莫扎特音乐对幼儿时空推理能力影响的研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 音乐对幼儿身心发展起重要的促进作用.利用实验法探讨莫扎特“D大调双钢琴奏鸣曲”(K.448)对幼儿时空推理能力的影响,并试图探究“莫扎特效应”产生的机制.采用相同唤醒度和情绪效价但不同结构化和周期性的三首音乐为刺激,共342名大班幼儿参与实验.结果显示:高度结构化、长时程周期性的莫扎特音乐K.448显著提高了女童时空推理能力,而在男童未发现此效应;而不具备高度结构化与周期性的科普兰“猫和老鼠”类似无声静息,对幼儿时空推理能力无显著影响.综上,产生“莫扎特效应”,音乐需具备长时程周期性和高度结构化特点,支持“直接启动说”理论.

关键词: 莫扎特效应, 幼儿, 时空推理, 周期性, 直接启动说

Abstract: Music has an important promoting effect on children's physical and mental development. This research used experimental method to study influence of Mozart music on preschoolers' spatio-temporal reasoning ability and tried to explore the mechanism of "Mozart effect". 342 5-6-year-old children participated in this study. This study used four types of music conditions: Mozart's Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major (K.448), Bach's Toccata in G major, Aaron Copland's The Cat and the Mouse and a silent control condition. The three types of music have the same kind of arousal and mood. Mozart music is highly structured and has long-lasting periodicity. Bach's music is highly structured and has short-lasting periodicity. The Cat and the Mouse is unstructured and has no periodicity. The results showed that Mozart music significantly improved girls' ability of spatio-temporal reasoning for a moment, while this effect was not found in boys. The Cat and the Mouse and the silence were similar, and both had no significant effect on the preschoolers’ability of spatio-temporal reasoning. In summary, the generation of "Mozart Effect" is based on the characteristics of Mozart music, which is highly structured and has long-lasting periodicity. The research provided experimental evidence for the "direct triggering theory".

Key words: Mozart effect, preschoolers, spatio-temporal reasoning, periodicity, direct triggering theory

中图分类号:

B844.1

吴海珍, 赵蕾, 卢英俊. 莫扎特音乐对幼儿时空推理能力影响的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 345-354.

WU Hai-zhen, ZHAO Lei, LU Ying-jun. The Effect of Mozart Music on Child Spatio-Temporal Reasoning Ability[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(4): 345-354.

参考文献

Aheadi, A., Dixon, P., & Glover, S. (2010). A limiting feature of the Mozart effect: listening enhances mental rotation abilities in non-musicians but not musicians. Psychology of Music, 38(1), 107-117.

Akiyama, K., & Sutoo, D. E. (2011). Effect of different frequencies of music on blood pressure regulation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuroscience Letters, 487(1), 58-60.

Berk, L. E. (2006). Child development. 7/e. Boston, MA: Pearson, 546.

Bodner, M., Muftuler, L. T., Nalcioglu, O., & Shaw, G. L. (2001). FMRI study relevant to the Mozart effect: brain areas involved in spatial-temporal reasoning. Neurological Research, 23(7), 683-690.

Cabanac, A., Perlovsky, L., Bonniot-Cabanac, M. C., & Cabanac, M. (2013). Music and academic performance. Behavioural Brain Research, 256, 257-260.

Cacciafesta, M., Ettorre, E., Amici, A., Cicconetti, P., Martinelli, V., Linguanti, A., et al. (2010). New frontiers of cognitive rehabilitation in geriatric age: the Mozart Effect (ME). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51(3), 79-82.

Cash, A. H., EL-Mallakh, R. S., Chamberlain, K., Bratton, J. Z., & Li, R. (1997). Structure of music may influence cognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(1), 66.

Crncec, R., Wilson, S. J., & Prior, M. (2006). No evidence for the Mozart effect in children. Music Perception: An interdisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 305-317.

Forti, S., Filipponi, E., Di. Berardino, F., Barozzi, S., & Cesarani, A. (2010). The influence of music on static posturography. Journal of Vestibular Research, 20(5), 351-356.

Grylls, E. K., Rudnay, J., Kinsky, M., Baggott, A., Wabnitz, C., & Mclellan, A. (2013). The Mozart Effect in children with epileptic EEGs. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 98(suppl 1), 86-87.

Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999). Sex Differences in Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Young Adults: Correlations with Cognitive Performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(10), 4065-4072.

Hughes, J. R., Daaboul, Y., Fino, J. J., & Shaw, G. L. (1998). The "Mozart effect" on epileptiform activity. Clinical Electroencephalography, 29(3), 109-119.

Hughes, J. R. (2001). The Mozart Effect. Epilepsy & Behavior, 2(5), 396-417.

Hughes, J. R. (2002). The Mozart effect: Additional Data. Epilepsy & Behavior, 3(2), 182-184.

Hetland, L. (2000). Listening to music enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: evidence for The "Mozart effect". Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 105-148.

Ivanov, V. K., & Geake, J. G. (2003). The Mozart effect and primary school children. Psychology of Music, 31(4), 405-413.

Jackson, C, S., & Tlauka, M. (2004). Route-learning and the Mozart effect. Psychology of Music, 32(2), 213-220.

Jausovec, N., & Habe, K. (2004). The influence of auditory background stimulation (Mozart's sonata K.448) on visual brain activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51(3), 261-271.

Jausovec, N., & Habe, K. (2005). The influence of Mozarts' sonata K.448 on brain activity during the performance of spatial rotation and numerical tasks. Brain Topograpphy, 17(4), 207-218.

Jenkins, J. S. (2001). The Mozart effect. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 94(4), 170-172.

Lin, L. C., Lee, W. T., Wu, H. C., Tsai, C. L., Wei, R. C., Mok, H. K., et al. (2011). The long-term effect of listening to Mozart K.448 decreases epileptiform discharges in children with epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 21(4), 420-424.

Maguire, E. A., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Lateral asymmetry in the hippocampal response to the remoteness of autobiographical memories. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(12),5302-5307.

Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., & Besson, M. (2009). Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 19(3), 712-723.

Moreno, S., Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Schellenberg, E. G., Cepeda. N. J., & Chau. T. (2011). Short-term music training enhances verbal intelligence and executive function. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1425-1433.

Morton, L. L., Pietrangelo, M. C., & Belleperche, S. (1998). Using music to enhance competence. Canadian Music Education, 39(4), 13-16.

Mckelvie, P., & Low, J. (2002). Listening to Mozart does not improve children's spatial ability: Final curtains for the Mozart effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 241-258.

Nantais, K. M., & Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). The Mozart effect: an artifact of preference. Psychological Science, 10(4), 370-373.

Perlovsky, L., Cabanac, A., Bonniot-Cabanac, M.C., & Cabanac, M. (2013). Mozart effect, cognitive dissonance, and the pleasure of music. Behavioural Brain Research, 244, 9-14.

Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M., & Formann, A. K. (2010). Mozart Effect-Shmozart Effect: A Meta-Analysis. Intelligence, 38(3), 314-323.

Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365(6447), 611.

Rauscher, F. H., Robinson, K. D., & Jens, J. J. (1998). Improve maze learning through early music exposure in rats. Neurological Research, 20(5), 427-432.

Rauscher, F. H. (1999). Music exposure and the development of spatial intelligence in children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 142, 35-47.

Rauscher, F. H. (2000). Is the" Mozart effect" debunked. Bi-annual Meeting of the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Keele, UK.

Sutoo, D. E., & Akiyama, K. (2004). Music improves dopaminergic neurotransmission: demonstration based on the effect of music on blood pressure regulation. Brain Research, 1016(2), 255-262.

Steele, K. M., Ball, T. N., & Runk, R. (1997). Listening to Mozart does not enhance backwards digit span performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(3c), 1179-1184.

Steel, K. M., Bass, K. E., & Crook, M. D. (1999). The mystery of the Mozart effect: Failure to replicate. Psychological Science, 10(4), 366-369.

Steele, K. M. (2003). Do rats show a Mozart effect? Music Perception, 21(2), 251-265.

Suda, M., Morimoto, K., Obata, A., Koizumi, H., & Maki, A. (2008). Cortical responses to Mozart's sonata enhance spatial-reasoning ability. Neurological Research, 30(9), 885-888.

Trappe, H. J. (2010). The effects of music on the cardiovascular system and cardiovascular health. Heart, 96(23), 1868-1871.

Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 248-251.

Wilson, T. L., & Brown, T. L. (1997). Reexamination of the effect of Mozart's music on spatial-task performance. The Journal of Psychology, 131(4), 365-370.

Zhu W, Zhao L, Zhang J, Ding X, Liu H, Ni E, et al. (2008). The influence of Mozart's sonata K.448 on visual attention: an ERPs study. Neuroscience Letter, 434(1), 35-40.

Jensen, E. (2005). 艺术教育与脑的开发. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 15-49.

陈俊, 乔玲玲, 张积家. (2009). 认知视野下的莫扎特效应辨析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 27(1), 43-50.

韩明鲲, 吕静. (2013). 音乐训练对改善儿童前额叶执行功能的作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(4), 542-545.

侯公林, 缪小春, 陈云舫, 胡世红, 徐微云. (1998). 幼儿二维心理旋转能力发展的研究. 心理科学, 21(6), 494-497.

侯建成. (2007). "莫扎特效应"的认知神经科学研究. 中国特殊教育, 81(3), 110-118.

侯建成,刘昌. (2008). 国外有关音乐活动的脑机制的研究概述——兼及"莫扎特效应". 中央音乐学院学报, 1, 110-118.

黄君. (2009). 莫扎特效应的实验研究. 博士论文. 重庆: 西南大学.

黄君. (2010). 音乐与空间推理能力—莫扎特效应的实验研究. 中央音乐学院学报, (2), 124-129.

刘秀环, 钱文, 林泳海. (2007). 3~6岁儿童心理旋转能力的发展研究. 幼儿教育(教育科学版), 35(2), 40-44.

卢英俊, 吴海珍, 钱靓, 谢飞. (2011). 莫扎特奏鸣曲K.448对脑电功率谱与重心频率的影. 生物物理学报, 27(2), 154-166.

孙长安, 韦洪涛, 岳丽娟. (2013). 音乐对工作记忆影响及机制的ERP研究. 心理与行为研究, 11(2), 195-198.

孙亚楠, 刘源, 南云. (2009). 音乐对情绪的影响及其脑机制的相关研究. 自然科学进展, 19(1), 45-49.

许燕, 张厚粲. (2000). 小学生空间能力及其发展倾向的性别差异研究. 心理科学,23(2), 160-164.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[2]	王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[3]	张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5～6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[4]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[5]	刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[6]	王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[7]	刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[8]	张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[9]	王薇, 贡德英, 程春, 陈科, 李永鑫, 闫晶晶. 5～7岁自闭症谱系障碍幼儿数感的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[10]	刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[11]	周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[12]	贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜. 3~5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 457-464.
[13]	李占星, 朱莉琪. “它”是所有者吗？幼儿对所有权主体的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 465-471.
[14]	郑晨烨, 黄焰, 王静梅, 姜存对, 卢英俊. 面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 472-480.
[15]	施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.