初中生同伴圈子的发展及其对合作倾向、预期和行为的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.05.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在社会化过程中，同伴圈子不仅决定儿童青少年的交往范围和互动质量，而且影响其心理发展和社会适应。本研究从苏州市某初级中学选取768名初一学生进行了为期一年的追踪，采用社会认知地图、合作倾向评定量表和公共物品困境实验范式测查了同伴圈子、合作倾向、预期与合作行为，运用多层线性模型技术（Two-level HLM）探讨同伴圈子的合作水平对个体合作水平的影响。结果发现：（1）女生圈子数量最多而规模最小，男女混合圈子规模最大而数量最少；跨地域圈子数量最多且规模最大；（2）女生圈子最为稳定，男女混合圈子最不稳定；（3）在混合性别圈子中，个体的合作预期与行为更容易随着圈子合作预期水平的提高而增强；而在单性别圈子中，个体的合作预期与行为更容易随着圈子合作行为水平的提高而增强。结论：初中生同伴圈子在性别上具有同质性，女生圈子多且稳定；第一年单性别和混合性别圈子的合作倾向、预期和行为水平对第二年个体的合作水平产生了不同影响，即不同性别圈子对个体的影响模式存在差异。

关键词: 初中生, 同伴圈子, 合作倾向, 合作预期, 合作行为

Abstract: During socialization, the peer circle not only determines the range and quality of children's and adolescents' interactions, but also affects their psychological development and social adaptation. In this study, 768 students from a junior high school in Suzhou, China, were followed for one year. The Social Cognitive Map (SCM), the Cooperative Tendency Rating Scale, and the Experimental Paradigm of Public Goods Dilemma were used to investigate peer characteristics, cooperative tendency, expectation, and behavior. In addition, we used two-level hierarchical linear modeling to explore the influence of peer cooperation levels on the individual's cooperation levels. The results were as follows: (1) The number of female circles was highest, but their sizes were the smallest. The size of mixed-gender circles was highest, but their number was lowest. The number of cross-regional circles was highest, but their sizes were the smallest. (2) Female circles were most stable, while mixed circles were most unstable. (3) The cooperative expectation and behavior of individuals in mixed-gender circles were more likely to improve with an increase in cooperative expectation. However, the cooperation expectation of individuals in single-gender circles was more likely to increase with an improvement in cooperative behavior. Conclusion: Junior high school peers were homogenous in gender; peer circles among female were multiple and stable. The level of cooperation tendency, expectation, and behavior of single-sex and mixed-sex peers in the first year has different effects on the level of individual cooperation in the second year. There are differences in the individual impact patterns of gender circles.

Key words: junior high school student, peer circle, cooperative tendency, cooperative expectation, cooperative behavior

中图分类号:

B844

周钰, 吴琴, 韩宪国, 崔佳蕾, 翟梦真, 邹何辉, 胡松龄, 崔丽莹. 初中生同伴圈子的发展及其对合作倾向、预期和行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 555-562.

ZHOU Yu, WU Qin, HAN Xianguo, CUI Jialei, ZHAI Mengzhen, ZOU Hehui, HU Songling, CUI Liying. The Development of Peer Circle in Junior High School Students and its Influence on Cooperative Tendency, Expectation, and Behavior[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 555-562.

参考文献

Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van, V. M. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation:a meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137(6), 881-909.
Brody, G. H., Dorsey, S., Forehand, R., & Armistead, L. (2002). Unique and protective contributions of parenting and classroom processes to the adjustment of African American children living in single-parent families. Child Development, 73(1), 274-286.
Brown, B. Bradford. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. At the threshold: The Developing Adolescent, 171-196.
Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks:pathways of youth in our time. American Journal of Sociology.
Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Buchanan, L., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence:fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Dev, 66(5), 1330-1345.
Chen, X., Chang, L., He, Y., & Liu, H. (2005). The peer group as a context:moderating effects on relations between maternal parenting and social and school adjustment in Chinese children. Child Development, 76(2), 417.
Chung-Hall, J., & Chen, X. (2010). Aggressive and prosocial peer group functioning:effects on children's social, school, and psychological adjustment. Social Development, 19(4), 659-680.
Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males:an experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77(4), 967-983.
Conway, C. C., Rancourt, D., Adelman, C. B., Burk, W. J., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Depression socialization within friendship groups at the transition to adolescence:the roles of gender and group centrality as moderators of peer influence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(4), 857.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 303-319.
Eckerman, C. Q, & Didow, S. M. (1988). Lessons drawn from observing young peers together. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 77, 55-70.
Ellis, W. E., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children's deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78(4), 1240.
Enders, C. K. (2006). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In G. Hancock & R. Mueller (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling:A Second Course (pp. 313-342). Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2004). The next 50 years:considering gender as a context for understanding young children's peer relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 260-273.
Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Leung, M. C., Trott, H., Bishop, J., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Individual characteristics, early adolescent peer affiliations, and school dropout:an examination of aggressive and popular group types. Journal of School Psychology, 41(3), 217-232.
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? a group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102(3), 458-489.
Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2006). Culture, evolution and thepuzzle of human cooperation. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2-3), 220-245.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models:implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623-641.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436.
Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186-1203.
Kindermann, T. A, Mccollam, T. L., & Jr, E. G. (1996). Peer networks and students' classroom engagement during childhood and adolescence. America (May).
Leung, M. C. (1996). Social networks and self enhancement in chinese children:a comparison of self reports and peer reports of group membership. Social Development, 5(2), 146-157.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007). Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups. Handbook of Child Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., et al. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 331(2), 1.
陈斌斌, 李丹. (2008). 班级生态系统对儿童亲社会行为影响的研究述评. 心理科学进展, 16(5), 733-739.
陈斌斌, 李丹, 陈欣银, 陈峰. (2011). 作为社会和文化情境的同伴圈子对儿童社会能力发展的影响. 心理学报, 43(1), 74-91.
陈思静, 马剑虹. (2010). 合作动机与信任:基于不确定性简化机制的研究. 应用心理学, 16(3), 208-214.
方晓义. (1997). 青少年最亲密同性友伴的相似性. 心理学报, 29(3), 278-285.
侯珂, 邹泓, 刘艳, 金灿灿, 蒋索. (2014). 同伴团体对青少年问题行为的影响:一项基于社会网络分析的研究. 心理发展与教育, 30(3), 259-267.
李彩娜, 孙翠翠, 徐恩镇, 顾娇娇, 张庆垚. (2017). 初中生应对方式、压力对社会适应的影响:纵向中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 172-182.
李颖, 罗涤. (2013). 大学生合作型亲社会行为的积极情绪体验研究. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 19(4), 177-182.
李幼穗, 张丽玲, 戴斌荣. (2000). 儿童合作策略水平发展的实验研究. 心理科学, 23(4), 425-429+510.
庞维国, 程学超. (2001). 9-16岁儿童的合作倾向与合作意图的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 17(1), 31-35.
王英春, 邹泓, 张秋凌. (2006). 初中生友谊的发展特点. 心理发展与教育, 22(2), 52-56.
谢晓非, 孔瑞芬, 陈曦, 阎学煌. (2000). 儿童合作倾向与家长价值观. 心理科学, 23(6), 699-702.
徐晓惠, 李晶, 朱莉琪. (2014). 婴幼儿对合作行为共享性特征的理解. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1404-1412.
严进, 王重鸣. (2002). 两难情景下任务结构与价值取向的效用特征转换. 心理学报, 34(5), 529-533.
张丽玲. (2000). 儿童合作行为中的性别角色差异研究. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), (1), 12-16.
张元鹏. (2016). 群体活动中合作行为的性别差异研究-来自公共品自愿捐献博弈实验的证据. 经济科学, Vol.0(5), 111-124.
邹泓, 余益兵, 周晖, 刘艳. (2012). 中学生社会适应状况评估的理论模型建构与验证. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 65-72.
周宗奎, 孙晓军, 赵冬梅, 田媛, 范翠英. (2015). 同伴关系的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 62-70.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[6]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[7]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[8]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[9]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[10]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[11]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[12]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[13]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[14]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[15]	陈英敏, 高玉洁, 邓秋月, 彭淼, 高峰强. 初中生羞怯与手机依赖的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 46-53.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed