心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 641-647.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.06.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

小学儿童分享的发展及反馈信息的促进效应

郝嘉佳1,2, 陈英和2   

  1. 1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300074;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2015-11-15 发布日期:2015-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈英和,E-mail:chenyinghe@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:chenyinghe@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国哲学社会科学基金项目重大项目(14ZDB160);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(12JJD190001);北京市社会科学规划重点项目(12JYA003);天津市社会科学"十二五"规划青年项目(TJJX12-038);天津市教育科学"十二五"规划课题(CEYP6014).

The Developmental Character of Primary School Children's Sharing and the Effects of Positive Feedbacks

HAO Jiajia1,2, CHEN Yinghe2   

  1. 1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Center Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 30074;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2015-11-15 Published:2015-11-15

PDF (PC)

摘要： 研究以独裁者博弈任务为载体,考查了小学儿童分享行为的发展趋势,并探讨了不同来源的正向反馈信息对于儿童分享行为的促进效应。研究随机选取了小学二、四、六年级的学生共386名,每个年级的三个实验组在自然分享条件后分别接受来自权威、同伴和自我的正向反馈信息,继而完成后续任务。结果表明:(1)在自然分享情况下,六年级儿童的分享数量显著多于二、四年级儿童的分享数量;随着年级升高,儿童从倾向于利己分享逐渐转为以平分为主;(2)来自同伴和权威的正向反馈可以提高二、四年级儿童的分享数量;自我评价的正向反馈明显提高四、六年级儿童的分享数量。结论:小学儿童的分享数量和进行平分的人数比例都随年级升高而增加,来自同伴、权威和自我的正向反馈分别适用于特定年龄阶段儿童的分享行为促进。

关键词: 小学儿童, 分享行为, 正向反馈, 反馈来源

Abstract: Sharing is one of the typical prosocial behaviors. This study explored the development of children's sharing during primary school and the effects of positive feedbacks from oneself, partner and authority. Double-anonymous dictator games were conducted to 386 students from 2-6 grades that randomly assigned as 3 experimental groups and control group. The experimental groups received positive feedback from self, partner or authority after the first session separately. The results showed:(a) most of children were willing to share with their partners in classic dictator game, and they shared more coins as growing up; the mainly sharing type changed from self-interested sharing to equal sharing.(b) feedbacks from partner and authority increased follow sharing of children in grade 2 and grade 4; however the feedback of self-evaluation increased follow sharing of children in grade 4 and grade 6. These results suggested that children's sharing increased during primary school, the positive feedbacks from different information sources had promoting effects on children's sharing varying with the age stage.

Key words: primary school children, sharing, positive feedback, information sources

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bosacki, S. L.(2015). Children's theory of mind, self-perceptions, and peer relations:A longitudinal study. Infant and Child Development.24(2), 175-188.
Caputi, M., Lecce, S., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R.(2012). Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations:The role of prosocial behavior.Developmental Psychology,48(1), 257-270.
Christoph Engel.(2011). Dictator games:A meta study, Experimental Economics,14(4),583-610.
Colman, A.(2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,26(2), 139-153.
Dunsmore, J. C.(2015). Effects of Person-and Process-focused Feedback on Prosocial Behavior in Middle Childhood.Social Development.24(1), 57-75.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L.(2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology(Vol. Social, emotional, and personality development. Hopoken:wiley, 646-718.
Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., & Keller, M.(2008). When child development meets economic game theory:An interdisciplinary approach to investigating social development. Human Development,51(4), 235-261.
Harbaugh, W., & Krause, K.(2000).Children's altruism in public good and dictator experiments. Economic Inquiry,38(1), 95-109.
Hoorn, J., Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A.(2014). Peer Influence on Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence. In press. doi:10.1111/jora. 12173
Kauten, R., & Barry, C. T.(2014). Do you think I'm as kind as I do? The relation of adolescent narcissism with self-and peer-perceptions of prosocial and aggressive behavior. Personality and individual differences,61, 69-73.
Kupersmidt, J. B., Stelter, R., & Dodge, K. A.(2011). Development and validation of the social information processing application:a Web-based measure of social information processing patterns in elementary school-age boys. Psychological assessment,23(4), 834-847.
Leman, P., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Gummerum, M.(2009). Children's and adolescents decisions about sharing money with others. Social Development,18(3), 711-727.
Lemerise, E., Gregory, D., & Fredstrom, B.(2005).The influence of provocateurs' emotion displays on the social information processing of children varying in social adjustment and age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,90(4), 344-366.
Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., Chaparro, M. P., & Buchmann, M.(2012). Early sympathy and social acceptance predict the development of sharing in children. PloS one,7(12), 293-297.
Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Ongley, S., Chaparro, M., Nola, M., & Bae, N. Y.(2015). "Who is worthy of my generosity?" Recipient characteristics and the development of children's sharing.International Journal of Behavioral Development, in press, doi:0165025414567007.
Nelson, D., & Crick, N.(1999). Rose-colored glasses:Examining the social information-processing of prosocial young adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence,19(1), 17-38.
Ongley, S. F., & Malti, T.(2014). The role of moral emotions in the development of children's sharing behavior. Developmental psychology,50(4), 1148-1159
Takezawa, M., Gummerum, M., & Keller, M.(2006). A stage for the rational tail of the emotional dog:Roles of moral reasoning in group decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology,27(1),117-139.
Van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A.(2014). Peer Influence on Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, in press, doi:10.1111/jora.12173
寇彧, 马艳.(2004).儿童社会适应的社会信息加工模型及其特殊应用,心理与行为研究,2(1), 388-393.
于静, 朱莉琪.(2010).儿童公平行为的发展——来自博弈实验的证据,心理科学进展,18(7),1182-1188.
朱莉琪, 皇甫刚, M. Keller, 牟毅, 陈单枝.(2008).从博弈游戏看儿童经济决策行为的发展,心理学报,40(4), 402-408.
[1] 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[2] 张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5～6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[3] 薛笑然, 黄碧娟, 李红霞, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童数学态度与数学成就的纵向联系：学业拖延和数学元认知的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 520-529.
[4] 王振宏, 彭源, 赵一萌. 父母婚姻质量与儿童内化问题:父母情绪表达的中介作用与儿童迷走神经活动的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 121-128.
[5] 刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟. 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展:一年纵向考察[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 439-446.
[6] 谷传华, 张笑容, 陈洁, 郝恩河, 王亚丽. 状态与特质之分：来自社会创造性的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 483-490.
[7] 李庆功, 周小梅, 徐芬. 好友可信度与9~12岁儿童信任的关系及其发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 232-237.
[8] 王昱文, 王振宏, 刘建君. 小学儿童自我意识情绪理解发展及其与亲社会行为、同伴接纳的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 65-70.
[9] 陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. 颜色、形状和大小相似性与变化性对儿童归纳推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 17-24.
[10] 陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. 前提项目间差异对儿童归纳推理多样性效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 457-464.
[11] 李燕芳, 王莹, 郑渝萍, 董奇. 小学儿童英语课堂学习焦虑发展及其与教师教育行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 42-47.
[12] 李燕芳, 管益杰, 楼春芳, 董奇. 小学汉语儿童英语口语产出形式的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 26-31,38.
[13] 谷传华, 周宗奎, 种明慧. 小学儿童社会创造性与其同伴关系、学业成绩的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 20-25.
[14] 谷传华, 周宗奎. 小学儿童社会创造性倾向与父母养育方式的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 34-38.
[15] 张春妹, 邹泓, 侯珂. 小学儿童尊重行为与人格、班级环境的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(3): 16-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发