学科领域知识和学业成绩对工作记忆广度的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 引入Alexander领域知识概念形成数学学科领域知识,以七年级有理数单元为研究材料,编写问卷和E-Prime实验程序,筛选60名初中生为被试,考察数学学科领域知识和学业成绩对工作记忆广度的影响。研究发现:(1)学优生的认知过程知识和问题条件知识显著高于学困生,而学理内容知识差异不显著;(2)在简单加工任务上,学优生和学困生工作记忆广度差异不显著。在复杂任务上,学优生的工作记忆广度都显著高于学困生;(3)当工作记忆广度任务中存储部分的词语和数学学科领域知识相关时,问题条件知识分数和认知过程分数能够显著地预测工作记忆广度。而不相关时,仅问题条件知识分数能够显著地预测工作记忆广度。

关键词: 工作记忆广度, 学科领域知识, 学业成绩, 初中生

Abstract: This study quoted the domain knowledge into math disciplinary-Disciplinary Domain Knowledge.The study chosen 60 seventh grade students as participants.According to rational number unit,disciplinary domain knowledge test and behavior experiment procedure be produced.The aim of this study is to investigate how disciplinary domain knowledge and mathematical achievement influence on working memory span. The results are as follows:first,the difference between poor students and excellent students are significant in procedural knowledge and conditional knowledge.It illustrate poor students can't do well in math not because they don't know the knowledge but don't know how to use it.Second,adopting the operation span task,working memory span of excellent students is more than poor students,but not significant in simple tasks.In complex-relative,complex-irrelative task,the difference is significant.finally,when storage words is related to math disciplinary,procedural knowledge and conditional knowledge showed a significant prediction on working memory span.when it is not related,conditional knowledge also can be a predictor of working memory span.

Key words: working memory span, disciplinary domain knowledge, mathematical achievement, junior school student

中图分类号:

G442

赵燕, 蔡笑岳. 学科领域知识和学业成绩对工作记忆广度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(1): 70-76.

ZHAO Yan, CAI Xiao-yue. The Effect of Disciplinary Domain Knowledge and mathematical achievement On Working Memory Span[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(1): 70-76.

参考文献

[1] Ackerman,P.L.,Beier,M.E.,&Boyle,M.O.(2002).Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.Journal of Experimental Psychology,131(4),567-589.
[2] Baddeley,A.D.,&Hitch,G.J.Working memory.(1974).In:Bower G H(Ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation:Advances in research and theory.New York:Academic Press,47-89.
[3] Bayliss,D.M.,Jarrold,C.,Gunn,D.M.&Baddeley,A.D. (2003).The complexities of complex span:Explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,132(1),71-92.
[4] Daneman,M.,&Merikle,P.M.(1996).Working memory and language comprehension:A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin& Review,3,422-433.
[5] David,Z.H.,&Frederick,L.O.(2005).Does domain knowledge moderate involvement of working memory capacity in higher-level cognition?A test of three models.Journal of Memory and Language, 52,377-397.
[6] Hitch,G.J.,&McAuley,E.(1990).Working memory in children with specific arithmetical learning difficulties.British of Psychology, 82,375-386.
[7] Hondt,M.D.,&Hondt,T.D.(1999).Is domain knowledge an aspect?Lecture notes in Computer science:Proceedings of the workshop on object-oriented technology,293-294.
[8] Kimberly,P.,Raghubar,M.A.,&Barnes,S.A.H.(2010).Working memory and mathematics:A review of developmental, individual difference,and cognitive approaches.Learning and Individual Differences,20,110-122.
[9] Moos,D.C.,&Azevedo,R.(2008).Self-regulated learing with hypermedia:The role of prior domain knowledge.Contemporary.
[10] Education Psychology,33,270-298.
[11] Spilich,G.J.,Vesonder,G.T.,Chiesi,H.L.,&Voss,J.F. (1979).Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18,275-290.
[12] Travis,R.R.,&Jennifer,W.(2009).The influence of domain knowledge on the functional capacity of working memory.Journal of Memory and Language,7,1-18.
[13] 曾守锤,吴华清.(2004).学习不良儿童的工作记忆.心理科学进展,12(3),355-362.
[14] 孙悦亮,金志成.(2009).工作记忆与学习困难的关系研究.华南师大学报(社科版),2(1),152-156.
[15] 蔡笑岳,何伯锋.(2010).学科领域知识的研究与教学—当代领域知识研究及其教学迁移.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),28(2),43-51.
[16] 蔡笑岳,苏静.(2008).工作记忆与领域知识在个体认知行为中的作用.心理与行为研究,6(4),306-310.
[17] 李长虹,蔡笑岳,何伯锋.(2010).学科领域知识与数学学习的知识表征研究.心理发展与教育,(3),267-273.
[18] 于洪卿.(2005).现代认知心理学的知识观.沈阳师范学院学报(社科版),21(3),267-273.
[19] 丁家永.(1998).知识的本质新论—一种认知心理学的观点.南京师范大学学报(社科版),(2),67-70.
[20] 宋广文,陈霞.(2010).工作记忆、试题难度对中学生几何应用题解决的影响.心理科学,33(5),1241-1243.
[21] 陈英和,王明怡.(2005).工作记忆中的存储与加工:理论演变与新趋势.北京师范大学学报(社科版),(6),11-16.
[22] 蔡丹.(2010).初中生数学学习困难的认知加工特点:基于工作记忆的研究.华东师范大学学博士论文,上海.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[6]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[7]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[8]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[9]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[10]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[11]	谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[12]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[13]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[14]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[15]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed