心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 691-700.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.10

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉语儿童口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项三年追踪研究

周婷娜1, 李宜逊2, 李虹3, 徐钟庚1, 张锋1, 程亚华1   

  1. 1. 宁波大学心理学系暨研究所, 宁波 315211;
    2. 美国马里兰大学学院公园分校人类发展与定量方法学系, 学院公园 20742, 美国;
    3. 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学), 未来教育高精尖创新中心, 北京师范大学心理学部, 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2021-09-23
  • 通讯作者: 程亚华 E-mail:chengyahua@nbu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目（18BYY077）。

The Relation between Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension among Chinese Children: A 3-year Longitudinal Study

ZHOU Tingna1, LI Yixun2, LI Hong3, XU Zhonggeng1, ZHANG Feng1, CHENG Yahua1   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211;
    2. Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA;
    3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education(Beijing Normal University), Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2021-09-23

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 对196名小学二年级儿童进行为期三年的追踪测查，使用交叉滞后模型检验了儿童字词阅读流畅性和篇章朗读流畅性等不同层面口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系。在控制了一般认知能力、汉字识别、口语词汇知识、快速命名和自回归效应之后发现：（1）模型比较的结果支持字词阅读流畅性对阅读理解作用的单向预测模型，儿童二年级时字词阅读流畅性对三年级的阅读理解，以及三年级时字词阅读流畅性对四年级的阅读理解均有显著预测作用；（2）模型比较的结果支持篇章朗读流畅性与阅读理解的双向预测模型，前一个测量时间点的篇章朗读流畅性可以稳定地预测后一个测量时间点的阅读理解，同时，前一个测量时间点的阅读理解也可以稳定地预测后一个测量时间点的篇章朗读流畅性。结果表明在排除了自回归效应和其他变量的作用后，只存在字词阅读流畅性对阅读理解的单向预测关系，而篇章朗读流畅性与阅读理解之间存在双向预测关系，这一发现支持了认知资源和自动化理论，并对阅读的交互-补偿模型进行了一定的补充。

关键词: 口语流畅性, 阅读理解, 追踪研究, 汉语儿童

Abstract: The present study followed a sample of Chinese second-grade (n=196) through fourth-grade students to evaluate the dynamic developmental relations between oral reading fluency (including word reading fluency and text reading fluency) and reading comprehension. Cross-lagged panel model was conducted to test for the presence of leading and lagging influences after controlling for nonverbal reasoning, character recognition, vocabulary knowledge, rapid automatized naming (RAN) and the auto-regression effects. The results showed that:(1) previous levels of word reading fluency acted as leading indicators of reading comprehension growth, but the reverse relation was not found; (2) Bidirectional predictive relation was found between text reading fluency and reading comprehension. The results support cognitive resources and automaticity theory and supplement the interactive-compensatory model of reading.

Key words: oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, longitudinal study, Chinese children

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Wu, X., Liu, H., Dong, Q., … Sun, P. (2017). Growth of compounding awareness predicts reading comprehension in Chinese students:A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2.Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 91-104.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence:A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading.Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.
Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction:What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.
Kim, Y. -S., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C. & Foorman, B. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 652-667.
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Wagner, R. K.(2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development:An investigation of its mediating role for children from Grades 1 to 4.Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224-242.
Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.),The science of reading:A handbook (pp. 209-226). Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310-321.
Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency:Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
Lai,S. A., Benjamin, R. B., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M. R. (2014). The longitudinal relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension skills in second-grade children. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 116-138.
Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children's character recognition:Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills.Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 287-307.
Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
Paris, S. G., Carpenter, R. D., Paris, A. H., & Hamilton, E. E. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children's reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131-160). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
PIRLS 台湾报告.(2006).取自https://sites.google.com/site/reading8learning01/pirls/pirls-2006
Seyomour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies.British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
Song, S., Su, M., Kang, C., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., McBride-Chang, C.,... Shu, H. (2015). Tracing children's vocabulary development from preschool through the school-age years:An 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 18(1), 119-131.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.
程亚华, 伍新春. (2018). 小学一年级阅读流畅性对二、三年级阅读理解的预测. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 314-321.
李虹, 董琼, 朱瑾, 刘俊娉, 伍新春. (2009). 语素意识在学前儿童言语技能发展中的作用. 心理科学, 32(6), 1291-1294.
温鸿博. (2005). 小学语文阅读能力测评量表的编制(硕士学位论文).华南师范大学, 广州.
张厚粲, 王晓平. (1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, 21(2), 113-121.
张玉平, 董琼, 舒华, 吴燕. (2017). 语音意识、命名速度和语素意识在汉语阅读发展中的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 401-409.
周雪莲, 程亚华, 李宜逊, 韩春翔, 李虹. (2016). 朗读流畅性在儿童阅读发展中的预测作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 471-477.
[1] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[2] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[3] 王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[4] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[5] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599.
[6] 张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[7] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[8] 陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[9] 林文毅, 杨怡, 余圣陶. 知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制:阅读策略的中介效应和主题知识的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 708-714.
[10] 韩瑽瑽, 陈英和, 于晓, 邓之君, 刘静, 侯江文, 林燕燕. 表面相似性对数量关系和相对大小关系理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 257-264.
[11] 闫梦格, 李虹, 李宜逊, 周雪莲, 回懿, 程亚华, 伍新春. 识字量和词汇知识在儿童阅读发展中的相对重要性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 311-317.
[12] 郑巧, 耿丽娜, 骆方, 李凌艳. 初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.
[13] 程亚华, 周婷娜, 赵英, 李虹, 伍新春. 小学低年级儿童阅读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 686-696.
[14] 赵英, 伍新春, 陈红君. 汉语儿童语素意识对阅读理解的影响:默读流畅性的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 430-438.
[15] 刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟. 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展:一年纵向考察[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 439-446.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发