不同类型自恋者对自我相关信息的认知加工偏好

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.05.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以姓名和形容词为材料，采用自恋人格量表测评被试的自恋水平，通过视觉搜索任务和记忆测试任务考察个体对相关信息的注意和记忆程度，探讨不同类型自恋者对自我相关信息的认知加工偏好。结果显示，高水平自恋者比低水平自恋者有更明显的认知加工偏好；高显性自恋者比低显性自恋者对积极词具有记忆偏好，高隐性自恋者比低隐性自恋者对消极词具有记忆偏好。被试对与自己相关密切的信息具有更高的认知加工偏好，且对自己信息的这一优势更为明显；高显性自恋者比低显性自恋者对自己相关、熟悉人相关的积极信息具有认知加工偏好，高隐性自恋者较低隐性自恋者对自己相关的消极信息具有认知加工偏好。结果表明，不同类型自恋者对自我相关信息具有不同的认知加工偏好，不同类型的自恋对自我相关信息的认知加工过程和结果具有影响。

关键词: 显性自恋, 隐性自恋, 自我相关信息, 认知加工偏好

Abstract: Using people names and adjectives words as materials, Narcissism Personality Scale was used to assess the level of overt narcissists and overt narcissists; Visual search task and memory test task were used to examine the attention and memory of individuals to relevant information, and to explore the cognitive processing preferences of different types of narcissists to self-related information. The results showed that high-level narcissists had more cognitive processing preferences than low-level narcissists; high-level overt narcissists had more memory preferences for positive words than low-level narcissists; high-level covert narcissists had more memory preferences for negative words than low-level covert narcissists. The participates had a higher preference for cognitive processing of information closely related to themselves, and the advantage of their own information was more obvious. Highly overt narcissists had a preference for cognitive processing of positive information related to themselves and familiar people than low overt narcissists. Highly covert narcissists have cognitive processing preferences only for their own negative information compared with low covert narcissists. The results show that different types of narcissists have different cognitive processing preferences for self-related information, and different types of narcissism have an impact on the cognitive processing process and results of self-related information.

Key words: overt narcissism, covert narcissism, self-related information, cognitive processing preference

中图分类号:

B844

侯永青, 侯婉滢, 周爱保. 不同类型自恋者对自我相关信息的认知加工偏好[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 528-537.

HOU Yongqing, HOU Wanying, ZHOU Aibao. Cognitive Processing Preferences of Different Types of Narcissists for Self-related Information[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 528-537.

参考文献

Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving bias in reactions to positive and negative events. In R F. Baumeister (Ed.). Self-esteem:The puzzle of low self-regard(pp.55-87). New York:Plenum Press.
Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). One's own face is hard to ignore. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 46-52.
Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self:Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp. 115-138). New York, NY, US:Psychology Press.
Campbell, W.K., & Miller, J. D. (Eds)(2011).The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder:Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments. Hoboken, New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E. A., & Sedikides, C. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem and the positivity of self-views:Two portraits of self love. Personality and Social Psychology, 28(3), 358-368.
Clark, M. A., Lelchook, A. K., & Taylor, M, L. (2010). Beyond the Big Five:How narcissism, perfectionism, and dispositional affect relate to work holism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(7), 786-791.
Devue, C., & Brédart, S. (2011). Attention to self-referential stimuli:Can I ignore my own face? Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 290-297.
Dewhurst, S. A., & Marlborough, M. A. (2003). Memory bias in the recall of pre-exam anxiety:the influence of self-enhancement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 695-702.
Foster, J. D., & Trimm, R. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited:Narcissism and approach-avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 1004-1017.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1:tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention:a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 132(4), 512-529.
Harris, C. R., & Pashler, H. (2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names:Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15(3), 171-178.
Jerry, M. Burger. (2010). personality psychology (Chen, H. C., et al., Trans.). Beijing:China Light Industry Press.
Keyes, H., & Brady, N. (2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 840-847.
Krizan, Z., & Johar, O. (2012). Envy divides the two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1415-1451.
Lapsley, D, K., & Aalsma, M. C. (2006). An empirical typology of narcissism and mental health in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 29(1), 53-71.
Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience:A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2010). Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 619-633.
Miller, J., D., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 76(3),449-476.
Miller, J. D., Hoffinan, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism:A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013-1042.
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism:A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 4(12), 177-196.
Pannese, A., & Hirsch, J. (2010). Self-specific priming effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 962-968.
Paulhus, D. L. (2007). Normal narcissism:Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 228-230.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality:Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563.
Pincus, A. L, & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421-446.
Rose, P. (2002). The Happy and Unhappy Faces of Narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(3), 379-391.
Sedikides, C., Rudich, E. A., Gregg, A. P., & Kumashiro, D, A. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy? Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 400-416.
Seta, J. J., Donaldson, S., & Seta, C. E. (1999). Self-relevance as a moderator of self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 442-462.
Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, S. (2006). Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions:An event-related brain potential study. Neuro Report, 17(4), 423-427.
Symous, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The Self-Reference Effect in Memory:A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371-394.
Tacikowski, P., Brechmann, A., Marchewka, A., Jednoróg, K., Dobrowolny, M., & Nowicka, A. (2011). Is it about the self or the significance? An fMRI study of self-name recognition. Social Neuroscience, 6(1), 98-107.
Tacikowski, P., Brechmann, A., & Nowicka, A. (2013). Cross modal pattern of brain activations associated with the processing of self and significant other's name. Human Brain Mapping, 34(9), 2069-2077.
Tafarodi, R. W., Marshall, T. C., & Milne, A. B. (2003). Self esteem and memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 29-45.
Trafimow, D., Armendariz, M. L., & Madson, L. (2004). A test of whether attribution provide for self-enhancement or self-defense. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 453-463
Watson, P. J., Trumpeter, N., & O' Leary B. J. (2005). Narcissism and self-esteem in the presence of imagined others:Supportive versus destructive object representations and the continuum hypothesis. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25, 253-268.
Willard, G., & Gramzow, R. H. (2008). Exaggeration in memory:Systematic distortion of self-evaluative in formation under reduced accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 246-259.
Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 590-597.
陈少华, 郑雪. (2005). 人格特质对选择性加工偏向的影响. 心理科学, 28(5), 1135-1138.
郭丰波, 张振, 原胜, 敬一鸣, 王益文. (2016). 自恋型人格的理论模型与神经生理机制. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1246-1256.
黄希庭. (2002). 人格心理学. 杭州:浙江教育出版社.
刘凯歌, 许欢欢, 毕重增. (2015). 高自恋者对大字体的偏爱. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(4), 78-82.
刘明慧, 张明, 隋洁. (2014). 自我信息对知觉选择中整体优先性的调控作用. 心理学报, 46(3), 312-320.
彭晓哲, 周晓林. (2005). 情绪信息与注意偏向. 心理科学进展, 13(4), 488-496.
石伟, 黄希庭. (2007). 自尊的记忆效应的实验研究. 心理科学, 30(4), 782-784.
孙晓, 李肖, 贾磊, 张庆林. (2013). 自我姓名加工的相对独特性:来自RSVP的证据. 心理科学, 36(1), 72-77.
宋健, 蔡晴, 胡兴林. (2013). 大学生显性自恋、隐性自恋与特质攻击的关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(5), 746-748.
谭群, 刘燊, 牟忠琛, 徐强, 张林. (2016). 不同类型自恋者对情绪信息的注意偏向. 心理研究, 9(3), 49-54.
田录梅, 张向葵. (2008). 不同自尊者对自我相关信息的记忆偏好. 心理发展与教育, 24(2), 91-96.
田录梅, 张向葵. (2010). 高低自尊者不同记忆偏好的发生机制. 心理科学, 33(6), 1393-1396.
严顺琴, 张宁. (2009). 自恋与自尊:社会赞许性的中介作用. 应用心理学, 15(1), 56-61.
杨红升. (2005). 自我面孔识别的独特性. 心理科学, 28(6), 1517-1519.
杨红升. (2013). 自我信息加工优势中的熟悉性问题. 心理科学, 36(5), 1058-1065.
杨红升, 黄希庭.(2007). 自我信息加工的独特性:来自人名识别研究的证据. 心理科学, 30(5), 1127-1129.
杨红升, 王芳, 顾念君, 黄希庭. (2012). 自我相关信息的加工优势:来自网名识别的证据. 心理学报, 44(4), 489-497.
杨慧, 吴明证, 刘永芳, Li Qian. (2012). 自尊与记忆偏向的关系. 心理科学, 35(04), 962-967.
余潇枫. (1995).自我与人格. 浙江大学学报, 9(3), 29-34.
赵国琴. (2014). 不同类型自恋者的注意偏向(硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.
赵静, 张海钟. (2007). 自恋研究进展. 精神医学杂志, 20 (1), 52-57.
郑雪. (主编). (2001). 人格心理学. 广州:暨南大学出版社.
郑涌, 黄藜. (2005). 显性自恋与隐性自恋:自恋人格的心理学探析. 心理科学, 28(5), 1259-1262.
周晖, 张豹, 陈丽文, 叶敏怡. (2009). 自恋人格问卷的编制及信效度的初步检验. 中国临床心理杂志, 17(1), 5-11.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed