心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 595-604.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.05.10

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

手机成瘾与大学生拖延行为的关系:有调节的中介效应分析

连帅磊1,2, 刘庆奇1,2, 孙晓军1,2, 周宗奎1,2   

  1. 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079
  • 出版日期:2018-09-15 发布日期:2018-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 周宗奎,E-mail:zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目(11&ZD151);国家自然科学青年基金项目(31400887);华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CCNU14Z02004、CCNU15A02043);华中师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划项目(2017YBZZ085、2017YBZZ086)。

Mobile Phone Addiction and College Students' Procrastination: Analysis of a Moderated Mediation Model

LIAN Shuailei1,2, LIU Qingqi1,2, SUN Xiaojun1,2, ZHOU Zongkui1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent CyberPsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-10-25

摘要: 为明确手机成瘾对其拖延行为的作用机制,本研究构建了一个有调节的中介模型,重点考察了注意控制在二者关系中的中介作用以及意志控制的调节作用。以1212名大学生为被试,采用问卷法对其手机成瘾、注意控制、意志控制及拖延行为进行调查。结果显示:(1)在控制性别、年龄、年级后,手机成瘾对拖延行为具有显著的正向预测作用;(2)注意控制能够在手机成瘾与拖延行为的关系中起中介作用;(3)手机成瘾对拖延行为的直接预测作用及注意控制在二者关系中的中介作用均会受到意志控制的调节。研究结果不仅有利于从注意控制理论及自我调节失败理论的视角理解手机成瘾与拖延行为的关系,而且对引导大学生合理使用手机为其心理社会适应服务具有启示意义。

关键词: 拖延行为, 手机成瘾, 注意控制, 意志控制

Abstract: In order to give an interpretation for the relationship and complex mechanisms between mobile phone addiction and procrastination, the present study conducted a moderated mediation model to examine the effects of mobile phone addiction, attention control and effortful control on procrastination and the underlying mechanism. A total of 1212 college students participated in this study. College students' mobile phone addiction was measured by the Mobile phone addiction index questionnaire. The short form of Attention Control Scale was used to assess attention control. Effortful control was assessed with Effortful Control Scale. College students' procrastination was assessed with Procrastination Scale. All the measures have good reliability and validity. The results showed that:(1) After controlling for age, grade, the mobile phone addiction has a positive direct effect on college students' procrastination. (2) The positive association between mobile phone addiction and college students' procrastination was mediated by attention control. (3) The mediating effect of attention control was moderated by effortful control. The indirect effect was stronger for college students with lower effortful control than for those with higher effortful control.

Key words: procrastination, mobile phone addiction, attention control, effortful control

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Anderson, N. D., Lau, M. A., Segal, Z. V., & Bishop, S. R. (2007). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and attentional control. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(6), 449-463.
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating Effortful Control, Executive Function, and False Belief Understanding to Emerging Math and Literacy Ability in Kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647.
Byun, Y. H., Ha, M., Kwon, H. J., Hong, Y. C., Leem, J. H., Sakong, J., et al. (2013). Mobile Phone Use, Blood Lead Levels, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms in Children:A Longitudinal Study. Plos One, 8(3), 404.
Carriere, J. S., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body:individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian journal of experimental psychology=Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 67(1), 19-31.
Demirci, K., Akgönül, M., & Akpinar, A. (2015). Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 85-92.
Dennis, T. A., Brotman, & L. M. (2003). Effortful Control, Attention, and Aggressive Behavior in Preschoolers at Risk for Conduct Problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008(1), 252-255.
Derakshan, N.,& Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance:New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168-176.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 225.
Dong, G., Huang, J., & Du, X. (2011). Enhanced reward sensitivity and decreased loss sensitivity in Internet addicts:an fMRI study during a guessing task. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(11), 1525-1529.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6(6), 495-525.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., Calvo, & M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance:attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353.
Fernie, B. A., Mckenzie, A. M., Nikević, A. V., Caselli, G., & Spada, M. M. (2016). The Contribution of Metacognitions and Attentional Control to Decisional Procrastination. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 34(1), 1-13.
Ferrari, J. R. (2012). Procrastination and Attention:Factor Analysis of Attention Deficit, Boredomness, Intelligence, Self-Esteem, and Task Delay Frequencies. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(5), 185-196.
Gökcearslan, S., Mumcu, F. K., Haslaman, T., & Cevik, Y. D. (2016). Modelling smartphone addiction:The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 639-649.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS:A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
Isiklar, A., Sar, A. H., & Durmuscelebi, M. (2013). An Investigation of the Relationship between High-School Students' Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Their Self-Esteem Levels. Education, 134, 9-14.
Jun, S. (2016). The reciprocal longitudinal relationships between mobile phone addiction and depressive symptoms among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 179-186.
Kandemir, M. (2014). Predictors of Academic Procrastination:Coping with Stress, Internet Addiction and Academic Motivation. World Applied Sciences Journal. 32(5):930-938.
Kanske, P., Kotz, & S. A. (2012). Effortful control, depression, and anxiety correlate with the influence of emotion on executive attentional control. Biological Psychology, 91(1), 88-95.
Kim, H. (2016). What drives you to check in on Facebook? Motivations, privacy concerns, and mobile phone involvement for location-based information sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 397-406.
Kim, J. K., & Kang, Y. S. (2016). The Effects of Smart-phone Use Experience on Emotion regulation and Attention Concentration of Young Children. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 6(4), 97-109.
Kranjec, E., Koir, K., & Komidar, L. (2016). Factors of academic procrastination:The role of perfectionism, anxiety and depression. Horizons of Psychology, 25, 51-62.
Lengua, L. J., Bush, N. R., Long, A. C., Kovacs, E. A., & Trancik, A. M. (2008). Effortful control as a moderator of the relation between contextual risk factors and growth in adjustment problems. Development and Psychopathology, 20(2), 509-528.
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 343-350.
Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J. E., & Salehi-Esfahani, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships between college students' cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 210-219.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., & Theokas, C. (2006). Dynamics of individual-context relations in human development:A developmental systems perspective. In J. Thomas & D. Siegel (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology (pp. 23-43). New York, NY:John Wiley.
Leung, L. (2008). Linking psychological, attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in HongKong. Journal of Children & Media, 2(2), 93-113.
Liu, Q. Q., Zhou, Z. K., Yang, X. J., Kong, F. C., Niu, G. F., & Fan, C. Y. (2017). Mobile phone addiction and sleep quality among Chinese adolescents:A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 108-114.
Lonigan, C. J., & Vasey, M. W. (2009). Negative affectivity, effortful control, and attention to threat-relevant stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(3), 387-399.
Marshall, L. M. & S. A. (2013). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Fear of Emotions:The Role of Attentional Control. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(3), 397.
Procee, R., Kamphorst, B., van Wissen, A., & Meyer, J. C. (2013). A formal model of procrastination. The Proceedings of the 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 152-159.
Pychyl, T. A., & Flett, G. L. (2012). Procrastination and Self-Regulatory Failure:An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 30(4), 203-212.
Rabin, L. A., Fogel, J., & Nutter-Upham, K. E. (2011). Academic procrastination in college students:the role of self-reported executive function. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 344-357.
Rebetez, M. M. L., Rochat, L., Barsics, C., & Van der Linden, M. (2016). Procrastination as a self-regulation failure:The role of inhibition, negative affect, and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 435-439.
Rozental, A., Forsell, E., Svensson, A., Forsström, D., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the pure procrastination scale, the irrational procrastination scale, and the susceptibility to temptation scale in a clinical population. BMC Psychology, 2(1), 54.
Ryutaro, Y., & Masao, O. (2013). Influences of procrastination and self-efficacy on depression. Technical Bulletin of Tokushima Bunri University, 86, 41-46.
Samaha, M., & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325.
Sari, B. A., Koster, E. H., Pourtois, G., & Derakshan, N. (2016). Training working memory to improve attentional control in anxiety:A proof-of-principle study using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Biological Psychology, 121, 203-212.
Zhou, Q., Main, A., & Wang, Y. (2010). The relations of temperamental effortful control and anger/frustration to chinese children's academic achievement and social adjustment:A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 180-196.
Zhou, Q., Wang, Y., Deng, X., Eisenberg, N., Wolchik, S. A., & Tein, J. Y. (2008). Relations of parenting and temperament to Chinese children's experience of negative life events, coping efficacy, and externalizing problems. Child Development, 79(3), 493-513.
陈武, 李董平, 鲍振宙, 闫昱文, 周宗奎. (2015). 亲子依恋与青少年的问题性网络使用:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学报, 47(5), 611-623.
方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. (2012). 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量:回顾与展望. 心理发展与教育, 28(1), 105-111.
高文斌, 陈祉妍. (2006). 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 596-603.
花蓉, 武晓锐, 方芳. (2016). 手机成瘾大学生注意偏向的实验研究. 心理学探新, 36(5), 446-450.
赖雪芬, 张卫, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉, 熊庆龙. (2014). 父母心理控制与青少年抑郁的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 30(3), 293-302.
李董平, 张卫, 李丹黎, 王艳辉, 甄霜菊. (2012). 教养方式、气质对青少年攻击的影响:独特、差别与中介效应检验. 心理学报, 44(2), 211-225.
李红, 高山, 王乃弋. (2004). 执行功能研究方法评述. 心理科学进展, 12(5), 693-705.
刘丽, 白学军. (2016). 注意控制定势和线索类型在注意捕获中的作用. 心理学报, 48(9), 1093-1104.
刘勤学, 杨燕, 林悦, 余思, 周宗奎. (2017). 智能手机成瘾:概念、测量及影响因素. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(1), 82-87.
刘斯漫, 刘柯廷, 李田田, 卢莉. (2015). 大学生正念对主观幸福感的影响:情绪调节及心理弹性的中介作用. 心理科学,38(4), 889-895.
倪士光, 徐继红, 叶霖. (2012). 非理性拖延行为量表的修订及其与健康行为的关系:自我效能的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(5), 603-605.
牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 魏华. (2013). 网络成瘾的认知神经科学研究述评. 心理科学进展, 21(6), 1104-1111.
宋梅歌, 苏缇, 冯廷勇. (2015). 拖延行为的时间取向模型. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1216-1225.
唐凯晴, 范方, 龙可, 陈世键, 彭婷, 杨彦川, 叶婷婷. (2015). 大学生早期适应不良图式、焦虑与拖延的关系. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 360-367.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补?. 心理学报, 46(05), 714-726.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展,20(5), 757-769.
张潮, 翟琳, 王畅. (2017). 大学生自我控制在手机依赖和学业拖延中的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(1), 145-148.
张萌, 陈英和. (2013). 父母教养方式与拖延:完美主义的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 11(2), 245-250.
周晓林(2004), 执行控制:一个具有广阔理论前途和应用前景的研究领域. 心理科学进展, 12(5), 641-642.
中国互联网络信息中心(2017). 第40次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201708/P020170807351923262153.pdf
[1] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[2] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 黄峰, 何安明. 独特性需要与大学生手机成瘾的关系:焦虑和意志控制的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 295-304.
[3] 杨晨, 连帅磊, 陈春宇, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 同伴依恋与初中生手机成瘾的关系:有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 538-545.
[4] 蒋欣玥, 林悦, 刘勤学. 父母心理控制与青少年智能手机成瘾:心理需求网络满足和环境敏感性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 254-262.
[5] 王财玉, 雷雳, 乔雪. 愉悦追求在自我调节疲劳与大学生智能手机成瘾之间的中介作用:自然联结的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 601-608.
[6] 杨秀娟, 范翠英, 周宗奎, 刘庆奇, 连帅磊. 正念与手机成瘾倾向的关系:无聊倾向和未来时间洞察力的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 419-428.
[7] 高斌, 朱穗京, 吴晶玲. 大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系:自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 400-406.
[8] 刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦. 大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系:手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 257-265.
[9] 祁迪, 林悦, 刘勤学. “打”出来的手机成瘾?父母粗暴养育对青少年智能手机成瘾的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 677-685.
[10] 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 无聊倾向与大学生认知失败的关系:意志控制的调节与中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 430-439.
[11] 吴茜玲, 罗娇, 白纪云, 侯木兰, 李霞. 大学生安全感对手机成瘾的影响:回避现实社交的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 589-596.
[12] 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 大学生无聊倾向与认知失败的关系:手机成瘾倾向的中介作用及其在独生与非独生群体间的差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 344-351.
[13] 何安明, 夏艳雨. 手机成瘾对大学生认知失败的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 295-302.
[14] 林悦, 刘勤学, 邓寒, 李羽萱, 丁凯旋. 智能手机成瘾者的注意执行控制功能:心智游移的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 273-283.
[15] 宋梅歌, 冯廷勇. 时间洞察力对拖延行为的影响机制:时间折扣的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 683-690.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!