运用均数与协方差结构模型侦查项目功能差异

心理发展与教育 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 119-122.

运用均数与协方差结构模型侦查项目功能差异

赵必华^1,2, 顾海根^1,2

1. 安徽师范大学教育科学学院, 安徽芜湖241000;
2. 上海师范大学教育学院, 上海200234

出版日期:2009-07-15 发布日期:2009-07-15
通讯作者: 赵必华, 安徽师范大学教育科学学院教授.E-mail:zhaobihua@yahoo.com.cn E-mail:zhaobihua@yahoo.com.cn

Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using the Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis Model

ZHAO Bi-hua^1,2, GU Hai-gen^1,2

1. College of education Science, Anhuinormal University, Wuhu 241000;
2. Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234

Online:2009-07-15 Published:2009-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 阐释了运用多组均数与协方差结构(MACS)模型侦查多级反应项目的一致性与非一致性项目功能差异(DIF)的原理与程序, 以道德自我概念量表DIF的侦查进行示例, 并对该方法进行了评价。与项目反应理论比照, MACS采用系统的、迭代的方式利用修正指数来侦查DIF, 并提供多个拟合指数协同评价模型拟合;与标准验证性因素分析相较, MACS不仅能侦查非一致性DIF, 而且能侦查一致性DIF。运用MACS侦查DIF是一种值得推荐的方法。

关键词: 均数与协方差结构模型, 项目功能差异, 非一致性DIF, 一致性DIF

Abstract: The article clarifies the principle and procedure of detection of uniform and non-uniform differential item functioning(DIF)on polytomous ordered response item using multiple-group mean and covariance structure analysis (MACS)model, gives a demonstration that how the procedure is applied to moral self-concept scale for detection of DIF, and evaluates the method.Compared with item response theory, MACS concerns the systematic and iterative use of modification indices to detect DIF and gives multiple fit indices to assess model fit jointly.And compared with the standard confirmatory factor analysis, MACS allows the detection of not only non-uniform DIF but also uniform DIF.It is recommendable to detect DIF using MACS.

Key words: mean and covariance structure analysis model, differential item functioning, non-uniform DIF, uniform DIF

中图分类号:

G449

赵必华, 顾海根. 运用均数与协方差结构模型侦查项目功能差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 119-122.

ZHAO Bi-hua, GU Hai-gen. Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using the Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 119-122.

参考文献

[1] Drasgow F.Scrutinizing psychological tests:Measurement equivalence and equivalence relations with external variables are central issue.Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95:134-135.
[2] Drasgow F.Study of the measurement bias of two standrardized psychological tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72:19-29.
[3] Mellenbergh GJ.Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1982, 7:105-118.
[4] Mellenbergh G J.Generalized linear item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 115:300-307.
[5] Angoff W H.Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology.In.Holla P W, Wainer H(Eds.), Differential item functioning.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.1993.3-23
[6] Camilli G, Shepard L A.Methods for identifying bias test items. Newbury Park, CA:sage.1994.
[7] Lord F M.Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.1980.
[8] Reise S, Widaman K, Pugh R.Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory:Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114:552-566.
[9] Sorbom D.Structural equation models with structured means.In Joreskog K G, Wold H.(Eds), Systems under indirect observation. Amsterdam:North Holland, 1982.183-195
[10] Ferrando P.Calibration of invariant item parameters in a continous item response model using the extended Lisrel measurement submodel. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1996, 31:419-439.
[11] Vandenberg R J, Lance C E.A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organization research.Organization Research Methods, 2000, 3:4-70.
[12] Oort F J.Simulation Study of item bias detection with restricted factor analysis.Structural Equation Modeling, 1998, 5:107-124.
[13] Marsh H W, Balla J R, McDonald R P.Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1988, 1:130-149.
[14] Kim S H, Cohen A S, Park T H.Detection of differential item functioning in multiple groups.Journal of Education Measurement, 1995, 32:261-276.
[15] Thissen D.MULTILOG:Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software, Inc.1991.
[16] Muraki E, Bock R D.PARSCALE:IRT item analysis and test scoring for rating-scale data.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software, Inc.1997.
[17] 骆方, 张厚粲.检验项目功能差异的两类方法——CFA和 IRT的比较, 心理学探新, 2006, 26(1):74-78.
[18] Chan D.Detection of Differential Item functioning on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory Using Multiple-Group Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2000, 35(2):169-199.

相关文章 15

[1]	张平平, 李凌艳, 辛涛. 学校氛围对学生数学成绩影响的跨文化比较:基于多水平分析的结果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 625-632.
[2]	陈平, 李珍, 辛涛, 高慧健. 标准参照测验决策一致性指标研究的总结与展望[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 210-215.
[3]	王钢, 张大均, 江琦. 大学生人际适应性量表的初步研制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 650-657.
[4]	王彦峰, 秦金亮. 幼儿教师工作投入问卷的编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 534-542.
[5]	彭文波, 邱晓婷, 刘电芝, 王平. 偶像崇拜量表的修订及其理论模型的验证[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 543-548.
[6]	姚计海, 申继亮. 教师教学自主性问卷的编制与修订[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 302-307.
[7]	黄时华, 李冬玲, 张卫, 李董平, 钟海荣, 黄诚恳. 大学生无聊倾向问卷的初步编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 308-314.
[8]	韩明, 董学安, 范丹, 何先友. 高校教师心理契约问卷的编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 315-321.
[9]	庞维国. 教学实验中的处理忠实度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 322-328.
[10]	俞国良, 金东贤, 郑建君. 教师心理健康评价量表的编制及现状研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 295-301.
[11]	姚计海, 申继亮. 教师教学自主性问卷的编制与修订[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 302-307.
[12]	黄时华, 李冬玲, 张卫, 李董平, 钟海荣, 黄诚恳. 大学生无聊倾向问卷的初步编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 308-314.
[13]	韩明, 董学安, 范丹, 何先友. 高校教师心理契约问卷的编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 315-321.
[14]	庞维国. 教学实验中的处理忠实度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 322-328.
[15]	俞国良, 金东贤, 郑建君. 教师心理健康评价量表的编制及现状研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 295-301.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed