初中和高中生英语语义通达机制的比较

心理发展与教育 ›› 2003, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 14-18.

初中和高中生英语语义通达机制的比较

郭桃梅, 彭聃龄

北京师范大学心理学院, 北京, 100875

出版日期:2003-04-15 发布日期:2003-04-15
通讯作者: 彭聃龄(1935- )男,北京师范大学心理学院教授.pdl3507@bnu.edu.cn. E-mail:pdl3507@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
攀登计划(95-专-09);文科研究基地项目(39730180)

A Comparative Study on the Accessing Mechanism of the Junior and Senior High School Students’ English Semantic Representation

GUO Tao-mei, PENG Dan-ling

School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Online:2003-04-15 Published:2003-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用跨语言启动条件下的真假字判断任务(启动刺激为英文,目标刺激为中文),采用两个实验,通过变化启动刺激与目标刺激的关系考察了初、高中生英语的词汇表征是如何通达其概念表征的.研究结果表明,对于两组被试来说,他们的英语都只能借助其汉语对译词的词汇表征通达其语义概念表征,实验结果在一定程度上支持了Kroll的层次模型.

关键词: 词汇表征, 语义表征, 通达机制, 中学生

Abstract: In order to explore how the lexical representation of the junior and senior high school students'second language accesses its conceptual representation,the cross-language primed lexical decision task was used in two experiments.60 subjects for each grade were recruited.In the first experiment,the Chinese target words were primed by their English translations.Significant priming effects were obtained.In the second experiment,the relation between the Chinese targets and the English primes was semantic association.No significant effect was found.In addition,no difference was found between the two types of subjects.The results suggested that the lexical representation of their English could only access the conceptual representation via the corresponding lexical representation of its the first language.Our result supported the hierachical model by Kioll (1994).

Key words: lexical representation, conceptual representation, access, middle-school students

郭桃梅, 彭聃龄. 初中和高中生英语语义通达机制的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 18(2): 14-18.

GUO Tao-mei, PENG Dan-ling. A Comparative Study on the Accessing Mechanism of the Junior and Senior High School Students’ English Semantic Representation[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2003, 18(2): 14-18.

参考文献

[1] Potter M C, So K F, von Eckhardt B, et al. Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1984, 23, 23-38.
[2] Kroll J F, Stewart E. Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asyrmnetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 1994, 33,149-174.
[3] De Groot, Nas. Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 1991,30, 90-123.
[4] Keatley C W, Spinks J A, De Gelder J A. Asymmetrical crosslanguage priming effects. Memory and Cognition, 1994, 22, 70-84.
[5] Fox E. Cross-language priming from ignored words: Evidence for a common representational system in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 1996, 35, 353-370.
[6] Frenck-Mestre, Prince. Second language autonomy. Journal of Memory and Language: Learning, Memory and Language, 1997, 37, 481-501.
[7] Gollan T H, Forster K I, Frost R. Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with coguates and noncognates in HebrewEnglish bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1997, 23(5), 1122-1139.
[8] Collins A M, Loftus E P. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 407-428.

相关文章 15

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[4]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[5]	程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[6]	程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[7]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[8]	彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
[9]	李大林, 黄梅, 陈维, 吴文峰. 生活事件对初中生抑郁的影响:自尊和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 352-359.
[10]	陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[11]	程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[12]	王琦, 俞国良. 刻板印象威胁对学习困难中学生成就动机的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 425-432.
[13]	张一波, 张卫, 朱键军, 喻承甫, 陈圆圆, 卢镇辉. 社区暴力暴露与初中生外化问题行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 228-239.
[14]	罗云, 陈爱红, 王振宏. 父母教养方式与中学生学业倦怠的关系:自我概念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 65-72.
[15]	李仁莉, 戴艳, 林崇德, 伍新春. 中学生创伤后成长、创伤后应激障碍的发展趋势:心理复原力的预测效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 728-737.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed