心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 188-197.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.02.08

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

教师关怀行为与学生学业成绩的关系:学习效能感的中介作用

雷浩1, 徐瑰瑰1, 邵朝友2, 桑金琰3   

  1. 1. 教育部人文社科重点研究基地华东师范大学课程与教学研究所, 上海 200062;
    2. 浙江工业大学教育科学与技术学院, 杭州 310012;
    3. 山东理工大学商学院, 淄博 255012
  • 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 雷浩,E-mail:leihao8998@163.com E-mail:leihao8998@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    “2014年华东师范大学博士研究生学术新人奖”资助.

The Relationship of Teachers' Caring Behavior and Students' Academic Development: The Mediating Role of Learning Self-efficacy

LEI Hao1, XU Guigui1, SHAO Chaoyou2, SANG Jinyan3   

  1. 1. Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062;
    2. Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310012;
    3. School of Business, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255012
  • Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-03-15

摘要: 采用教师关怀行为问卷、学生学习效能感问卷调查1430名中学生,考察教师关怀行为、学生学习效能感和学业成绩之间的关系.结果发现:(1)教师关怀行为的得分高于“3”,达到了3.54;学生的学习效能感的得分也比较高,得分为3.73;(2)教师关怀行为、学生学习效能感和学生的学业成绩及其各维度之间存在着显著的正相关;(3)学生学习效能感在教师关怀和学生的学业成绩之间起着部分中介作用,其中介效应值为0.25,并且学习效能感的两个维度中的学习能力效能感的中介效应(效应值为0.18)大于学习行为效能感(效应值为0.04)的中介效应.

关键词: 教师关怀行为, 学习效能感, 学业成绩, 模型

Abstract: This study discusses how the Chinese middle school students' learning self-efficacy plays a mediating role between the teachers' caring behavior and the students' academic Performance. This study investigates 1340 middle school students by using teachers' caring behavior questionnaire and the Chinese version of the students' learning self-efficacy questionnaire, and collects their midterm test scores. Result: (1) Teachers' caring behavior score is higher than “3”; Students' learning self-efficacy has a high score, score of 3.73. (2)Correlation results show that there was a significantly Positive correlation among the teachers' caring behavior, middle school students' learning self-efficacy and academic Performance. (3)Middle school students learning self-efficacy Plays a Partial mediating role between the teachers' caring behavior and the student's academic Performance, effect value is 0.25; Learning Self-efficacy contained two constructs, Learning ability self-efficacy and Learning behavior self-efficacy, Learning ability self-efficacy could explain Partial variance of Teachers' Caring Behavior (effect value is 0.18) and Students' Academic Development and Play Partial-mediating role, and so did Learning behavior self-efficacy (effect value is 0.04); Learning ability self-efficacy could explain more variance and mediate the relationship more.

Key words: teachers' caring behavior, learning self-efficacy, academic Performance, model

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Al-Rofo, M. (2010). The dimensions that affect the students' low accumulative average in Tafila Technical University.Journal of Social Sciences, 22(1), 53-59.
Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of Effective Teacher-Student Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Predicting Student Achievement With the Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary.School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76-97.
Allen, J. D. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning.The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(5), 218-223.
Assor, A., KaPlan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as Predictors of Poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety.Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397-413.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social Psychological research: ConcePtual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bayat, A., Louw, W., & Rena, R. (2014). The ImPact of Socio-economic Factors on the Performance of Selected High School Learners in the Western CaPe Province, South Africa.J Hum Ecol, 45(3), 183-196.
Betz, N. E. (2013). Assessment of self-efficacy. In N. E. Betz (Ed.), APA Handbook of testing and assessment in Psychology: Testing and assessment in clinical and counseling psychology (Vol. 2, PP. 379-391). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brisk, M. E. (1999). Quality bilingual education: Defining success(LAB Working PaPer No. 1). Providence, R. I. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory, Brown University. (ERIC Document ReProduction Service No. ED 445549)
Buckley, K. E., & Anderson, C. A. (2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of Playing video games.Playing video games: Motives, resPonses, and consequences, 363-378.
CaPrara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of Personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78-96.
Cole, D. A., Martin, J. M., & Powers, B. (1997). A ComPetency-based Model of Child DePression: A Longitudinal Study of Peer, Parent, Teacher, and Self-evaluations.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 505-514.
Dacre, P. L., & Qualter, P. (2012). Improving emotional intelligence and emotional self-efficacy through a teaching intervention for university students.Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 306-312.
Diseth, H. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement.Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191-195.
Gulbrandsen, P., Jensen, B. F., Finset, A., & Blanch-Hartigan, D. (2013). Long-term effect of communication training on the relationship between physicians' self-efficacy and performance.Patient education and counseling, 91(2), 180-185.
Imran, M., Afshari, M., Ghavifekr, S., & Razak, A. Z. A. (2013). DemograPhy Factors and Students' Academic Performance in Secondary Schools.Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 1(2), 12-23.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology.The handbook of social Psychology, 1(4), 233-265.
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67-72.
Komarraju, M. (2013). Ideal Teacher Behaviors Student Motivation and Self-Efficacy Predict Preferences.Teaching of Psychology, 40(2), 104-110.
Lawman, H. G., & Wilson, D. (2013). Self-Determination Theory.In EncycloPedia of Behavioral Medicine(PP. 1735-1737). SPringer New York.
MacKinnon, D. P., & Fairchild, A. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 16-20.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis.Annual review of Psychology, 58, 593.
Macphee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic Self-Efficacy and Performance of UnderrePresented STEM Majors: Gender, Ethnic, and Social Class Patterns.Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347-369.
Perry, J. C., Liu, X., & Pabian, Y. (2010). School engagement as a mediator of academic performance among urban youth: The role of career preparation, Parental career support, and teacher support.The Counseling Psychologist, 38(2), 269-295.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). AsymPtotic and resamPling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiPle mediator models.Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 353.
Rosenhan, D. L., Salovey, P., & Hargis, K. (1981). The joys of helPing: Focus of attention mediates the impact of positive affect on altruism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(5), 899.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 173-208.
Sit, C. H., Braman, O. R., Kerr, J. H., & Lindner, K. J. (2013). Motivational style and actual and perceived academic performance of secondary school students in Hong Kong.School Psychology International, 34(1), 17-32.
Sitzmann, T., & Yeo, G. (2013). A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Within-Person Self-Efficacy Domain: Is Self-Efficacy a Product of Past Performance or a Driver of Future Performance?Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 531-568.
Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration.Clinical Psychology review, 30(7), 890-905.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn.Contemporary educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
邓逊, 章志光. (1993). 心境, 移情对助人行为影响的实验研究.学生品德形成新探. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 267.
侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004).结构方程模型及其应用: Structural equation model and its aPPlications: 教育科学出版社.
黄慧静, 辛涛. (2007). 教师课堂教学行为对学生学业成绩的影响: 一个跨文化研究.心理发展与教育, 23(4), 57-62.
黄曼娜. (1999). 中学生自卑感的特点及其克服.心理发展与教育, 15(4), 0-44
雷浩. (2014). 教师关怀行为三维模型的建构.国家教育行政学院学报, (2), 67-72.
李妍. (2012).小学生学业自我效能感, 成就目标定向与自我调节学习及学业成绩的关系. 济南:山东师范大学.
梁宇颂. (2000).大学生成就目标, 归因方式与学业自我效能感的研究. 武汉: 华中师范大学.
刘丽红, 姚清如. (1996). 教师期望对学生学业成绩的影响.心理科学, 19(6), 348-350.
辛涛. (2006). 新课程背景下的学业评价:测量理论的价值.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1, 56-61.
张广辉, 李德树, 卿平海. (1993). 关于 25000 名初中学生自信心的调查报告.教育理论与实践, 1(43.47).
张敏, 雷开春, 张巧明. (2006). 中学生学习效能感的特点研究.心理科学, 28(5), 1148-1151.
郑海燕, 刘晓明, 莫雷. (2004). 初二学生知觉到的教师期望, 自我价值感与自我效能的关系研究.应用心理学, 3, 23-28.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法.心理科学进展, 12(06), 942-950.
周文霞, 郭桂萍. (2006). 自我效能感: 概念, 理论和应用.中国人民大学学报, 1(1), 91-97.
[1] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[2] 余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[3] 李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[4] 李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[5] 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[6] 金花, 梁紫平, 单金磊, 张羽萍, 朱子良. 老年人整体运动知觉衰退的视觉机制——基于知觉模板模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 761-768.
[7] 张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[8] 张锋, 尹华站, 靳凯歌, 臧鑫磊, 朱芷毅, 赵俊峰. 聋生1秒以下与以上的视时距知觉研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 457-465.
[9] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[10] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[11] 魏华, 何灿, 刘元, 周宗奎, 李倩. 青少年留守经历对网络成瘾的影响:病理性互联网使用的认知行为模型视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 399-406.
[12] 马小凤, 文美琪, 史凯, 杜青青, 姚贝, 穆缘, 霍小宁. 记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.
[13] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[14] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[15] 陈慧, 何婷, 唐远琼, 唐怡欣, 陆风勇, 蔺秀云. 共情与青少年内外化问题的关系及影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 439-446.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!