心理发展与教育 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 471-477.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.04.11

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

朗读流畅性在儿童阅读发展中的预测作用

周雪莲1, 程亚华2, 李宜逊1, 韩春翔1, 李虹1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学心理学院, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    2. 宁波大学心理系, 宁波 315211
  • 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 李虹,E-mail:psy.lihong@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:psy.lihong@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(11JZD041)。

The Role of Oral Reading Fluency in Chinese Children's Reading Development

ZHOU Xuelian1, CHENG Yahua2, LI Yixun1, HAN Chunxiang1, LI Hong1   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
  • Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-15

摘要: 本研究对八个班的二年级汉语儿童进行了长达一年的追踪,深入探索了朗读流畅性在儿童阅读发展中的作用。结果发现,篇章朗读流畅性与学生的多项言语和阅读能力正相关;在控制了年龄、瑞文推理、汉字识别和口语词汇量之后,只在三年级时发现了篇章朗读流畅性对同时期的阅读理解有独特解释作用,但未能在二年级时找到类似的横断证据;但在排除了自回归效应和其他变量的作用之后,二年级时的朗读流畅性对一年后的阅读理解具有独特的预测作用。这表明朗读流畅性在汉语儿童阅读能力发展中具有重要预测作用,今后的理论研究和教学实践都应对此给予足够重视。

关键词: 朗读流畅性, 阅读理解, 小学低年级, 追踪研究

Abstract: The role of oral reading fluency in Chinese children's reading development was examined in a one-year longitudinal study. Participants were 192 students from 8 second grade classes in one of Beijing's elementary schools. Results showed that oral reading fluency positively correlated with language and reading skills. After controlling for age,IQ, character recognition and vocabulary, oral reading fluency was unique predictor of concurrent reading comprehension of Grade 3, but not uniquely related with the concurrent reading comprehension of Grade 2. In addition, after controlling for autoregressive effects and other related variables, oral reading fluency in Grade 2 was an unique significant predictor of children'sreading comprehension performance one year later. These resultsindicated that oral reading fluency playeda significant role in the development of Chinese students' reading comprehension. Researchers and teachers should payenough attention to oral reading fluency in future.

Key words: oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, reading development, longitudinal study

中图分类号: 

  • G442

Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933-958.

Baker, D. L., Park, Y., & Baker, S. K. (2012). The reading performance of English learners in Grades 1 to 3: the role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 251-281.

Buck, J.,&Torgesen, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCRR Tech. Rep. No. 1). FloridaCenter for Reading Research.Available:www.Fcrr.org/Technical Reports/TechnicalReport1.pdf.

Geva, E.,&Farnia., F. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1819-1845.

Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., &Kame'enui, E. J. (2001).The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes.Scientific Studies of Reading,5(3), 257-288.

Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., &Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in readingcomprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.

Kim, Y. S., Park, C. H., &Wagner, R. K. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a “bridge” to reading comprehension? Reading and Writing, 27(1), 79-99.

Kim, Y. S., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C. &Foorman, B. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 652-667.

Kim, Y. S. G.,& Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: an investigation of its mediating role for children from Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224-242.

Kim, Y. S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: a latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338-362.

Kim, Y. S., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: a longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(1), 93-111.

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.

Li, L., &Wu, X. (2015). Effects of metalinguistic awareness on reading comprehension and the mediator role of reading fluency from Grades 2 to 4.Plos One, 10(3), 1-16.doi:10.1371/journal. pone. 0114417.

Perfetti, C. A. (1992).The representation problem in reading acquisition. In L. C. Ehri, R. Trieman, & P.B. Gough (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 145-174.

Salvador, S. K., Schoeneberger, J., Tingle, L.,&Algozzine, B. (2012). Relationship between second grade oral reading fluency and third grade reading. Assessmentin Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 341-356.

Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P., & Morris, R. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 496-522.

Song, S., Su, M., Kang, C., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., McBride-Chang, C., et al. (2014). Tracing children's vocabulary development from preschool through the school-age years: an 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 18(1), 119-131.

Xue, J., Shu, H., Li, H., Li, W., & Tian, X. (2013). The stability of literacy-related cognitive contributions to Chinese character naming and reading fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), 433-450.

李虹, 董琼, 朱瑾, 刘俊娉, 伍新春. (2009). 语素意识在学前儿童言语技能发展中的作用.心理科学, 32(6),1291-1294.

张婵, 盖笑松. (2010). 汉语阅读障碍儿童与普通儿童朗读错误研究. 中国特殊教育,17(2),48-52.

张婵, 盖笑松.(2013). 汉语阅读障碍儿童的阅读流畅性研究. 心理与行为研究, 11(3), 340-345.

张厚粲, 王晓平. (1985). 瑞文标准推理测验手册(中国城市修订版).北京:北京师范大学出版社, 1-60.
[1] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[2] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[3] 王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[4] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[5] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599.
[6] 张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[7] 吴甲旺, 李红霞, 司继伟. 小学低年级儿童的计算流畅性与数学焦虑:基于变量为中心与个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 72-80.
[8] 周婷娜, 李宜逊, 李虹, 徐钟庚, 张锋, 程亚华. 汉语儿童口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 691-700.
[9] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[10] 陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[11] 林文毅, 杨怡, 余圣陶. 知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制:阅读策略的中介效应和主题知识的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 708-714.
[12] 韩瑽瑽, 陈英和, 于晓, 邓之君, 刘静, 侯江文, 林燕燕. 表面相似性对数量关系和相对大小关系理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 257-264.
[13] 闫梦格, 李虹, 李宜逊, 周雪莲, 回懿, 程亚华, 伍新春. 识字量和词汇知识在儿童阅读发展中的相对重要性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 311-317.
[14] 郑巧, 耿丽娜, 骆方, 李凌艳. 初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.
[15] 程亚华, 周婷娜, 赵英, 李虹, 伍新春. 小学低年级儿童阅读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 686-696.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!