elder,G. H. (2011). Insights on adolescence from a life course perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence,21(1),273-280.
Minuchin,S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
Noom,M. J.,Dekovic,M.,& Meeus,W. H. J. (1999). Autonomy,attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence:A double-edged sword? Journal of Adolescence,22,771-783.
Olson,D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy,22(2),144-167.
Podsakoff,P. M.,MacKenzie,S. B.,& Podsakoff,N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology,63,539-569.
Renshaw,T. L.,& Cohen,A. S. (2014). Life satisfaction as a distinguishing indicator of college student functioning:Further validation of the two continua model of mental health. Social Indicators Research,117(1),319-334.
Roth,J. L.,& Brooks-Gunn,J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science,7,94-111.
Savickas,M. L. (2002). Career construction. In D. Brown & Associates(Eds.),Career choice and development(4thed.,Vol. 149-205). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Seligman,M. (1975). Helplessness:On depression,development,and death. A series of books in psychology. New York,NY:WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
Shek,D. T. L.,Siu,A. M. H.,& Lee,T. Y. (2007). The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale:A validation study. Research on Social Work Practice,17,380-391.
Sher-Censor,E.,Parke,R. D.,& Coltrane,S. (2011). Parents' promotion of psychological autonomy,psychological control,and Mexican-American adolescents' adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,40(5),620-632.
Sikkink,D. (1999). The social sources of alienation from public schools. Social Forces,78(1),51-86.
Super,D. E. (1980). A life-span,life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior,16(3),282-298.
Tung,S.,& Dhillon,R. (2006). Emotional autonomy in relation to family environment:A gender perspective. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology,32(3),201-212.
Vansteenkiste,M.,Lens,W.,Soenens,B.,& Luyckx,K. (2006). Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese sojourners and applicants:Conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motivation and Emotion,30(4),273-282.
Westerhoff,G. J.,& Keyes,C. L. M. (2010). Mental illness and mental health:The two continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development,17,110-119.
Zung,W. W. K. (1971). A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics,12(6),371-379.
崔丽霞,史光远,张玉静,于园. (2012). 青少年抑郁综合认知模型及其性别差异. 心理学报, 44(11),1501-1514.
方晓义,徐洁,孙莉,张锦涛. (2004). 家庭功能:理论、影响因素及其与青少年社会适应的关系.心理科学进展, 12(4),544-553.
侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社.
侯志瑾. (2004). 家庭对青少年职业发展影响的研究综述. 心理发展与教育,20(3),90-95.
胡宁,邓林园,张锦涛,方晓义,陈蕾,梅海燕. (2009). 家庭功能与青少年问题行为关系的追踪研究. 心理发展与教育,25(4), 93-100.
李彩娜,张曼,冯建新. (2010). 家庭功能与社会适应:个人自主的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,26(4),371-377.
刘靖东,钟伯光,姒刚彦. (2013). 自我决定理论在中国人人群的应用. 心理科学进展,21(10),1803-1813.
刘世宏,李丹,刘晓洁,陈欣银. (2014). 青少年的学校适应问题:家庭亲密度家庭道德情绪和责任感的作用. 心理科学,37(3),617-624.
罗伏生,沈丹,张珊明. (2009). 青少年焦虑和抑郁情绪特征研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,17(4),468-470.
谭千保,钟毅平. (2003). 高中生家庭环境与家庭功能的影响因素研究. 心理科学,26(6),1117-1118.
唐芹,方晓义,胡伟,陈海德,吴梦希,王帆. (2013). 父母和教师自主支持与高中生发展的关系. 心理发展与教育,29(6),604-615.
王萍. (2012). 中学寄宿生的家庭互动及其自主性发展的关系研究.硕士学位论文, 山西大学.
吴波,方晓义. (2006). 青少年自主性发展的特点. 心理与行为研究,4(1),22-27.
吴庆兴. (2012). 青少年焦虑的发展与家庭功能、依恋质量的关系. 硕士学位论文, 山东师范大学.
肖三蓉,徐光兴. (2009). 家庭环境影响青少年人格特质的性别差异. 心理学探新,29(2),71-75.
徐夫真,张文新. (2010). 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的预测:同伴接纳的调节作用及性别差异. 心理发展与教育,26(3),274-281.
徐洁,方晓义,张锦涛,林丹华,孙莉. (2008). 家庭功能对青少年情绪问题的作用机制. 心理发展与教育,24(2),79-85.
叶苑,邹泓,李彩娜,柯锐. (2006). 青少年家庭功能的发展特点及其与心理健康的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志,20(6),385-387.
于凤杰,赵景欣,张文新. (2013). 早中期青少年未来规划的发展及其与父母教养行为的关系:行为自主的中介效应. 心理学报,45(6),658-671.
袁文得,艾思柏,许锦屏,梁健文,刘兆瑛,陈茂钊等. (2004a). 学业发展自我效能量表:使用手册. 香港:香港大学教育学院生活技能发展计划.
袁文得,艾思柏,许锦屏,梁健文,刘兆瑛,陈茂钊等. (2004b). 个人与群性发展自我效能量表:使用者手册. 香港:香港大学教育学院生活技能发展计划.
袁文得,艾思柏,许锦屏,梁健文,刘兆瑛,陈茂钊等. (2004c). 事业发展自我效能量表:使用者手册. 香港:香港大学教育学院生活技能发展计划.
张文新,王美萍,Fuligni,A. (2006). 青少年的自主期望、对父母权威的态度与亲子冲突和亲合. 心理学报,38(6),868-876.
周浩,龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展,12(6),942-950.
[1] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[4] 姚计海, 蒋雨含, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教学反思的关系:心理授权和职业承诺的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 842-849.
[5] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[6] 李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[7] 郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系:自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.
[8] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[9] 王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[10] 白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[11] 王兴华, 洪慧芳, 朱瑞玲. 2~3岁幼儿执行功能与母子互动的关系:幼儿气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 784-791.
[12] 王靖民, 郭明宇, 常淑敏. 儿童父母拒绝与同伴拒绝的关系:问题行为的中介作用和家庭环境纷杂度的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 845-853.
[13] 任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[14] 施国春, 赵东妍, 范会勇. 2004至2016年中国大学生身体自尊的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 648-659.
[15] 窦芬, 李巧灵, 王书豪. 自我分化与大学生经验回避:羞怯的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 517-524.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!