社会观点采择与故事阅读的关系——字词认知的调节作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以161名小学四年级（10岁）儿童为对象，探讨社会观点采择与故事阅读理解之间的关系。要求被试完成故事阅读理解测验，社会观点采择测验和字词认知测验。采用分层回归进行数据分析，结果发现：（1）被试的社会观点采择能力对阅读理解总分、直接理解、直接推论、诠释整合具有显著的预测作用，对检视评价的预测作用不显著；（2）字词认知调节社会观点采择对故事阅读理解成绩的预测作用。社会观点采择对故事阅读理解成绩的影响随着字词认知能力的减弱而增高。对于字词认知能力较低的儿童，社会观点采择在故事阅读理解中发挥更强的预测作用。

关键词: 观点采择, 字词认知, 阅读理解, 调节效应, 儿童

Abstract: The present research explored the connection between social perspective-taking and story reading comprehension outcomes. One hundred and sixty-one ten-years old (four-grade) children completed a social perspective-taking measure, a story reading comprehension test and a vocabulary scale. Hierarchical regression was used for data analysis, results suggested that: social perspective-taking could predict the overall score of story reading comprehension, and the score of the three of four reading processes at significant level, which include ‘focusing on and retrieving explicitly stated information’, ‘making straightforward inferences’, and ‘examining and evaluating content, language, and textual elements’. But social perspective-taking could not predict the process of ‘interpreting and integrating ideas and information’. Moreover, our results revealed that vocabulary level was a moderator in the relationship between social perspective-taking and story reading comprehension. That is, children who had low level vocabulary, the role social perspective-taking played was more important compared with their peers who have high level vocabulary on the story reading comprehension.

Key words: perspective-taking, vocabulary, reading, comprehension, moderating, effect, children

中图分类号:

G442

李芳, 罗良, 王文静. 社会观点采择与故事阅读的关系——字词认知的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 284-292.

LI Fang, LUO Liang, WANG Wen-jing. The Relationship between Children’s Social Perspective-taking and Story Reading Comprehension：Moderating Effect of Vocabulary[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(3): 284-292.

参考文献

Ackermann, E. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction: two keys to learning. In Kafai, Y.,and Resnick, M., Eds.,Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates. 25-35.
Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(1), 21-37.
Astington, J. W., & Olson, D. R. (1995). The cognitive revolution in children's understanding of mind. Human Development, 38(4-5), 179-189.
Barrett, D. E., & Yarrow, M. R. (1977). Prosocial behavior, social inferential ability, and assertiveness in children. Child Development, 475-481.
Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Carpenter, A., Dulin, L., Harjusola-Webb, S., Stocks, E. I., et al.(2003)."As you would have them do unto you": Does imagining yourself in the others place stimulate moral action? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1190-1201.
Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of school psychology, 35(1), 61-79.
Bouley, T. M., & Godfrey, P. C. (2008). Reading outside the boundaries: children's literature as pedagogy for building empathy and understanding of social justice in the college classroom. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 2008(8): 33-41.
Bourg, T., & Stephenson, S. (1997). Comprehending characters' emotions: The role of event categories and causal connectivity. In van den Broek P.W., Bauer P.J., & Bourg T. Eds., Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 295-319.
Brewer, W. F. (1982). Plan Understanding, Narrative Comprehension, and Story Schemas. In, Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pittsburgh PA: 262-264.
Chandler, M. J., & Greenspan, S. (1972). Ersatz egocentrism: A reply to H. Borke. Developmental Psychology, 7(2): 104-106.
Davis, O. L. (2001). In pursuit of historical empathy. In Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A. & Foster, S. J. Eds., Historical empathy and perspective taking insocial studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefied, Publishers, 1-12.
Dray A. J. (2006). Social development and reading comprehension: a study of development diversity, comprehension and conflict. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Drummond K. V. (2003). Social Cognition. A Necessary Connection to Literacy? Doctoral dissertation, University of California.
Dunbar, R. I. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of general psychology, 8(2), 100-110.
Dyson, A. H. (1988). Negotiating among multiple worlds: The space/time dimensions of young children's composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 22(4),355-390.
Dyson, A. H. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press, 1-8.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds-a biological basis. Science, 286(5445), 1692-1695.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 148.
Gagné, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown, 349-366.
Gallimore, R. (1996). Classrooms are just another cultural activity. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keough Eds., Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 229-250.
Hogan, K. E., & Pressley, M. E. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books, Inc.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (2006). PIRLS 2006 Assessment Framework and Specifications(2nd Edition): Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. Retrieved April 29, 2011, from http://timss.bc.edu/PDF/AppendixC.pdf. 11-16.
Kemmelmeier, M., & Winter, D. G. (2000). Putting threat into perspective: Experimental studies on perceptual distortion in international conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 795-809.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377-380.
Landry, M. O. R., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (1980). Recursive structure in cognitive perspective taking. Child Development, 51, 386-394.
Lobchuk, M. M., & Vorauer, J. D. (2003). Family caregiver perspective-taking and accuracy in estimating cancer patient symptom experiences. Social science & medicine, 57(12), 2379-2384.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on psychological science, 3(3), 173-192.
Maurer, A. C. (2008). Peer Dialogue at Literacy Centers in One First-grade Classroom Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Miranda, A. H. (2002). Best practices in increasing cross-cultural competence. Best practices in school psychology IV, 1, 353-362. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
zyürek, A., & Trabasso, T. (1997). Evaluation during the understanding of narratives. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 305-335.
Palmer, A. (2004). Fictional minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 28-52.
Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 309-315.
RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND Education. 19-28.
Selman, R. L. (1971). Taking anothers perspective: Role-taking development in early childhood. Child Development, 42, 1721-1734.
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press, 102-105.
Selman, R. L., & Schultz, L. H. (1990). Making a friend in youth: Developmental theory and pair therapy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 96-124.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading research quarterly,16(1), 32-71.
Urberg, K. A., & Docherty, E. M. (1976). Development of role-taking skills in young children. Developmental Psychology, 12(3), 198-204.
Van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 336-382.
Weingartner, K. M., & Klin, C. M. (2005). Perspective taking during reading: An on-line investigation of the illusory transparency of intention. Memory & cognition, 33(1), 48-58.
Wright, H. H., & Newhoff, M. (2001). Narration abilities of children with language-learning disabilities in response to oral and written stimuli. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(3), 308-319.
Ziegler, F., Mitchell, P., & Currie, G. (2005). How does narrative cue children's perspective taking?. Developmental psychology, 41(1), 115-123.
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920-933.
戴维, 谢弗. (2012). 社会性与人格发展(陈会昌等译). 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 209.
李毓秋, 张厚粲. (2001). 关于小学四年级至初中一年级学生阅读理解能力的研究. 心理科学,24(1), 29-31.
林彬. (2002). 儿童社会观点采择能力发展的实验研究. 硕士论文, 福建师范大学.
台湾中央大学教育研究所. (2009). 台湾四年级学生阅读素养(PIRLS 2006报告)(第二版). 取自www.dorise.info. 96-101, 108-112.
王孝玲,陶保平. (1996). 小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表. 上海: 上海教育出版社. 76-105.
温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2) : 268-274.
曾祥芹,韩雪屏主编. (1992). 阅读学原理. 郑州: 河南教育出版社, 159-225
张必隐. (2002). 阅读心理学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. 165-171.
张文新,林崇德. (1998). 儿童社会观点采择结构效度的研究. 心理发展与教育, 4, 11-16.
张文新,林崇德. (1999). 儿童社会观点采择的发展及其与同伴互动关系的研究. 心理学报, 31(4), 418-427.
张文新,郑金香. (1999). 儿童社会观点采择的发展及其子类型间的差异的研究. 心理科学, 22(2), 116-119.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[11]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[12]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[13]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[14]	王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[15]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.