心理发展与教育 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 71-75.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

幼儿基于信息判断的选择性信任——与亲社会行为及决策判断的关系

张兰萍, 周晖   

  1. 中山大学心理学系, 广州510275
  • 出版日期:2011-01-15 发布日期:2011-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 周晖,E-mail:happy_zhui@sina.com E-mail:happy_zhui@sina.com

Children’s Selective Trust Based on Judgments of Information:Its Relationship with Prosocial Behavior and Decision Making

ZHANG Lan-ping, ZHOU Hui   

  1. Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhong, China 510275
  • Online:2011-01-15 Published:2011-01-15

摘要: 选择性信任指人们在面对不同信息传达者时,能依据信息的正误区分出他们的可信赖度,从而有选择地相信某些传达者。本研究探讨幼儿选择性信任与亲社会行为及决策判断的关系。研究一以75名3~4岁幼儿为研究对象,采用选择性信任任务与分配糖果任务相结合的模式,探讨亲社会行为与选择性信任的关系,发现3~4岁幼儿在选择性信任形成后,亲社会倾向更多地指向可信赖者。研究二关注选择性信任与幼儿的决策判断的关系,在对72名3~4岁幼儿的研究中发现,在众多颜色糖果的选择中,相对于对照组的均等偏好,实验组的3~4岁幼儿决策判断明显受到可信赖者的影响,即更倾向于选择可信赖者推荐的颜色糖果。

关键词: 选择性信任, 信任, 亲社会行为, 决策判断

Abstract: Selective trust refers to that people could distinguish reliable/unreliable informants on the basis of the accuracy of their objects naming.The current two studies examined the relation between selective trust and childrens prosocial behavior and decision-making.In the first study,75 young children aged 3 to 4 took part in both selective trust and prosocial tasks.Results illustrated that children were likely to share candies with the reliable informant.The second study investigated the relation between selective trust and children's decision making.Since there were candies with 5 different colors,72 3-to 4-year-olds children in the study were likely to choose candies introduced by the reliable informant.

Key words: selective trust, trust, prosocial behavior, decision making

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Child,I.L.,Hansen,J.A.,&Hornbeck,F.W.(1968).Age and sex differences in children's color preferences.Child Development,39,237-247.
[2] Clément,F.,Koenig,M.,&Harris,P.L.(2004).The ontogenesis of trust.Mind&Language,19(4),360-379.
[3] Corriveau,K.,&Harris,P.L.(2009).Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information.Developmental Science,12(1),188-193.
[4] Doney,P.M.,Bristol,T.,&Mangleburg,T.F.(2004).Shopping with friends and teens-susceptibility to peer influence.Journal of Retailing,80(2),101-116.
[5] Fehr,E.,Bernhard,H.,&Rockenbach,B.(2008).Egalitarianism in young children.Nature,454,1079-1084.
[6] Hala,S.,Chandler,M.J.,&Fritz,A.(1991).Fledgling theories of mind:Deception as a marker of 3-year-olds-understanding of false belief.Child Development,62,83-97.
[7] Hoffman,M.L.(2000).Empathy and moral development:implications for caring and justice.New York:Cambridge University Press.
[8] Koenig,M.A.,&Harris,P.L.(2005).The role of social cognition in early trust.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9(10),457-459.
[9] Koenig,M.A.,Clément,F.,&Harris,P.L.(2004).Trust in testimony.Psychological Science,13(10),694-698.
[10] Mellers,B.A.,Schwartz,A.,&Cooke,A.D.J.(1998).Judgment and decision making.Annual Review of Psychology,49,447-477.
[11] Miller,S.A.(2000).Children-s understanding of preexisting differences in knowledge and belief.Developmental Review,20,227-282.
[12] Pasquini,E.S.,Corriveau,K.H.,&Koenig,M.(2007).Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants.Developmental Psychology,43(5),1216-1226.
[13] Peskin,J.(1992).Ruse and representations:on children's ability to conceal information.Developmental Psychology,28,84-89.
[14] Rotenberg,K.J.,&Fox,C.(2005).Construction and validation of achildren's interpersonal trust belief scale.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,23(2),271-292.
[15] Sodian,B.(1991).The development of deception in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,9,173-188.
[16] Zahn-Waxler,C.,Cole,P.M.,Welsh,J.D.,&Fox,N.A.(1995).Psychophysiological correlates of empathy and prosocial behaviors in preschool children with problem behaviors.Development and Psychopathology,7,27-48.
[17] 陈树婷,曹立人.(2005).儿童消费行为的影响因素和发展过程.人类工效学,11(4),61-63.
[18] 李丹.(2000).影响儿童亲社会行为的因素的研究.心理科学,23(3),285-288.
[19] 马伟娜,洪灵敏,桑标.(2009).同伴交往、亲子交往与儿童心理理论发展的关系.心理科学,32(1),81-84.
[20] 张兰萍,周晖.(2009).幼儿基于信息判断的选择性信任的发展——其持续性及与人际信任的关系.心理发展与教育,25(3),9-14.
[1] 章洁敏, 陶云, 杨舒涵, 陈睿. 亲社会行为的概念表征及其方法述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 298-304.
[2] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[3] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[4] 李强强, 胡佳. 时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 360-368.
[5] 项珵, 姜亚丽, 彭凯平, 刘啸莳. 科技侵扰与恋爱关系满意度:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 48-57.
[6] 雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[7] 王斯麒, 赵彬璇, 吴红, 刘伟. 婚姻质量对儿童亲社会行为的影响:父母积极情绪表达和教养行为的链式中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 323-330.
[8] 田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[9] 唐蕾, 刘衍玲, 杨营凯. 亲社会行为的认知过程及脑神经基础[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 437-446.
[10] 马利, 王滔. 残疾儿童心理健康对家长亲职压力的影响:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 126-133.
[11] 刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[12] 夏晓彤, 段锦云, 黄辛隐. 错失恐惧对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 344-352.
[13] 李倩倩, 姚力宁, 梁金军, 邢淑芬. 电视暴力对不同外倾性气质学前儿童社会行为的差异化影响——“一般攻击模型”与“催化剂模型”的理论之争[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 545-554.
[14] 王沛, 刘雨婷, 梁雅君, 谈晨皓. 关系认知与善意认知对大学生人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 406-413.
[15] 张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持?来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!