面部特征空间关系、肤色亮度对卡通面孔吸引力的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取88名大班儿童（43名女童和45名男童）及90名在校大学生（42名男生和48名女生）为实验被试，通过心理量表评分，探讨面部特征空间关系、肤色和亮度对儿童卡通面孔吸引力影响。结果显示：（1）幼儿与成人对卡通面孔最佳面部特征空间关系评价存在差异；（2）幼儿评价女童卡通面孔眼嘴间距离占面长24%时吸引力最优，两眼间距离占面宽41%时吸引力最优，但未达显著。成人评价女童卡通面孔也存在纵向“黄金比例（19%）”现象；（3）男童卡通面孔不存在最佳比例；（4）幼儿偏爱偏白肤色，而成人偏好白里透红；（5）受众性别与卡通形象性别均对肤色偏好有影响；（6）亮度高的儿童卡通面孔更具吸引力。结论：卡通面孔吸引力受面部特征空间关系、肤色与亮度等因素显著影响，卡通设计需针对不同年龄、性别受众来设定面部特征空间关系与肤色等要素。

关键词: 卡通面孔, 幼儿, 面孔吸引力, 黄金比例, 肤色亮度

Abstract: 88 children (43 girls and 45 boys) and 90 college students (42 boys and 48 girls) participated in this study. By method of psychological scale evaluation, effects of spatial relationship of facial features, facial skin color and lightness on child cartoon facial attractiveness were investigated. Children's evaluation of cartoon facial attractiveness was different from that of adults' in spatial relationship of facial features. Children's evaluation results showed the individual attractiveness of female child cartoon faces was optimized when the face's vertical distance between the eyes and the mouth was approximately 24% of its length. Female child cartoon faces' horizontal ratio showed that the individual attractiveness was optimized when the face's interocular distances was approximately 41% of its width; however, the result did not reach statistical significance. Adults' evaluation of female child cartoon facial attractiveness was also exhibiting vertical "golden ratio (19%)". There was no golden ratio for male cartoon faces. Children had preference for child cartoon faces with whitish skin color, while most adults preferred "milk and roses" skin color. Both genders of cartoon faces and subjects had influences on skin color preference. High lightness cartoon faces were more attractive than the low lightness ones. Conclusions: Spatial relationship of facial features, facial skin color and lightness have significant influence on cartoon aesthetic assessment. Therefore, factors such as spatial relationship of facial features and facial skin color should be taken into account in designing cartoon images for audiences of different ages and sexes.

Key words: cartoon face, preschool children, facial attractiveness, golden ratio, facial skin color and lightness

中图分类号:

B844.1

陈溢智, 方慧, 沈楠, 吴美如, 郑丽燕, 王静梅, 卢英俊. 面部特征空间关系、肤色亮度对卡通面孔吸引力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 561-570.

CHEN Yi-zhi, FANG Hui, SHEN Nan, WU Mei-ru, ZHENG Li-yan, WANG Jing-mei, LU Ying-jun. Effects of Spatial Relationship of Facial Features, Facial Skin Color and Lightness on Cartoon Facial Attractiveness[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(6): 561-570.

参考文献

Baudouin, J.Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117, 313-332.
Desrumaux, P., Bosscher, S.D., & Leoni, V. (2009). Effects of facial attractiweness, gender, and competence of applicants on job recruitment. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68(1), 33-42.
Frank, T., Ken, N., & Oren, W., Nancy, K. (2000). Response Properties of the Human Fusiform Face Area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1/2/3), 257-279.
Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Matts, P.J. (2006). Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 433-442.
Johnston, V.S. (2006). Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 9-13.
Kemp, S., Bruce V., & Linney, A. (2004). Future Face: Image, Identity and Innovation. London: Profile Books.
Klein, H., & Shiffman, K.S. (2006). Messages about physical attractiveness in animated cartoons. Body Image, 3(4), 353-363.
Langlois, J.H., Roggman, L.A., & Reiser, D.L.A. (1990). Infants'differential responses to attractive and unattractive faces. Dev Psychol, 26, 153-159.
Pallett, P.M., Link, S., & Lee, K. (2010). New "Golden" Ratios for Facial Beauty. Vision Research, 50(2), 149-154.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
Rosset, D.B., Santos, A., & Da, F.D. (2010). Do children perceive features of real and cartoon faces in the same way? Evidence from typical development and autism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(2), 212-218.
Rumsey, N., & Harcourt, D. (2005). The Psychology of Appearance (Health Psychology). Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Press.
Stephen, I.D., Law, S.M.J., Stirrat, M.R., & Perrett, D.I. (2009). Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces. Int J Primatol, 30(6), 845-857.
Tong, F., Nakayma, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive neuropsychology, 17, 257-279.
Chen, H., Russell, R., Nakayama, K., & Livingstone, M. (2010). Crossing the "uncanny valley": adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception, 39, 378-386.
韩世辉, 蒋毅, 许晓婧, Humphreys, G.W. (2007). 儿童观看卡通片激活内侧前额皮层. 科学通报, 52(19), 2283-2286.
李鸥, 陈红. (2010). 面孔吸引力的回顾与前瞻. 心理科学进展, 18(3), 472-479.
梁静. (2010). 博弈任务中面孔吸引力对个体决策及公平感的影响. 硕士论文. 重庆: 西南大学.
马华维, 俞琴燕, 陈浩. (2007). 面孔吸引力研究方法综述. 心理科学, 30, 906-908.
史新广. (2007). 女性容貌吸引力及其人格和心理健康的关系研究. 硕士论文. 苏州: 苏州大学.
王静梅, 卢英俊. (2011). 绘图方式与脸型对卡通面孔吸引力的影响. 幼儿教育(教育科学版), 6, 6-11.
王玲, 王静梅, 王军利, 卢英俊. (2012). 卡通面孔与真实面孔识别的ERP比较研究. 心理研究, 5(5), 19-28.
杨元魁, 王彩, 周建中. (2005). 卡通面孔识别和表情特征分析的ERP研究. 第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集, 上海.
俞琴燕, 乐国安, 陈浩. (2007). 面孔的心理性别与面孔偏好的关系初探. 第十一届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集, 开封.
赵仑, 赵昆, 刘昌, Andrew, C.N., Chen. (2006). EPP: 一个与表情特征加工相关的ERPs晚正成分. 航天医学与医学工程, 19(1), 37-40.
张妍, 孔繁昌, 陈红, 向燕辉, 高笑, 陈敏燕. (2010). 男性对女性面孔吸引力的认知偏好: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 42(11), 1060-1072.

相关文章 15

[1]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[2]	王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[3]	张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5～6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[4]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[5]	刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[6]	王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[7]	刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[8]	张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[9]	王薇, 贡德英, 程春, 陈科, 李永鑫, 闫晶晶. 5～7岁自闭症谱系障碍幼儿数感的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[10]	刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[11]	周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[12]	贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜. 3~5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 457-464.
[13]	李占星, 朱莉琪. “它”是所有者吗？幼儿对所有权主体的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 465-471.
[14]	郑晨烨, 黄焰, 王静梅, 姜存对, 卢英俊. 面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 472-480.
[15]	施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed