班级集体效能对初中生学业自我效能与学习倦怠的调节作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用学习倦怠、学业自我效能、班级集体效能问卷,选取26个班级的1125名初中生作为被试,运用多层线性模型探讨班级集体效能对学业自我效能与学习倦怠的影响。在控制性别和年级的影响后,结果发现:(1)班级集体效能与学习倦怠具有直接的关联:班级正向联合力越高,则学生的学习成就感越高;班级负向联合力越高,则学生的情绪与生理的消耗越严重;班级优秀成员的效能越高,则其他学生学习的成就感越低,师生关系越疏远、生理消耗越严重;而班级成员的自我效能越高,学生的学习成就感越高、情绪的损耗越小;(2)班级集体效能对学业自我效能与学习倦怠之间的关系具有显著的调节作用:班级的正向和负向联合力越强,则学业自我效能对师生疏离的负向影响就越弱;班级的负向联合力越强,则学业自我效能对情绪耗竭的负向影响就越小;优秀成员效能越高,则学业自我效能对学习低成就感的负向影响就越大;而成员自我效能强,则学业自我效能对师生疏离的负向影响也强。

关键词: 班级集体效能, 学习倦怠, 学业自我效能, 初中生

Abstract: In order to examine and investigate the effects of class collective efficacy and academic self-efficacy on student burnout at the individual and organizational levels,1125 students as subjects from 26 junior high schools were chosen randomly.After controlled the effect of gender and grade,Hierarchical Linear Model(HLM) results revealed that (1) the higher the positive conjoint capabilities of group,the higher personal learning accomplishment; negative conjoint capabilities of group positively predicts mental exhaustion and physical exhaustion; efficacy of higher status members positively predicts the lack of personal learning accomplishment,the alienated relationship between students and teachers,and physical exhaustion; and the high personal efficacy as a member of group,the lower mental exhaustion and the lack of personal learning accomplishment; (2) the positive and negative conjoint capabilities of group have been found to weaken the negative relationship of academic self- efficacy and the alienated relationship between students and teachers; the negative conjoint capabilities of group also weaken the negative relationship of academic self-efficacy and mental exhaustion; efficacy of higher status members promotes the negative relationship of academic self-efficacy and the lack of personal learning accomplishment; and personal efficacy as a member of group also promotes the negative relationship of academic self-efficacy and the alienated relationship between students and teachers.

Key words: class collective efficacy, student burnout, academic self-efficacy, junior high school students

中图分类号:

G442

石雷山, 高峰强, 沈永江. 班级集体效能对初中生学业自我效能与学习倦怠的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(3): 289-296.

SHI Lei-shan, GAO Feng-Qiang, SHEN Yong-jiang. Academic Self-efficacy and Burnout： Moderating Effects of Class Collective Efficacy among Junior High School Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(3): 289-296.

参考文献

[1] Bandura,A.(1997).Self-efficacy:The exercise of control.New York:W.H.Freeman and Company.
[2] Chang,L.(2004).The Role of Classroom Norms in Contextualizing the Relations of Children's Social Behaviors to Peer Acceptance.Developmental Psychology,40,691-702.
[3] Fernández-Ballesteros,R.,Díez-Nicolás,J.,& Bandura,A.(2002).Determinants and Structural Relation of Personal Efficacy to Collective Efficacy.Applied Psychology:An International Review,51 (1),107-125.
[4] Goddard,R.D.,Hoy,W.K.,& Hoy,A.W.(2004).Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments,Empirical Evidence,and Future Directions.Educational Researcher,33,3-13.
[5] Kiuru,N.,Aunola,K.,Nurmi,J.-E.,Leskinen,E.,& Salmela-Aro,K.(2008).Peer group influence and selection in adolescents' school burnout:A longitudinal study.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,54,23-55.
[6] Maslach,C.,Schaufeli,W.B.,& Leiter,M.P.(2001).Job burnout.Annual Review of Psychology,52,397-422.
[7] Salmela-Aro,K.,Kiuru,N.,Leskinen,E.,& Nurmi,J.E.(2009).School-Burnout Inventory (SBI) Reliability and Validity.European Journal of Psychological Assessment,25(1),48-57.
[8] Salmela-Aro,K.,Kiuru,N.,& Pietikainen,M.(2008).Does School Matter? The Role of School Contextin Adolescents'School-Related Burnout.European Psychologist,13,12-23.
[9] Schaufeli,W.B.,Martinez,I.M.,Pinto,A.M.,Salanova,M.,& Bakker,A.B.(2002).Burnout and engagement in university students:A cross-national study.Journal of Cross-Cultural Studies,33,464-481.
[10] Schaufeli,W.B.,& Buunk,B.(2003).Burnout:an overview of 25 years of research and theorizing.The handbook of work and health psychology.England Chichester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd,383-425.
[11] Yang,H.J.,& Cheng,K.F.(2005).An investigation the factors affecting MIS student burnout in technical-vocational college.Computers in Human Behavior,21,917-932.
[12] Zellars,K.L.,Hochwarter,W.A.,& Perrewe,P.(2001).Beyond self-efficacy:interactive effects of role conflict and perceived collective efficacy.Journal of Managerial Issues,8,483-499.
[13] 陈顺森.(2006).中学生集体效能感量表的初步编制.中国学校卫生,27,861-862.
[14] 高峰强,王鹏,刘玉,李世海.(2006).学生班级集体效能、考试焦虑和学业成绩的SEM研究.心理科学,29,1132-1136.
[15] 胡俏,戴春林.(2007).中学生学习倦怠结构研究.心理科学,30,162-164.
[16] 梁宇颂.(2000).大学生成就目标,归因方式与学业自我效能感的研究.硕士论文,华中师范大学.
[17] 刘红云,张雷,孟庆茂.(2005).小学教师集体效能及其对自我效能功能的调节.心理学报,37,79-86.
[18] 石雷山,高峰强.(2010).影响教师职业倦怠的多层变量之间的关系.心理发展与教育,26,521-526.
[19] 王翠荣(2008).高职学生学习倦怠与学业自我效能感及社会支持的关系研究.中国健康心理学杂志,16(7),743-744.
[20] 温福星.(2009).阶层线性模型的理论与应用.北京:中国轻工业出版社,48.
[21] 杨丽娴,连榕,张锦坤.(2007).中学生学习倦怠与人格关系.心理科学,30,1409-1412.
[22] 张璇,王嘉宇.(2010).关于分层线性模型样本容量问题的研究.统计与决策,15,4-8.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[6]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[7]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[8]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[9]	陈建文, 刘艳, 谭千保. 累积生态风险与高职生学习倦怠：消极自我图式和网络成瘾的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 576-583.
[10]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[11]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[12]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[13]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[14]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[15]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed