鳏与寡对老年人抑郁水平的影响:社会网络的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.06.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了进一步探讨丧偶与抑郁水平之间的关系，讨论社会网络（包括家庭网络和朋友网络）在其中的作用机制，并比较丧偶与抑郁水平的关系及社会网络作用机制的性别差异，本研究对中国老年社会追踪调查（CLASS）2014年调查中7649名老年人（其中丧偶老人2149名，男性715，女性1434；在婚老人5500名，男性3398，女性2102）的数据进行分析。结果发现，丧偶对老年人抑郁水平有消极影响，但影响作用不存在性别差异；男性丧偶老人的朋友网络显著低于男性在婚老人，而女性老年人中无此差异；相对于在婚老人，家庭网络对男性丧偶老人的抑郁水平的缓解作用更大，而在女性样本未发现家庭网络的缓冲作用。应重视丧偶老年人，特别是男性丧偶老年人，家庭网络的建设与维护，从而缓解丧偶对老年人心理健康的消极影响。

关键词: 老年, 丧偶, 社会网络, 抑郁水平

Abstract: Data are derived from the 2014 baseline survey of the China Longitudinal Social Survey (CLASS), which provides a sample of older adults who had been married. This Study examines the association between widowhood and the depressive symptoms of older adults, and addressed the moderating role of social networks (measured by family ties and friendship ties) on the perceived association. Furthermore, the study analyzed gender as a moderator of these associations. The results showed that widowhood had a negative effect on the depression symptoms of the older adults, but there was no gender difference in this association. The friendship ties of the male widowed older adults was significantly lower than that of the married elderly, but there was no such difference among the female sample. Compared with the married older adults, the family ties had a greater effect on alleviating the depression level of the male widowed older adults, but the buffering effect of the family network was not found in the female sample.

Key words: elderly, widowhood, social networks, depressive symptoms

中图分类号:

B844

唐丹, 乔欣, 邓雨萌. 鳏与寡对老年人抑郁水平的影响:社会网络的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 889-896.

TANG Dan, QIAO Xin, DENG Yumeng. Gendered Impact of Widowhood on Depressive Symptoms among Chinese Older Adults: The Moderating Role of Social Networks[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 889-896.

参考文献

Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2014). The convoy model:Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82-92.
Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Do social relationships buffer the effects of widowhood? A prospective study of adaptation to the loss of a spouse. Journal of Personality, 82(5), 367-378.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
Förster, F., Pabst, A., Stein, J., Röhr, S., Löbner, M., Heser, K., …Steffi, G. (2019). Are older men more vulnerable to depression than women after losing their spouse? Evidence from three German old-age cohorts (age different. de platform). Journal of Affective Disorders, 256(1), 650-657.
Ha, J. H., & Ingersoll-Dayton, B. (2011). Moderators in the relationship between social contact and psychological distress among widowed adults.Aging & Mental Health, 15(3), 354-363.
Isherwood, L. M., King, D. S., & Luszcz, M. A. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of social engagement in late-life widowhood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 74(3), 211-229.
Jadhav, A., & Weir, D. (2017). Widowhood and depression in a cross-national perspective:Evidence from the united states, Europe, Korea, and China. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), 143-153.
Jeon, G. S., Jang, S. N., Kim, D. S., & Cho, S. I. (2013). Widowhood and depressive symptoms among Korean elders:The role of social ties. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(6), 963-973.
Li, Y., Xu, L., Ming, J., Chi, I., & Xie, B. (2016). Social participation and life satisfaction among widowed older adults in China. Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research, 5(5), 353-358.
Litwin, H., & Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 379-388.
Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., Von, R. K. W., Beck, J. C., Stuck, A. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503-513.
Perkins, J. M., Lee, H. Y., James, K. S., Oh, J., Krishna, A.,Heo, J., & Subramanian, S. V. (2016). Marital status, widowhood duration, gender and health outcomes:A cross-sectional study among older adults in India. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1032.
Powers, S. M.,Bisconti, T. L., & Bergeman, C. S. (2014). Trajectories of social support and well-being across the first two years of widowhood. Death Studies, 38(8), 499-509.
Santini, Z. I., Fiori, K. L., Feeney, J., Tyrovolas, S., Haro, J. M., & Koyanagi, A. (2016). Social relationships, loneliness, and mental health among older men and women in Ireland:A prospective community-based study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 204, 59-69.
Schwartz, E., & Litwin, H. (2018). Social network changes among older Europeans:The role of gender. European Journal of Ageing, 15(4), 359-367.
Sliverstein, M., Cong, Z., & Li, S. (2006). Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China:Consequences for psychological well-being. Journals of Gerontology:Social Sciences, 61(5), S256-S266.
Stimpson, J. P., Ju, H., Raji, M. A., & Eschbach, K. (2007). Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(2), 215-222.
Tang, D., Lin, Z., & Chen, F. (2020). Moving beyond living arrangements:The role of family and friendship ties in promoting mental health for urban and rural older adults in China.Aging & Mental Health, 24(9), 1523-1532.
Utz, R. L., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. B. (2002). The effect of widowhood on older adults' social participation:An evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. The Gerontologist, 42(4), 522-533.
VanGrootheest, D. S., Beekman, A. T., Van Groenou, M. B., & Deeg, D. J. (1999). Sex differences in depression after widowhood. Do men suffer more? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34(7), 391-398.
Vries, B. D., Utz, R., Caserta, M., & Lund, D. (2014). Friend and family contact and support in early widowhood. Journals of Gerontology, 69(1), 75-84.
Wade, J. B., Hart, R. P., Wade, J. H.,Bekenstein, J., Ham, C., & Bajaj, J. S. (2016). Does the death of a spouse increase subjective well-being:An assessment in a population of adults with neurological illness? Healthy Aging Research, 5(2), 1-9.
Xu, J., Wu, Z., Schimmele, C. M., & Li, S. (2020). Widowhood and depression:a longitudinal study of older persons in rural china. Aging & Mental Health, 24(6), 914-922.
陈立新. (2008). 北京市城市丧偶老人抑郁症状及其影响因素分析. 见北京师范大学(编). 学术前沿论坛科学发展:社会秩序与价值建构(pp.271-276).北京师范大学生出版社.
程新峰, 姜全保. (2017). 丧偶与老年人主观幸福感研究:性别差异与城乡差异分析. 人口与发展, 23(4), 59-79.
池丽萍. (2014). 婚姻会使人幸福吗:实证结果和理论解释. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 136-144.
狄文婧, 陈青萍. (2009). 丧偶老年人主观幸福感及其影响因素. 中国心理卫生杂志, 23(5), 372-376.
宫宇轩. (1994). 社会支持与健康的关系研究概述. 心理科学进展, 2(2),34-39.
何艳芝. (2016). 社会支持对丧偶老人心理健康状况的影响研究 (博士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
焦开山. (2010). 中国老人丧偶与其死亡风险的关系分析——配偶照顾的作用. 人口研究, 34(3), 66-78.
麻超, 张怡萱, 张澜,马利. (2018). 社会支持在丧偶老人生存质量与心理需求中的中介作用. 中国老年学杂志, 38(1), 203-205.
唐丹, 陈章明. (2011). 相同生活背景下老年人心理健康的性别差异及年龄相关变化. 中国老年学杂志, 31(1), 118-121.
唐丹, 姜凯迪. (2015). 家庭支持与朋友支持对不同自理能力老年人抑郁水平的影响. 心理与行为研究, 13(1), 65-69.
王莉莉. (2011). 女性丧偶老年人的养老保障状况分析. 南方人口, 26(2), 33-40+66.
吴晓莲, 雷利霞, 周繁华, 李晨曦. (2014). 农村不同性别丧偶老人抑郁状况及影响因素的调查研究. 中国实用护理杂志, 30(17), 1-4.
肖汉仕.(2016). 湖南丧偶老人的心理健康状况和社会支持. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(10), 1560-1563.
叶欣. (2018). 中国丧偶老年人居住安排对心理健康的影响研究——基于CHARLS 2015全国追踪调查数据的分析. 人口与发展, 24(5), 113-121.
袁正, 李玲. (2017). 婚姻与幸福感:基于WVS的中国微观数据. 中国经济问题,(1), 24-35.
赵忻怡, 潘锦棠. (2014). 城市女性丧偶老人社会活动参与和抑郁状况的关系. 妇女研究论丛,(2), 25-33.
周琴, 毕鸿燕. (2015). 北京农村不同性别丧偶老人抑郁状况及影响因素. 中国老年学杂志, 35(2), 1058-1059.

相关文章 15

[1]	余林伟, 李爽, 刘燊, 潘文沛, 徐强, 张林. 老年人模糊表情识别的积极效应及其机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 196-206.
[2]	张弘弛, 毛伟宾, 崔慧园, 安姝, 李庆元. 价值对老年人项目记忆和联结记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 625-634.
[3]	林瑶, 张宝山, 徐冉, 张何雅婷. 老年人睡眠质量与家人沟通质量的关系及其影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 200-209.
[4]	刘钰, 苏彦捷, 曹春梅, 丁宇, 樊煜. 社区老年人执行功能和加工速度与运动能力的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
[5]	黄潇潇, 张宝山, 俞国良. 日常小团体多样性与老年人身体症状的关系：团体积极情绪的中介作用和心理压力感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 729-738.
[6]	郭滢, 肖红蕊, 龚先旻, 王大华. 情绪影响错误记忆认知机制的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 17-25.
[7]	刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[8]	林之萱, 杨莹, 寇彧. 老年人的元刻板印象及其对社会互动的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 686-693.
[9]	辛素飞, 岳阳明, 辛自强. 1996至2016年中国老年人心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 753-761.
[10]	周玮, 洪紫静, 胡蓉蓉, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 亲子支持与老年人抑郁情绪的关系:安全感和情绪表达的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 249-256.
[11]	吴玉婷, 苑鑫, 王雨晴, 朱慧, 毛叶琳, 金灿灿. 广场舞组织氛围和老年人主观幸福感的关系:组织认同和自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 624-631.
[12]	张骏, 仝文, 刘志方. 不同词长中文句子阅读知觉广度的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 312-319.
[13]	牛玉柏, 郝泽生, 王任振, 洪芳. 老年人乐观、领悟社会支持与主观幸福感的关系—控制策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 227-235.
[14]	辛素飞, 岳阳明, 辛自强, 林崇德. 1996至2015年中国老年人社会支持的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 672-681.
[15]	张金凤, 汪彦. 目标坚持性和目标灵活性对老年夫妻幸福感的影响:基于行动者-对象互依性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 750-757.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed