正负参照点下性别和损益情景对大学生延迟折扣的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.05.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大量研究表明,延迟折扣受到个体特质性和状态性因素的影响。本研究通过两个实验分别探究正参照点(实验1)和负参照点(实验2)下,特质性因素性别和状态性因素损益情景对大学生个体延迟折扣的影响。实验1研究发现,在正性参照点下,无论男女,收益情景的主观远期价值远高于损失情景。实验2研究发现,在负性参照点下,男女在损益情景的主观远期价值不同;与男性相比,女性的主观远期价值在损失情景中更高,而在收益情景中则无显著差异。本研究结果表明,在不同的参照点下,男女在损益情景中表现了不同的延迟折扣倾向;与男性相比,女性在负性参照点面对损失情景跨期选择时,更愿意选择延迟赔偿。

关键词: 延迟折扣, 跨期选择, 性别, 损益情景, 参照点

Abstract: Numerous studies have shown that delay discounting is affected by the trait and state factors. The study used two experiments to explore the effects of gender as a trait factor and gain-loss situation as a state factor on delay discounting of college students under positive reference point (Experiment 1) and negative reference point (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 found that under positive reference point, no matter male and female, the subjective long-term value of gain situation was higher than that of loss situation. Experiment 2 found that under negative reference point, male and female have different subjective long-term value in gain situation and loss situation; That is, the subjective long-term value of female was higher compared with male in loss situation, whereas there was no significant difference in gain situation. The results showed that under different reference points, male and female have different tendency to delay discounting in gain situation and loss situation. Compared with male, female is more willing to delay compensation in loss situation under negative reference point.

Key words: delay discounting, intertemporal choice, gender, gain-loss situation, reference points

中图分类号:

B844

诸钟烨, 谢于宏, 刘雷. 正负参照点下性别和损益情景对大学生延迟折扣的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 618-625.

ZHU Zhongye, XIE Yuhong, LIU Lei. The Effects of Gender and Gain-loss Situation on Delay Discounting of College Students under Positive and Negative Reference Points[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(5): 618-625.

参考文献

Beck, R. C., & Triplett, M. F. (2009). Test-retest reliability of a group-administered paper-pencil measure of delay discounting.Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(5), 345-355.
Ben-Ner, A.,Puttermann, L., Kong, F., & Magan, D. (2004). Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53(3), 333-352.
Bixter, M. T., & Rogers, W. A. (2019). Age-related differences in delay discounting:Immediate reward, reward magnitude, and social influence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(4), 471-484.
Bolla, K. I.,Eldreth, D. A., Matochik, J. A., & Cadet, J. L. (2004). Sex-related differences in a gambling task and its neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 14(11), 1226-1232.
van den Bos, R., Jolles, J., van der Knaap, L., Baars, A., & de Visser, L. (2012). Male and female Wistar rats differ in decision-making performance in a rodent version of the Iowa Gambling Task.Behavioural Brain Research, 234(2),375-379.
Cornwall, A. C., Byrne, K. A.,& Worthy, D. A. (2018). Gender differences in preference for reward frequency versus reward magnitude in decision-making under uncertainty. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 40-44.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences.Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474.
Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy:Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective.Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 202-207.
Dittrich, M., & Leipold, K. (2014). Gender differences in time preferences.Economics Letters, 122(3), 413-415.
Doidge, J. L., Flora, D. B., & Toplak, M. E. (2018). A Meta-analytic review of sex differences on delay of gratification and temporal discounting tasks in ADHD and typically developing samples. Journal of Attention Disorders, 25(4), 540-561.
Fujimoto, H.,& Park, E. S. (2010). Framing effects and gender differences in voluntary public goods provision experiments. Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(4),455-457.
Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being:The case for emotional intensity. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 61(3), 427-434.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference:A critical review.Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769-792.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames.New York:Cambridge University Press.
Kardos, Z., Tóth, B., Boha, R., File, B., & Molnár, M. (2017). Age-dependent characteristics of feedback evaluation related to monetary gains and losses.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 122, 42-49.
Kim, B. K., & Zauberman, G. (2009). Perception of anticipatory time in temporal discounting.Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 2(2), 91-101.
Kirby, K. N.,& Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards:Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 3(1),100-104.
Kirby, K. N., Winston, G. C., & Santiesteban, M. (2005). Impatience and grades:Delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college gpa. Learning & Individual Differences, 15(3), 213-222.
Lee, N. C., De, G. R. H. M., Annemarie, B., Sanne, D., Lydia, K., & Jelle, J. (2013). Age and educational track influence adolescent discounting of delayed rewards. Frontiers in Psychology, 4,993.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00993
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6),523-534.
Liu, L., Chen, X., Cui, J., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Neumann, D. L. (2016). Age differences in delay discounting in chinese adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 90,205-209.
Liu, L., Feng, T. Y., Chen, J., & Li, H. (2013). The value of emotion:How does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting?PLoS One, 8(11),e81717.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081717
Luking, K. R., Luby, J. L., & Barch, D. M. (2014). Kids, candy, brain and behavior:Age differences in responses to candy gains and losses.Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 82-92.
Malesza, M. (2019). Stress and delay discounting:The mediating role of difficulties in emotion regulation.Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 56-60.
Martínez-Loredo, V., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Carballo, J. L., & Fernández-Artamendi, S. (2017). Long-term reliability and stability of behavioral measures among adolescents:The Delay Discounting and Stroop tasks. Journal of Adolescence, 58, 33-39.
Mitchell, S. H., & Wilson, V. B. (2010). The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes:Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses. Behavioural Processes, 83(1),36-40.
Mischel, W.,Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933-938.
O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later.American Economic Review, 89(1),103-124.
Overman, W., Graham, L., Redmond, A., Eubank, R., Boettcher, L., Samplawski, O., & Walsh, K. (2006). Contemplation of moral dilemmas eliminates sex differences on the iowa gambling task.Behavioral Neuroscience, 120(4),817-825.
Petry, N. M. (2003). Discounting of money, health, and freedom in substance abusers and controls.Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71(2), 133-141.
Read, D., Olivola, C. Y., & Hardisty, D. J. (2017). The value of nothing:Asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making.Management Science, 63(12), 4277-4297.
Reynolds, B. (2006). A review of delay-discounting research with humans:Relations to drug use and gambling.Behavioral Pharmacology, 17(8),651-667.
Reavis, R., & Overman, W. H. (2001). Adult sex differences on a decision-making task previously shown to depend on the orbital prefrontal cortex.Behavioral Neuroscience, 115(1),196-206.
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The Rationality Quotient (RQ):Toward a test of rational thinking.Boston Review.
Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O'Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2010). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28-44.
Tang, Z., Zhang, H., Yan, A., & Qu, C. (2017). Time is money:The decision making of smartphone high users in gain and loss intertemporal choice.Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 363.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00363
Thomsen, D. K., Mehlsen, M. Y., Viidik, A., Sommerlund, B., & Zachariae, R. (2005). Age and gender differences in negative affect-Is there a role for emotion regulation?Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1935-1946.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance.Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
Wardley, M., & Alberhasky, M. (2021). Framing zero:Why losing nothing is better than gaining nothing.Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101641.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101641
de Water, E., Cillessen, A. H., & Scheres, A. (2014). Distinct age-related differences in temporal discounting and risk taking in adolescents and young adults.Child Development, 85(5),1881-1897.
Weafer, J., & de Wit, H. (2014). Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice. Addictive Behaviors, 39(11), 1573-1579.
Xu, L. J.,Liang, Z. Y., Wang, K., Li, S., & Jiang, T. Z. (2009). Neural mechanism of intertemporal choice:From discounting future gains to future losses. Brain Research, 1261, 65-74.
Zhang, Y. Y., Xu, L., Rao, L. L., Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., Jiang, T., … Liang, Z. Y. (2016). Gain-loss asymmetry in neural correlates of temporal discounting:An approach-avoidance motivation perspective. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 573-597.
Zhang, Y.Y., Xu, L., Zhu, Y.L., Wang, K., Hou, B., Zhou, Y. & Jiang, T. (2018). Separate neural networks for gains and losses in intertemporal choice.Neuroscience Bulletin, 34(5), 725-735.
陈海贤, 何贵兵. (2014). 心理距离对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 46(05), 677-690.
何贵兵, 于永菊. (2006). 决策过程中参照点效应研究述评. 心理科学进展, 14(03), 408-412.
刘雷, 苏缇, 彭娟, 郭逸群, 冯廷勇. (2014). 延迟折扣的认知与神经机制:特质性与状态性研究取向. 心理科学进展, 22(07), 1047-1061.
马文娟, 索涛, 李亚丹, 罗笠铢, 冯廷勇, 李红. (2012). 得失框架效应的分离——来自收益与损失型跨期选择的研究. 心理学报, 44(08),1038-1046.
索涛, 顾本柏, 张辰炎, 刘雷. (2018). 不同特质自控者在跨期选择中自我损耗后效的差异. 心理科学, 41(06), 1443-1449.
王盼盼, 何嘉梅. (2020).情景预见对跨期决策的影响机制. 心理学报, 52(04), 38-54.
王晓田, 王鹏. (2013). 决策的三参照点理论:从原理到应用. 心理科学进展, 21(08),1331-1346.
徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽. (2019). 享受当下,还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 51(01), 96-105.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[4]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[5]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[6]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[7]	李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[8]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[9]	白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[10]	刘春晖, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 母亲男孩偏好和亲子沟通的关系:子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 64-71.
[11]	李启明. 双元孝道代际传递:亲子性别和子女年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 808-817.
[12]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[13]	施国春, 赵东妍, 范会勇. 2004至2016年中国大学生身体自尊的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 648-659.
[14]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[15]	唐辉一, 陈倩, 吴俊华. 大学生社会性发展与心理健康的关系:述情障碍的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 735-742.