心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 468-478.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.04.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

学龄中期儿童团体创造力的发展特点及其与个体创造力的关系

张环1,2,3, 谢忠珖4, 王亚丽2, 秦锡权2, 刘拓1,2,3   

  1. 1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300387;
    2. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
    3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室, 天津 300387;
    4. 北京师范大学心理学部, 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2024-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘拓 E-mail:mikebonita@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目“心理测验中不同类型异常反应模式的识别与结果校正”(31800945)。

The Development of Group Creativity and Its Relationship with Individual Creativity in Middle-aged Children

ZHANG Huan1,2,3, XIE Zhongguang4, WANG Yali2, QIN Xiquan2, LIU Tuo1,2,3   

  1. 1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students' Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387;
    4. Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2024-08-27

摘要: 团体创造力在人才创新和社会创新中发挥着重要的作用。然而以往研究对于团体创造力的发展特点及其与个体创造力之间的关系仍不明确。由此,本文研究一采用横断研究法,以8~10岁的学龄中期儿童作为被试,考察团体创造力的发展特点及其与个体创造力的关系,结果显示,学龄中期儿童的团体创造力与个体创造力之间呈显著的正相关关系,且9岁是儿童团体创造力发展的一个关键时期;研究二采用实验法,以9岁儿童作为被试,通过创造力思维训练的方法,进一步探讨团体创造力与个体创造力之间关系的方向性问题,结果发现创造力思维训练对9岁儿童的团体创造力总分和各维度分的促进作用较弱。以上结果为初步了解学龄中期儿童团体创造力的发展特点及其与个体创造力之间的关系提供了证据,在学龄中期儿童群体中检验了个体创造力向团体创造力转化的透镜模型理论。

关键词: 学龄中期儿童, 团体创造力, 个体创造力, 创造力思维训练

Abstract: Group creativity plays an important role in talent innovation and social innovation. However, the relationship between individual creativity and group creativity is still inexplicit. Childhood is a critical period for creativity development, and children often need to use their creativity to work with others to solve problems. The current study aims to explore the development characteristics of children's group creativity and the relationship between children's individual creativity and group creativity. Two experiments were conducted with 8~10-year-old children in the critical period of creativity development. Results of experiment 1 showed that in the process of creativity development of 8~10-year-old children, the age of 9 is a critical period for the development of group creativity, and the overall development trend of group creativity was consistent with that of individual creativity, especially in the dimension of novelty. Furthermore, results of experiment 2 found that creative thinking training significantly improved the level of group creativity of 9-year-old children. These results provide an empirical basis for understanding the development of group creativity and its relationship with individual creativity in middle-aged children, and further support the lens model theory of transformation from individual creativity to group creativity in middle-aged children.

Key words: middle-aged children, group creativity, individual creativity, overinclusive thinking training

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Abraham, A.,Windmann, S., Daum, I., & Güntürkün, O. (2005). Conceptual expansion and creative imagery as a function of psychoticism. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(3), 520-534.
Alacapinar, F. G. (2013). Grade level and creativity. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (50), 247-266.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity:A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M.Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Andreasen, N. J. C., & Powers, P. S. (1974). Overinclusive thinking in mania and schizophrenia.The British Journal of Psychiatry, 125(588), 452-456.
Ansburg, P. I., & Dominowski, R. L. (2000). Promoting insightful problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(1), 30-60.
Besançon, M. (2006). Development of creativity: The influence of school environment and cognitive factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universite Paris V—Rene Descartes Institut de Psychologie, Paris, France.
Chen, C. X., Williamson, M. G., & Zhou, F. H. (2012). Reward system design and group creativity: An experimental investigation.The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1885-1911.
Chiu, F-C. (2015). Improving your creative potential without awareness: Overinclusive thinking training.Thinking Skills & Creativity, 15, 1-12.
Coursey, L. E., Gertner, R. T., Williams, B. C., Kenworthy, J. B., Paulus, P. B., & Doboli, S. (2019). Linking the divergent and convergent processes of collaborative creativity: The impact of expertise levels and elaboration processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 699. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00699
Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2008). Training insightful problem solving: Effects of realistic and puzzle-like contexts.Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 291-296.
Dagenbach, D. E., & Carr, T. H. (1994). Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language. Academic Press.
Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286-307.
Gilhooly, K. J.,Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), 611-625.
Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Lee, D. R., & Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity.Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 827-851.
Gong, X., Zhang, X., & Tsang, M. C. (2020). Creativity development in preschoolers: The effects of children's museum visits and other education environment factors.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100932
Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V. G., Dmitrieva, Y. A., Korobova, S. Y., & Glukhova, V. A. (2020). Children's creativity and personal adaptation resources. Behavioral Sciences, 10(2), 49.https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10020049
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity.American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
Hoever, I. J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982-996.
Hoever, I. J., Zhou, J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2017). Different strokes for different teams: The contingent effects of positive and negative feedback on the creativity of informationally homogeneous and diverse teams. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2159-2181.
Hu, W., Adey, P., Jia, X., Liu, J., Zhang, L., Li, J., & Dong, X. (2011). Effects of a “learn to think” interventionprogramme on primary school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 531-557.
Kim, Y. J., & Kim, J. (2020). Does negative feedback benefit (or harm) recipient creativity? Therole of the direction of feedback flow. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 584-612.
Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 175-184.
Lu, K., Teng, J., & Hao, N. (2020). Gender of partner affects the interaction pattern during group creative idea generation. Experimental Brain Research, 238(5), 1157-1168.
Lu, K.,Xue, H., Nozawa, T., & Hao, N. (2019). Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex, 29(8), 3457-3470.
MacGregor, J., Cunningham, J., & Walinga, J. (2019). An experimental comparison of approaches to training insight. Creativity Theories Research Applications, 6(2), 155-181.
Mullineaux, P. Y., & Dilalla, L. F. (2009). Preschool pretend play behaviors and early adolescent creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 41-57.
Ostafin B. D., & Kassman, K. T. (2012). Stepping out of history: Mindfulness improves insight problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 1031-1036.
Oztop, P., & Gummerum, M. (2020). Group creativity in children and adolescents. Cognitive Development, 56(1), 100923.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100923
Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235-257.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity.Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Saracho, O. N. (1992) The relationship between preschool children’s cognitive style and play and implications for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 35-47.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2008). The emergence of team creative cognition: The role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 23-41.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator.Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709-1721.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999).The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
Wang, L., Long, H.,Plucker, J. A., Wang, Q., Xu, X., & Pang, W. (2018) High schizotypal individuals are more creative? The mediation roles of overinclusive thinking and cognitive inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01766
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity.Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
Xie, H.,Karipidis, I. I., Howell, A., Schreier M, Sheau, K. E., Manchanda M. K., … Saggar M. (2020). Finding the neural correlates of collaboration using a three-person fMRI hyperscanning paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(37), 23066-23072.
Xue, H., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2018). Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair. NeuroImage, 172, 527-537.
Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2015). Effects of cultural power distance on group creativity and individual group member creativity.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 990-1007.
Yuan, Y., & Knippenberg, D. V. (2020).From member creativity to team creativity? Team information elaboration as moderator of the additive and disjunctive models. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0243289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243289
边桂珍. (2019). 8~11岁儿童创造力及创造性自我概念的发展研究(硕士学位论文). 西北师范大学, 兰州.
曹芮. (2020). 学龄中期儿童在团队创造力任务中的表现及其影响因素(硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
陈英和, 刘玉新. (1996). 小学生形成合取概念的策略训练及其迁移效果. 心理学报, 28(4), 367-374.
胡卫平, 韩琴. (2006). 国外青少年创造力培养的理论与实践. 外国中小学教育, (3), 40-43.
胡卫平, 刘佳. (2015). 小学生思维能力的培养:五年追踪研究. 心理与行为研究, 13(5), 648-654.
贾小娟. (2017). 儿童创造力的认知神经机制及其可塑性(博士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.
林崇德. (1981). 小学儿童数概念与运算能力发展的研究. 心理学报, 13(3), 43-52.
林崇德. (2009). 创新人才与教育创新研究. 北京: 经济科学出版社.
刘彤冉, 施建农. (2007). 9-11岁儿童的工作记忆和智力、创造力之间关系的研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 15(02), 164-167.
卢克龙. (2020). 团体创造活动的脑-脑间神经互动机制(博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
李值霖. (2007). 创造力与认知抑制、工作记忆的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
潘仲君. (2010). 情绪对个体创造性思维的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 苏州大学.
孙鹏, 邹泓, 杜瑶琳. (2014). 青少年创造性思维的特点及其对创造性行为的影响: 人格的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(4), 355-362.
沃建中, 王烨晖, 刘彩梅, 林崇德. (2009). 青少年创造力的发展研究. 心理科学, 32(3), 535-539.
姚海娟, 白学军. (2014). 创造性思维与认知抑制的关系. 心理科学, 37(2), 62-67.
张厚粲, 王晓平. (1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, 23(2), 113-120.
张景焕, 刘欣, 任菲菲, 孙祥薇, 于颀. (2016). 团队多样性与组织支持对团队创造力的影响. 心理学报, 48(12), 1551-1560.
周耀烈, 杨腾蛟. (2007). 个体创造力向团队创造力转化的机理研究. 科学学研究, 25(Supp.2), 409-413.
朱智贤, 陈帼眉, 吴凤岚. (1964). 儿童左右概念发展的实验研究. 心理学报,(3), 229-236.
[1] 王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2] 于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3] 邬钟灵, 陈亮. 父亲、母亲教养行为对幼儿社会适应的影响:同胞关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 478-489.
[4] 毕爽, 朱华琳, 周晖. 每日父母教养焦虑与儿童亲社会行为的动态关系:正念教养的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 490-501.
[5] 李书琴, 向燕辉. 初中生宽恕的发展趋势与异质轨迹:大五人格的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 502-511.
[6] 唐凤华, 翟予童, 李家瑶, 王芳. 是在“卷”我吗?大学生学业零和信念影响对他人努力的解读及其后果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 512-524.
[7] 杨明, 辛素飞, 辛自强. 社会支持弱化与倾向避免失败:中国大学生成就动机的代际演变[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 525-535.
[8] 陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[9] 刘媛, 曹文锦, 王美芳, 权思翔. 父母体罚和青少年攻击行为的双向动态关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 577-585.
[10] 吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[11] 舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[12] 金星, 刘景弘, 马跃, 于战宇. 聋童和正常儿童身体表情注意瞬脱的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 305-312.
[13] 钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 语言范畴影响面部表情知觉的电生理学证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
[14] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[15] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!