生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.06.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生成性绘图是学习心理学中一种有效的学习策略,能够促进学习者对科学文本知识的表征和深层理解。目前关于学习者生成性绘图的研究主要集中在个体学习领域,很少有研究探讨合作学习中生成性绘图的作用。本研究将合作学习与学习者生成性绘图相结合,探讨生成性绘图和合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响。实验1采用单因素(绘图、阅读)被试间设计来验证生成性绘图对学习效果以及认知负荷等主观体验的影响;实验2采用2(合作、个体)×2(绘图、阅读)被试间设计来探讨合作与生成性绘图对学习效果和学习者主观体验的影响。研究表明,生成性绘图和合作都可以有效促进高中生科学知识的学习效果;生成性绘图能够降低学习者的内在认知负荷;合作能够降低学习者的内在和外在认知负荷,提高学习者的相关认知负荷和学习兴趣。

关键词: 生成性绘图, 合作学习, 科学知识, 阅读, 高中生

Abstract: Learner-generated drawing is an effective learning strategy that can promote learners’ comprehending of science texts. Most of the research about learner-generated drawing focused on individual learning settings, and few studies explored learner-generated drawing in collaborative settings. This study combines cooperative learning with learner-generated drawing to explore the impact of generative drawing and cooperation on high school students’ scientific knowledge learning. In Experiment 1, a single factor (drawing vs. reading) between-subjects design was employed to investigate whether learner-generated drawing can facilitate learning and the influence on subjective experience such as cognitive load and interest. In Experiment 2, a 2 (drawing vs. reading) × 2 (individual learning vs. collaborative learning) between-subjects design was employed to investigate the effects of generative drawing and cooperation on scientific knowledge learning of high school students. The results show that both learner-generated drawing and cooperation can effectively promote the learning effect of high school students. Learner-generated drawing can reduce learners’ internal cognitive load. In addition, cooperative learning can reduce learners’ internal cognitive load and external cognitive load, and improve learners’ relevant cognitive load and learning interest.

Key words: learner-generated drawing, cooperative learning, scientific knowledge, reading, high school students

中图分类号:

G442

张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.

ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Wanying, WANG Yanqing, ZHAO Tingting, WANG Fuxing. The Effects of Learner-generated Drawing and Cooperative Learning on Scientific Knowledge Learning of High School Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.

参考文献

Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1 (1), 27.http://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6
Cai, H., & Gu, X. (2019). Supporting collaborative learning using a diagram-based visible thinking tool based on cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (5), 2329-2345.
Cheng, L., & Beal, C. R. (2020). Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68 (1), 225-247.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49 (4), 219-243.
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2), 315-324.
Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9 (4), 343-363.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E.(2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 717-741.
Fiorella, L., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Drawing boundary conditions for learning by drawing. Educational Psychology Review, 30 (3), 1115-1137.
Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22 (3), 340-374.
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35 (4), 258-291.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1), 92-102.
Johnson, D. W. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89 (1), 47-62.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38 (5), 365-379.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21 (1), 31-42.
Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2), 284-289.
Lin, L., Lee, C. H., Kalyuga, S., Wang, Y., Guan, S., & Wu, H. (2017). The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending a science text. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85 (1), 142-154.
Mason, L., Lowe, R., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). Self-generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38 (3), 211-224.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43-71). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (2), 223-246.
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 647-658.
Schmeck, A., Mayer, R. E., Opfermann, M., Pfeiffer, V., & Leutner, D. (2014). Drawing pictures during learning from scientific text: Testing the generative drawing effect and the prognostic drawing effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39 (4), 275-286.
Schwamborn, A., Mayer, R. E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (4), 872-879.
Schwamborn, A., Thillmann, H., Opfermann, M., & Leutner, D. (2011). Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (1), 89-93.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12 (2), 257-285.
Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 129-140.
Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (2), 142-166.
Van Meter, P., & Firetto, C. M. (2013). Cognitive model of drawing construction: Learning through the construction of drawings. In G. Schraw, M. T. McCrudden, & D. Robinson (Eds.), Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction. Learning through visual displays (pp. 247-280). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17 (4), 285-325.
Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48 (10), 1177-1198.
龚少英, 上官晨雨, 翟奎虎, 郭雅薇. (2017). 情绪设计对多媒体学习的影响. 心理学报, 49 (6), 771-782.
王燕青, 王福兴, 谢和平, 陈佳雪, 李文静, 胡祥恩. (2019). 一图抵千言:多媒体学习中的自我生成绘图策略. 心理科学进展, 27 (4), 623-635.
王玉鑫, 谢和平, 王福兴, 安婧, 郝艳斌. (2016). 多媒体学习的图文整合:空间邻近效应的元分析. 心理发展与教育, 32 (5), 565-578.

相关文章 15

[1]	甘严, 柏霁容, 罗明玥, 范奕敏, 刘苗苗, 闫梦格, 苏永强, 李虹. 小学新生朗读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对三年级阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 544-552.
[2]	韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[3]	李利平, 罗丽, 伍新春. 汉字识别和快速命名对阅读流畅的作用:基于成份观和发展观视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 391-399.
[4]	张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响：任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[5]	戴琳, 任筱宇, 赵婧, 毕鸿燕. 视觉大细胞-背侧通路干预下阅读障碍儿童的应答机制研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 830-839.
[6]	张珊珊, 吴佳钰, 王泓懿, 刘致宏. 线上真实自我呈现与高中生抑郁的纵向联系:归属需求的中介作用和人际敏感性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 903-912.
[7]	叶文婷, 滕召军, 黎杨杨, 崔宏晶, 聂倩. 父母心理控制、高中生抑郁症状及其生命意义感的纵向关系:一项交叉滞后模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 710-719.
[8]	李赛男, 王亚丽, 袁小源, 刘妮娜, 赵淑萍, 闫国利. 2~5年级小学生汉语阅读知觉广度的发展轨迹[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 305-312.
[9]	谢瑞波, 方园园, 伍新春, 阮世芳, 赵英. 小学中年级儿童成语理解的发展轨迹及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 68-76.
[10]	冯瑶, 王佳雯, 沈岚岚, 李宜逊, 宋学玲, 伍新春, 李虹, 陈文, 程亚华. 小学低年级儿童部件知识对三年级汉字识别和阅读理解的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 816-823.
[11]	夏艳雨, 李丹, 马艳歌, 韩宪国, 李正云. 高中生父母婚姻冲突、焦虑与教养方式：主客体互倚调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 335-345.
[12]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[13]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[14]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[15]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed