心理发展与教育 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 257-264.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.03.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

初中生的社会比较对认知与情感信任的影响

徐芬, 周晓禹, 马凤玲   

  1. 浙江理工大学心理系, 杭州 310018
  • 出版日期:2016-05-15 发布日期:2016-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 马凤玲,E-mail:maer.fling@163.com E-mail:maer.fling@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(31170996);浙江理工大学研究生创新基金(YCX14039)。

Social Comparison's Effects on Cognitive and Affective Trust in Middle School Students

XU Fen, ZHOU Xiaoyu, MA Fengling   

  1. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hang Zhou 310018
  • Online:2016-05-15 Published:2016-05-15

摘要: 本研究旨在探讨不同友谊状态下,初中生的社会比较对认知与情感信任的影响,及两种信任在社会比较与亲密度变化关系中的中介作用。有效被试为522名(M=12.87岁, SD=0.67),开学初让被试提名一位最亲密朋友,期中考试后让其比较与该好友的成绩排名并评价对好友的认知与情感信任水平,随后重新评价该好友的亲密度。结果表明:在亲密朋友(第二次依旧为最亲密的朋友)中,向下比较的情感信任高于向上比较,社会比较不影响认知信任;在普通朋友(第二次亲密度降低的朋友)中,向上比较的认知和情感信任均高于向下比较;社会比较只通过认知信任影响亲密度变化(完全中介),即相比于向下比较,向上比较时的认知信任水平较高,从而更有利于维持友谊的亲密性。

关键词: 初中生, 社会比较, 认知信任, 情感信任, 友谊

Abstract: The present study investigated the social comparison's effects on cognitive and affective trust of middle school students who were in different friendship states, and to further analyze the mediation effects of the cognitive and affective trust in the relationship between social comparison and intimacy change in friendship. 522 valid participants (Mage=12.87, SD=0.67) nominated one most intimate friend at the beginning of term. After midterm examination, we asked subjects to compare their own class rankings with their nominated friends' class rankings in a 7-level ladder. Then subjects rated their cognitive and affective trust to their nominated friends in a 7-point Likert scale. Finally, subjects reevaluated the intimacy of their nominated friends. The results show that:compared to upward comparison, subjects who compared downward, had higher affective trust to their close friends (the second intimacy did not change); Social comparison had no effect on cognitive trust. Compared to downward comparison, subjects who compared upward had higher affective and cognitive trust to their ordinary friends (the second intimacy decreased). The mediation analyses indicated that only cognitive trust fully mediated the relationship between social comparison and intimacy change in friendship, compared to downward comparison, upward comparison had an indirect positive effect on friendship intimacy through cognitive trust.

Key words: middle school students, social comparison, affective trust, cognitive trust, friendship

Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 708-722.

Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447-1460.

Berndt, T. J., & Keunho, K. (1995). Friends' influence of adolescents' adjustment to school. Child Development, 66(5), 1312-1329.

Brown, J. E., & Mann, L. (1990). The relationship between family structure and process variables and adolescent decision making. Journal of Adolescence, 13(1), 25-37.

Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E. G., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence:actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 397-404.

Chen, X.Y., Rubin, K. H., & Li, D. (1997). Relation between academic achievement and social adjustment:evidence from Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 518-525.

Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity:a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927.

Dishion, T. J., Véronneau, M. H., & Myers, M. W. (2010). Cascading peer dynamics underlying the progression from problem behavior to violence in early to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 603-619.

Dunn, J., Ruedy, N. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2012). It hurts both ways:how social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 2-14.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.

Fincham, F. D., Hokoda, A., & Sanders, R. J. (1989). Learned helplessness, test anxiety, and academic achievement:a longitudinal analysis. Child Development, 60(1), 138-145.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1-184.

Hill, J. P., & Palmquist, W. J. (1978). Social cognition and social relations in early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1(1), 1-36.

Kahn, J., Peter, H., & Turiel, E. (1988). Children's conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34(4), 403-419.

La Greca, A. M., & Harrison, H. M. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships:do they predict social anxiety and depression? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 49-61.

Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.

Locke, K. D., & Nekich, J. C. (2000). Agency and communion in naturalistic social comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 864-874.

Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280-295.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

Meisel, C. J., & Blumberg, C. J. (1990). The social comparison choices of elementary and secondary school students:The influence of gender, race, and friendship. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(2), 170-182.

Mercer, J. (2011). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. Choice:Current Reviews for Academic Libraries, 48(7), 1386-1386.

Molleman, E., Nauta, A., & Buunk, B. P. (2007). Social comparison-based thoughts in groups:their associations with interpersonal trust and learning outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1163-1180.

Moran, S., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). When better is worse:envy and the use of deception. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1(1), 3-29.

Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment:mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472-489.

Rotenberg, K. J., Boulton, M. J., & Fox, C. L. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among children's trust beliefs, psychological maladjustment and social relationships:are very high as well as very low trusting children at risk? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(5), 595-610.

Rotenberg, K. J., Addis, N., Betts, L. R., Corrigan, A., Fox, C., Hobson, Z., et al. (2010). The relation between trust beliefs and loneliness during early childhood, middle childhood, and adulthood. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1086-1100.

Suls, J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication (pre-1986), 27(1), 164-168.

Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison:why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159-163.

Summers, J. J., Schallert, D. L., & Ritter, P. M. (2003). The role of social comparison in students' perceptions of ability:An enriched view of academic motivation in middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 510-523.

Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental psychology, 46(4), 773-790.

Visconti, K. J., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Clifford, C. A. (2013). Children's attributions for peer victimization:A social comparison approach. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 277-287.

Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245-271.

Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time:the development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16-33.

Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231-248.

蔡洋洋, 龙文祥. (2012). 初中生的社会比较研究. 卷宗, (9), 26-27.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5] 冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[6] 苏志强, 马郑豫. 童年期友谊质量与孤独感的纵向发展关系:应对方式的共变作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 31-39.
[7] 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[8] 姚琳, 刘福会, 李伟强, 张晓琪, 袁博. 能力社会比较与归因反馈对不诚实行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 778-785.
[9] 肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式:心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[10] 严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[11] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[12] 周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[13] 任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[14] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[15] 赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!