心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 555-562.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.05.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学生学校适应的发展特点及其与父母教养方式关系的研究

卢富荣1, 王侠2, 李杜芳3, 王耘4   

  1. 1. 山西大学教育科学学院, 太原 030006;
    2. 北京市海淀区教育科学研究所, 北京 100088;
    3. 北京师范大学实验小学, 北京 100875;
    4. 北京师 范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 王耘, E-mail: wangyun@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:wangyun@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    山西大学人文社会科学科研基金(010651901006).

The Characteristics of Children's Early School Adjustment and Relationship with Parenting Styles

LU Furong1, WANG Xia2, LI Dufang3, WANG Yun4   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006;
    2. Beijing Haidian Institute for Educational Resecrch, Beijing 100088;
    3. Experiment Primary School of Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    4. National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-09-15

PDF (PC)

被引次数

23

摘要： 通过对178名小学生两年的追踪研究,考察小学生学校适应的发展特点,并进一步探讨父母教养方式对学校适应及其发展变化的影响。采用多层线性模型(HLM)方法的分析结果发现:(1)一年级小学生第一学期末(T2)的同伴关系、学校态度和学业行为表现都较好,随着入学时间延长,同伴关系和学业行为呈上升趋势,而学校态度呈下降趋势;(2)父亲学历正向预测T2时的同伴关系和学校态度;家庭收入负向预测T2时的学校态度;权威教养方式正向预测T2时的学业行为;专制教养方式负向预测T2时的同伴关系和学业行为;(3)母亲学历显著正向预测同伴关系随时间变化的速度;权威教养方式显著正向预测同伴关系和学校态度随时间变化的速度。

关键词: 小学生, 父母教养方式, 学校适应

Abstract: The present longitudinal study examined the developmental characteristics of children's school adjustment and the effect of parenting style on children's school adjustment. One hundred and seventy-eight children and their parents, recruited from Beijing city in China，participated in the four-wave survey. Hierarchical Linear Modeling analyses revealed: (1)The three aspects of peer relationship, school attitude and academic behavior showed good in the first semester in elementary school. However, peer relationships and academic behaviors got better as times went by, but not in school attitude. (2) In the first semester in elementary school, Father's education was a positive prediction to peer relationships and academic behaviors. Family income was a negative prediction to school attitude. Authoritative parenting styles were positive predictions to academic behaviors, however, authoritarian parenting styles were negative predictions to peer relationship and academic behaviors. (3) Mother's education positively predicted the developmental trends of peer relationships. Authoritative parenting was positively associated with developmental trends of peer relationships and school attitude.

Key words: Children, School adjustment, Parenting styles

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patters of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4,1-103.

Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., Van Der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004). Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child development, 75(5), 1523-1537.

Bronstein, P., Ginsburg, & G. S., Herrera, I. S. (2005). Parental predictors of motivational orientation in early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 559-575.

Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child development, 1244-1257.

Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Destinct relation systems that contribute uniquely to children's school adjustment?. Child development, 68(6), 1181-1197.

Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child development, 62(5), 1049-1065.

Mattanah, J. F. Authoritative parenting and the encouragement of children's autonomy. In Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., Ablow, J., Johnson, V., & Measelle, J. (Eds.). (2005). The family context of parenting in children's adaptation to school. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McKinney, C., Milone, M. C., & Renk, K. (2011). Parenting and late adolescent emotional adjustment: Mediating effects of discipline and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 42(4), 463-481.

Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1978). Classroom social climate and student absences and grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 263.

NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Fathers' and mothers' parenting behavior and beliefs as predictors of children's social adjustment in the transition to school. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 628-638.

Robinson, C. C., Mandleco, B., Olsen, S. F., & Hart, C. H. (1995). Authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting practices: Development of a new measure. Psychological Reports, 77(3), 819-830.

Robins, L. N., & Price, R. K. (1991). Adult disorders predicted by childhood conduct problems: results from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area project. Psychiatry, 54(2), 116-132.

Sangeeta, M. (1999). Social and academic school adjustment during early elementary school. Purdue University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62-06(B), 2975.

Tan, T. X. (2009). School-age adopted Chinese girls' behavioral adjustment, academic performance, and social skills: Longitudinal results. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(2), 244.

盖笑松,张向葵.(2005).多层线性模型在纵向研究中的运用.心理科学,28(2),429-431.

李彦章.(2001).父母教养方式影响因素的研究.健康心理学杂志,9(2),106-108.

刘红云,孟庆茂.(2002).教育和心理研究中的多层线性模型.心理科学进展,10(2),213-219.

刘文婧,许志星,邹泓. (2012).父母教养方式对青少年社会适应的影响:人格类型的调节作用.心理发展与教育,6,625-633.

刘万伦.(2004).中小学学生学校适应性的发展特点调查.中国心理卫生杂志,18(2),113-114.

宋爱芬,张向葵,高丽.(2007).青少年学校适应的调查研究.宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 29(4),17-21.

汪清华,张通昌,孙晓明.(2007).社会环境与青少年学校适应的关系研究.社会心理科学, 22,308-312.

谢蓓芳,方永年, 林永清, 陈勇华, 金蓉, 胡慧芳, 王芳.(2004).小学生的适应行为与父母教养方式的相关分析.中国心理卫生杂志,18(8),567-568.

谢军.(1994).3-9岁儿童自我控制能力的发展.心理发展与教育,4,30-33.

张文娟,邹泓,梁钰苓. (2012).青少年父母支持的特点及其对社会适应的影响:情绪智力的中介作用.心理发展与教育,2,160-166.

张文新.(1997).城乡青少年父母教育方式的比较研究.心理发展与教育,13,44-49.

邹泓.(1997).同伴接纳、友谊与学校适应的研究.心理发展与教育,3,55-59.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[3] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[4] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[5] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[6] 高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[7] 李继娜, 王玮玮, 张维军, 屈智勇. 累积创伤对儿童复杂性创伤后应激障碍的影响：经验回避与消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 683-691.
[8] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康：情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[9] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[10] 李婷, 张又文, 李玥漪, 黄峥. 坚毅力的代际传递:父母教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 207-215.
[11] 沈怡佳, 张国华, 何健康, 罗丽兰, 韩锦涛, 江波. 父母学习陪伴与小学生学业不良的关系:亲子学业沟通的中介作用和学习负担的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 826-833.
[12] 李文福, 贾旭卿, 李功迎, 张庆林. 父母教养方式与大学生手机依赖:自我控制和感觉寻求的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 660-667.
[13] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[14] 赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[15] 罗世兰, 张大均, 刘云艳. 家庭社会经济地位对幼儿良好行为习惯的影响:父母教养方式与幼儿心理素质的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 26-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发