心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 457-465.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同任务情境中5~6岁儿童卡通面孔加工的眼动研究

赵倩, 王静梅, 徐侃鸿, 卢英俊   

  1. 浙江师范大学杭州幼儿师范学院发展认知神经科学实验室, 杭州 310012
  • 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 卢英俊,E-mail:luyingjun@zjnu.cn E-mail:luyingjun@zjnu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    浙江师范大学开放性实验项目(2012).

An Eye-movement Research on Cartoon Face Processing of 5-6-year-old Children in Different Task Situations

ZHAO Qian, WANG Jing-mei, XU Kan-hong, LU Ying-jun   

  1. Lab of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Hangzhou College for Preschool Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012
  • Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-09-15

摘要: 以卡通面孔图片为刺激材料,赋予5~6岁儿童三种不同的加工任务,包括卡通面孔识别、分类和吸引力评价,旨在比较其在不同任务情境中的眼动差异。结果表明:(1)任务情境会影响儿童对卡通面孔的加工。在不同的面孔加工任务中,儿童的反应时、正确率、注视时间和次数等存在差异;(2)随着三种任务难度的逐渐加大,儿童的加工程度也相应地加深;(3)儿童在三种任务中的加工方式一致,对面部不同部位的关注程度不同:加工初期特别关注鼻子,而后眼睛部位耗费最多的注意资源,其次是鼻子、嘴巴、前额和脸颊,极少关注下巴;(4)男女童在卡通面孔分类任务中表现出较显著的性别差异,女童具有速度方面的优势,而男童对于关键信息的搜索则更为积极主动。

关键词: 儿童, 卡通面孔, 任务情境, 面孔加工, 眼动

Abstract: In this research, with cartoon pictures as stimuli, the authors tried to compare the difference of eye-movement in different tasks by giving three different processing tasks including cartoon face recognition, classification and attractiveness evaluation in 5-6-year-old children. The research results showed that: (1) the task situation affected the cartoon face processing of children. The reaction time, accuracy, fixation time and frequency varied when children were performing different face processing tasks; (2) the processing degree of children increased according to the three tasks with increasing degrees of difficulty; (3) the processing modes of children were consistent in the three tasks, and different parts of the cartoon face got different amount of attention from children. In the beginning, attention was first paid to the nose, and then most attention went to the eyes, next were the nose, the mouth, the forehead and the cheeks, while the chin was rarely noted; (4) a significant difference in gender was shown in the cartoon face classification task between boys and girls - girls had an advantage over boys in processing speed, while boys were more active in searching for key information.

Key words: children, cartoon face, task situation, face processing, eye-movement

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
Antes, J. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experiment Psychology, 103 (1), 62-70.
Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., & Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLos One, 3(8), e3022-e3022.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). The Eye Direction Detector (EDD) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM): Two case for evolutionary psychology. In C. Moore and P. Dunnhanm(Eds), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 41-59.
Buswell, G.T. (1935). How people look at pictures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Daniel, B.W., & Benjamin, S. (2003). An own gender bias and the improtance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114(1), 101-114.
Fitts, P.M., Jones, R.E., & Milton, J.L. (1950). Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 9(2), 24-29.
Goldberg, J.H., & Kotval, X.P. (1998). Eye movement-based evaluation of the computer interface. Advances in occupational ergonomics and safety. Amsterdam: S K Kumar, 529-532.
Hsiao, J.H., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two fixation suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science. San Diego: university of California.
Jenny, R., & Agneta, H. (2007). Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychologica, 124(3), 344-355.
John, M.H., Carrick, C.W., & Richard, J.F. (2005). Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory cognition, 33(1), 98-110.
Klein, H., & Shiffman, K. S. (2006). Messages about physical attractiveness in animated cartoons. Body Image, 4(3), 353-363.
Lance, C.B., & Samuel, A.M. (1991). Depth of processing approach to face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17(3), 391-421.
Mason, M., Tatkow, E., & Macrae, N. (2005). The look of love: gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science, 16(3), 236-239.
Morton, J., & Johnson, M.H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164-181.
Nguyen, H.T., Isacowitz, D.M., & Rubin, P.A. (2009). Age-and fatigue-related markers of human faces: an eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology, 116(3), 50-60.
Pearson, A.M., Henderson, J.M., Schyns, P.G., & Gosselin, F. (2003). Task-dependant eye movements during face recognition. Psychonomics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Regine, A., & Isabelle, B. (2009). Gaze behavior in face comparison: The roles of sex, task, and symmetry. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(5), 1107-1126.
Rosset, D.B., Santos, A., & Da, F.D. (2010). Do children perceive features of real and cartoon faces in the same way? Evidence from typical development and autism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(2), 212-218.
Tong, F., Nakayma, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive neuropsychology, 17, 257-279.
Yarbus, A.L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
曹立人. (2000). 不规则几何图形识别的取样首视点研究. 心理科学, 23, 690-693.
高蕾, 赵仑. (2006). 任务难度调控面孔认知的早期阶段. 第四军医大学学报, 27(19), 1732.
韩世辉, 蒋毅, 许晓婧, & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). 儿童观看卡通片激活内侧前额皮层. 科学通报. 52(19), 2283-2286.
兰公瑞, 刘成刚, 盖笑松. (2011). 面孔识别的认知发展机制. 心理科学, 34(5), 1120-1123.
梁静. (2010). 博弈任务中面孔吸引力对个体决策及公平感的影响. 重庆:西南大学.
吕勇, 于乐, 刘亚平. (2010). 面孔再认能力性别差异的实验研究. 心理与行为研究, 1, 20-24.
唐玉梅, 葛列众. (2004). 陌生面孔特征信息的拼图实验研究. 人类工效学, 10(4), 37-38.
王军利, 王静梅, 任静婷, 卢英俊. (2013). 卡通面孔分类与知觉加工的ERP比较研究. 心理科学, 36(2), 320-327.
王静梅, 卢英俊. (2011). 绘图方式与脸型对卡通面孔吸引力的影响. 幼儿教育(教育科学), 6, 6-11.
王玲, 王静梅, 王军利, 卢英俊. (2012). 卡通面孔与真实面孔识别的ERP比较研究. 心理研究, 5(5), 19-28.
王乾东, 胡超, 傅根跃. (2013). 幼儿面孔加工异族效应的眼动研究. 心理学报, 45(2), 169-178.
袁加锦, 汪宇, 鞠恩霞, 李红. (2010). 情绪加工的性别差异及神经机制. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1899-1908.
周燕红, 王伟, 刘旭峰, 黄志强. (2011). 大学生对社会暴力信息注意偏向的眼动研究. 中国心理卫生杂志. 25(2). 156-160.
[1] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为:心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5] 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7] 朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8] 王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[9] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[10] 高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[11] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[12] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[13] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[14] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[15] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!