儿童欺负行为的类型及其相关因素

心理发展与教育 ›› 2001, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 12-17.

儿童欺负行为的类型及其相关因素

张文新¹, 王益文¹, 鞠玉翠¹, 林崇德²

1. 山东师范大学心理学系, 济南, 250014;
2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 100875

出版日期:2001-01-15 发布日期:2001-01-15
作者简介:张文新,(1962- ),男,汉族,山东人,山东师范大学心理学系教授.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目,项目号:39730180

Types of Bullying Begavior and Its Correlates

张文新¹, 王益文¹, 鞠玉翠¹, 林崇德²

1. 山东师范大学心理学系, 济南, 250014;
2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 100875

Online:2001-01-15 Published:2001-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用Olweus欺负问卷中文修订版对我国6471名中小学生进行调查,探讨了中小学生欺负行为的类型特点及其相关因素,结果发现:(1)在小学和初中阶段,直接言语欺负的发生率最高,其次是直接身体欺负,间接欺负的发生率最低。(2)小学和初中男生受直接身体欺负的比例显著高于女生,直接言语欺负没有显著的性别差异。(3)小学阶段三类欺负行为的发生率存在显著的年级差异,三年级儿童受直接身体欺负的比例极显著地高于四、五年级,受直接言语欺负的比例总体上随儿童年级升高而上升,受间接欺负的比例在2-4年级之间相对稳定,5年级出现极显著的下降;在初中阶段三类欺负行为的发生率相对稳定。(4)欺负者大多与受欺负者同龄或年长于受欺负者,初中学生的欺负呈现出明显的“团体化”特点。

关键词: 欺负行为, 类型, 相关因素

Abstract: A modified Chinese version of Olweus Bully/victim Questionnaire was employed in a sample of 6,471 pupils from primary and junior middle schools in the urban and rural areas of Shandong Province of China.The results indicated:(1)Direct verbal bullying has the highest rate of occurrence among children of primary schools and junior middle schools,followed by direct physical bullying,with the ratio of children experiencing indirect bullying being the lowest.(2)Boys experienced a significant higher percentage of direct physical bullying than girls.No significant gender difference was found in the ratios of direct verbal bullying.(3)In the period of primary school,significant age differences existed in the ratios of children experiencing the three types of bullying,with children in grade three experiencing a higher ratio of direct physical bullying than those from grade four and five.On the whole,the ratio of children experiencing verbal bullying decreases with age,and the ratio of children experiencing indirect bullying dropped significantly in grade five.In the junior middle school period,the ratios of the three types of bullying remained relatively stable across the three grades.(4)Most bullies were of the same age with or older than the victims.Bullying was performed by,in most cases,more than one child in junior middle school period.

Key words: bullying behavior, types, correlates

中图分类号:

B844.1

张文新, 王益文, 鞠玉翠, 林崇德. 儿童欺负行为的类型及其相关因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(1): 12-17.

张文新, 王益文, 鞠玉翠, 林崇德. Types of Bullying Begavior and Its Correlates[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2001, 17(1): 12-17.

参考文献

[1] Parke, R.D. & Slaby, R.G.; The Development of Aggression, Handbook of Child Psychology, Fourth Edition, 1983; 547-620.
[2] Macoby, E.E. & Jacklin, C.N., Sex differences in aggression: A rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 1980;51:964-980.
[3] Lagerspetz, KMJ, Bjrkqvist, K, & Peltonen, T: Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11-to 12-year-old children. Aggressive Behavior,1988; 14: 403-414.
[4] Bj(rkqvist, KL, Lagerspetz, KMJ, & Kaukiainen, A.:Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 1992; 18:117-127.
[5] Smith, PK: The silent nightmare: bullying and victimization in school peer groups. The Psychologist, 1991 ;4:243-248.
[6] Whitney, I, & Smith, PK: A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 1993;35: 3-25.
[7] Rivers, I, & Smith, PK: Types of Bullying Behavior and Their Correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 1994;20: 359-368.
[8] 张文新,谷传华,王美萍,王益文,Jones,K.中小学生欺负问题中的性别差异的研究,心理科学,2000,4,435-439.
[9] 张文新,武建芬,Jones,K.Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订,心理发展与教育,1999,2,7-11.

相关文章 15

[1]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[2]	高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[3]	刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[4]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[5]	张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[6]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[7]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[8]	张洁, 陈亮, 张良, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. 父母心理控制与小学生的欺负行为:敌意归因和冷酷无情的作用检验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 715-724.
[9]	肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和. 受助者结果类型对亲社会表现的影响:成人与儿童的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 274-281.
[10]	张云运, 牛丽丽, 任萍, 秦幸娜. 同伴地位对青少年早期不同类型攻击行为发展的影响:性别与班级规范的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 38-48.
[11]	孟泽龙, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍亚类型研究进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 113-121.
[12]	陈羿君, 沈亦丰, 张海伦. 单亲家长性别角色类型与子女社会适应的关系——性别角色教养态度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 301-309.
[13]	邢学玮, 伍新春, 侯建芳, 刘畅, 陈玲玲. 父亲的角色态度对其教养投入的影响：母亲态度类型的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 387-395.
[14]	项紫霓, 张兴慧, 黎亚军, 王耘, 李燕芳. 3~5岁儿童母亲抚养压力类型特点及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 427-434.
[15]	康廷虎, 白学军. 任务类型和性别属性对人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 456-462.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed