初中生诚实性测验中社会赞许反应研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用马洛-克罗恩社会赞许量表(MCSD)和儿童社会期望量表(CSD),采用3×3设计,测查了高、中、低三类赞许动机水平的246名初中生在高、中、低三种不同赞许情境下完成诚实性测验的差异,以考察社会赞许性反应。结果显示低赞许动机被试比高赞许动机被试整体上更诚实,他们在三种情境下的诚实性行为差异不显著;高赞许动机水平被试在三种赞许情境下诚实性行为差异显著。说明前者更多依从自己内部判断,后者更多依从外界评价。

关键词: 初中生, 人格变量, 社会赞许反应, 赞许情境, 诚实性测验

Abstract: This study aimed to detect how would SDR work on the honesty test in different desirability conditions.It used MCSD and CSD to examine 246 junior middle school students, who were divided into high, medium, and low groups according to the level of the desirability motivation.Then, it used the direction words to set the high desirability condition, the medium, and the low, and investigated the different behaviors of the three-group subjects on an honesty test under three different conditions by using a 3×3 design of two-factor.The result showed that the lower desirability motivation subjects were always more honest than the higher ones, but the differences were not significant in all conditions.For the lower desirability motivation subjects, there were not significant differences among the three different conditions on the honesty test; but for the higher desirability motivation subjects, the differences were significant,which showed that the anterior group more liked to comply with their opinions inside, the posterior group more liked to comply with the value outside.

Key words: junior middle school students, personality variable, social desirability responding, desirability condition, honesty test

吴燕, 徐建平. 初中生诚实性测验中社会赞许反应研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 107-111.

WU Yan, XU Jian-ping. A Study on the Social Desirability Responding in the Junior Middle School Students’ Honesty Test[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(3): 107-111.

参考文献

[1] 瑟雷伯著,李伯黍,杨尔衢,孙名之等译.心理学词典.上海:上海译文出版社,1996,801.
[2] 白利刚.亲社会行为研究中的几个问题.心理学动态,1997,5(1),47-52.
[3] 汪向东,王希林,马弘等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂社,1999,383-398.
[4] Paulhus D L.Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1984,46(3),598-609.
[5] Holden R R,Starzyk K B,McLeod L D et al.Comparison among the holden psychological screening inventory (HPSI),the brief symptom inventoy (BSI),and the balanced inventory of desirable responding(BIDR).Assessment,2000,7(2),163-175.
[6] ReidSeiser H L,Ftitzsche B A.The usefulness of the NEO PI-Rpositive presentation management scale for detecting response distortion in employment contexts.Personality and Individual Differences,2001,31(4),639-650.
[7] Ones D S,Viswesvaran C,Reiss A D.Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection:the red herring.Journal of Applied Psychology,1996,81(6),660-679.
[8] Piedmont R L,McCrae R R,Riemann R et al.On the invalidity of validity scales:evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,78(3),582-593.
[9] McCrae R R,Costa PT.Social desirability scales:more substance than style.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1983,51 (6),882-888.
[10] Pauls C A,Stemmler G.Substance and bias in social deairability responding.Personality and Individual Differences,2003,35(2),263-275.
[11] Lobel T,Levanon I.Self-esteem,need for approval,and cheating behavior in children.Journal of Educational Psychology,1988,80(1),122-123.
[12] 白利刚,章志光.初中生利他取向、社会赞许性与亲社会行为关系的实验研究.心理发展与教育,1996,12(4),8-13.
[13] 郑日昌,蔡永红,周益群著.心理测量学.北京:人民教育出版社,1999,185-186.
[14] 李林仙.关于性别角色刻板观念的一些研究.心理学动态,1995,3(4),17-22.
[15] 刘萃侠.马洛-克罗恩社会赞许性量表对中国被试适用性之初步验证.社会学研究,2001,16(2),49-57.
[16] 钱铭怡,张光健,罗珊红等.大学生性别角色量表CSRI的编制.心理学报,2000,32(1):99-104.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[6]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[7]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[8]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[9]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[10]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[11]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[12]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[13]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[14]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[15]	陈英敏, 高玉洁, 邓秋月, 彭淼, 高峰强. 初中生羞怯与手机依赖的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 46-53.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed