心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 49-56.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

云南省中小学生师生关系发展特点及对学校适应的预测

杨阿丽1,2, 方晓义1, 李辉3, 蔺秀云1, 刘倩倩3   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所 北京100875;
    2. 沈阳体育学院 沈阳110032;
    3. 云南师范大学教育科学学院 昆明650092
  • 出版日期:2007-04-15 发布日期:2007-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 方晓义,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授.E-mail:fangxy@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    云南省教育部资助课题“云南省学生心理健康维护的系统方案研究”,项目批号为2004JYHZ01

The Development Trend of Teacher-students Relationship and Its Effect on School Adaptation in Yunnan Province Students of Middle-school and Elementary-school

YANG A-li1,2, FANG Xiao-yi1, LI Hui3, LIN Xiu-yun1, LIU Qian-qian3   

  1. 1. Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Shenyang Physical Education Institute, Shenyang 110032;
    3. Department of Education and Management, Yunnan Normal Uriversity, Kunming 650092
  • Online:2007-04-15 Published:2007-04-15

摘要: 考察云南省中、小学生师生关系的发展趋势、类型特点和师生关系对中小学生学校适应的作用.采用分层随机取样的方式选取云南省中小学生9055名,调查了他们的师生关系和学校适应.结果发现:(1)云南省中小学生与教师的依恋和亲密性随年级升高呈下降趋势,冲突和回避性随年级升高呈先上升后下降趋势,初中生得分最高.不同年级段学生和性别之间存在显著差异;(2)云南省中小学生与教师的关系存在三种类型:矛盾型、疏远型和亲密型.在矛盾型分布上,随年级升高呈先上升后下降趋势,初中生矛盾型最多.在疏远型上,随年级升高呈上升趋势,高中生疏远型最多.在亲密型上,随年级升高呈下降趋势,小学生亲密型最多.在三种类型上,小学和初中年级段学生存在显著性别差异;(3)冲突性和亲密性是中小学生学校适应的重要预测变量,回避性对中学生有显著预测作用.(4)具有亲密型师生关系的学生学校适应能力显著好于矛盾型和疏远型.结论:应加强对学生亲密型师生关系的培养,更加重视对中学生师生关系的干预.

关键词: 师生关系, 发展特点, 学校适应, 中小学生

Abstract: Objective:In order to explore the teacher-student relationship's development changing trend and type's characteristic in the middle-school students and elementary-school pupils in Yunnan Province;and analysis the effect of teacher-student relationship on students' School Adaptation. Method:Selected the participants according to different layer randomly, then 9055 middle-school students and elementary-school pupils were selected. Every student finished the Teacher-Student Relationship Measure and Adaptation Scale. Result:The analysis showed that(1) The relationship of attachment and friendliness between teacher and student were dropping with grade increasing, and The relationship of conflict and avoidance showed a increasing-droping trend among them, junior high school students were most in conflict and avoidance. Furthermore there was significant different among different grade and gender student;(2) There were three teacher-student relationship types which are contrary type, distant type and close type, and contrary type showed a ascending-droping trend followed grade increasing among them, junior high school students were most in contrary type, distant type were rising with grade increasing, senior high school students were most in this type. The close type were dropping followed grade increasing, elementary-school pupils were most in this type. Also, there was significant different in gender in three types;(3) The relationship of conflict and friendliness significantly predict students'school adaptation, however avoidance significantly predict middle-school students'school adaptation.(4) The students that were belong the close type had better school adaptation than contrary type and distant type. Conclusion:We should enhance education for students' close type in teacher-student relationship, and especially pay more attention to middle-chool students' teacher-student relationship.

Key words: teacher-student relationship, developmental characteristic, school adaptation, students of middle-school and elementary-school

中图分类号: 

  • G444
[1] Hamre B K,Pianta R C.Early teacher-child relationship and the trajectory of children's school outcome through eighth grade.Child Development,2001,72,625-628.
[2] 张磊.中学生师生关系的特点及其与学校适应的关系研究.北师大硕士论文,2003.
[3] Birch S H,Ladd G W.The teacher child relatiohsip and children's early school adjustment.Journal of School Psychology,1997,35:61-79.
[4] Robert C,Pianta Megan W Stuhlma.Teacher-child relationships and children'd success in the first years of school.School Psychology Review,2004,33(3):444-458.
[5] 张晓,陈会昌.儿童早期师生关系的研究概述.心理发展与教育,2006,12(2):120-124.
[6] Rebecca P.Ang.Development and validation of the teacher-student relationship inventory using exploratory and confirmatory.The Journal of Experimental Education,2005,74(1):55-73.
[7] Lisbrth Henricsson and ANN-Margret Rydell.Elementary school children with behavior problems:teacher-child relations and serf-perception.Aprospective study.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,2004,50(2):11-138.
[8] Carol A.Lundberg and Laurie A.Schreiner.Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning:an analysis by student rece/ethnicity.Journal of College Student Development,2004,45(5):549-565.
[9] 王耘,王晓华,张红川.3~6年级小学生师生关系:结构、类型及其发展.心理发展与教育,2001,17(3):16-21.
[10] 林崇德,王耘,姚计海.师生关系与小学生自我概念的关系研究.心理发展与教育,2001,17(40:17-22.
[11] Pianta RC,Steinberg M.Teacher child relationships and the process fo adjusfing toschool.New Directions for Child Development,1992,57:61-80.
[12] Pianta RC.Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarten teachers.Journal of School Psychology,1994,32:15-31.
[13] Heather A.Davis.Exploring the contexts of relationship quality between middle school student and teacher.The Elementary School Jouranl,2006,106(3):193-223.
[14] 李彩娜,邹泓,杨晓莉.青少年的人格、师生关系与心理健康的关系研究.临床心理学杂志.2005,13(4):440-451.
[15] 刘万伦.初中与小学生师生关系的发展特点及其与学校适应性的研究.北京师范大学硕士论文,2000.
[16] 邹泓.同伴接纳、友谊与学校适应的研究.心理发展与教育,1997,17(3):55-59.
[17] 邹泓.青少年同伴关系的发展特点、功能及其影响因素的研究.北京师范大学博士论文,1998.
[18] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.教育科学出版社.2000.
[19] Kenneth W,Merrell Ph D.School Social Behavior Scales Test Manual version 2.1 revised.2000,10.
[20] Merrell K W.Assessing social skills and peer relations.In H.B.Vance(Ed),Psychological assessment of children:Best practices for school and clinical settings(2nd ed.:pp.246-276).New York:John Wiley & Sons,1997.
[21] 郭志刚.社会统计分析方法.中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[22] 黄熠,雷雳.初中生心理学.浙江教育出版社,1993.
[1] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[2] 李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度:师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[3] 辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[4] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[5] 余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[6] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[7] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[8] 楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[9] 罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[10] 吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[11] 张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. 亲子、同伴、师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 458-466.
[12] 曹睿昕, 陈会昌, 陈欣银, 梁宗保. 儿童资源获取行为对学校适应的影响——一个历时5年的跨文化追踪[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 641-648.
[13] 张光珍, 王娟娟, 梁宗保, 邓慧华. 初中生心理弹性与学校适应的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 11-20.
[14] 王玥, 赵丽娟, 许志星. 课业负担对学校生活满意度的影响:学校氛围的多水平调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 205-213.
[15] 师保国, 王黎静, 徐丽, 刘霞. 师生关系对小学生创造性的作用:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!