初中生学习成绩与成就STROOP干扰

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 取某普通中学初中学生129人,使用修正的Stroop任务,测试被试对积极关联词语、消极关联词语和中性词语的颜色命名的反应时间,结果发现,初中学生对成就关联词语的反应时间比中性词语长,特别是在消极关联词语方面,差异显著,表现出了典型的Stroop干扰;学习好的同学在所有词语方面的反应时间都比学习成绩差的同学反应时间长,特别是在成就关联词语方面,差异极显著,学习好的同学表现出了更加明显的Stroop干扰.学习成绩与成就关联词语的反应时间有显著的相关.女同学对所有词语的反应时间都比男同学时间长,特别是在高成就反应时间上,二者差异显著,女同学比男同学有更加明显的成就Stroop干扰.

关键词: 学习成绩, Stroop干扰, 初中生

Abstract: 129 junior high school students were selected.A version of the modified Stroop color-naming task was used to examine their reacting time on naming the color of different words,including high achievement-related words,low achievement-related words and neutral words.The results suggest that the students'reacting time toward achievement-related words is longer than that toward neutral words,especially for low achievement-related words.The difference between the two is significant,representing typical Stroop interference.RT of students with high scores is longer than that of students with low scores toward all 3 kinds of words.The difference is significant regarding achievement-related words.Students with high scores show more typical Stroop interference.Student performance correlates significantly with RT toward achievement-related words.RT of girl students is longer than that of boy students toward all 3 kinds of words.The difference is significant regarding high achievement-related words.Girl students show more significant Stroop interference than boy students.

Key words: achievement, stroop interference, junior high school students

中图分类号:

B844.2

郑希付. 初中生学习成绩与成就STROOP干扰[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 78-82.

ZHENG Xi-fu. Achievement of Junior High School Students and Achievement Stroop Interference[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(1): 78-82.

参考文献

[1] Donna C J,Dinkar S.Emotion and adherence to treatment in people with asthma:An application of the emotional Stroop paradigm British Journal of Psychology,2004,95(2):127-148.
[2] Leventhal H,Nerenz D R,Steele D J.Illness representations and coping with health threats.In:A.Baum,S.E.Taylor,& J.E.Singer(Fds.).Handbook of psychology and health,2004,4:219-252.
[3] Leventhal H,Nerena D,Strana A.Self-regulation and the mechanisms for symptom appraisal.In:D.Mechanic(Ed.).Psychosocial epidemiology,New York:Neale Watson,1998:55-86.
[4] McKenna E,Sharma D.Intrusive cognitions:An investigation of the emotional Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1995,21(6):1595-1607.
[5] Williams J,Mathews A,MacLeod C.The emotional Stroop taak and psychopathology.Psychological Bulletin,1996,720(1):3～24.
[6] Williams J,Matbews A,MacLend C.The emotional Strcop task and psychopathology.Psychological Bulletin,1996,720(1):3～24.
[7] McKenna E,Shorma D.Intrusive cognitions:An investigation of the emotional Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1995,21(6):1595-1607.
[8] Riemann B,McNally R.Cognitive processing of penamally relevant information.Cognition.and Emotion,1995,5(4):325-340.
[9] Donna C,Jessop D R.Motion and adherence to treatment in people with asthma:An application of the emotional Strcop paradigm.British Journal of Psychology,2004,95(2):127-148.
[10] Nader Amir etc.Suppression of the emotional Stroop effect by increased anxiety in patients with social phobia.Shorter Communications,1996(34):245-249.
[11] Boris E,Michacl H.Interactive effect of state anxiety and trait anxiety on emotional Stroop interference.Personality and Individual Differences,2001(31):471-478.
[12] Motta R,Joseph J,Rose R,Suozzi J,Leidenmn L.Secondary trauma:Assessing nter-gensrational transmission of war experiences with a nsxlified Stroop procedure,Journal of Clinical Psychology,1997,53(8):895-9O3.
[13] Lavy E,van Oppen P,van den Hont M.Selective processing of emotional information in obsessive compulsive disorder.Behaviom-Research and Therapy,1994,32:243-246.
[14] Williams J M G,Watts F N,MacLeed C,Matthews A.Costive psychology and emotional disorders(2nd ed.).New York:rally,1997:238-345.
[15] Motta R,Joseph J,Rose R,Suozzi J,Leiderman L.Secondary trauma:Assessing inter-generational transmission of war experiences with a modified Stroop proedure.Journal of Clinical Psyehology,1997,53(8):895-903.
[16] Watts E,McKenna P,Sharreek R,Trezise L.Colonr naming of phobia-related words.British Jonmal of Psychology,1986.77:97-108.
[17] Leventhal H,Meyer D,Neronz D.The common sense representation of illness danger.In:S.Rachman(Ed.).Contributions to medical psychology,Oxford:Pergamon,1980,2:7-30.
[18] Dahlem N W,Kinsman R A.Pnaie-fear in asthma:A divergence between subjective report and behavioral patterns.Perceptual and Motor Skills,1978,46:95-98.
[19] Lootti M M,Helen S.The Role of Functional Neuroimaging in the Neuropsycbuingy of Depression.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsycholngy,2001,1:331-337.
[20] Skadvik E M.Attribution of perceived achievement in school in general and in moth and verbal areas:Relations with academic self-concopt and selfesteem.Birth Journal of Educational Psychology,1994,64:33-143.392-398.
[21] 郑希付,中学生元担忧与考试焦虑.心理学报,2006,38(3):392-398.
[22] 郑希付,不同情绪模式的词语和图片刺激启动的时间效应研究,心理学报,2004,36(5):545-549.
[23] Forgas J P.MondandJndgment:theAffectInfusionMode(AIM).PsychologicalBulletin,1995,117(1):39-66.
[24] 郑希付,学习困儿童和学习优秀儿童的手书特点比较,心理科学;2007,30(1):165-168.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[6]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[7]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[8]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[9]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[10]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[11]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[12]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[13]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[14]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[15]	陈英敏, 高玉洁, 邓秋月, 彭淼, 高峰强. 初中生羞怯与手机依赖的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 46-53.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed