智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.02.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在考察智力障碍儿童对不同对象(朋友和陌生人)的分享行为,同时探讨心理理论对不同对象分享行为的预测作用。研究共选取了82名智力障碍儿童作为被试,并通过言语能力分数匹配了82名典型发展儿童作为对照,结果发现:(1)7~17岁(儿童中期和青少年期)的智力障碍儿童和心理年龄相匹配的典型发展儿童一样,对朋友的分享都显著高于对陌生人的分享;(2)心理理论预测了智力障碍儿童对陌生人的分享行为,但不能显著预测对朋友的分享行为。这些结果表明相比于陌生人,智力障碍儿童和典型发展儿童对朋友表现出更多的分享,且智力障碍儿童偏爱朋友分享的现象从儿童中期持续到了青少年期;心理理论是智力障碍儿童对陌生人分享的相关因素。

关键词: 分享行为, 分享对象, 心理理论, 智力障碍儿童

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the effects of different recipients (friends vs strangers) on sharing behavior in children with intellectual disabilities, and to explore the predictive role of Theory of Mind in sharing behavior with friends and strangers. A total of 82 children with intellectual disabilities were selected as subjects for the study, and 82 typically developmental children were selected as controls matched by verbal ability. The results showed that: (1) The 7-to 17-year-old (mid-childhood and adolescence) children with intellectual disabilities shared significantly more with their friends than strangers, as did typically developmental children matched for mental ages; (2) Theory of Mind significantly predicted the sharing behavior with strangers, rather than those with friends in children with intellectual disabilities. These results suggested that children with intellectual disabilities and typically developing children shared more with their friends than strangers; Theory of Mind might play a predictive role in the sharing behavior with strangers in children with intellectual disabilities.

Key words: sharing behavior, recipients, theory of mind, children with intellectual disabilities

中图分类号:

B844

刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.

LIU Yanchun, DENG Yuting, ZHANG Xi. Sharing Behavior towards Different Recipients in Children with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Theory of Mind[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.

参考文献

Aguilar-Pardo, D., Martinez-Arias, R., & Colmenares, F.(2013). The role of inhibition in young children's altruistic behaviour. Cognitive Processing, 14(3), 301-307.
Allen, J. W. P., & Bickhard, M. H. (2018).Stage fright:Internal reflection as a domain general enabling constraint on the emergence of explicit thought. Cognitive Development, 45, 77-91.
Asscheman, J. S., He, J., Koot, S., Buil, J. M., Krabbendam, L., & van Lier, P. A. (2020).Classroom peer preferences and the development of sharing behavior with friends and others. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 412-423.
An, J., Yu, J., & Zhu, L. (2020). The origins of intergroup resource inequality influence children's decision to perpetuate or rectify inequality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 571570.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571570
Bennett, M., Barrett, M., Karakozov, R., Kipiani, G., Lyons, E., Pavlenko,V., & Riazanova, T. (2004). Young children's evaluations of the ingroup and of outgroups:A multi-national study. Social Development, 13(1), 124-141.
Callus, A. M. (2017). 'Being friends means helping each other, making coffee for each other':Reciprocity in the friendships of people with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 32(1), 1-16.
Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Sanfey, A. G., & Marchetti, A. (2014). "What is fair for you?" Judgments and decisions about fairness and theory of mind. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(1), 49-62.
Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2015). Children's evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 554-563.
Costin, S. E., & Jones, D. C. (1992). Friendship as a facilitator of emotional responsiveness and prosocial interventions among young children.Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 941-947.
Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). Children rectify inequalities for disadvantaged groups. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1318-1329.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079-1083.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004).Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185-190.
Foley, K-R., Blackmore, A. M., Girdler, S., O'Donnell, M., Glauert, R., Llewellyn, G., & Leonard, H. (2012). To feel belonged:The voices of children and youth with disabilities on the meaning of wellbeing. Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 375-391.
Forgas, J. P., & Tan, H. B. (2013). Mood effects on selfishness versus fairness:Affective influences on social decisions in the ultimatum game. Social Cognition, 31(4), 504-517.
Furman, W., & Bierman, K. L. (1984). Children's conceptions of friendship:A multimethod study of developmental changes.Developmental Psychology, 20(5), 925-931.
Garolera, G. D., Díaz, M. P., & Noell, J. F. (2021).Friendship barriers and supports:Thoughts of young people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(6), 815-833.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2011). Intelligence and social inequality:Why the biological link? In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 538-575). Wiley Blackwell.
Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., & Keller, M. (2008). When child development meets economic game theory:An interdisciplinary approach to investigating social development.Human Development, 51(4), 235-261.
Güroglu, B., van den Bos,W., & Crone, E. A. (2014). Sharing and giving across adolescence:An experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 291.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00291
Hennessy, J., & West, M. A. (1999). Intergroup behavior in organizations:A field test of social identity theory. Small Group Research, 30(3), 361-382.
Hogrefe, G. J., Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1986). Ignorance versus false belief:A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57(3), 567-582.
Jordan, J. J., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12710-12715.
Kenward, B., & Dahl, M. (2011). Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients' previous actions. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1054-1064.
Kucuker, S., Erdogan, N. I., & Curuk, C. (2014).Peer acceptance of children with disabilities in inclusive kindergarten classrooms. Pamukkale Vniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 163-177.
Laursen, B., & Hartup, W. W. (2002).The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (95), 27-40.
LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S., & Haidt, J. (2011). When getting something good is bad:Even three-year-olds react to inequality. Social Development, 20(1), 154-170.
Locke, J., Ishijima, E. H., Kasari, C., & London, N. (2010). Loneliness, friendship quality and social networks of adolescents with high-functioning autism in an inclusive school setting.Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10(2), 74-81.
Lu, H. J., & Chang, L. (2016). Resource allocation to kin, friends, and strangers by 3- to 6-year-old children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 194-206.
Luttropp, A., & Granlund, M. (2010).Interaction-it depends-a comparative study of interaction in preschools between children with intellectual disability and children with typical development. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 12(3), 151-164.
Monteiro, M. B., de Franca, D. X., & Rodrigues, R. (2009). The development of intergroup bias in childhood:How social norms can shape children's racial behaviours.International Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 29-39.
Moore, C. (2009). Fairness in children's resource allocation depends on the recipient.Psychological Science, 20(8), 944-948.
Nader-Grosbois, N., Houssa, M., & Mazzone, S. (2013).How could theory of mind contribute to the differentiation of social adjustment profiles of children with externalizing behavior disorders and children with intellectual disabilities? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(9), 2642-2660.
Paulus, M., & Essler, S. (2020).Why do preschoolers perpetuate inequalities? Theoretical perspectives on inequity preferences in the face of emerging concerns for equality. Developmental Review, 58, 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100933
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526.
Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A. (2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence:A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82(6), 1715-1737.
Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2017). Fair resource allocation among children and adolescents:The role of group and developmental processes.Child Development Perspective, 11(1), 56-62.
Sella, F., Lanfranchi, S., & Zorzi, M. (2013). Enumeration skills in Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(11), 3798-3806.
Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2009). Differential roles of fairness and compassion-based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 41-50.
Takagishi, H., Kameshimab, S., Schuga, J., Koizumia, M., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1-2), 130-137.
Thirion-Marissiaux, A. F., & Nader-Grosbois, N. (2008). Theory of mind "emotion", developmental characteristics and social understanding in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29(5), 414-430.
Vonk, J., Jett, S. E., Tomeny, T. S., Mercer, S. H., & Cwikla, J. (2020). Young children's theory of mind predicts more sharing with friends over time. Child Development, 91(1), 63-77.
Wagemaker, E., van Hoorn, J., & Bexkens, A. (2022).Susceptibility to peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescents with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 120, 104143.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104143
Wu, Z., & Su, Y. (2014). How do preschoolers' sharing behaviors relate to their theory of mind understanding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 120, 73-86.
Yirmiya,N., Solomonica-Levi, D., Shulman, C., & Pilowsky, T. (1996). Theory of mind abilities in individuals with Autism, Down syndrome, and mental retardation of unknown etiology:The role of age and intelligence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(8), 1003-1014.
Yu, J., Zhu, L., & Leslie, A. M. (2016). Children's sharing behavior in mini-dictator games:The role of in-group favoritism and theory of mind. Child Development, 87(6), 1747-1757.
Zion, E., & Jenvey, V. B. (2006). Temperament and social behaviour at home and school among typically developing children and children with an intellectually disability.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(6), 445-456.
陈世平, 崔鑫. (2015). 从社会认同理论视角看内外群体偏爱的发展. 心理与行为研究, 13(3), 422-427.
陈童, 伍珍. (2017). 儿童的分配公平性:心理理论的作用. 心理科学进展, 25(8), 1299-1309.
林青, 赵航, 宿淑华, 刘巧云, 丁文君. (2018). 唐氏综合征儿童语音识别能力与言语短时记忆的关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (11), 33-38.
柳乐, 江琴娣. (2014). 培智学校智力障碍学生抑制控制发展的研究. 中国特殊教育, (7), 19-25.
刘璐, 肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳. (2019). 儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用. 心理学报, 51(5), 584-597.
彭湘莹. (2017). 智力障碍儿童心理理论、执行功能与亲社会行为的关系(硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学.
桑标, 缪小春. (1990). 皮博迪图片词汇测验修订版(PPVT-R)上海市区试用常模的修订. 心理科学通讯, 27(5), 20-25+63-64.
苏彦捷, 马天舒. (2014). 孤独症儿童的公平决策:心理理论和自我/他人情绪识别的作用. 心理科学, 37(4), 985-992.
王海梅, 陈会昌, 谷传华. (2004). 关于儿童分享的研究述评. 心理科学进展, 12(1), 52-58.
王斯, 苏彦捷. (2011). 儿童面对不同对象的公平性选择:心理理论的作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 37(04), 26-32+223.
魏芳. (2014). 中度智力落后儿童亲社会行为与心理理论的关系(硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学.
韦小满, 焦青, 金星, 赵玉兰, 宋戈, 程文捷, … 陈林. (2005). 弱智学生合作与分享行为的干预实验研究. 中国特殊教育, (11), 5-8.
张厚粲.(2008). 韦氏儿童智力量表第四版中文版指导手册. 珠海:京美心理测量技术开发有限公司.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5～6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[2]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[3]	葛国宏. 成人依恋与心理理论的关系:认知融合与经验性回避的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 223-235.
[4]	肖雪, 刘璐, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳. 内群体偏爱与儿童基于贡献的分配公平性:心理理论的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 498-507.
[5]	王笑楠, 郝洋, 苏彦捷. 竞争和合作对学龄前儿童分配模式的影响:心理理论和抑制控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 385-392.
[6]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和. 小学儿童分享的发展及反馈信息的促进效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 641-647.
[7]	苏彦捷, 于晶. 执行功能与心理理论关系的元分析: 抑制控制和灵活转换的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 51-61.
[8]	徐芬, 郭筱琳, 张佳. 3~4岁幼儿谎言概念理解的特点及心理理论、父母教养方式的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 449-456.
[9]	童薇, 阳泽, 张霞. 幼儿心理理论与时序记忆的关系——来自时序记忆分离的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 248-254.
[10]	刘岩, 杨丽珠, 邓晨曦. 幼儿预见能力的发展及与抑制控制、心理理论的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(1): 1-8.
[11]	刘娟, 李红. 5～8岁儿童二级信念-愿望推理能力的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 233-238.
[12]	刘娟, 李红. 5～8岁儿童二级信念-愿望推理能力的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 233-238.
[13]	刘娟, 李红. 5～8岁儿童二级信念-愿望推理能力的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 233-238.
[14]	张晶晶, 胡清芬. 错误信念任务中的知识偏差[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(2): 210-214.
[15]	赵婧, 王璐, 苏彦捷. 视觉观点采择的发生发展及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 107-111.