心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 15-21.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学儿童的道德行为及其与道德观念的相关——诚实原则和集体主义价值观冲突情境下的研究

王玲凤1, 傅根跃2   

  1. 1. 湖州师范学院教科学院心理系, 浙江, 313000;
    2. 浙江师范大学心理系, 金华, 321004
  • 出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
  • 作者简介:王玲凤(1966- ),女,湖州师范学院教科学院心理系主任,副教授.E-mail:wlfluck@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    美国国立卫生研究院资助项目(NIH grant R01HD048962-01)

The Correlation between Moral Concept and Behavior of Primary School Children--Under the Circumstances of the Conflict between Honest Principle and Collectivistic Value

WANG Ling-feng1, FU Gen-yue2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Huzhou Teachers College, Zhejiang 313000;
    2. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhu 321004
  • Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要: 研究探讨了585名7、9、11岁的小学儿童在诚实原则和集体主义价值观冲突的真实情境下的道德行为及其与道德观念的相关。结果表明,在诚实原则和集体主义价值观冲突情境下,小学儿童的道德行为主要受到诚实原则的支配,表现为:为集体说谎行为发生率都很低;随着年龄的增长,小学儿童的为集体说谎行为的发生率显著增高;小学儿童的为集体说谎行为不存在性别差异;7岁、9岁儿童的为集体说谎行为与集体观念无关,11岁儿童的为集体说谎行为与集体观念显著正相关。

关键词: 为集体说谎行为, 集体观念, 冲突情境, 相关

Abstract: To explore the correlation between moral concept and behavior of primary school children under the circumstances of the conflict between honest principle and collectivistic value,585 7-,9-,and 11-year-old children were investigated.The results showed that under the circumstances of conflict between honest principle and collectivistic value,only a small proportion of primary school children (not more than 30 %) lied for collective.It reflected that primary school children's moral actions were mostly dominated by honest principle.The results also revealed that more and more children lied for collective as their age increased,and that their action of lying for collective had no significant gender differences.Meanwhile,our research showed that there was no relationship between collective lie action and collective concept of 7- and 9-year-olds children,and that collective lie action was markedly and positively related to collective concept of 11-year-olds children.

Key words: collective lie action, collective concept, circumstances of conflict, correlation

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Lee K,Cameron C A,Xu F,Fu G,& Board J.Chinese and Canadian childran's evaluations of lying and truth-telling.Child Development,1997,64:924-934.
[2] Bussey K.Lying and truthfulness:Children's definitions,standards,and evaluative reactions.Child Development,1992,63:129-137.
[3] Lee K,Ross H J.The Concept of Lying in Adolescents and Young Adults:Testing Sweetser's Folkloristic Model.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,1997,43(2):255-270.
[4] Lee K,Xu F,Fu G,et al.Taiwan and Mainland Chinese and Canadian children's categorizati on and evaluation of lie-and truth-telling:A modesty effect.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2001,19(4):525-542.
[5] Peterson C C.The role of perceived intention to deceive in children's and adult's concepts of lying.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1995,13:237-260.
[6] Talwar V,Lee K.Emergence of white lie telling in children between 3 and 7 years of age.Memll-Palmer Quarterly,2002,48,160-181.
[7] 傅根跃,陈伟伟.小学儿童谦虚行为的发展研究.应用心理学,2001,7(1):19-24.
[8] 李伯黍,岑国桢,叶慧珍等.小学儿童集体观念发展的研究.心理科学通讯,1985,8(1):11-15.
[9] 傅根跃,陈昌凯,胡优君.小学儿童集体主义意识研究.心理科学,2002,25(5):612-613.
[10] 李伯黍.中国儿童青少年的道德认知发展与教育.见:朱智贤主编.中国儿童青少年心理发展与教育.北京:中国卓越出版公司,1990:494,497-498.
[11] Blasi A.Bridging moral cognition and moral action:critical review of the literature.Psychological Bulltin,1980,88:1-45.
[12] 傅根跃,王玲凤.为集体或为个人情境下小学儿童对说谎或说真话的理解和道德评价.心理科学,2005,28(4):859-862.
[13] 傅根跃,王玲风.假想的道德两难情境下小学儿童对说谎或说真话的抉择.心理科学,2006,29(5):1049-1052.
[14] 陈伟伟.小学儿童对谦虚的道德评价及行为的发展研究.[学位论文].杭州:浙江大学心理系资料室,1999.
[15] 胡优君.小学儿童对谦虚的评价及实际行为的相关研究.[学位论文].杭州:浙江大学心理系资料室,2002.
[16] 包雪华.小学儿童对白谎的认知及其与白谎行为间的关系.[学位论文].杭州:浙江大学心理学资料室.
[17] 朱智贤,林崇德著.思维发展心理学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1986:13.
[18] Blatt M,& Kohlberg L.The effects of classroom moral discution up on children's level of moral judgment.Journal of Moral Education,1975,4:129-161.
[1] 钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 语言范畴影响面部表情知觉的电生理学证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
[2] 张妍, 王峥, 罗娜, 王小莹, 李晓南. 失恋经历对爱情相关刺激注意偏向的影响:趋近还是回避?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 12-20.
[3] 沈洋, 袁文颖, 赵小淋, 姜珂, 彭茂莹, 陈禹, 杨娟. 死亡凸显对自我姓名注意瞬脱对抗效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 520-527.
[4] 侯永青, 侯婉滢, 周爱保. 不同类型自恋者对自我相关信息的认知加工偏好[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 528-537.
[5] 陈琼, 赵俊峰, 谷璜, 邢小莉, 李晓铭. 听障儿童认知抑制控制的脑电特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 275-282.
[6] 马原啸, 陈旭. 阈下安全启动改善非安全依恋女性的注意加工[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 11-22.
[7] 牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 孔繁昌, 范翠英, 魏华. 网络相关文字刺激和压力对网络成瘾者线索诱发渴求的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 495-502.
[8] 邢强, 夏静静, 王彩燕. 工作记忆容量与内容相关性对类别学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 324-329.
[9] 段朝辉, 颜志强, 王福兴, 周宗奎. 动画呈现速度对多媒体学习效果影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 46-53.
[10] 张庆鹏, 刘静丽, 黄慧, 黎洁, 寇彧. 冲突情境中青少年的亲社会意图:预期重要他人观点的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 368-375.
[11] 宋娟, 吕勇, 沈德立. 物体分类任务中线索效应的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 113-120.
[12] 卢张龙, 吕勇, 沈德立. 内隐序列学习与注意负荷关系的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 561-568.
[13] 李明芳, 张烨, 贾磊, 李婷, 李伟霞, 张庆林. 面孔识别特异性本质的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(5): 459-467.
[14] 张兰鸽, 张莉, 寇彧, 田启瑞. 中学生完美主义特点及其与亲社会倾向的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 365-373.
[15] 吕勇, 宋娟. 继时呈现条件下类别归纳过程的ERPs研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 14-23.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!