合作指数与描述方式对儿童囚徒困境博弈中合作行为的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用囚徒困境任务,考察了91名10~12岁儿童和101名成人在博弈决策中合作行为的特点。并分别考察合作指数和描述方式这两个变量对个体合作性的影响。结果表明:(1)描述方式对儿童的合作行为有显著影响,表现为"回避"描述中较之"趋向"描述有更多合作行为,而描述方式对成人则无影响。(2)儿童对合作指数不敏感,平均合作率显著高于成人,表现出合作倾向;成人平均合作率随合作指数的升高而升高,但始终处于几率水平之下,表现出竞争倾向。

关键词: 合作指数, 描述方式, 囚徒困境博弈, 儿童, 合作性

Abstract: Using the Prisoner's Dilemma task to research the impact of cooperation Index and the description of matrix on coopertation of the Prisoner's Dilemma.Subjects were 91 children and 101 adults.The results show that:(1)there are more cooperation in the conditon of "avoidance" description than in "approach" type,and no impact of the description type of matrix on adult.(2)Children were not sensitive with the index of cooperation,and the average cooperation ratio was significantly higher than adults',and showed cooperation tendency.The average cooperation ratio of adult increased with the cooperation of the index increased,but always below 0.5,and showed competition tendency.

Key words: cooperation index, description type, Prisoner’s Dilemma game, children, coopertaion

中图分类号:

B844.1

孙昕怡, 陈璟, 李红, 李秀丽. 合作指数与描述方式对儿童囚徒困境博弈中合作行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 27-33.

SUN Xin-yi, CHEN jing, LI Hong, LI Xiu-li. The Impact of Cooperation Index and the Description of Payoff Matrix on Cooperation of the Prisoner’s Dilemma of Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(1): 27-33.

参考文献

[1] Wedekind C.Give and ye shall be recognized.Science,1998, 280:2070-2071.
[2] Dawes R,Thaler R.Cooperation.Journal of Economic Perspectives,1988,2:187-197.
[3] Gigerenzer G.Adaptive thinking-rationality in the real world. Londen Oxford university Press,2000.
[4] 朱莉琪.生态智力—介绍一种新的智力观点.心理科学. 2002,25(1):118-119.
[5] 朱莉琪,皇甫刚.不确定情境中的决策心理—适应与认知. 心理科学进展,2003,11(5):481-485.
[6] 裘指挥,张丽.利己与利他的博弈论分析—幼儿德育研究的新视角.学前教育研究,2006,6:18-20.
[7] Harbaugh W T,Krause K,Liday S.Bargaining by children. University of Oregon Economics Department Working Paper,2003.http://economics.uoregon.edu/papers/UO2200224-Harbaugh-Kid-Bargaining. pdf.
[8] Krause K,Harbaugh W T.Economic experiments that you can perform at home on your children.University of Oregon Economics Department Working Paper,1999.http://economics.uoregon.edu/papers/ UO-199921-Harbaugh-Economic-Experiments.pdf.
[9] Camerer C F.Behavioral Game Theory.Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,2003.
[10] Shapira A,Madsen M C.Cooperative and competitive behavior of kibbutz and urban children in Israel.Child Development,1969,40:609-617.
[11] Wichman H.Effects of isolation and communication in cooperation in a two person game.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1970, 16:114-120.
[12] Marin G,Mejia B,Oberle D C.Cooperation as a function of place of residence in Colombian children.The Journal of Social Psychology, 1975,95:127-128.
[13] Perner J.Young children's preoccupation with their own payoffs in strategic analysis of 2×2games.Developmental Psychology,1979,15: 204-213.
[14] Fan C.Teaching children cooperation:An application of experimental game theory.Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization, 2000,41:191-209.
[15] Sally D,Hill E.The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism,theory-of-mind,cooperation and fairness.Journal of Economic Psychology,2006,27:73-97.
[16] Rapoport A,Chammah A.Prisoner's dilemma:A study in conflict and cooperation.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1965.
[17] Hristova E,Grinberg M.Context effects on judgment scales in the Prisoner's dilemma game.2004,Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Cognitive Economics.
[18] Vlaev I,Chater N.Game relativity:How context influences strategic decision making.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory,and Cognition,2006,32:131-149.
[19] Tversky A,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,1981,211:453-458.
[20] Margaret A N,Max H B.The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes.The Academy of Management Journal,1985,1(28):34-49.
[21] Camerer C,Ho T H.Experience-weighted attraction learning in games:A unifying approach.California Institute of Technology Working Paper,1997,1003.
[22] Tedeschi J T,Hiester D,Gahagan J P.Matrix Values and the Behavior of Children in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game.Child Development, 1969,2(40):517-527.
[23] Perner J.Young children's preoccupation with their own payoffs in strategic analysis of 2×2games.Developmental Psychology,1979,15: 204-213.
[24] Allison S T,Messick D M.Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,1990,3:195-204.
[25] Messick D M.Equality as a decision heuristic.In B.A.Mellers &J.Baron(Eds.),Psychological perspectives on justice:Theory and applications(pp.11-31).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1993.
[26] Messick D M.Equality,fairness,and social conflict.Social Justice Research,1995,8:153-173.
[27] Messick D M,Schell T.Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making.Acta Psychologica,1992,80:311-323.
[28] Gallucci M,Perugini M.An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000,13:367-389.
[29] Gallucci M,Perugini M.Information seeking and reciprocity:A transformational analysis.European Journal of Social Psychology,2003,33: 473-495.
[30] Allison S.T,McQueen L R,Schaerfl L M.Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1992,28:23-42.
[31] Eek D,Garling T.Prosocial prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes.British Journal of Social Psychology,2006,45:321-337.
[32] 罗伯特·吉本斯著,高峰译.博弈论基础,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999,3.
[33] Klaczynski P A.Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs,and theory polarization:A two-process approach to adolescent cognition.Child Development,2000,71:1347-1366.
[34] Jacobs J E,Potenza M.The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions:a developmental perspective.Child Development,1991,62:166-178.
[35] Agnoli F.Development of judgmental heuristics and logical reasoning:training:training counteracts the representativeness heuristic. Cognitive Development,1991,6:195-217.
[36] Reyna V F,Ellis S C.Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children's risky decision making.Psychological science,1994(5):275-279.
[37] Levin I L,Hart S S.Risk preferences in young children:Early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2003,16:397-413.
[38] Schlottmann A,Tring J.How children reason about Gains and Losses:Framing Effects and Risk Attitudes in judgment and choice,SRCD, 2003,Tampa,Florida.
[39] 朱莉琪,方富熹,皇甫刚.儿童"期望值"判断的研究.心理学报,2002,34(5):517-521.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed