心理发展与教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 295-304.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.02.15
• 理论探讨与进展 • 上一篇
匡子翌1, 冷晓雪2, 王福兴2, 胡祥恩2,3
KUANG Ziyi1, LENG Xiaoxue2, WANG Fuxing2, HU Xiangen2,3
摘要: 追踪手势(tracing gesture)是指手指基于学习内容进行有意义的动态移动。以往研究主要通过具身认知理论,信号原则和认知负荷理论解释追踪手势的有效性。基于对以往追踪手势的实证研究汇总发现:在学习效果上,追踪手势提高了学习者的保持成绩(d = 0.41)和迁移成绩(d = 0.52);在主观评定上,追踪手势降低了学习者感知的内在认知负荷(d = 0.22),提高了学习者的学习动机(d = 0.22)。未来研究应进一步探讨追踪手势的有效属性和调节因素,并通过更加更多客观的方法验证其有效性。
中图分类号:
| *为纳入分析的文献 *Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: Finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 427-443. Barsalou, L.W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. Dai, L., Jung, M. M., Postma, M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2022). A systematic review of pedagogical agent research: Similarities, differences and unexplored aspects. Computers & Education, 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2 022.104607 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. Deci, E. L.,Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.1 Dargue, N., Sweller, N., & Jones, M. P. (2019). When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 765-784. *Du, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Tracing worked examples: Effects on learning in geometry. Educational Psychology, 39, 169-187. Duijzer, C., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Veldhuis, M., Doorman, M., & Leseman, P. (2019). Embodied learning environments for graphing motion: A systematic literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 597-629. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer, & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 185-198). Cambridge University Press. Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science.Educational Psychologist, 43, 179-195. *Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., & Bobis, J. (2020). Tracing enhances problem-solving transfer, but without effects on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1522-1529. *Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., Byrne, E., & Bobis, J. (2016). Learning by tracing worked examples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 160-169. *Ginns, P., & King, V.L. (2021). Pointing and tracing enhance computer-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1387-1403. *Ginns, P., & Kydd, A. (2019). Learning human physiology by pointing and tracing: A cognitive load theory. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching (pp. 119-129). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney. Hostetter, A. B.(2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297-315. *Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning? Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 14, 45-49. *Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85-93. Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 343-355. Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172-176. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T. (2014). Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 86-104. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (2003).Touch. In B. Weiner, A. F. Healy, & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp.147-176). New York: Wiley. Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017).Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997 *Korbach, A., Ginns, P., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2019). Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 102-113. Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G.D., Ginns, P., Krell, M., & Schneider, S. (2022). A systematic meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of subjective cognitive load questionnaires in experimental multimedia learning research. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 2485-2541. Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1058-1072. Li, W.,Kuang, Z., Leng, X., Mayer, R. E., & Wang, F. (2024). Role of gesturing onscreen instructors in video lectures: A set of three-level meta-analyses on the embodiment effect. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09910-0 *Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36(7), 596-601. Mayer, R. E. (2021).Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. Montessori, M. (1964).The Montessori Method, Rome 1912. Bentley, Inc. Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27-45. Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking aboutnonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34, 602-619. Sarailoo, R., Latifzadeh, K., Amiri, S. H., Bosaghzadeh, A., & Ebrahimpour, R. (2022). Assessment of instantaneous cognitive load imposed by educational multimedia using electroencephalography signals. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 744737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.744737 *Schueler, A., & Wesslein, A. K. (2022). Investigating the effect of deictic tracing on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101525 Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9 Smyrnis, E., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2022). Mimicking tracing actions enhances young children's mathematical learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(6), 1356-1364. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292. *Tang, M., Ginns, P., & Jacobson, M. J. (2019). Tracing enhances recall and transfer of knowledge of the water cycle. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 439-455. van Gog, T. (2022). The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer, & L. Fiorella (Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 221-230). Cambridge University Press. *van Wermeskerken, M., Fijan, N., Eielts, C., & Pouw, W. T. (2016). Observation of depictive versus tracing gestures selectively aids verbal versus visual-spatial learning in primary school children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 806-814. van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95-99. *Wang, B., Ginns, P., & Mockler, N. (2022). Sequencing tracing with imagination. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 421 -449. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636. *Yeo, L. M., & Tzeng, Y. T. (2020). Cognitive effect of tracing gesture in the learning from mathematics worked examples. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 733-751. 叶浩生. (2010). 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710. 叶浩生. (2014). “具身”涵义的理论辨析. 心理学报, 46(7), 1032-1042. *左跟梅. (2022). 手势追踪在多媒体学习中的效应研究(硕士学位论文), 华东师范大学, 上海. |
| [1] | 张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161. |
| [2] | 王娟, 刘天碧, 范小月. 象似性手势和指示性手势对自闭症儿童动作相关词汇学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 367-374. |
| [3] | 于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11. |
| [4] | 王燕青, 杨晓梦, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 张洋, 赵庆柏, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. 分段是视频学习的有效方式吗?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 600-608. |
| [5] | 陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 619-627. |
| [6] | 袁娟娟, 杨炀, 郑志伟, 刘萍萍. 图文横排促进低熟悉词汇再认:基于8岁儿童和成人证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 525-538. |
| [7] | 刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦. 大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系:手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 257-265. |
| [8] | 王舒, 殷悦, 王婷, 刘国芳, 罗俊龙. 教学设计中的成绩表现和心流体验:基于认知负荷视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 329-337. |
| [9] | 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音. 具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 664-672. |
| [10] | 谢久书, 王瑞明, 张昆, 张常青. 不同类型的知觉刺激对语言理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 502-509. |
| [11] | 龚德英, 刘电芝, 张大均. 概述和音乐对认知负荷和多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 83-87. |
| [12] | 曹宝龙, 刘慧娟, 林崇德. 认知负荷对小学生工作记忆资源分配策略的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(1): 36-42. |
|
||