前提项目间差异对儿童归纳推理多样性效应的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过两个实验深入探讨了前提项目间差异对儿童归纳推理多样性效应的表现水平的影响。结果发现:(1)多样性效应受多样组和非多样组之间差异(前提项目间差异)大小的影响,在减小两组差异的前提下,5～6岁儿童尚未表现出多样性效应;除个别任务外,8～9岁儿童表现出多样性效应(实验1)。(2)对前提图片的形状差异进行数量化处理后发现,儿童在归纳推理多样性效应任务上的归纳判断力度随前提项目间差异的增大而增强;在前提项目间差异很小的情况下,10～12岁儿童也没有运用多样性信息进行推理;当前提项目间差异很大时,被试表现出多样性效应(实验2)。

关键词: 幼儿园儿童, 小学儿童, 归纳推理, 多样性效应, 前提项目间差异

Abstract: This research studied and discussed the possible effect of the differences between premises on diversity-based reasoning,and examined the development of diversity-based reasoning of children as well.During our studies,two experiments were designed.32 children aged 5-6 and 32 children aged 8-9 participated in experiment 1,while 51 children aged 10-12 participated in experiment 2.As differences between premises reducing,children aged 5-6 consistently failed to consider sample diversity in inductive reasoning,but children aged 8-9 tended to create diverse samples in their reasoning.Although our way to quantifying the difference between premises was artificial,as the difference between premises increased,the strength of inductive reasoning was enhanced.At least in this study,when the difference between premises reached the most of the differences it can be,choices of most subjects showed the diversity effect.However,when the differences were very small,although the subjects could judge which group's differences were great,their inductive reasoning has no significant tendency.

Key words: Kindergarten Children, primary school students, inductive reasoning, diversity effect, the difference between premises

中图分类号:

B844.1

陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. 前提项目间差异对儿童归纳推理多样性效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 457-464.

CHEN Qing-fei, LEI Yi, LI Hong. The Effect of Difference between Premises on Diversity-based Reasoning of Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(5): 457-464.

参考文献

[1] Choi,I.,Nisbett,R.E.,&Smith,E.E.(1997).Culture,category salience,and inductive reasoning.Cognition,65(1),15-32.
[2] Carey,S.(1985).Conceptual change in childhood.Cambridge,MA:Bradford Books.
[3] Gutheil,G.,&Gellman,S.A.(1997).Children's use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,64(2),159-174.
[4] Heit,E.,&Hahn,U.(2001).Diversity-Based Reasoning in Children.Cognitive Psychology,43(4),243-273.
[5] Jones,S.S.,&Smith,L.B.(1991).Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning.Child Development,62(3),499-516.
[6] Kincannon,A.,&Spellman,B.A.(2003).The use of category and similarity information in limiting hypotheses.Memory&Cognition,31(1),114-132.
[7] Kim,N.S.,&Keil,F.C.(2003).From symptoms to causes:Diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning.Memory&Congnition,31(1),155-165.
[8] Lopez,A.,Gelman,S.A.,Gutheil,G.,&Smith,E.E.(1992).The development of category-based induction.Child Development,63(5),1070-1090.
[9] Lo,Y.,Sides,A.,Rozelle,J.,&Osherson,D.(2002).Evidential diversity and premise probability in young children's inductive judgment.Cognitive Science,26(2),181-206.
[10] Medin,D.L.,Coley,J.D.,Storms,G.,&Hayes,B.K.(2003).A relevance theory of induction.Psychonomic Bulletin&Review,10(3),517-532.
[11] Proffitt,J.B.,Coley,J.L.,&Medin,D.L.(2000).Expertise and category-based induction.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,&Cognition,26(4),811-828.
[12] Rhodes,M.,Gelman,S.A.,&Brickman,D.(2008).Developmental changes in the consideration of sample diversity in inductive reasoning.Journal of Cognition and Development,9(1),112-143.
[13] Shipley,E.F.,&Shepperson,B.(2006).Test sample selection by preschool children:Honoring diversity.Memory and Cognition,34(7),1444-1451.
[14] Sloutsky,V.M.,Lo,Y.,&Fisher,A.V.(2001).How much does a shared name make things similar?Linguistic labels,similarity,and the development of inductive inference.Child Development,72(6),1695-1709.
[15] Sloman,S.A.(1993).Feature-based induction.Cognitive Psychology,25(2),231-280.
[16] 陈安涛.(2003).归纳推理多样性效应前提概率原则的实验研究.硕士论文.西南师范大学.
[17] 陈安涛,李红.(2003).归纳推理心理效应的研究.心理科学进展,11(6),607-615.
[18] 陈安涛,李红,冯廷勇,高雪梅,张仲明,李富洪等.(2005).分段设计条件下归纳推理的多样性效应.中国科学C辑:生命科学,35(3),275-283.
[19] 陈庆飞,雷怡,欧阳含璐,李红.(2009).归纳推理多样性效应的发展及其争论.心理科学进展,17(5),901-908.
[20] 李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪,龙长权.(2004).个体归纳推理能力的发展及其机制研究展望.心理科学,27(6),1457-1459.
[21] 李富洪,李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,龙长权.(2006).归纳推理的多样性效应及其机制探索.心理科学进展,14(3),360-367.
[22] 吴霞,李红.(2008).儿童对人的行为进行推理的多样性效应.西南大学学报(社会科学版),34(1),128-132.

相关文章 15

[1]	薛笑然, 黄碧娟, 李红霞, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童数学态度与数学成就的纵向联系：学业拖延和数学元认知的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 520-529.
[2]	王振宏, 彭源, 赵一萌. 父母婚姻质量与儿童内化问题:父母情绪表达的中介作用与儿童迷走神经活动的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 121-128.
[3]	刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟. 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展:一年纵向考察[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 439-446.
[4]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和. 小学儿童分享的发展及反馈信息的促进效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 641-647.
[5]	谷传华, 张笑容, 陈洁, 郝恩河, 王亚丽. 状态与特质之分：来自社会创造性的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 483-490.
[6]	李庆功, 周小梅, 徐芬. 好友可信度与9~12岁儿童信任的关系及其发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 232-237.
[7]	龙长权, 李红, 邓小凤, 袁颖, 李军, 雷怡. 相似和相同语言标签对幼儿归纳推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 239-247.
[8]	王昱文, 王振宏, 刘建君. 小学儿童自我意识情绪理解发展及其与亲社会行为、同伴接纳的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 65-70.
[9]	路晓英, 龙长权, 孙锋, 邢东亮, 李红. 知觉和概念信息对3岁儿童归纳推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 25-34.
[10]	陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. 颜色、形状和大小相似性与变化性对儿童归纳推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 17-24.
[11]	李燕芳, 王莹, 郑渝萍, 董奇. 小学儿童英语课堂学习焦虑发展及其与教师教育行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 42-47.
[12]	李燕芳, 管益杰, 楼春芳, 董奇. 小学汉语儿童英语口语产出形式的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 26-31,38.
[13]	谷传华, 周宗奎, 种明慧. 小学儿童社会创造性与其同伴关系、学业成绩的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 20-25.
[14]	谷传华, 周宗奎. 小学儿童社会创造性倾向与父母养育方式的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 34-38.
[15]	张春妹, 邹泓, 侯珂. 小学儿童尊重行为与人格、班级环境的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(3): 16-22.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed