心理发展与教育 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 662-669.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

师范生职业认同感的效能—价值双维核心模型的构建

王鑫强1, 张大均1, 曾丽红2   

  1. 1. 西南大学心理健康教育研究中心、教育科学研究所;
    2. 武夷学院人文与教师教育学院
  • 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2011-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 张大均,E-mail:zhangdj@swu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangdj@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家哲学社会科学基金(教育学)项目(BBA070014);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(西部)(10XJCXLX001)

Professional Value and Professional Efficacy:The Dual Core Factor Model of Professional Identity in Normal Students

WANG Xin-qiang1, ZHANG Da-jun1, ZENG Li-hong2   

  1. 1. Research Center of Mental Health Education & Research Institute of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
    2. College of Humanities and Teacher Education, Wuyi University, Fujian Wuyishan, 354300, China
  • Online:2011-11-15 Published:2011-11-15

摘要: 以师范生职业认同感研究的"职业能力"和"职业价值"两大取向为基础,根据其单维评估的不足,将职业效能感和职业价值感指标联合,提出师范生职业认同感的效能—价值双维核心模型,并考察该模型在3所部属师范大学的1237名免费师范生中是否存在及其效用。研究表明:(1)模型能有效将免费师范生分组,其中低效能—低价值占31.69%、低效能—高价值占6.63%、高效能—低价值占40.01%、高效能—高价值仅占21.67%,克服了单维评估存在的高估或低估问题;(2)模型在职业认同结果(职业意志感、职业意愿与期望感)、学业满意度、总体生活满意度及未来担忧上的分组效应显著,同时拥有高职业效能感和高职业价值感的免费师范生具有最佳的职业认同感、学业满意度、总体生活满意度和最少的未来担忧。

关键词: 免费师范生, 教师职业认同感, 职业意志, 学业满意度, 心理健康

Abstract: Extant studies on professional identity of normal students either focus on "professional efficacy" or "professional value",such single dimensional perspective is prone to overestimation or underestimation.Based on both perspectives,the present study put forward the dual core factor model,and tested it by investigating professional identity of 1237 tuition-free normal college students from three normal universities in China.Results show that:1)four groups were identified based on the survey:31.69% of students are low efficacy-low value, 6.63% are low efficacy-high value,40.01% are high efficacy-low value,and 21.67% are high efficacy-high value,and the result is better than single dimensional assessment;2)the four groups differed significantly in terms of professional identity outcomes(involve professional volition and professional expectation),academic satisfaction, life satisfaction,and the worry about the future.Results also show that,among these tuition-free normal college students,those with high professional efficacy and high professional value have best professional identity,academic satisfaction,general life satisfaction,and least worry about the future.

Key words: tuition-free normal college students, teachers’ professional identity, professional volition, academic satisfaction, mental health

中图分类号: 

  • G443
[1] Cochran-Smith,M.(2000).The questions that drive reform.Journal of Teacher Education,51,331-333.
[2] Gross,L.A.,Fitts,S.,Goodson-Espy,T.,&Clark,A.(2010).Self as Teacher:Preliminary Role Identification of the Potential Teaching Candidate.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35(2),1-19.
[3] Hong,J.Y.(2010).Pre-service and beginning teachers'professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession.Teaching and Teacher Education,26,1530-1543.
[4] Huizen,P.V.,Oers,B.V.,&Wubbels,T.(2005).A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education.Journal of Curriculum Studies,37(3),269-290.
[5] Joseph,D.,&Heading,M.(2010).Putting Theory into Practice:Moving from Student Identity to Teacher Identity.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35(3),75-87.
[6] Korthagen,F.A.J.(2004).In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education,20(1),77-97.
[7] Korthagen,F.,&Vasalos,A.(2005).Levels in reflection:core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth.Teachers and Teaching:Theory and Practice,11(1),47-71.
[8] Luehmann,A.L.(2008).Using Blogging in Support of Teacher Professional Identity Development:A Case Study.The journal of the learning sciences,17,287-337.
[9] Malderez,A.,Hobson,A.,Tracey,L.,&Kerr,K.(2007). Becoming a student teacher:core features of the experience.European Journal of Teacher Education,30(3),225-248.
[10] McNay,M.,&Graham,R.(2007).Can Cooperating Teachers Help Student Teachers Develop a Vision of Education?The Teacher Educator,42(3),224-237.
[11] Merseth,K.K.,Sommer,J.,&Dickstein,S.(2008).Bridging Worlds:Changes in Personal and Professional Identities of Pre-Service Urban Teachers.Teacher Education Quarterly,35(3),89-108.
[12] Moore,M.,&Hofman,J.E.(1998).Professional identity in institutions of higher learning in Israel.Higher Education,17(1),69-79.
[13] Sutherland,L.,Howard,S.,&Markauskaite,L.(2010).Professional identity creation:Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers'understanding of their work as teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(3),455-465.
[14] Timostsuk,I.,&Ugaste,A.(2010).Student teachers'professional identity.Teaching and Teacher Education,26,1563-1570
[15] Walkington,J.(2005).Becoming a teacher:encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,33(1),53-64
[16] Wang,C.Y.(2007).Analysis of teacher attrition.Chinese Education and Society,40(5),6-10.
[17] Willams,J.(2010).Constructing a new professional identity:Career change into teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education,26,639-647.
[18] 蔡辰梅,刘刚.(2010)."教师是一种良心活"——对教师职业认同方式的分析与反思.教师教育研究,22(1),6-11.
[19] 程巍,王在勇,王瑶.(2008).高等师范教育专业学生的中小学教师职业认同现状调查.教师教育研究,20(5),45-48.
[20] 封子奇,姜宇,杜艳婷,高钦.(2010).免费师范生教师职业认同及其影响因素研究.河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),12(7),69-75.
[21] 权朝鲁.(2003).效果量的意义及测定方法.心理学探新,(2),39-44.
[22] 杨宏.(2007).和谐校园文化与教师职业认同.教学与管理,(21),20-21.
[23] 姚云,董晓薇.(2009).全国师范生免费教育政策实施认同度调查.教育研究与实验,(1),45-50.
[24] 聂磊.(2009).德国职业教育领域职业认同的研究现状及培养策略.江苏技术师范学院学报(职教通讯),24(9),82-86.
[25] 宋广文,魏淑华.(2006).影响教师职业认同的相关因素分析.心理发展与教育,(1),80-86.
[26] 田澜,王鑫强.(2007).影响大学生学业满意度的因素分析.中国行为医学科学,16(3),255-257.
[27] 汪向东,王希林,马弘(编).(1999).心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:心理卫生杂志社出版,82-83.
[28] 王鑫强,曾丽红,张大均,李森.(2010).师范生职业认同感量表的初步编制.西南大学学报(社会科学版),36(5),152-157.
[29] 魏淑华,宋广文.(2005).国外教师职业认同研究综述.比较教育研究,(5),61-66.
[30] 魏淑华.(2008).教师职业认同研究.西南大学博士学位论文.
[31] 曾丽红,王鑫强,李森.(2011).免费师范生职业认同感的现状调查与对策.曲靖师范学院学报,30(1),11-14.
[32] 张芬只,郑高洁.(2007).河南省师范生职业认同感调查研究.中天学刊,22(3),127-130.
[1] 张丽, 潘霈霖, 牛梓瑜, 马敏. 安静自我:基于平衡和成长视角的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 288-297.
[2] 彭海云, 盛靓, 王金睿, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 2001~2019年我国青少年孤独感的变迁:横断历史研究的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 449-456.
[3] 徐富明, 黄龙. 贫困对儿童心理健康的影响及其内在机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 132-139.
[4] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[5] 何安明, 万娇娇, 惠秋平. 手机依赖与青少年心理健康的关系:学业倦怠的中介作用和应对方式的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 391-398.
[6] 王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[7] 马利, 王滔. 残疾儿童心理健康对家长亲职压力的影响:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 126-133.
[8] 唐辉一, 陈倩, 吴俊华. 大学生社会性发展与心理健康的关系:述情障碍的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 735-742.
[9] 周莉, 耿靖宇, 王兴超, 雷雳. 基本需要在导师排斥感知与研究生心理健康的关系中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 222-229.
[10] 韩黎, 袁纪玮, 龙艳. 苔花盛开如牡丹?农村留守儿童负性生活事件与心理健康的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 266-274.
[11] 王艳红, 叶丽媛, 李府桂, 周明洁. D型人格对大学新生心理健康的影响:基于三个时间点调查数据的有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 120-127.
[12] 辛素飞, 岳阳明, 辛自强. 1996至2016年中国老年人心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 753-761.
[13] 何安明, 包灿灿, 惠秋平. 大学生情绪智力与心理健康的关系:社会支持的中介作用和手机依赖的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 494-501.
[14] 王江洋, 李昂扬, 聂家昕. 依恋与孤儿初中生心理健康的关系:自我污名和心理韧性的并行中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 228-239.
[15] 熊俊梅, 海曼, 黄飞, 辛亮, 徐颖. 家庭累积风险与青少年心理健康的关系——心理资本的补偿效应和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 94-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!