同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究使用问卷法,以自我报告和同伴提名相结合的方式对青少年的同伴侵害、攻击行为、同伴接纳和抑郁进行测量,考察同伴侵害对青少年抑郁的预测作用以及班级攻击规范凸显性对上述关系的调节作用。多层线性分析的结果表明:(1)在个体水平上控制了性别因素后,同伴侵害可显著正向预测青少年抑郁水平;(2)在班级水平上控制了年级、班级人数、班级性别比后,班级攻击规范凸显性可显著调节同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系。具体表现为,在对攻击行为接纳程度(即班级攻击规范凸显性)较低的班级,同伴侵害对青少年抑郁水平的正向预测作用更强。研究结果在一定程度上扩展了“健康环境悖论”的内涵,对校园欺凌的预防与干预有一定的启示意义。

关键词: 青少年, 同伴侵害, 抑郁, 班级攻击规范凸显性, 健康环境悖论

Abstract: The goal of the present study was to explore the moderating role of classroom norm salience for aggression in the links between peer victimization and adolescents' depression. Data on peer victimization, peer acceptance and depression were obtained from peer nominations and self-reports. Results of multilevel linear analysis indicated that: (1) Peer victimization was positively associated with depression after controlling for the effect of gender; (2) Classroom norm salience for aggression could moderate the relationship between peer victimization and depression after controlling for the effects of grade, classroom size and the gender ratio in the classroom. Specifically, peer victimization was more strongly associated with depression in classrooms where aggressive behaviors were less accepted by peers. The results were in accordance with the hypothesis of “healthy context paradox” and provided some insights for the prevention and intervention of school bullying in future.

Key words: adolescents, peer victimization, depression, classroom norm salience for aggression, healthy context paradox

中图分类号:

B844

胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.

HU Yihao, XU Luyan, BIAN Xiaohua, ZHOU Ying, LIU Junsheng. Peer Victimization and Depression among Chinese Adolescents: The Moderating Effects of Classroom Norm Salience for Aggression[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.

参考文献

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2010). The psychological impact of peer victimization: Exploring social-cognitive mediators of depression. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 615-623.
Blakemore, S., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 187-207.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466-480.
Chen, X., Cen, G., Li, D., & He, Y. (2005). Socialfunctioning and adjustment in chinese children: The imprint of historical time. Child Development, 76(1), 182-195.
Chen, X., & Tse, H. C. H. (2010). Social and psychological adjustment of Chinese Canadian children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(4), 330-338.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Decreases in the proportion of bullying victims in the classroom: Effects on the adjustment of remaining victims.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 64-72.
Garandeau, C. F., Vermande, M. M., Reijntjes, A. H. A., & Aarts, E. (2019). Classroom bullying norms and peer status: Effects on victim-oriented and bully-oriented defending. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 401-410.
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world.Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549-576.
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twentyyears' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455.
Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000).Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59-81.
Hoglund, W. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2007). Managing threat: Do social-cognitive processes mediate the link between peer victimization and adjustment problems in early adolescence? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(3), 525-540.
Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). “It must be me” or “It could be them?”: The impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims' adjustment.Social Networks, 34(4), 379-386.
Ju, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Developmental trajectories and longitudinal mediation effects of self-esteem, peer attachment, child maltreatment and depression on early adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 76, 353-363.
Kokkinos, C. M., Voulgaridou, I. P., Koukoutsis, N. D., & Markos, A. (2016). Peer victimization and depression in Greek preadolescents: Personality and attachment as moderators.Personal Relationships, 23(2), 280-295.
Kovacs, M. (1992).The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Manual. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school: Differential pathways for children's school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 826-841.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88(4), 1265-1283.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Mainhard, T., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2021a). The role of aggressive peer norms in elementary school children's perceptions of classroom peer climate and school adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(8), 1582-1600.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Mainhard, T., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2021b). The role of defending norms in victims' classroom climate perceptions and psychosocial maladjustment in secondary school. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(2), 169-184.
Liu, J., Chen, X., Li, D., & French, D. (2012). Shyness-sensitivity, aggression, and adjustment in urban chinese adolescents at different historical times. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 393-399.
Llewellyn, N., & Rudolph, K. D. (2014). Individual andsex differences in the consequences of victimization: Moderation by approach and avoidance motivation. Developmental Psychology, 50(9), 2210-2220.
McDougall, P., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. The American Psychologist, 70(4), 300-310.
Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60-76.
Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., Barhight, L. J., & Thomson, A. K. (2014). Fifth-grade children's daily experiences of peer victimization and negative emotions: Moderating effects of sex and peer rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(7), 1089-1102.
Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., & Sharp, M. K. (2019). Preadolescents' daily peer victimization and perceived social competence: Moderating effects of classroom aggression.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48(5), 716-727.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012).Mplus statistical modeling software. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
Niu, L., Jin, S., Li, L., & French, D. C. (2016). Popularity andsocial preference in chinese adolescents: Associations with social and behavioral adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828-845.
Pan, B., Li, T., Ji, L., Malamut, S., Zhang, W., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Why does Classroom‐Level victimization moderate the association between victimization and depressive symptoms? The “Healthy context paradox” and two explanations. Child Development, 92(5), 1836-1854.
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling.Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85-112.
Pouwels, J. L., van Noorden, T. H. J., & Caravita, S. C. S. (2019). Defending victims of bullying in the classroom: The role of moral responsibility and social costs.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84,103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103831
Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61-76.
Saarento, S., Kärnä, A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Student-, classroom-, and school-level risk factors for victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 51(3), 421-434.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112-120.
Salmivalli, C. (2018). Peervictimization and adjustment in young adulthood: Commentary on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 67-72.
Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2015). Theeffects of school-level victimization on self-blame: Evidence for contextualized social cognitions. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 841-847.
Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Farver, J. M. (2001). Correlates ofvictimization in chinese children's peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 520-532.
Shin, H. (2017). Examining early adolescents' peer climate using descriptive and status norms on academic engagement and aggressive behavior in the classroom.Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(3), 309-320.
Terry, R., & Coie, J. D. (1991). Acomparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 867-880.
Twenge, J. M., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2002). Age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and birth cohort differences on the children's depression inventory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 578-588.
Ulman, J. B. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.),Using multivariate statistics (6th ed., pp. 681-785). Pearson Education.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying.Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483
van den Berg, Yvonne H.M, Lansu, T. A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78-95.
Wang, M., L. Degol, J., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children's academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Developmental Review, 57, 2-21.
Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Socialstatus in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social “misfit”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 523-536.
Yun, H. Y., & Juvonen, J. (2020). Navigating the healthy context paradox: Identifying classroom characteristics that improve the psychological adjustment of bullying victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2203-2213.
Zhang, W., Chen, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Research on bullying in mainland China. In P. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp. 113-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, X., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2018). Characteristics oflikability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568-1581.
曾欣然, 汪玥, 丁俊浩, 周晖. (2019). 班级欺凌规范与欺凌行为:群体害怕与同辈压力的中介作用. 心理学报, 51(08), 935-944.
侯金芹, 陈祉妍. (2016). 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素. 心理学报, 48(08), 957-968.
刘晓薇, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 张文新, Salmivalli, C. (2021). 班级环境如何影响受欺负者的适应?健康环境悖论及其发生机制. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 298-304.
刘洋, 张伟波, 葛聪聪, 张琼, 杨莉, 朱丽娜, 蔡军. (2018). 2015 年上海市初中生焦虑抑郁情绪现状调查. 中国健康教育, 34(04), 299-303.
吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, ··· 张卫. (2021). 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 249-256.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2]	李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3]	赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4]	刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[5]	王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响：自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[6]	李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[7]	向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[8]	边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[9]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[10]	鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[11]	王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[12]	郑天鹏, 周欣然, 梁丽婵, 袁柯曼, 边玉芳. 父母温暖教养的亲子感知差异与儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 869-880.
[13]	张明浩, 王俊儒, 王艳, 杨照黎, 张艳芳, 娄慧琳, 徐晓惠, 徐敏. 生命早期环境不可预测性对初中生抑郁的影响:生命史策略和资源控制策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 881-891.
[14]	陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[15]	张珊珊, 吴佳钰, 王泓懿, 刘致宏. 线上真实自我呈现与高中生抑郁的纵向联系:归属需求的中介作用和人际敏感性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 903-912.