心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 520-527.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.05.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

死亡凸显对自我姓名注意瞬脱对抗效应的影响

沈洋1,2, 袁文颖1,2, 赵小淋1,2, 姜珂1,2, 彭茂莹1,2, 陈禹1,2, 杨娟1,2   

  1. 1. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715;
    2. 教育部认知与人格重点实验室, 重庆 400715
  • 发布日期:2020-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨娟 E-mail:valleyqq@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31971019);国家自然科学基金(31671123);重庆市基础与前沿课题(cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0016);重庆市社科规划项目(2019YBSH088)。

The Influence of Mortality Salience on Self-name Attention Blink Sparing Effect

SHEN Yang1,2, YUAN Wenying1,2, ZHAO Xiaolin1,2, JIANG Ke1,2, PENG Maoying1,2, CHEN Yu1,2, YANG Juan1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
    2. Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
  • Published:2020-09-12

摘要: 已有研究表明死亡凸显会抑制自我面孔和自我参照记忆加工的自我优势,可是死亡凸显对自我姓名的影响尚不明确,本研究采用事件相关电位技术,探索死亡凸显对自我姓名注意瞬脱对抗效应及其大脑神经活动的影响。58名被试在经历不同的启动任务后,完成自我姓名、朋友姓名和名人姓名的注意瞬脱任务。行为结果发现自我姓名识别正确率显著高于朋友姓名和名人姓名,表现出稳定的自我姓名加工的注意瞬脱对抗效应;电生理数据发现死亡启动后自我姓名诱发的P300波幅显著低于消极启动组和中性启动组,而朋友姓名和名人姓名并不受启动的影响。本研究结果与以往研究结果共同表明死亡想法凸显会使个体将抑制自我加工(自我姓名、自我面孔和自我参照记忆)作为应对远端死亡焦虑的一种手段。

关键词: 死亡凸显, 恐惧管理理论, 自我姓名, 注意瞬脱, 事件相关电位(ERP)

Abstract: Terror management theory has suggested that increased attention on self may therefor increase individual's concern with their own death. In order to cope with the death anxiety, people will tend to avoid self-awareness. Recent researches have repeatedly shown that reminders of mortality impaired self-referential processing and self-face processing. As a kind of symbolized self, self-name is special in emotional value and psychological meaning. The current work investigated whether reminders of mortality motivated avoidance of self-name processing. In the experiment, 58 college students were randomly assigned to one of the three priming conditions (priming: mortality salience priming vs. negative priming vs. neutral priming). participants in the mortality salience condition wrote responses to two open ended questions:‘Please briefly describe the emotions that the thought of your own death arouses in you’, and ‘Jot down, as specifically as you can, what you think will happen to you as you physically die and once you are physically dead. In the neutral condition participants responded to parallel questions focused on move: ‘Please briefly describe the emotions that the thought of your move arouses in you’, and ‘Jot down, as specifically as you can, what you think will happen to you as you physically move and once you are physically move, and in the negative condition participants focused on toothache:‘Please briefly describe the emotions that the thought of your own toothache arouses in you’, and ‘Jot down, as specifically as you can, what you think will happen to you as you physically toothache and once you are physically toothache.. After that, they were asked to perform 40 calculations. In rapid series of visual presentation (RSVP) task, each trial consisted of a first target (T1, left arrow or right arrow) and a second target (T2, a celebrity's name or a friend's name or one's own name or black) embedded of 20 common nouns. Each subject was instructed to press the “F” key (T1: left; T2: male),“J” key (T1: right; T2: female) and “L” key if T2 was black. The ERPs results suggested that The P300 (380~470ms) of self-name in mortality salience priming were lower than the P300 of self-name in negative priming and neutral priming, and there was no significant difference of friend-name or famous-name among three different priming. The P300 of self-name were higher than P300 of friend-name and famous-name, and the P300 of friend-name was higher than the P300 of famous-name. Our findings suggest that relative to the negative affect priming and neutral priming, reminders of mortality priming significantly decreased the amplitudes of P300 in response to self-name, meanwhile friend-name and famous-name were not been affected. In sum, these results suggested that reminders of mortality reduced the attention source of self-name processing. The finding of the present study have enhanced our understanding of TMT, suggesting a direct role of shutting down self-awareness, as a means of coping with mortality concerns.

Key words: mortality salience, terror management theory, self-name, attentional blink, ERP

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., & Cook, A. (2002). Mortality salience and the spreading activation of worldview-relevant constructs:exploring the cognitive architecture of terror management. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 131(3), 307-324.
Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1998). Terror management and self-awareness:Evidence that mortality salience provokes avoidance of the self-focused state. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1216-1227.
Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning:An interdisciplinary perspective on the problem of man, 2nd ed.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation:Springer New York.
Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Shi, Z., Zhang, X., Li, H., Xu, X., et al. (2019). Mortality salience impairs self-referential processing:Neurophysiological and behavioral evidence. Current Psychology, 1-11.
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel-now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70.
Cul, A. D., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Brain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness. Plos Biology, 5(10), e260.
Depaola, S. J., Griffin, M., Young, J. R., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2003). Death anxiety and attitudes towardthe elderly among older adults:The Role of gender and ethnicity. Death Studies, 27(4), 335-354.
Donchin, E., Gratton, G., Dupree, D., & Coles, M. (1988). After a rash action:latency and amplitude of the P300 following fast guesses.
Fan, X., & Han, S. (2018). Neural responses to one's own name under mortality threat. Neuropsychologia, 108,32-41.
Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It's all about you:An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. Neuroimage, 62(1), 562-574.
Guan, L., Chen, Y., Xu, X., Qiao, L., Wei, J., Han, S., et al. (2015). Self-esteem buffers the mortality salience effect on the implicit self-face processing. Personality & Individual Differences, 85(4), 77-85.
Guan, L., Qi, M., Li, H., Hitchman, G., Yang, J., & Liu, Y. (2015). Priming with threatening faces modulates the self-face advantage by enhancing the other-face processing rather than suppressing the self-face processing. Brain Research, 1608, 97-107.
Hall, G. S. (1898). Some aspects of the early sense of self. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 351-395.
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2009). Understanding the self:a cultural neuroscience approach. Progress in brain research, 178, 203-212.
Han, S., Qin, J., & Ma, Y. (2010). Neurocognitive processes of linguistic cues related to death. Neuropsychologia, 48(12), 3436-3442.
Harris, & Pashler. (2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names:Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15(3), 171-178.
Hirschberger, G., Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., Goldenberg, J. L., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). Gender differences in the willingness to engage in risky behavior:A terror management perspective. Death Studies, 26(2), 117-141.
Kimble, C. E., Hirt, E. R., & Arnold, E. M. (1985). Self-consciousness, public and private self-awareness, and memory in a social setting. The Journal of Psychology, 119(1), 59-69.
Kok, A. (1997). Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources:a review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45(1-3), 19-56.
Lam, S. R., Rios Morrison, K., & Smeesters, D. (2009). Gender, intimacy, and risky sex:A terror management account. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1046-1056.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self:Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
Mu, Y., & Han, S. (2010). Neural oscillations involved in self-referential processing. Neuroimage, 53(2), 757-768.
Pierce Jr, J. D., Cohen, A. B., Chambers, J. A., & Meade, R. M. (2007). Gender differences in death anxiety and religious orientation among US high school and college students. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 10(2), 143-150.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts:an extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106(4), 835.
Qin, P., & Northoff, G. (2011). How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network? Neuroimage, 57(3), 1221-1233.
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory:I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57(4), 681-690.
Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1391.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 357.
Shi, Z., & Han, S. (2017). Distinct effects of reminding mortality and physical pain on the default-mode activity and activity underlying self-reflection. Social Neuroscience, 13(3), 372-383.
Silvia, P. J. (2001). Nothing or the opposite:intersecting terror management and objective self-awareness. European Journal of Personality, 15(1), 73-82.
Tacikowski, P., & Nowicka, A. (2010). Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face:An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 84(2), 318-324.
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520.
Wang, J., Shen, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, X., Yuan, W., & Yang, J. (2018). Reminders of mortality weaken P2 amplitude underlying both self-reflection and mother-reflection. Culture & Brain, 1-11.
Wang, Y., Yuan, B., Roberts, K., Wang, Y., Lin, C., & Simons, R. F. (2014). How friendly is a little friendly competition? Evidence of self-interest and empathy during outcome evaluation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(3), 155-162.
Wisman, A. (2006). Digging in terror management theory:To use or lose the symbolic self? Psychological Inquiry, 17(4), 319-327.
Wisman, A., Heflick, N., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2015). The great escape:The role of self-esteem and self-related cognition in terror management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 121-132.
刘凤英, 袁加锦, 李红. (2011). 人名相关自我加工的时间过程——事件相关电位研究提供的电生理证据. 心理科学(6), 1289-1294.
戚健俐, 朱滢. (2002). 中国大学生的记忆的自我参照效应. 心理科学, 25(3), 275-278.
孙晓, 李肖, 贾磊, 张庆林. (2013). 自我姓名加工的相对独特性:来自RSVP的证据. 心理科学(1), 72-77.
杨红升, 黄希庭. (2007). 自我信息加工的独特性:来自人名识别研究的证据. 心理科学, 30(5), 1127-1129.
袁文颖, 张馨心, 杜杰, 李豪, 杨娟. (2018). 生存和死亡启动对自我参照加工的影响:ERP证据. 心理科学(1), 38-44.
周柳叶. (2015). 自我、朋友、陌生人道德判断的时程加工特点研究(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
[1] 金星, 刘景弘, 马跃, 于战宇. 聋童和正常儿童身体表情注意瞬脱的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 305-312.
[2] 贾磊, 李肖, 孙晓, 张庆林, 李海江, 蒋军. 情绪图片的效价与唤醒度在注意瞬脱对抗效应中的作用:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 376-383.
[3] 梁福成, 韩玉荣, 董军. 多动症儿童的智力水平、行为与认知事件相关电位的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(1): 50-53.
[4] 梁福成, 董军, 王欣. 大学生不同个性特点事件相关电位P300的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(1): 31-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!