心理发展与教育 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 9-16.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

几何线索直接性和显著性对儿童菱形空间再定向的影响

周婵, 胡清芬   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京100875
  • 出版日期:2011-01-15 发布日期:2011-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 胡清芬,E-mail:cara1235@sina.com E-mail:cara1235@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“婴幼儿空间与客体认知发展过程及机制研究”

The Effect of Geometrical Cues’Directness and Salience on Children’s Reorientation for Rhombic Plane

ZHOU Chan, HU Qing-fen   

  1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Online:2011-01-15 Published:2011-01-15

摘要: 以25名幼儿园中班儿童为研究对象,采用在一个边或角有颜色标记的菱形平面的四个角或边位置中藏物找物的任务,来探究几何线索的直接性和显著性如何影响5岁儿童对几何及非几何线索的利用。研究发现:几何线索优先性并不稳定;几何线索的直接性影响了几何线索的使用;在几何线索直接的条件下,几何线索的显著性影响了几何线索的使用;几何线索直接性及显著性均不影响儿童对颜色线索的使用。

关键词: 几何线索优先, 几何线索直接性, 几何线索显著性, 菱形, 儿童

Abstract: To study the effects of geometrical cue directness and geometrical cue salience on 5 year old childrensreorientation for rhombic plane,25 children aged 5 years were tested in a 2×3 two-factor in-subjects design research using rhombic planes with colored border or corner.The results we found are following:(1)Diagonal errors were prominently more than concolorous errors in the trials of corner position,but prominently less in the trails of border position.(2)Children searched the geometrically appropriate places prominently more in the trials of corner position than in those of border position.(3)In the trails of corner position,the times of geometry appropriate searches decreased with the increase of the acute angle.(4)The effects of geometrical cue directness and geometrical cue salience were not significant on the times of color appropriate searches.The results suggest that the directness and salience of geometrical cues really affect on children's reorientation,at least in small,rhombic planes.

Key words: geometric priority, directness of geometrical cue, salience of geometrical cue, rhombic plane, children

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Cheng,K.(1986).A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation.Cognition,23,149-178.
[2] Gouteux,S.,Vauclair,J.,&Thinus-Blanc,C.(2001).Reorienta-tion in a small-scale environment by 3-,4-,and 5-year-old children.Cognitive Development,16,853-869.
[3] Hermer,L.,&Spelke,E.(1994).A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.Nature,370(6484),57-59.
[4] Hermer,L.,&Spelke,E.(1996).Modularity and development:the case of spatial reorientation.Cognition,61,195-232.
[5] Hermer,L.,Spelke,E.,&Katsnelson,A.(1999).Sources of Flexibility in human cognition:dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology,1999,3-36.
[6] Hupbach,A.,&Nadel,L.(2005).Reorientation in a rhombic environment:No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module.Cognitive Development,20,279-302.
[7] Huttenlocher,J.,&Vasilyeva,M.(2003).How toddlers represent enclosed spaces.Cognitive Science,27,749-766.
[8] Learmonth,A.E.,Newcombe,N.S.,&Huttenlocher,J.(2001).Toddlers-use of metric information and landmarks to reorient.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,80,225-244.
[9] Learmonth,A.E.,Nadel,L.,&Newcombe,N.S.(2002).Children's Use of Landmarks:Implications for Modularity Theory.Psychological Science,13,337-341.
[10] Learmonth,A.E.,Newcombe,N.S.,Sheridan,N.,&Jones,M.(2008).Why size counts:Children-s spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures.Developmental Science,11,414-426.
[11] Lee,S.A.,&Spelke,E.(2008).Children's Use of Geometry for Reorientation.Developmental science,11,743-749.
[12] Lourenco,S.,&Huttenlocher,J.(2006).How do young children determine location?Evidence from disorientation tasks.Cognition,100,511-529.
[13] Ratliff,K.,&Newcombe,N.S.(2008).Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation?Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms.Cognitive psychology,56,142-163.
[14] 李富洪,孙弘进,李红,曹碧华,邬德利.(2008).几何模块论的局限性——来自梯形实验的证据.心理学报,40,175-183.
[15] 邬德利.(2007).儿童空间再定向几何模块论及其修正.硕士学位论文.西南大学.
[16] 邬德利,李富洪,孙弘进,李红.(2007).儿童空间再定向的几何模块论及其局限.心理科学进展,15,319-325.
[1] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为:心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5] 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7] 朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14] 李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!