初中生欺凌、受害与亲社会行为的关系：基于发展级联理论的交叉滞后分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.02.12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用欺凌/受害行为量表和亲社会行为量表对320名北京市初中生进行为期三年的追踪调查,应用交叉滞后模型探讨欺凌、受害和亲社会行为的发展级联关系及潜在的性别差异。结果发现:(1)初中三年的欺凌、受害行为较为稳定,初二至初三的欺凌和受害行为之间存在显著的双向正向预测关系;(2)初一、初二时的亲社会行为显著负向预测下一学年的欺凌和受害行为,仅初二时的欺凌、受害行为显著负向预测初三的亲社会行为;(3)欺凌与受害对亲社会行为的预测作用存在显著的性别差异,初二男生的欺凌行为和女生的受害行为显著负向预测其初三的亲社会行为。结果启示相关教育工作者,应积极创设相关环境,提高所有学生的亲社会行为水平,有性别针对性地及时干预欺凌和受害行为,促进青少年社会行为健康发展。

关键词: 初中生, 欺凌, 受害, 亲社会行为, 交叉滞后分析

Abstract: This study examined the developmental stability and interrelations of bullying, victimization, and prosocial behavior by employing a three-year cross-lagged panel design among 320 Chinese middle school students. Guided by the developmental cascades model, The findings revealed that: (1) Bullying and victimization were relatively stable over the three years of middle school, with a significant bidirectional association from T2 to T3; (2) Prosocial behavior at T1 and T2 predicted lower bullying and victimization in the following year, while only bullying and victimization at T2 negatively predicted prosocial behavior at T3; (3) Significant gender differences were also observed. Among boys, bullying at T2 negatively predicted prosocial behavior at T3, while among girls, victimization at T2 negatively predicted prosocial behavior at T3. This research offered valuable understanding of the interplay between these positive and negative behaviors and emphasized the significance of fostering prosocial behavior and intervening bullying victimization at early adolescence.

Key words: middle school students, bullying, victimization, prosocial behavior, cross-lagged panel analysis

中图分类号:

B844

李蓓蕾, 林彤, 赖梅艳, 车猛, 邓林园. 初中生欺凌、受害与亲社会行为的关系：基于发展级联理论的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 264-273.

LI Beilei, LIN Tong, LAI Meiyan, CHE Meng, DENG Linyuan. Bullying, Victimization and Prosocial Behavior: A Cross-lagged Panel Study among Chinese Early Adolescents[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 264-273.

参考文献

Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory.Criminology, 30(4), 475-500.
Asparouhov, T. (2006). General multi-level modeling with sampling weights.Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 35(3), 439-460.
Aurino, E., Lleras-Muney, A., Tarozzi, A., & Tinoco, B. (2023). The rise and fall of SES gradients in heights around the world.Journal of Health Economics, 91, Article e102797. https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.jhealeco.2023.102797
Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Sorrentino, A. (2017). School bullying and cyberbullying among boys and girls: Roles and overlap.Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(9), 937-951.
Berger, C., Batanova, M., & Cance, J. D. (2015). Aggressive and prosocial? Examining latent profiles of behavior, social status, machiavellianism, and empathy.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2230-2244.
Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perceptions:A sequential model. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 135-145.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment.Child Development, 79(5), 1185-1229.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504.
Chen, X., & French, D. C. (2008). Children's social competence in cultural context.Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 591-616.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255.
Christina, S., Magson, N. R., Kakar, V., & Rapee, R. M. (2021). The bidirectional relationships between peer victimization and internalizing problems in school-aged children: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical Psychology Review, 85, Article e101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101979
Chu, X. W., Fan, C. Y., Liu, Q. Q., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts: A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2384-2400.
Cillessen, A. H., Mayeux, L., Ha, T., de Bruyn, E. H., & LaFontana, K. M. (2014). Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence.Aggressive Behavior, 40(3), 204-213.
Closson, L. M., & Watanabe, L. (2018). Popularity in the peer group and victimization within friendship cliques during early adolescence.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(3), 327-351.
Cooley, J. L., Frazer, A. L., Fite, P. J., Brown, S., & DiPierro, M. (2017). Anxiety symptoms as a moderator of the reciprocal links between forms of aggression and peer victimization in middle childhood. Aggressive Behavior, 43(5), 450-459.
Coyne, S. M., Archer, J., & Eslea, M. (2006). “We're not friends anymore! Unless…”: The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 294-307.
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children's future social adjustment.Child Development, 67(5), 2317-2327.
De Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H., & Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(4), 543-566.
De Guzman, M. R. T., Do, K. A., & Kok, C. M. (2014). The cultural contexts of children's prosocial behaviors. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp.221-241). Oxford University Press.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender.American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658.
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors.Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91-119.
Ellis, B. J., Volk, A. A., Gonzalez, J. M., & Embry, D. D. (2016). The meaningful roles intervention: An evolutionary approach to reducing bullying and increasing prosocial behavior.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(4), 622-637.
Eron, L. D., & Huesmann, L. R. (1984). The relation of prosocial behavior to the development of aggression and psychopathology.Aggressive Behavior, 10(3), 201-211.
Falla, D., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Runions, K., & Romera, E. M. (2022). Why do victims become perpetrators of peer bullying? Moral disengagement in the cycle of violence.Youth & Society, 54(3), 397-418.
Farrell, A. H., & Dane, A. V. (2020). Bullying, victimization, and prosocial resource control strategies: Differential relations with dominance and alliance formation.Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 270-283.
Fu, X., Li, S., Shen, C., Zhu, K., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Zhang, M. (2023). Effect of prosocial behavior on school bullying victimization among children and adolescents: Peer and student-teacher relationships as mediators. Journal of Adolescence, 95(2), 322-335.
Fu, X., Lv, Y., Yang, Z., Yu, X., & Wang, R. (2018). Chinese adolescents’ power distance value and prosocial behavior toward powerful people: A longitudinal study.PLoS ONE, 13(12), Article e0208473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208473
Giumetti, G. W., Kowalski, R. M., & Feinn, R. S. (2022). Predictors and outcomes of cyberbullying among college students: A two wave study.Aggressive Behavior, 48(1), 40-54.
Griese, E. R., Buhs, E. S., & Lester, H. F. (2016). Peer victimization and prosocial behavior rajectories: Exploring sources of resilience for victims.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.01.009
Hansen, T. B., Steenberg, L. M., Palic, S., & Elklit, A. (2012). A review of psychological factors related to bullying victimization in schools.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 383-387.
Hartl, A. C., Laursen, B., Cantin, S., & Vitaro, F. (2020). A test of the bistrategic control hypothesis of adolescent popularity.Child Development, 91(3), 635-648.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279-309.
Hay, D. F. (1994). Prosocial development.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 35(1), 29-71.
Hellström, L., & Beckman, L. (2020). Adolescents’ perception of gender differences in bullying.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 90-96.
Hellström, L., & Lundberg, A. (2020). Understanding bullying from young people’s perspectives: An exploratory study.Educational Research, 62(4), 414-433.
Jindal-Snape, D., Hannah, E. F. S., Cantali, D., Barlow, W., & Mac-Gillivray, S. (2020). Systematic literature review of primary-secondary transitions: International research.Review of Education, 8(2), 526-566.
Kim, J., Leban, L., Hong, J. S., & Lee, Y. (2023). Sex differences in the overlap between bullying perpetration and victimization: A developmental perspective.Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 9(1), 35-53.
Kokko, K., Tremblay, R. E., Lacourse, E., Nagin, D. S., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Trajectories of prosocial behavior and physical aggression in middle childhood: Links to adolescent school dropout and physical violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(3), 403-428.
Låftman, S. B., Grigorian, K., Lundin, A., Östberg, V., & Raninen, J. (2024). Bullying experiences before and after the transition from lower to upper secondary school: Associations with subsequent mental health in a Swedish cohort.BMC Public Health, 24(1), Article e27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17443-4
Låftman, S. B., & Modin, B. (2017). Peer victimization among classmates—associations with students’ internalizing problems, self-esteem, and life satisfaction.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(10), Article e1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101218
Leadbeater, B. J., Blatt, S. J., & Quinlan, D. M. (1995). Gender-linked vulnerabilities to depressive symptoms, stress, and problem behaviors in adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0501_1
Leadbeater, B. J., Boone, E. M., Sangster, N. A., & Mathieson, L. C. (2006). Sex differences in the personal costs and benefits of relational and physical aggression in high school.Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 409-419.
Lee, J. M., Kim, J., Hong, J. S., & Marsack-Topolewski, C. N. (2021). From bully victimization to aggressive behavior: Applying the problem behavior theory, theory of stress and coping, and general strain theory to explore potential pathways.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21-22), 10314-10337.
Lian, Y., Liu, L., Lu, Z., & Wang, W. (2022). Longitudinal relationships between bullying and prosocial behavior: The mediating roles of trauma-related guilt and shame.Psychology Journal, 11(4), 492-499.
Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
Malti, T., Perren, S., & Buchmann, M. (2010). Children’s peer victimization, empathy, and emotional symptoms.Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41(1), 98-113.
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades.Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 491-495.
Mathieson, L. C., Murray-Close, D., Crick, N. R., Woods, K. E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Geiger, T. C., & Morales, J. R. (2011). Hostile intent attributions and relational aggression: The moderating roles of emotional sensitivity, gender, and victimization.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(7), 977-987.
McCarty, S., Teie, S., McCutchen, J., & Geller, E. S. (2016). Actively caring to prevent bullying in an elementary school: Prompting and rewarding prosocial behavior.Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 44(3), 164-176.
Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 324-344.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10(4), 397-438.
Olweus, D. (1979). Stability of aggressive reaction patterns in males: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 86(4), 852-875.
Östberg, V., Modin, B., & Låftman, S. B. (2018). Exposure to school bullying and psychological health in young adulthood: A prospective 10-year follow-up study.Journal of School Violence, 17(2), 194-209.
Ostrov, J. M., Kamper, K. E., Hart, E. J., Godleski, S. A., & Blakely-McClure, S. J. (2014). A gender-balanced approach to the study of peer victimization and aggression subtypes in early childhood.Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 575-587.
Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2016). Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents’(cyber) bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 162-172.
Pouwels, J. L., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2016). Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria.Aggressive Behavior, 42(3), 239-253.
Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Van De Schoot, R., Aleva, L., & Van Der Meulen, M. (2013). Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of the peer group: A three wave longitudinal analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1217-1229.
Rosen, P. J., Milich, R., & Harris, M. J. (2007). Victims of their own cognitions: Implicit social cognitions, emotional distress, and peer victimization.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 211-226.
Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates.Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 261-275.
Scholte, R. H., Engels, R. C., Overbeek, G., De Kemp, R. A., & Haselager, G. J. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 217-228.
Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Farver, J. M. (2001). Correlates of victimization in Chinese children's peer groups.Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 520-532.
Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735-747.
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K.,& Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 547-560.
Stubbs-Richardson, M., Sinclair, H. C., Goldberg, R. M., Ellithorpe, C. N., & Amadi, S. C. (2018). Reaching out versus lashing out: Examining gender differences in experiences with and responses to bullying in high school.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 39-66.
Swearer, S. M., Turner, R. K., Givens, J. E., & Pollack, W. S. (2008). “You're so gay!”: Do different forms of bullying matter for adolescent males?School Psychology Review, 37(2), 160-173.
van Den Broek, N., Deutz, M. H., Schoneveld, E. A., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2016). Behavioral correlates of prioritizing popularity in adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(12), 2444-2454.
Walters, G. D. (2021). School-age bullying victimization and perpetration: A meta-analysis of prospective studies and research.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(5), 1129-1139.
Wang, C., Li, B., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., & Xu, P. (2022). Prosocial behavior and teachers’ attitudes towards bullying on peer victimization among middle school students: Examining the cross-level moderating effect of classroom climate.School Psychology Review, 53(5), 579-592.
Wiepking, P., & Bekkers, R. (2012). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part Two: Gender, family composition and income.Voluntary Sector Review, 3(2), 217-245.
Wójcik, M., & Mondry, M. (2020). “The game of bullying”: Shared beliefs and behavioral labels in bullying among middle schoolers.Group Dynamics, 24(4), 276-293.
Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L., & Karstadt, L. (2000). The association between direct and relational bullying and behaviour problems among primary school children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 41(8), 989-1002.
Yao, Z., & Enright, R. (2022). Developmental cascades of hostile attribution bias, aggressive behavior, and peer victimization in preadolescence.Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 31(1), 102-120.
Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., Dobbelaar, S., van der Meulen, M., & Achterberg, M. (2022). Longitudinal associations between prosocial behavior and behavioral problems across childhood: A robust random-intercept cross-lagged panel model.Developmental Psychology, 58(6), 1139-1155.
白燕. (2016). 校园欺凌与儿童亲社会行为培养.天津市教科院学报, 157(5), 47-50.
段文婷, 孙启武, 王铭, 吴才智, 陈真珍. (2022). 青少年早期亲社会行为倾向、内化问题和外化问题发展级联的个体内分析.心理学报, 54(7), 813-827.
刘建榕. (2003). 不同性别学童攻击行为与家庭环境的关系.健康心理学杂志, 11(2), 103-106.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法.心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	何震, 詹林, 曾子豪, 胡义秋. 羞耻心对青少年主观幸福感的影响——亲社会行为和人际关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 172-181.
[2]	袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[3]	李泱巾, 陆增颜, 郭俊俏, 赵必华. 高年级小学生师生关系、学校归属感与校园受欺凌的关系：一项交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 245-253.
[4]	黎钰林, 吴德华, 卿亿承, 李丹, 尹华站. 童年期虐待对初中生主观幸福感的影响：同伴依恋的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 254-263.
[5]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[6]	鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[7]	李强强, 胡耿丹. 加工模式对亲社会行为的影响——社会价值取向和代价的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 791-798.
[8]	张明浩, 王俊儒, 王艳, 杨照黎, 张艳芳, 娄慧琳, 徐晓惠, 徐敏. 生命早期环境不可预测性对初中生抑郁的影响:生命史策略和资源控制策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 881-891.
[9]	田雨, 丁洪君, 郭宗新. 大学新生负性生活事件与手机成瘾的双向关系:领悟社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 579-588.
[10]	罗玉晗, 徐梓婧, 周晴, 杨政乾, 柯李, 王耘, 陈福美. COVID-19疫情压力对青少年生命史策略的影响及其行为表现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 398-409.
[11]	刘采梦, 苑广哲, 丁絮, 冯康泓, 黄茗瑜, 林锦祺. 初中生焦虑症状对问题性手机使用的影响:错失恐惧与无法忍受不确定性的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 427-435.
[12]	刘畅, 伍新春, 邹盛奇. 父母协同教养与初中生学校适应:教养投入和亲子依恋的作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 226-234.
[13]	刘燊, 范航, 王喆, 宋明华, 滕瀚. 父母婚姻冲突与中学生欺凌行为的关系:越轨同伴交往和感觉寻求的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 235-244.
[14]	鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希, 于明申. 受欺凌经历对青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的影响:道德推脱与感知班级反欺凌规范的作用机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 265-275.
[15]	游志麒, 郭宇顺, 张陆, 李晓军. 父母冲突与青少年亲社会行为的关系: 人际信任与共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 51-59.