心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 21-27.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.01.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母的经济人信念对自身信任及儿童信任的影响

刘国芳   

  1. 中国人民解放军国防大学政治学院, 上海 200433
  • 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘国芳,E-mail:liuguofang99@126.com E-mail:liuguofang99@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CSH013)。

The Effects of Parents' Homo Economicus Belief on Themselves' Trust and Adolescents' Trust

LIU Guofang   

  1. College of Politics, National Defence University, Shanghai 200433
  • Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-01-15

摘要: 经济人信念认为人是自私的与理性的,研究者发现,经济人信念会破坏人际信任。然而,以上研究均是以大学生为被试的启动研究,限制了结论的可推广性。本研究编制了经济人信念量表,测量了351名成年被试的经济人信念及他们在投资博弈中的信任水平,以及其子女的信任水平,以考察父母的经济人信念对自身信任和其子女信任的影响。结果发现:(1)研究所编制的经济人信念量表信效度良好;(2)父母和儿童在投资博弈中均表现出了一定水平的信任;(3)父母的经济人信念能够预测其在投资博弈中的信任水平;(4)父母的经济人信念能够预测男孩在投资博弈中的投资额,主要表现为父亲的经济人信念能够负向预测男孩的投资额。

关键词: 经济人信念, 信任, 投资博弈

Abstract: Homo economicus belief is the basic humanity hypothesis of economics, which assumes that human beings are rational decision makers who have the motivation to maximize their own self-interest. Previous literature revealed that homo economicus belief would inhibit trust. Those studies first activated college students' homo economicus belief by concept activation methods and mindset activation methods. It was found that participants' trust was inhibited by the activated belief. However, those studies cannot affirm that it was the homo economicus belief was activated in their priming tasks. Moreover, the college students in their studies had little economic experiences which may impede the potential validity of the results. Therefore, the effect of homo economicus belief on trust should be confirmed further. Finally, several studies had revealed that parents' trust can transmit to their children and individuals' selfish behaviors could inhibit observers' trust. Therefore, parents' homo economicus belief may inhibit children's trust. Based on a Chinese sample of 351 parents-child pairs, this study aimed to examine whether parents' homo economicus belief could affect their own trust and their children's trust. The study first developed a scale of homo economicus belief which contains two subscales:selfish and rational, and then collected parents' homo economicus belief, and then collected parents' and children's trust levels in investment game questionnaires. Each child was asked to decide how many chocolates would they like to send to a strange child and to guess how many chocolates would the strange child return to them. Each parent was asked to decide how much money would they like to send to a stranger and to guess how much money would the stranger return to them. Both the amounts of money and chocolates that participants sending and estimating to be returned was used to measure the level of interpersonal trust. The results showed that (1) the scale of homo economicus belief had good reliability and validity. (2) Both the parents and the children exhibited trust to some extent in the investment game questionnaires. (3) There was no significant gender difference between parents' homo economicus belief, parents' trust, and children's trust. (4) Parents' homo economicus belief can negatively predict their trust levels:the investment money and the estimated returning money. (5) Gender of the child moderated the effect of parents' homo economicus belief on children's trust. Parents' homo economicus belief can predict sons' trust (i.e., the investment chocolates), whereas they did not for daughters. This study confirms the previous literature and improves the understanding of the effect of homo economicus belief on trust.

Key words: homo economicus belief, trust, investment game

Bauman, Y., & Rose, E. (2011). Selection or indoctrination:Why do economics students donate less than the rest? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 79(3), 318-327.

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142.

Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology:The new science of the mind. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.

Carter, J. R., & Irons, M. D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 171-177.

Chen, X., & Liu, G. (2017). Gender moderates the effect of homo economicus belief on trust. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(5), 873-880.

Costa Jr., P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures:Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of attitudes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(1), 8-12.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), 645-677.

Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior:The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393-398.

Gino, F., Gu, J., & Zhong, C. (2009). Contagion or restitution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1299-1302.

Marwell, G., & Ames, R. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295-310.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

Rubinstein, A. (2009). A sceptic's comment on the study of economics. The Economic Journal, 116(510), 1-9.

Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition:The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18(1), 19-23.

Xin, Z., & Liu, G. (2013). Homo economicus belief inhibits trust. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e76671.

Xin, Z., & Xin, S. (2017). Marketization process predicts trust decline in China. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 120-129.

池丽萍. (2013a). 信任:父母的代内相似和亲子的代际传递. 心理学报, 45(3), 336-344.

池丽萍. (2013b). 父母与青少年的信任水平及代际传递. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 491-499.

刘国芳, 辛自强, 林崇德. (2016). 经济人信念对信任的影响:信任主题的调节作用. 心理科学, 39(1), 166-171.

刘国芳, 辛自强, 林崇德. (2017). 人际信任中的坏苹果效应及其传递. 心理与行为研究, 15(5),691-696.

马得勇. (2008). 信任、信任的起源与信任的变迁. 开放时代, (4), 74-88.

彭凯平. (2009). 经济人的心理博弈:社会心理学对经济学的贡献与挑战. 中国人民大学学报, 23(3), 61-69.

辛涛. (2010). 回归分析与实验设计. 北京:北京师范大学出版社.

辛自强. (2014). 经济心理学的历史、现状与方法论. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 44-52.

辛自强, 窦东辉, 陈超. (2013). 学经济学降低人际信任?经济类专业学习对大学生人际信任的影响. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 31-36.

辛自强, 周正. (2012). 大学生人际信任变迁的横断历史研究. 心理科学进展, 20(3), 344-353.

周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[1] 项珵, 姜亚丽, 彭凯平, 刘啸莳. 科技侵扰与恋爱关系满意度:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 48-57.
[2] 田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[3] 刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[4] 王沛, 刘雨婷, 梁雅君, 谈晨皓. 关系认知与善意认知对大学生人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 406-413.
[5] 李庆功, 张雯雨, 孙捷元, 马凤玲. 8~12岁儿童同伴信任的发展:特质可信度和面孔可信度的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 38-44.
[6] 童钰, 王福兴, 李卉. 信息提供者的先前准确性对幼儿选择性信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 257-266.
[7] 易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.
[8] 陈丽君, 王欣, 赵陵波, 陈昕, 王益文. 面孔二态性对学前儿童信任行为的影响——来自人格标签的解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 513-522.
[9] 曹钰舒, 徐璐璐, 贺雯, 罗俊龙, 李海江. 不同人际情境影响工作记忆的初探[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 139-144.
[10] 刘勤为, 徐庆春, 刘华山, 刘勤学. 大学生网络社会支持与网络利他行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 426-434.
[11] 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞. 真实自豪对人际信任的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 435-443.
[12] 徐芬, 周晓禹, 马凤玲. 初中生的社会比较对认知与情感信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 257-264.
[13] 李庆功, 吴素芳, 傅根跃. 儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳的关系:社会行为的中介效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 303-310.
[14] 孙晓军, 赵竞, 周宗奎, 谢笑春, 童媛添. 大学生网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 129-136.
[15] 周海丽, 周晖. 4~7岁儿童基于不同可信度特质和情景的信任判断[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 570-576.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!