心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 889-896.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.06.16

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

鳏与寡对老年人抑郁水平的影响:社会网络的调节作用

唐丹1,2,3, 乔欣1, 邓雨萌1   

  1. 1. 中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心, 北京 100872;
    2. 中国人民大学北京社会建设研究院, 北京 100872;
    3. 中国人民大学老年学研究所, 北京 100872
  • 发布日期:2021-11-16
  • 通讯作者: 邓雨萌 E-mail:18642791791@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(18JJD840001);北京市社科基金基地项目(19DJSRB006)。

Gendered Impact of Widowhood on Depressive Symptoms among Chinese Older Adults: The Moderating Role of Social Networks

TANG Dan1,2,3, QIAO Xin1, DENG Yumeng1   

  1. 1. Center for Population and Development Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    2. Research Institute of Social Construction of Beijing, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    3. Institute of Gerontology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
  • Published:2021-11-16

摘要: 为了进一步探讨丧偶与抑郁水平之间的关系,讨论社会网络(包括家庭网络和朋友网络)在其中的作用机制,并比较丧偶与抑郁水平的关系及社会网络作用机制的性别差异,本研究对中国老年社会追踪调查(CLASS)2014年调查中7649名老年人(其中丧偶老人2149名,男性715,女性1434;在婚老人5500名,男性3398,女性2102)的数据进行分析。结果发现,丧偶对老年人抑郁水平有消极影响,但影响作用不存在性别差异;男性丧偶老人的朋友网络显著低于男性在婚老人,而女性老年人中无此差异;相对于在婚老人,家庭网络对男性丧偶老人的抑郁水平的缓解作用更大,而在女性样本未发现家庭网络的缓冲作用。应重视丧偶老年人,特别是男性丧偶老年人,家庭网络的建设与维护,从而缓解丧偶对老年人心理健康的消极影响。

关键词: 老年, 丧偶, 社会网络, 抑郁水平

Abstract: Data are derived from the 2014 baseline survey of the China Longitudinal Social Survey (CLASS), which provides a sample of older adults who had been married. This Study examines the association between widowhood and the depressive symptoms of older adults, and addressed the moderating role of social networks (measured by family ties and friendship ties) on the perceived association. Furthermore, the study analyzed gender as a moderator of these associations. The results showed that widowhood had a negative effect on the depression symptoms of the older adults, but there was no gender difference in this association. The friendship ties of the male widowed older adults was significantly lower than that of the married elderly, but there was no such difference among the female sample. Compared with the married older adults, the family ties had a greater effect on alleviating the depression level of the male widowed older adults, but the buffering effect of the family network was not found in the female sample.

Key words: elderly, widowhood, social networks, depressive symptoms

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2014). The convoy model:Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82-92.
Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Do social relationships buffer the effects of widowhood? A prospective study of adaptation to the loss of a spouse. Journal of Personality, 82(5), 367-378.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
Förster, F., Pabst, A., Stein, J., Röhr, S., Löbner, M., Heser, K., …Steffi, G. (2019). Are older men more vulnerable to depression than women after losing their spouse? Evidence from three German old-age cohorts (age different. de platform). Journal of Affective Disorders, 256(1), 650-657.
Ha, J. H., & Ingersoll-Dayton, B. (2011). Moderators in the relationship between social contact and psychological distress among widowed adults.Aging & Mental Health, 15(3), 354-363.
Isherwood, L. M., King, D. S., & Luszcz, M. A. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of social engagement in late-life widowhood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 74(3), 211-229.
Jadhav, A., & Weir, D. (2017). Widowhood and depression in a cross-national perspective:Evidence from the united states, Europe, Korea, and China. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), 143-153.
Jeon, G. S., Jang, S. N., Kim, D. S., & Cho, S. I. (2013). Widowhood and depressive symptoms among Korean elders:The role of social ties. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(6), 963-973.
Li, Y., Xu, L., Ming, J., Chi, I., & Xie, B. (2016). Social participation and life satisfaction among widowed older adults in China. Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research, 5(5), 353-358.
Litwin, H., & Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 379-388.
Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., Von, R. K. W., Beck, J. C., Stuck, A. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503-513.
Perkins, J. M., Lee, H. Y., James, K. S., Oh, J., Krishna, A.,Heo, J., & Subramanian, S. V. (2016). Marital status, widowhood duration, gender and health outcomes:A cross-sectional study among older adults in India. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1032.
Powers, S. M.,Bisconti, T. L., & Bergeman, C. S. (2014). Trajectories of social support and well-being across the first two years of widowhood. Death Studies, 38(8), 499-509.
Santini, Z. I., Fiori, K. L., Feeney, J., Tyrovolas, S., Haro, J. M., & Koyanagi, A. (2016). Social relationships, loneliness, and mental health among older men and women in Ireland:A prospective community-based study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 204, 59-69.
Schwartz, E., & Litwin, H. (2018). Social network changes among older Europeans:The role of gender. European Journal of Ageing, 15(4), 359-367.
Sliverstein, M., Cong, Z., & Li, S. (2006). Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China:Consequences for psychological well-being. Journals of Gerontology:Social Sciences, 61(5), S256-S266.
Stimpson, J. P., Ju, H., Raji, M. A., & Eschbach, K. (2007). Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(2), 215-222.
Tang, D., Lin, Z., & Chen, F. (2020). Moving beyond living arrangements:The role of family and friendship ties in promoting mental health for urban and rural older adults in China.Aging & Mental Health, 24(9), 1523-1532.
Utz, R. L., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. B. (2002). The effect of widowhood on older adults' social participation:An evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. The Gerontologist, 42(4), 522-533.
VanGrootheest, D. S., Beekman, A. T., Van Groenou, M. B., & Deeg, D. J. (1999). Sex differences in depression after widowhood. Do men suffer more? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34(7), 391-398.
Vries, B. D., Utz, R., Caserta, M., & Lund, D. (2014). Friend and family contact and support in early widowhood. Journals of Gerontology, 69(1), 75-84.
Wade, J. B., Hart, R. P., Wade, J. H.,Bekenstein, J., Ham, C., & Bajaj, J. S. (2016). Does the death of a spouse increase subjective well-being:An assessment in a population of adults with neurological illness? Healthy Aging Research, 5(2), 1-9.
Xu, J., Wu, Z., Schimmele, C. M., & Li, S. (2020). Widowhood and depression:a longitudinal study of older persons in rural china. Aging & Mental Health, 24(6), 914-922.
陈立新. (2008). 北京市城市丧偶老人抑郁症状及其影响因素分析. 见 北京师范大学(编). 学术前沿论坛科学发展:社会秩序与价值建构(pp.271-276).北京师范大学生出版社.
程新峰, 姜全保. (2017). 丧偶与老年人主观幸福感研究:性别差异与城乡差异分析. 人口与发展, 23(4), 59-79.
池丽萍. (2014). 婚姻会使人幸福吗:实证结果和理论解释. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 136-144.
狄文婧, 陈青萍. (2009). 丧偶老年人主观幸福感及其影响因素. 中国心理卫生杂志, 23(5), 372-376.
宫宇轩. (1994). 社会支持与健康的关系研究概述. 心理科学进展, 2(2),34-39.
何艳芝. (2016). 社会支持对丧偶老人心理健康状况的影响研究 (博士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
焦开山. (2010). 中国老人丧偶与其死亡风险的关系分析——配偶照顾的作用. 人口研究, 34(3), 66-78.
麻超, 张怡萱, 张澜,马利. (2018). 社会支持在丧偶老人生存质量与心理需求中的中介作用. 中国老年学杂志, 38(1), 203-205.
唐丹, 陈章明. (2011). 相同生活背景下老年人心理健康的性别差异及年龄相关变化. 中国老年学杂志, 31(1), 118-121.
唐丹, 姜凯迪. (2015). 家庭支持与朋友支持对不同自理能力老年人抑郁水平的影响. 心理与行为研究, 13(1), 65-69.
王莉莉. (2011). 女性丧偶老年人的养老保障状况分析. 南方人口, 26(2), 33-40+66.
吴晓莲, 雷利霞, 周繁华, 李晨曦. (2014). 农村不同性别丧偶老人抑郁状况及影响因素的调查研究. 中国实用护理杂志, 30(17), 1-4.
肖汉仕.(2016). 湖南丧偶老人的心理健康状况和社会支持. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(10), 1560-1563.
叶欣. (2018). 中国丧偶老年人居住安排对心理健康的影响研究——基于CHARLS 2015全国追踪调查数据的分析. 人口与发展, 24(5), 113-121.
袁正, 李玲. (2017). 婚姻与幸福感:基于WVS的中国微观数据. 中国经济问题,(1), 24-35.
赵忻怡, 潘锦棠. (2014). 城市女性丧偶老人社会活动参与和抑郁状况的关系. 妇女研究论丛,(2), 25-33.
周琴, 毕鸿燕. (2015). 北京农村不同性别丧偶老人抑郁状况及影响因素. 中国老年学杂志, 35(2), 1058-1059.
[1] 李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[2] 李金凤, 詹洁辰, 王大华. 情绪唤醒度对老年人健康谣言转发意愿的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 202-211.
[3] 袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点:基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[4] 金梦菡, 徐慧, 龚先旻, 彭华茂. 主播情绪唤醒度对中老年人直播购物的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 50-59.
[5] 曹贤才, 张浩, 周博霖, 陈宪涛, 崔晨虹, 吴捷. 影响老年人技术接受的因素——基于技术接受模型的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 799-816.
[6] 赵沐恩, 韩布新, 王大华. 老年人身体健康与依恋长期性变化的联系:六年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 663-674.
[7] 牛更枫, 金斯妤, 史晓涵, 杨文城, 周宗奎. 跨越年龄数字鸿沟:老年人互联网使用行为及其促进和阻碍因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 740-749.
[8] 艾美杉, 刘玺, 王大华. 失独父母的社区支持现状及其与心理健康的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 720-728.
[9] 刘啸莳, 曹中平, 俞俊杰, 莫碧波, 吴芸. 受教育水平能促进农村中老年人的身体健康吗?——安全感和年龄的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 729-736.
[10] 余林伟, 李爽, 刘燊, 潘文沛, 徐强, 张林. 老年人模糊表情识别的积极效应及其机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 196-206.
[11] 张弘弛, 毛伟宾, 崔慧园, 安姝, 李庆元. 价值对老年人项目记忆和联结记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 625-634.
[12] 林瑶, 张宝山, 徐冉, 张何雅婷. 老年人睡眠质量与家人沟通质量的关系及其影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 200-209.
[13] 刘钰, 苏彦捷, 曹春梅, 丁宇, 樊煜. 社区老年人执行功能和加工速度与运动能力的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
[14] 黄潇潇, 张宝山, 俞国良. 日常小团体多样性与老年人身体症状的关系:团体积极情绪的中介作用和心理压力感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 729-738.
[15] 郭滢, 肖红蕊, 龚先旻, 王大华. 情绪影响错误记忆认知机制的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 17-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!