心理发展与教育 ›› 2010, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 502-508.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

流动儿童的未来取向及与学业卷入的关系

胡心怡1,2, 刘霞2, 冀巧玲2, 申继亮2, 张玲玲3   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学学生心理素质教育中心, 北京100044;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京100875;
    3. 山东省教学研究室, 济南250011
  • 出版日期:2010-09-15 发布日期:2010-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 申继亮,E-mail:jlshen@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:jlshen@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会学重大攻关项目“处境不利儿童心理发展状况与教育对策研究”(04JZD0026)

Chinese Migrant Children’s Future Orientation and Its Relationship with School Engagement

HU Xin-yi1,2, LIU Xia2, JI Qiqo-ling2, SHEN Ji-liang2, ZHANG Ling-ling3   

  1. 1. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044;
    2. The Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Shandong Teaching and Research Office, Shandong 250011
  • Online:2010-09-15 Published:2010-09-15

摘要: 采用问卷法,选取755名初中生(其中流动儿童562名)作为被试,对未来取向及其与学业卷入的关系进行考察。结果表明:(1)打工子弟学校流动儿童的未来取向与公立学校流动儿童、城市儿童差异较大,具体表现为,打工子弟学校流动儿童的受教育领域未来目标显著较少,未来职业目标较多;未来计划得分显著较低;未来评价方面,打工子弟学校的流动儿童具有较少的内部归因,乐观性也较弱;(2)打工子弟学校的流动儿童未来取向主要表现出了年级差异,初一年级受教育目标显著高于初二年级,而未来职业内部归因显著低于初二年级;公立学校流动儿童则表现出了性别差异,男生在各领域上的外部归因和乐观性均显著高于女生;(3)教育计划和乐观性对流动儿童的行为卷入得分有显著的正向预测作用,教育的外部归因和未来的职业计划有着显著的负向预测作用;流动儿童的未来受教育计划、教育目标和乐观性以及职业的内部归因对其心理卷入有显著的正向预测作用。

关键词: 流动儿童, 未来取向, 学业卷入

Abstract: This study was aimed to explore the characteristics of migrant children's future orientation and the effect of migrant children's future orientation on school engagement.Seven hundred and fifty-five participants(including 562 migrant children)were investigated with the questionnaires of future orientation and school engagement.The results indicated that(1)Compared with the migrant children from public school and the urban children,migrant children from the school of migrant children had fewer goals on future education and more goals on future vocation, they also had lower scores on planning,internal attribution and optimism.(2)Migrant children in grade one had more goals on future education,and less internal attribution on future vocation than those in grade two in the school of migrant children.Migrant boys had higher external attribution and optimism than migrant girls in public school. (3)Planning and optimism in educational domain had significantly positive effect on Migrant children's behavioral engagement,while external attribution in educational domain and planning in vocational domain had significantly negative effect on it.Planning,goals and optimism in educational domain and internal attribution in vocational domain were the significantly positive predictors for Migrant children's psychological engagement.

Key words: migrant children, future orientation, school engagement

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
[1] Archambault,I.,Janosz,M.,&Fallu,J.(2009).Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout.Journal of Adoles-cence,32(3),651-670.
[2] Brown,W.T.,&Jones,J.M.(2004).The substance of things hoped for:A study of the future orientation,minority status perceptions,academic engagement,and academic performance of black high school students.Journal of Black Psychology,30(2),248-273.
[3] Cunningham,M.,Corprew,C.,&Becker,J.(2009).Negative friends,and Academic Achievement in high-achieving African American adolescents.Urban Education,44(3),280-296.
[4] Finn,J.D.,&Rock,D.A.(1997).Academic success among students at risk for school failure.Journal of Applied Psychology,82(2),221-234.
[5] Glanville,J.L.,&Wildhagen,T.(2007).The measurement of school engagement assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(6),1-23.
[6] McCabe,K.M.,&Barnett,D.(2000).The relation between familial factors and the future orientation of urban,African American sixth graders.Journal of Child and Family Studies,9(4),491-508.
[7] Mirza,S.A.,&Somers,C.L.(2004).Future orientation among Caucasian and Arab-American adolescents:the role of realism about child-rearing and perceptions of others'acceptance of adolescent pregnancy.School Psychology International,25(3),361-372.
[8] Nurmi,J.E.,Berzonsky,M.D.,Tammi,K.,Kinney,A.(1997).Identity processing orientation,cognitive and behavioral strategies and well-being.International Journal of Behavioral Development,21(3),555-570.
[9] Nurmi,J.E.(1993).Adolescent development in an age-graded context:the role of personal beliefs,goals,and strategies in the tackling of developmental tasks and standards.International Journal of Behavioral Development,16(2),169-189.
[10] Nurmi,J.E.(1989).Development of orientation to the future during early adolescence:a four-year longitudinal study and two cross-sectional comparisons.International Journal of Psychology,24(2),195-214.
[11] Nurmi,J.E.(1991).How do adolescents see their future?A review of the development of future orientation and planning.Developmental Review,11(1),1-59.
[12] Seginer,R.,&Schlesinger,R.(1998).Adolescents'future orientation in time and place:the case of the Israeli Kibbutz.International Journal of Behavior Development,22(1),151-167.
[13] 郭良春,姚远,杨变云.(2005).流动儿童的城市适应性研究-对北京市一所打工子弟学校的个案调查.青年研究,(3),22-31.
[14] 侯娟,邹泓,李晓巍.(2009).流动儿童家庭环境的特点及其对生活满意度的影响.心理发展与教育,25(2),78-85.
[15] 雷有光.(2004).都市“小村民”眼中的大世界-城市流动人口子女社会认知的调查研究.教育科学研究,(6),28-32.
[16] 申继亮,胡心怡,刘霞.(2007).流动儿童的家庭环境:特点及其对自尊的影响.华南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),(6),113-119.
[17] 师保国,申继亮.(2007).家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系.心理发展与教育,23(1),30-34.
[18] 孙晓莉.(2006).流动儿童学校适应性现状研究.现代教育科学,(6),20-22.
[19] 张玲玲.(2005).青少年未来取向的发展.硕士论文,山东,山东师范大学.
[20] 张玲玲,张文新,纪林芹,Nurmi.(2006).青少年未来取向问卷中文版的测量学分析.心理发展与教育,22(1),103-109.
[21] 张玲玲,张文新.(2008).中晚期青少年的个人规划及其与亲子、朋友沟通的关系,心理学报,40(5),583-592.
[22] 张文新,张玲玲,纪林芹,Nurmi.(2006).青少年的个人未来发展目标和担忧.心理科学,29(2),274-277.
[1] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[2] 陈奕荣, 吴忠良. 特殊教育师范生感知班级氛围对学习投入的影响:专业认同的中介作用与未来取向的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 244-253.
[3] 袁柯曼, 李白璐, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 累积情境风险与流动儿童主观幸福感的关系:个体保护因子的补偿效应和保护效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 546-557.
[4] 刘济榕, 王泉泉. 日常压力对流动儿童诚信感的影响:社会支持与逆境信念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 548-557.
[5] 王晖, 熊昱可, 刘霞. 亲子关系和朋友支持对流动儿童情绪和行为适应的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 614-624.
[6] 王中会, 蔺秀云. 流动儿童的亲子依恋与其城市适应的关系:心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 284-293.
[7] 张岩, 杜岸政, 谭顶良, 雷婷婷, 周炎根. 歧视知觉与流动儿童社会疏离感的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 719-726.
[8] 叶枝, 柴晓运, 郭海英, 翁欢欢, 林丹华. 流动性、教育安置方式和心理弹性对流动儿童孤独感的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 595-604.
[9] 张茜洋, 冷露, 陈红君, 方晓义, 舒曾, 蔺秀云. 家庭社会经济地位对流动儿童认知能力的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 153-162.
[10] 李文桃, 刘学兰, 喻承甫, 张彩霞, 叶佩珏. 学校氛围与初中生学业成就:学业情绪的中介和未来取向的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 198-205.
[11] 王道阳, 陆祥, 殷欣. 流动儿童消极学业情绪对学习自我效能感的影响:情绪调节策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 56-64.
[12] 王中会, 蔺秀云, 黎燕斌. 流动儿童心理韧性对文化适应的影响:社会认同的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 656-665.
[13] 张光珍, 姜宁, 梁宗保, 邓慧华. 流动儿童的歧视知觉与学校适应:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 587-594.
[14] 鲍学峰, 张卫, 喻承甫, 朱键军, 鲍振宙, 江艳平, 马娜, 吴涛, 陈遵炳. 初中生感知校园氛围与网络游戏成瘾的关系:学业自我效能感的中介效应与父母学业卷入的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 358-368.
[15] 黎燕斌, 侯香凝, 蔺秀云, 王中会, 方晓义, 李俊红. 父母情绪调节困难对流动儿童对立违抗症状的影响:亲子冲突解决方式和儿童情绪调节的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 214-225.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!