心理发展与教育 ›› 2005, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 91-95.

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

中学生受欺负状况与心理控制感的关系

朱皕1,2, 雷雳2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
    2. 首都师范大学心理系, 北京, 100089
  • 出版日期:2005-01-15 发布日期:2005-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 雷雳(1968-)男,首都师范大学心理学系教授.E-mail:dr.leili@china.com E-mail:dr.leili@china.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育科学"十五"规划课题、北京市重点学科(发展与教育心理学);北京市重点实验室(学习与认知)的资助.

The Relationship Between Perceptions of Control and Victimization of Adolescents

ZHU Bi1,2, LEI Li2   

  1. 1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089
  • Online:2005-01-15 Published:2005-01-15

摘要: 该研究采用自陈问卷方法,考察了108名中学生的心理控制感与受欺负状况的关系。结果:在生活外控、社交内控、受身体欺负上,男高于女。高中生受身体欺负比初中生少,而未知控制更多。受社会性欺负与外部控制有正相关。受言语欺负与社交外控、生活外控、外部控制有正相关;与社交内控、躯体内控有负相关。受财产欺负与外部控制有正相关。外部控制对受社会性欺负、言语欺负和财产欺负有预测作用;躯体内控对受言语欺负有预测作用。

关键词: 受欺负, 心理控制感, 中学生

Abstract: This study explores perceptions of control in victims of school bullying,by surveying 108 adolescents with questionnaires.The result shows there are significant gender differences on external control in life,internal control of sociality,and victimization of physical bullying.With the age,physical victimization is decreasing,but unknown control is increasing.Social victimization is positively correlated with all factors of external control.Verbal victimization is positively correlated with factors of unknown control of sociality,external control of sociality,in life; and negatively correlated with factors of internal control of sociality and physicality.Victimization of property bullying is positively correlated with average external control.External control is a predictor of victimization of social,verbal,and property bullying; internal control of body is that of verbal victimization.

Key words: victimization, perception of control, adolescent

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
[1] Heinemann P.Gruppvald bland barn och vuxna.Stockholm:Natur och Kultur.1972.
[2] Olweus D.Hackkycklingar och oversittare.Forskning om skol mobbning[ M].Stockholm:Almisphere Press,1973.
[3] Smith P K,Shu S.What good schools can do about bullying:Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action.Childhood,2000,7,193-212.
[4] Simon C H,James M E.Perceptions of control in the victims of school bullying:the importance of early intervention.Educational Research,2002,44 (3),323-336.
[5] Olweus D.Peer Harassment:A Critical Analysis and Some Important Issues.In J.Juvonen & S.Graham (Eds.),Peer Harassment in School:The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized.New York:The Guilford Press.2001.
[6] Juvonen J,Graham S.Peer harassment in school:the plight of vulnerable and victimized.New York:Guilford.2001.
[7] 赵莉,雷雳.关于校内欺负行为中受欺负者研究的评述.心理科学进展,2003,11(6),668-674.
[8] 雷雳,张雷.初中生受欺负状况的某些预测变量.心理学探新,2002,22(4),38-43.
[9] 张文新,王益文,鞠玉翠等.儿童欺负行为的类型及其相关因素.心理发展与教育,2001,1,12-17.
[10] 王登峰.心理控制源的认知一知识系统模型.心理学报,1996,28(1),70-75.
[11] Eleni A.Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children.British Journal of Educational Psychology,2004,74,297-309.
[12] Chicago Associated Press.Obese kids more likely to be bullied.From the World Wide Web:http://www.pediatrics.org.May 03,2004.
[13] Rotter J B,Phares E J.Applications of a social learning theory of personality,New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winston.1972.
[14] 张泱,郑胜圣,郑全全等.MMCPC在中学生中的应用.应用心理学,1999,5(2),38-42.
[15] Gregory L P,Mario J S.The utility of locus of control for assessing juvenile amenability to treatment.Aggression and Violent Behavior,2004,9,523-534.
[16] Mynard H,Joseph S.Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale.Aggressive Behavior,2000,26,19-178.
[17] 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.1999.
[18] Connell J P.A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control.Child Development,1985,56,108-1041.
[19] 谷传华,张文新.小学儿童欺负与人格倾向的关系.心理学报,2003,35(1),101-105.
[20] Stevens V,De Bourdeaudhuij,Van Oost.Relationship of the Family Environment to Children's Involvement in Bully/Victim Problems at School.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,2002,31,6,419-428.
[21] Rodkin P,Hodges E.Bullies and victims in the peer ecology.School Psychology Review,2003,32,3.
[22] Eric M V,Bridget K G.Resistance to Violence Prevention Interventions in Schools:Barriers and Sclu tions.Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies,2003,5,2,125-138.
[1] 陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2] 苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3] 汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[4] 王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响:特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[5] 王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[6] 程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[7] 任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[8] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[9] 刘晓薇, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 张文新, Christina Salmivalli. 班级环境如何影响受欺负者的适应?健康环境悖论及其发生机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 298-304.
[10] 程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[11] 薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[12] 彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
[13] 汪倩倩, 范翠英, 褚晓伟. 青少年网络受欺负与网络欺负的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 216-227.
[14] 李大林, 黄梅, 陈维, 吴文峰. 生活事件对初中生抑郁的影响:自尊和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 352-359.
[15] 陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!