责任心的多元内涵与结构及其理论整合

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 责任心研究, 在心理学不同领域有类似的对象、相近的内涵, 但又有不同的概念界定、研究方法和测量工具, 研究结果迥异。文章首先回顾了已有研究对责任心内涵和结构的探索, 试图从整体上把握责任心研究在各领域成果间的关联;其次, 对人格领域、道德领域和认知领域中与责任心相关的的理论进行了分析;最后, 基于对责任三角模型优势和局限的分析, 并结合先前理论的启示, 尝试提出了一个更具综合性的责任心三侧面理论模型, 并探讨了该模型在理论上可能具有的特征。

关键词: 责任心, 责任感, 尽责性, 结构, 模型

Abstract: Studies on responsibility or conscientiousness have similar objects, close connotations and different conceptualizations.The uniqeness of each of their study methods and measurements has brough us various results.This article firstly reviewed the explorations on the connotation and structure of responsibility and conscientiousness so as to catch the connection among the research fields of responsibility and conscientiousness.Secondly, we analysed the theories from different fields such as moral study and cognitive proach relevant to responsibility and conscientiousness.And finally we made a further step on a more comprehensive model named three-facet model of responsibility.The potential characteristics of the model were also discussed.

Key words: responsibility, sense of duty, conscientiousness, structure, model

中图分类号:

B848

李明, 叶浩生. 责任心的多元内涵与结构及其理论整合[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 123-128.

LI Ming, YE Hao-sheng. The Multiple Connotation and Structure of Responsibility and the Relevant Theoretical Integration[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 123-128.

参考文献

[1] 卓琴.员工工作责任心问卷[D].南京师范大学, 2006.
[2] 金芳.3～6岁幼儿责任心培养的实验研究[D].辽宁师范学, 2004.
[3] 李雪.中学生社会责任心结构及其发展特点研究[D].西南师范大学, 2004.
[4] 谭小宏.中学生责任心问卷的编制[D].西南师范大学, 004.
[5] 郑小方.高中生学习责任心的研究[D].南京师范大学, 005.
[6] 程岭红.青少年学生责任心问卷的初步编制[D].西南师范大学, 2002.
[7] Lind G.The Meaning and Measurement of Moral Judgment ompetence:A Dual-Aspect Model.In:Fasko D, Willis W.Contemporary hilosophical and Psychological Perspectives on Moral Development and Education.Cresskill.NJ:Hampton Press, in press, 185-220.
[8] Winter D G.The Role of Motivation, Responsibility, and Integrative Complexity in Crisis Escalation:Comparative Studies of War and Peace Crises.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(5): 920-937.
[9] Winter D G.A Motivational Model of Leadership:Predicting Long-Term Management Success from TAT Measures of Power Motivation And Responsibility.Leadership Quarterly, 2:67-80.
[10] Britt T W.Engaging the self in the field:Testing the triangle model of responsibility.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25 (6):696-706.
[11] Schlenker B R, Britt T W, Pennington J, Murphy R, Doherty K. The triangle model of responsibility.Psychological Review, 1994, 101(4): 632-652.
[12] Sheldon K M, Schachtman T R.Obligations, Internalization, and Excuse Making Integrating the Triangle Model and Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality, 2007, 75(2):359-382.
[13] Nevala J D, Gray N J, McGaban J R, Minchew T.Gender differences in the effect of visual sexual stimulation on the perceived covariation between freedom and responsibility.The Journal of Psychology, 2006, 140(2):133-153.
[14] Wohl M J A, Pritchard E T, Kelly B.How responsible are people for their employment situation?An application of the triangle model of responsibility.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science Revue canadienne des Sciences du comportement, 2002, 34(3):201-209.
[15] Christopher A N, Schlenker B R.The Protestant work ethic and attributions of responsibility:Applications of the triangle model.Journal of Applied Social Psychology.2005, 35(7):1502-1518.
[16] Barron G, Yechiam E.Private E-mail Requests and the Diffusion of Responsibility.Computers in Human Behavior, 2002, 18:507-520.
[17] Stone L A.Social Desirability Correlates of Social Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965, 2(5):756-757.
[18] Cougle J R, Lee H J.Are responsibility beliefs inflated in non-checking OCD patients Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2007, 21(1):153-159.
[19] Poornima G.Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Facets of Conscientiousness.North American Journal of Psychology, 2004, 6 (2):309-326.
[20] Gareth E, Martha C W.Conscientiousness facets and health behaviors:A latent variable modeling approach.Personality and Individual Differences, 2007, 43(5):1235-1245.
[21] Ashton M C, Lee K.The Lexical Approach to the Study of Personality Structure:Toward the Identification of Cross-Culturally Replicable Dimensions of Personality Variation.Journal of Personality Disorders.2005, 19(3):303-308.
[22] Caspi A, Roberts B W, Shiner R L.Personality Development Stability and Change.Annual Review of Psychology, 2005, 564:53-84.
[23] Digman, J.M.Personality structure:Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology, 1990, 41:417-440.
[24] McCrae R R, Costa P T, Jr.:A Five-Factor Theory of personality.In:L.A.Pervin;O.P.John(Eds.):Handbook of personality psychology.New York:Guilford, 1999:139-153.
[25] Poornima M.Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Facets of Conscientiousness.North American Journal of Psychology.2004, 6 (2):309-326.
[26] Roberts B W, Wood D, Smith J L.Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development.Journal of Research in Personality.2005, 39:166-184.
[27] Roberts B W, Bogg T, Walton K, Chernyshenko O S, Stark S.A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of Conscientiousness.Journal of Research in Personality, 2004, 38:164-178.
[28] Roberts B W, Chernyshenko O S, Stark S, Goldberg L R.The Structure of Conscientiousness:An Empirical Investigation Based on Seven Major Personality Questionnaires.Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58(1):103-139.
[29] Roberts B W, Walton K, Viechtbauer W.Personality changes in adulthood:Reply to Costa&McCrae(2006).Psychological Bulletin, 2006, 132:29-32.
[30] Saucier G, Ostendorf F.Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors:A cross-language replication.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76:613-627.
[31] 张建新.中国人人格结构探索——人格特质六因素假说. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(4):574-585.
[32] 王登峰, 崔红.中国人的人格特点与中国人人格量表 (QZPS与QZPS2SF)的常模.心理学探新, 2004, 24(4):43-51.
[33] Hurtz G M, Donovan J J.Personality and job performance:the big five Revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology.2000, 85:869-879.
[34] Barrick M R, Mount M K, Strauss J P.Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives:Test of the mediating effects of goal setting.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78:715-722.
[35] Frink D D, Ferris G R.The moderating effects of accountability on the conscientiousness-performance relationship.Journal of Business and. Psychology, 1999, 13:515-524.
[36] Moon H.The two faces of Conscientiousness:Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86:535-540.
[37] Hough L M, Ones D S.The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial work, and organizational psychology.In Anderson N, Ones D S, Sinangil H K, Viswesvaran C (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology.Sage, 2001, 1:233-277.
[38] 孙继红.山东省高中生责任心现状、特点及教育对策探究
[D].曲阜师范大学, 2006.
[39] 朱智贤.心理学大词典.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 1989:930.
[40] 陈会昌.7～16岁儿童责任观念的发展.发展心理教育心理论文选.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 1985:255-273.
[41] 姜勇, 鹿丽娟.幼儿责任心维度构成的探索性与验证性因子分析.心理科学, 2000(4):417-421.
[42] 燕国材.论责任心及其培养.中小学教育, 1997, 3:3-7.
[43] 张积家.试论责任心的心理结构.教育研究与实验.1998, 4:43-47.
[44] 王燕.当代大学生责任观调查报告.青年研究, 2003, 1:18-23.
[45] Hofstee W KB, de Raad B, Goldberg L R.Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 63:146-163.
[46] 尤瑾, 郭永玉.“大五”与五因素模型:两种不同的人格结构.心理科学进展, 2007, 15(1):122-128.
[47] Epstein S.Cognitive-expericntial self2theory of personality.In T Millon M J.Lemer(Eds.).Handbook of psychology:Personality and social psychology.New York:Wiley, 2003, 5:159-184.
[48] Ford L R, Scandura T A.Garbage-in, garbage2out:Item generation as a threat to construct validity.Presentation at the annual meeting of the Southern Management Association, Charleston, SC, 2005.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘欢, 李于凡. 大学新生学习适应、社交适应、情绪适应间的动态联系：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 270-278.
[2]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[4]	余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[5]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[6]	金花, 梁紫平, 单金磊, 张羽萍, 朱子良. 老年人整体运动知觉衰退的视觉机制——基于知觉模板模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 761-768.
[7]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[8]	张锋, 尹华站, 靳凯歌, 臧鑫磊, 朱芷毅, 赵俊峰. 聋生1秒以下与以上的视时距知觉研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 457-465.
[9]	张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[10]	魏华, 何灿, 刘元, 周宗奎, 李倩. 青少年留守经历对网络成瘾的影响:病理性互联网使用的认知行为模型视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 399-406.
[11]	马小凤, 文美琪, 史凯, 杜青青, 姚贝, 穆缘, 霍小宁. 记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.
[12]	张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[13]	杨海波, 董良, 周婉茹. 人工语法学习中习得知识的分离:基于信号检测论和结构知识的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 10-16.
[14]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[15]	陈慧, 何婷, 唐远琼, 唐怡欣, 陆风勇, 蔺秀云. 共情与青少年内外化问题的关系及影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 439-446.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed