工作记忆负荷对词汇理解和产生认知老化的不同影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.04.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 人类语言能力的衰退受到一般认知能力和语言加工系统两方面的影响,且语言理解和语言产生的衰退存在不同的模式。已有研究主要考虑了语言特异性因素的影响,本研究考察一般认知能力中的工作记忆负荷对词汇理解和词汇产生过程认知老化的影响机制。采用双任务范式,要求被试同时完成数字串回忆和词汇理解(或词汇产生)任务。在排除其他一般认知能力的影响后发现,老年人在词汇理解和产生任务的反应时长于青年人,表现出语言加工过程的认知老化。而且词汇理解的认知老化效应大于词汇产生,表现出认知老化的不对称性。研究表明工作记忆负荷和语言加工任务类型共同影响了语言的认知老化效应。

关键词: 认知老化, 双任务范式, 工作记忆负荷, 词汇理解, 词汇产生

Abstract: The decline of human language ability is probably affected by language-universal factors and language-specific factors, and the aging of language comprehension and production presents distinct patterns. However, most studies investigated the contribution of language-specific factors in aging of language processing. The current study aims to investigate how working memory load, as one of general cognitive abilities, affects the aging of lexical comprehension and production. In a dual-task paradigm, young and older adults were required to complete a lexical decision (or a lexical production) task as well as a number string recall task. Excluding the influence of other general cognitive abilities such as processing speed, our results showed that older adults presented longer latencies than young adults in lexical decision and lexical production tasks, indicating an age-related decline in language processing. Critically, the aging effect in lexical decision was larger than lexical production, indicating an asymmetrical pattern in word comprehension and production tasks. Our findings reveal that working memory load (as a language-universal factor) and specific language task (as a language-specific factor) affect aging of word processing together.

Key words: cognitive aging, dual-task paradigm, working memory load, word comprehension, word production

中图分类号:

B844

徐宁宁, 张敏慧, 吴翰林, 张清芳. 工作记忆负荷对词汇理解和产生认知老化的不同影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 457-467.

XU Ningning, ZHANG Minhui, WU Hanlin, ZHANG Qingfang. Distinct Effects of Working Memory Load in Aging of Word Comprehension and Production[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(4): 457-467.

参考文献

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies.Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278.
Bates, D.,Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
Ben-David, B. M.,Erel, H., Goy, H., & Schneider, B. A. (2015). “Older is always better”: Age-related differences in vocabulary scores across 16 years. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 856-862.
Bettcher, B. M., Libon, D. J., Kaplan, E., Swenson, R., & Penney, D. L. (2011). Digit Symbol Substitution Test. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 849-853). New York: Springer.
Bishop, N., Lu, T., & Yankner, B. (2010). Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature, 464(7288), 529-535.
Boudiaf, N., Laboissière, R., Cousin, É., Fournet, N., Krainik, A., & Baciu, M. (2018). Behavioral evidence for a differential modulation of semantic processing and lexical production by aging: A full linear mixed-effects modeling approach. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(1), 1-22.
Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389-411.
Britt, A. E., Ferrara, C., & Mirman, D. (2016). Distinct effects of lexical and semantic competition during picture naming in younger adults, older adults, and people with aphasia.Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 813.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00813
Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G.,Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 542-579.
Caplan, D. N., Dede, G., Waters, G., Michaud, J., & Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 439-450.
Clapp, W. C., & Gazzaley, A. (2012). Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging.Neurobiology of Aging, 33(1), 134-148.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral Brain Science, 24(1), 87-114.
De Beni, R.,Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2007). Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(2), 189-212.
DeDe, G., & Flax, J. K. (2016). Language comprehension in aging. In H. H. Wright (Ed.), Cognition, language and aging (pp.107-133). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Diaz, M. T., Johnson, M., Burke, D., & Madden, D. (2014). Age-related differences in the neural bases of phonological and semantic processes.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(12), 2798-2811.
Diaz, M. T.,Rizio, A. A., & Zhuang, J. (2016). The neural language systems that support healthy aging: Integrating function, structure, and behavior. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(7), 314-334.
Elgamal, S. A., Roy, E. A., & Sharratt, M. T. (2011). Age and verbal fluency: The mediating effect of speed of processing. Canadian Geriatrics Journal: CGJ, 14(3), 66-72.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1276-1285.
Greenwood, P. M. (2007). Functional plasticity in cognitive aging: Review and hypothesis.Neuropsychology, 21(6), 657-673.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ivanova, I., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019). The role of working memory for syntactic formulation in language production.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(10), 1791-1814.
James, L. E.,& Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1378-1391.
Joy, S., Fein, D., & Kaplan, E. (2003). Decoding digit symbol: Speed, memory, and visual scanning.Assessment, 10(1), 56-65.
Joy, S., Kaplan, E., & Fein, D. (2004). Speed and memory in the WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding subtest across the adult lifespan.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(6), 759-767.
Karlamangla, A. S., Miller-Martinez, D., Aneshensel, C. S., Seeman, T. E., Wight, R. G., & Chodosh, J. (2009). Trajectories of cognitive function in late life in the United States: Demographic and socioeconomic predictors. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(3), 331-342.
Kavé, G., & Mashal, N. (2012). Age-related differences in word-retrieval but not in meaning generation. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(4), 515-529.
Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults.Applied Psycholinguistics, 7(3), 277-287.
Krigolson, O. E., Hassall, C. D., Satel, J., & Klein, R. M. (2015). The impact of cognitive load on reward evaluation. Brain Research, 1627, 225-232.
Krigolson, O. E., Heinekey, H., Kent, C. M., & Handy, T. C. (2012). Cognitive load impacts error evaluation within medial-frontal cortex. Brain Research, 1430, 62-67.
Kurthen, I., Meyer, M., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2020). Individual differences in peripheral hearing and cognition reveal sentence processing differences in healthy older adults. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 573513.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513
LeFever, F. F. (1985). A noncoding motoric equivalent measures most of what the digit symbol does, including age changes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61(2), 371-377.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-38.
Light, L. L. (1990). Interactions between memory and language in old age. In J. E.Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 275-290). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Liu, Y. Y., Hao, M. L., Li, P., & Shu, H. (2011). Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese.PLoS ONE , 6(1), Article e16505.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016505
Mathuranath, P. S., George, A., Cherian, P. J., Alexander, A. L., Sarma, S. G., & Sarma, P. S. (2003). Effects of age, education and gender on verbal fluency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(8), 1057-1064.
McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A.,Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24(2), 222-243.
McDowd, J., Hoffman, L., Rozek, E., Lyons, K. E., Pahwa, R., Burns, J., & Kemper, S. (2011). Understanding verbal fluency in healthy aging, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology, 25(2), 210-225.
Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 435-459.
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., … Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699.
Ouyang, M., Cai, X., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Aging effects on phonological and semantic priming in the tip-of-the-tongue: Evidence from a two-step approach.Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 338.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00338
Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding.Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 173-196.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 593-608.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329-347.
Poulisse, C., Wheeldon, L., & Segaert, K. (2019). Evidence against preserved syntactic comprehension in healthy aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(12), 2290-2308.
Rayner, K.,Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448-465.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Sylvester, C.-Y. C. (2005). Thecognitive neuroscience of working memory and aging. In R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, & D. Park (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral aging (pp. 186-217). Oxford University Press.
Salthouse, T. A. (1992). What do adult age differences in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test reflect?Journal of Gerontology, 47(3), 121-128.
Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(5), 754-760.
Schaie, K. W. (1996). Intellectual development in adulthood: The seattle longitudinal study. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 266-286). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shafto, M. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation.Science, 346(6209), 583-587.
Sung, J. E. (2015). Age-related changes in sentence production abilities and their relation to working-memory capacity: Evidence from a verb-final language. PLoS ONE, 10(4), Article e0119424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119424
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 43-54.
Valente, A., & Laganaro, M. (2015). Ageing effects on word production processes: An ERP topographic analysis. Language Cognition & Neuroscience, 30(10), 1259-1272.
Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 332-339.
Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-3: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Administration and Scoring Manual.Psychological Corporation.
White, E. J., & Grant, D. M. (2017). Electrocortical consequences of image processing: The influence of working memory load and worry.Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 261, 1-8.
Wingfield, A., & Grossman, M. (2006). Language and the aging brain: Patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging.Journal of Neurophysiology, 96(6), 2830-2839.
陈宝国, 彭聃龄. (2001). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(I). 心理学报, 33(1), 1-6.
陈宝国, 王立新, 彭聃龄. (2003). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(II). 心理学报, 35(5), 576-581.
何洁莹, 张清芳. (2017). 老年人书写产生中词汇频率和音节频率效应的时间进程: ERP研究. 心理学报, 49(12), 1483-1493.
何文广. (2017). 语言认知老化机制及其神经基础. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1479-1491.
欧阳明昆, 蔡笑, 张清芳. (2019). 认知还是元认知:口语产生中舌尖效应的心理机制. 心理科学进展, 27(12), 2052-2063.
彭华茂, 申继亮,王大华. (2004). 工作记忆容量和加工速度在归纳推理能力老化中的作用. 心理科学, 27(3), 536-539.
吴翰林, 于宙, 王雪娇, 张清芳. (2020). 语言能力的老化机制:语言特异性与非特异性因素的共同作用. 心理学报, 52(5), 541-561.
杨群, 张清芳. (2015). 口语词汇产生中词频效应、音节频率效应和语音促进效应的认知年老化. 心理科学, 38(6), 1303-1310.
杨群, 张清芳. (2019). 汉语图画命名过程的年老化机制:非选择性抑制能力的影响. 心理学报, 51(10), 1079-1090.
张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2003). 影响图画命名时间的因素. 心理学报, 35(4), 447-454.
赵瑞瑛, 娄昊, 欧阳明昆, 张清芳. (2019). 自然情境下舌尖效应的认知年老化 ——日记研究. 心理学报, 51(5), 598-611.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王娟, 刘天碧, 范小月. 象似性手势和指示性手势对自闭症儿童动作相关词汇学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 367-374.
[2]	孙赛男, 何文广. 语音加工的发展、老化及其神经机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 894-901.
[3]	吴瑕, 钟希苹, 姜云鹏. 不同搜索情境下老化对自上而下注意加工的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 26-34.
[4]	宋晓蕾, 李小芳, 赵媛, 何丹. 不同任务难度条件下认知老化对冲突适应能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 569-576.
[5]	濮冰燕, 彭华茂. 认知老化对于老年人决策过程的影响:动机的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 114-120.
[6]	代曼, 刘儒德, 邸妙词, 马雪莹, 徐乐. 工作记忆负荷和自动化提取对小学生加法心算策略执行效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 420-426.
[7]	高悦, 彭华茂, 文静, 王大华. 教育水平在认知老化中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 591-598.
[8]	苏周简开. 香港学前儿童粤语词汇理解能力的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(2): 11-14.