时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 亲社会行为是指以牺牲自我利益为代价帮助他人的行为,按照损失利益属性,可分为时间亲社会行为、金钱亲社会行为。以往研究认为时间定价启动会导致个体减少亲社会行为,但是较少考察时间定价启动影响亲社会行为是否受主观社会阶层作用。本研究通过三个实验考察时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响。结果发现:(1)时间定价启动会减少亲社会行为;(2)主观社会阶层正向预测金钱亲社会行为,但无法预测时间亲社会行为;(3)时间定价启动与主观社会阶层存在交互作用:时间定价启动下,主观社会阶层正向预测金钱亲社会行为、反向预测时间亲社会行为;非时间定价启动下,主观社会阶层正向预测金钱亲社会行为,但无法预测时间亲社会行为。

关键词: 亲社会行为, 时间定价启动, 主观社会阶层, 交互作用

Abstract: Prosocial behavior is defined as behavior that helps others at the expense of self-interest, and can be classified as time-consuming pro-social behavior and money-consuming pro-social behavior according to the loss of benefit attribute. Previous research has suggested that putting a price for time priming leads individuals to reduce pro-social behavior, but less has examined whether putting a price for time priming affects pro-social behavior as a function of subjective social class. This study examined the effects of putting a price for time priming and subjective social class on pro-social behavior through three experiments. The results found that: (1) putting a price for time priming reduced pro-social behavior; (2) subjective social class positively predicted money-consuming pro-social behavior but failed to predict time-consuming pro-social behavior; (3) there was an interaction between putting a price on time priming and subjective social class: under putting a price on time priming, subjective social class positively predicted money-consuming pro-social behavior and negatively predicted time-consuming pro-social behavior; under non putting a price on time priming, subjective social class positively predicts money-consuming pro-social behavior but not time-consuming pro-social behavior under non putting a price on time priming.

Key words: prosocial behavior, putting a price on time priming, subjective social class, interaction

中图分类号:

B844

李强强, 胡佳. 时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 360-368.

LI Qiangqiang, HU Jia. The Influence of Subjective Social Class and Putting a Price for Time Priming on Individual Prosocial Behavior[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 360-368.

参考文献

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research:What, why, when and how.Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
Devoe, S. E., & House, J. (2012). Time, money, and happiness:How does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 466-474.
Devoe, S. E., House, J., & Zhong, C. (2013). Fast Food and Financial Impatience:A Socioecological Approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 476-494.
Devoe, S. E., Lee, B. Y., & Pfeffer, J. (2010). Hourly versus Salaried Payment and Decisions about Trading off Time and Money over Time.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(4), 627-640.
Devoe, S. E., & Pfeffer, J. (2007). When time is money:The effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 1-13.
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER:A general power analysis program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1-11.
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989).The roots of prosocial behavior in children. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Evans, J. A., Kunda, G., & Barley, S. R. (2004). Beach time, bridge time, and billable hours:The temporal structure of technical contracting.Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 1-38.
Korndorfer, M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015). A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.PLoS One, 10(7), e0133193.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.003
Kraus, M. W., & Callaghan, B. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior:The moderating role of public versus private contexts.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 769-777.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social Class, Sense of Control, and Social Explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992-1004.
Kraus, M. W., Tan, J. J. X., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2013). The social ladder:A rank-based perspective on social class.Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 81-96.
Li, J., Chen, Y., & Huang, X. (2015). Materialism moderates the effect of accounting for time on prosocial behaviors.Journal of Social Psychology, 155(6), 576-589.
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class:How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267-291.
Mogilner C. (2010). The pursuit of happiness:Time, money, and social connection.Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354.
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more:The influence of social class on prosocial behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771-784.
Piff, P. K., & Robinson, A. R. (2017). Social class and prosocial behavior:Current evidence, caveats, and questions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 6-10.
Pfeffer, J., & Devoe, S. E. (2012). The economic evaluation of time organizational causes and individual consequences.Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 47-62.
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money.Science, 314(5802), 1154-1156
Whillans, A. V., Caruso, E. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Both selfishness and selflessness start with the Self:How wealth shapes responses to charitable appeals.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 242-250.
解晓娜, 李小平. (2018). 主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(04), 563-569.
李爱梅, 荣恺兮, 高结怡, 谭飞, 彭元. (2015). "时间定价启动":概念、后果与心理机制. 心理科学进展, 23(10), 1679-1687.
李继波. (2016). 时间定价启动影响利他行为的实证研究——论超越自我中心在时间定价启动影响利他行为中的调节作用. 岭南师范学院学报, 37(01), 150-154.
李继波, 陈盈盈. (2016). 亲社会行为类型在时间定价启动影响亲社会行为中的调节作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(07), 1024-1026.
李继波, 黄希庭. (2014). 时间定价启动对亲社会行为的影响. 心理科学, 37(04), 925-929.
芦学璋, 郭永玉, 李静. (2014). 社会阶层与亲社会行为:回报预期的调节作用. 心理科学, 37(05), 1212-1219.
罗艺文. (2019). 社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响及其心理机制 (硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
王慧美. (2020). 时间定价启动、共情水平对大学生亲社会行为影响的研究 (硕士学位论文). 四川师范大学, 成都.
杨莹, 寇彧. (2017). 亲社会自主动机对青少年幸福感及亲社会行为的影响:基本心理需要满足的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(02), 163-171.
张潮, 刘赛芳, 隋玲, 刘金蕙, 张文焱. (2019). 大学生时间定价启动对内隐利他行为的影响机制. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27(05), 784-788.

相关文章 15

[1]	章洁敏, 陶云, 杨舒涵, 陈睿. 亲社会行为的概念表征及其方法述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 298-304.
[2]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[3]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[4]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[5]	雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[6]	王斯麒, 赵彬璇, 吴红, 刘伟. 婚姻质量对儿童亲社会行为的影响:父母积极情绪表达和教养行为的链式中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 323-330.
[7]	唐蕾, 刘衍玲, 杨营凯. 亲社会行为的认知过程及脑神经基础[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 437-446.
[8]	马利, 王滔. 残疾儿童心理健康对家长亲职压力的影响:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 126-133.
[9]	夏晓彤, 段锦云, 黄辛隐. 错失恐惧对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 344-352.
[10]	李倩倩, 姚力宁, 梁金军, 邢淑芬. 电视暴力对不同外倾性气质学前儿童社会行为的差异化影响——“一般攻击模型”与“催化剂模型”的理论之争[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 545-554.
[11]	张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持？来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[12]	方建东, 常保瑞. 怀旧与亲社会行为的关系:一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 303-311.
[13]	刘亚鹏, 邓慧华, 张明浩, 张光珍, 陆祖宏. 5-HTTLPR基因多态性和早期养育压力对学前儿童问题行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 85-94.
[14]	侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 417-425.
[15]	王文超, 伍新春, 田雨馨, 周宵. 青少年创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长对亲社会行为的影响:生命意义的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 112-119.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed